Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Premarital Sex Should Be Outlawed - AK Politician  
User currently offlineusxguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1022 posts, RR: 5
Posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3930 times:

People like this guy are making it more difficult to remain a Republican in my State of Alaska.

This article is about a guy who is up for consideration for a judicial panel that helps pick judges here.

http://www.adn.com/2011/03/23/177226...nate-panel-questions-judicial.html


Sex outside marriage should be illegal, says Parnell nominee

Don Haase was active for years as advocate for socially conservative issues.

By RICHARD MAUER
rmauer@adn.com

Published: March 24th, 2011 09:50 AM
Last Modified: March 24th, 2011 11:16 AM

JUNEAU -- Gov. Sean Parnell's appointee for the panel that nominates state judges testified Wednesday that he would like to see Alaskans prosecuted for having sex outside of marriage.

Read more: http://www.adn.com/2011/03/23/177226...stions-judicial.html#ixzz1HYFUOGB1


The candidate, Don Haase of Valdez, also admitted under questioning by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that his official resume failed to disclose his leadership role in Eagle Forum Alaska, which advocates for social conservative issues. He most recently was president of the organization, but resigned when he learned of his nomination, he said.

========================
I'm tempted to hop over to the hearings and ask a question as a member of the public...

"so if you feel that premarital sex is illegal, then will you support same-sex unions/marriages?"


 


xx
41 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSpringbok747 From Australia, joined Nov 2004, 4387 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 3921 times:

Ok..so how does he plan to enforce this?


אני תומך בישראל
User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3823 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3901 times:

Ok let me get this straight, according to this politician, I should be a virgin now, at age 28? Vote republican and give up on more than a decade of fun? Screw that.

Soren   



All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8847 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3902 times:

Quoting usxguy (Thread starter):
Sex outside marriage should be illegal, says Parnell nominee
Quoting usxguy (Thread starter):
I'm tempted to hop over to the hearings and ask a question as a member of the public...

"so if you feel that premarital sex is illegal, then will you support same-sex unions/marriages?"

Don't you see the big discrepancy in what you and he are saying? He's saying that it SHOULD be illegal, not that it IS illegal. It is a subjective opinion that should have no place whatsoever in his decisions as a judge. The danger here is that he is an "activist" judge who will in some way penalize someone based on that opinion - that just because he thinks it should be illegal that he will find a way to make it illegal. This is why activist judges are so bad for everyone.

However, as far as I can tell, he has not given any indication that he is an activist. The fact of the matter is that pre-marital sex is not illegal, period. He has no say in the matter.

Or are you saying that if a judge believes that the speed limit should be 100 mph (and obviously it's not) that that makes him unfit to be a judge?

You want to see personal opinions banned?



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlinefr8mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5470 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3898 times:

There are extremists views on all sides of the political spectrum. Everybody has a right to be an idiot.

The governor should withdraw his nomination. Extremist judicial panel members make for extremist judicial nominations.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):
You want to see personal opinions banned?

No they should not be banned. But, he should be held to account for his personal views and opinions if he is to hold public trust, especially in an appointed role. If his views are outside the mainstream, those views should be scrutinized.

[Edited 2011-03-24 13:56:22]


When seconds count...the police are minutes away.
User currently offlineAgill From Sweden, joined Feb 2004, 1011 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3880 times:

Is it me or has GOP become really strange lately. I used to always think they were the ones that made more sence.

User currently offlineusxguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1022 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3876 times:

agill,

this is unfortunately the Sarah Palin - Tea party UBER right wing side of the republican party. There are still a significant majority of us "moderates" in the party.. just look at Senator Murkowski and her support for Obama...



xx
User currently offlinewindy95 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 2738 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3876 times:

Quoting usxguy (Thread starter):
People like this guy are making it more difficult to remain a Republican in my State of Alaska.

This is not a GOP thing. There are nut-jobs on both sides. Do not let them get to you. How about the Dem mayor today from a large city that wants a Federal toilet paper roll tax. The fringe and looney's need to be avoided or voted out.



OMG-Obama Must Go
User currently offlineYellowstone From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3071 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3872 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):
You want to see personal opinions banned?

Some personal opinions display such immense stupidity that, even if he will not be ruling on that specific issue, one must question his overall judgement.



Hydrogen is an odorless, colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people.
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19794 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3802 times:

Quoting usxguy (Thread starter):

"so if you feel that premarital sex is illegal, then will you support same-sex unions/marriages?"

Of course not! Gays should not be permitted to have sex. My guess is that he also believes that gays should be executed with extreme prejudice, but he knows better than to say it out loud.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):

You want to see personal opinions banned?

As I've become older, I've seen the merit to banning certain personal opinions. Those that deny the inherent humanity or worth of other human beings should be banned, much as Germany did.

That said, he has not crossed that line. So right now, he's just a flaming idiot. And, unfortunately, that is perfectly legal. Besides, extermination of the world's idiots would be an impossibly vast program.


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8847 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3780 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 9):
As I've become older, I've seen the merit to banning certain personal opinions. Those that deny the inherent humanity or worth of other human beings should be banned, much as Germany did.

The first amendment was specifically written to protect unpopular, stupid, extreme, and crazy opinions. Popular, normal opinions don't need a 1st amendment.

I agree he's an idiot. But that just puts him on the same level as all our political leaders, so no big change there.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19794 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3763 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 10):

The first amendment was specifically written to protect unpopular, stupid, extreme, and crazy opinions.

It was. It was also written before the Holocaust.

Believe it or not, the USA is not The Best Country In The World. There are other free nations that operate differently than we do. If our Constitution was The Best Constitution In The World then everyone would be using it.


User currently offlinethegreatRDU From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2310 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3758 times:

Typical religious right BS these people are crazy


Our Returning Champion
User currently offlineOA412 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 5295 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3758 times:

I think we can all agree that this will never happen. Still, I really am surprised that in the US in 2011, we actually have people advocating for such things. People are not going to stop having pre-marital or extra-marital sex, and there is simply no way to police such a law without seriously violating people's right to privacy.

Quoting Yellowstone (Reply 8):
Some personal opinions display such immense stupidity that, even if he will not be ruling on that specific issue, one must question his overall judgement.


Agreed. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but when someone says something so immensely stupid and impractical, one does begin to question that person's judgement.

Quoting usxguy (Reply 6):
this is unfortunately the Sarah Palin - Tea party UBER right wing side of the republican party.


I do agree with this. The danger is in assuming that all Republicans are similarly nutty. Unfortunately for the rest of the GOP, the Sarah Palin/Tea Party types are incredibly loud at the moment.

Quoting usxguy (Reply 6):
There are still a significant majority of us "moderates" in the party.. just look at Senator Murkowski and her support for Obama...


There is, but unfortunately your voices are often drowned out by the extremists in your party. Honestly, if I were a Republican, I'd be drowning those voices out at every turn.



Hughes Airwest - Top Banana In The West
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5628 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3728 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):
Don't you see the big discrepancy in what you and he are saying? He's saying that it SHOULD be illegal, not that it IS illegal. It is a subjective opinion that should have no place whatsoever in his decisions as a judge. The danger here is that he is an "activist" judge who will in some way penalize someone based on that opinion - that just because he thinks it should be illegal that he will find a way to make it illegal. This is why activist judges are so bad for everyone.

Judges always have and always will issued legal "opinions". All rulings are based on the opinions of the judge (and juries) involved. They just have to follow the set of rules that have been established and then have their "opinions vetted and validated by a host of judges above them (if they are appealed).

I like the Republican that stated something to the effect of ""activist judges" are those that issue a ruling which you don't agree with". While I know many say that a judge can only rule within the confines established in the Constitution, that has been interpreted (by legal opinions I might add) such that we have the system we have today.

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):
However, as far as I can tell, he has not given any indication that he is an activist. The fact of the matter is that pre-marital sex is not illegal, period. He has no say in the matter.

Or are you saying that if a judge believes that the speed limit should be 100 mph (and obviously it's not) that that makes him unfit to be a judge?

You want to see personal opinions banned?

He is not being appointed to be a judge, the big issue is that he will likely nominate judges that fall into what his view of "acceptable" is. So he is more likely to nominate judges that hold a freakishly minority view that premarital sex is not OK (though they will be few and far between).

As to the idea that his opinions should be allowed, the problem is that it is not a justifiable opinion outside of a religious basis whereas the 100mph speed limit can be backed up with some justification. Additionally driving at high speeds is not a "natural right" whereas having sex is (within the societal limitations of age and consent). So his opinion is not really OK because it is not acceptable for one that is to represent the people of the state of Alaska.

Quoting fr8mech (Reply 4):
Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 3):
You want to see personal opinions banned?

No they should not be banned. But, he should be held to account for his personal views and opinions if he is to hold public trust, especially in an appointed role. If his views are outside the mainstream, those views should be scrutinized.

  

Quoting windy95 (Reply 7):
This is not a GOP thing. There are nut-jobs on both sides. Do not let them get to you. How about the Dem mayor today from a large city that wants a Federal toilet paper roll tax. The fringe and looney's need to be avoided or voted out.

Yes but many Republicans like to point out the nut job Democrats and paint all Democrats as the same. I have seen you argue that it is not valid to bring up what Republicans do when discussing the nuttiness of some Democrat's idea when it is used in the "I know that's crazy but have you seen what X Republican did?" form.

I do agree with you though that the fringe and loonies on all sides need to be voted out and stop being given the power they are given.

Quoting OA412 (Reply 13):
There is, but unfortunately your voices are often drowned out by the extremists in your party. Honestly, if I were a Republican, I'd be drowning those voices out at every turn.

I try but sometimes it does appears that the lunatics are running the asylum.

They are certainly running the country.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8299 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3704 times:

Quoting Agill (Reply 5):
Is it me or has GOP become really strange lately. I used to always think they were the ones that made more sence.

I'm old enough to remember Ike and felt that the Republican Party was the one for professional financial management of the country. That is no longer the case. Moderates are looked down on and anything that doesn't cut taxes (especially for the top of the money pile) is socialist.

Personally I believe it all gets down to cash over country.

Quoting usxguy (Reply 6):
this is unfortunately the Sarah Palin

Nah, not Sarah. She was making the beast with two backs before she got married. Got knocked up before heading to the alter. Same with her eldest daughter, who passed up the marriage bit.

Quoting usxguy (Reply 6):
There are still a significant majority of us "moderates" in the party.. just look at Senator Murkowski and her support for Obama...

The way the GOP has been running to the right a "moderate" these days is a future closet Democrat.

Quoting windy95 (Reply 7):
How about the Dem mayor today from a large city that wants a Federal toilet paper roll tax.

As long as the money went to sewage treatment facilities around the country it would be as logical as the various petrol taxes.  Wow!


User currently offlinesoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3658 times:

Quoting usxguy (Thread starter):
Sex outside marriage should be illegal, says Parnell nominee

The jails are going to be filled with priests and alter boys...  Wow!


User currently offlinekiwiinoz From New Zealand, joined Oct 2005, 2165 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3622 times:

This would have been a big problem for me as my 1st wife enforced a post-marital sex ban. Could have been a virgin forever if I lived in this state

User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7919 posts, RR: 52
Reply 18, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3616 times:

Quoting soon7x7 (Reply 16):
The jails are going to be filled with priests and alter boys...  

Classy



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinesoon7x7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3599 times:

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 18):

Excuse the sarcasm but nothing surprises me anymore...nothing.


User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6688 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3569 times:

Quoting usxguy (Reply 6):
agill,

this is unfortunately the Sarah Palin - Tea party UBER right wing side of the republican party. There are still a significant majority of us "moderates" in the party.. just look at Senator Murkowski and her support for Obama...

Well I'm not following her but I doubt she's still talking about the sex/marriage issue much. But I remember reading somewhere that her daughter was now abstinent again... right !



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19794 posts, RR: 59
Reply 21, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3538 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 15):

I'm old enough to remember Ike and felt that the Republican Party was the one for professional financial management of the country. That is no longer the case. Moderates are looked down on and anything that doesn't cut taxes (especially for the top of the money pile) is socialist.

Not only that, but there's this crazy vehement anti-government streak to the point that I've heard Tea Partiers say that all taxes are confiscatory! At the same time, there's a push to ban this behavior and outlaw that one and ban this thing and that.

It's schizophrenic. A government-less theocratic dictatorship where the government tells you exactly what you may and may not do in your own home, but somehow has no money or infrastructure to enforce it!

I'm *really* worried that this movement is becoming so mainstream. This is unprecedented. Until now, extremist positions, even when they've gone mainstream, have been geographically isolated. Slavery comes to mind. But this is diffuse and it seems to be influencing American politics in a tangible way. I actually submitted my resume to overseas placement companies because I'm really worried that the absolutely nonsensical policies that have been pushed through the UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES are actually going to collapse the country and I don't want to be around for what comes after that.

You pass absurdly restrictive laws about personal behavior, then you cut all funding for any social safety net, then you ban abortion and restrict access to birth control so that those same people using the social safety net reproduce out of control. You defund all the schools. You defund any and all infrastructure other than roads. You make it next to impossible to obtain quality healthcare. And then you start inquisitions on an entire religion with government money!.

Oh, but the elected representatives sure want their Tricare. And their government salaries (which will continue to be paid if the Federal Government shuts down).

What the hell is going on?


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7919 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3524 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 21):
I'm *really* worried that this movement is becoming so mainstream.

I think it might be media hype. You have things like crime... it looks like it's rampant, out of control, and growing, but in reality it has been going down since 1990. Thank you media for accurate reporting. Personally I've seen my conservative friends lighten up a bit more on some issues. I don't think this movement is becoming mainstream, just a lot more loud (and annoying.)



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineimiakhtar From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3406 times:

When it comes to the conservative stance on pre-marital sex, the following quote from Hamlet comes to mind:

'Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven,
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads.
And recks not his own rede'.


User currently offlineMudboy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1167 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (3 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3403 times:

Is there anyone here that would buy a car, before they test drove it? As many times as I have crapped out rolling the dice, I think I am going to take that test drive, before I commit to the sale 

25 Dreadnought : Don't generalize so much. I am very conservative, and I am all for premarital sex. You don't buy a car before you take it for a test drive do you?
26 oly720man : Given that the exchange was Paskvan: "What about premarital affairs -- should that be a crime?" Haase: "I think that would be up to the voters certain
27 Post contains images travelavnut : Hehe, classy but true
28 comorin : His position is reasonable and mainstream - for society 100 years ago, and still true for societies in certain other countries. He pines for a more or
29 ALTF4 : Who decides what is mainstream? The one who screams the loudest? What is there are 5x as many "quiet" people on the matter than there are people scre
30 IMissPiedmont : It probably already is, most locations still have a statutue regarding sex laws and most, if not all, are unenforceable.
31 tootallsd : Doc Doc Doc -- you know that we should not be permitted to exist. All other regulation is therefor a waste of time.
32 usxguy : actually you are right about Sarah Palin's kids... considering one of her kids has already spit out a grandbaby for Sarah.. and probably not the last
33 Post contains images FlyDeltaJets87 : Doc, California would go from being the most populous state to virtually empty.
34 futurepilot16 : Just because they don't like sex doesn't mean they should ruin it for everybody else.
35 Post contains images soon7x7 : The road to hell is paved with good intentions...I say keep plugging away in Alaska...the place needs all the heat it can muster up...
36 TSS : You know, if they could include an addendum covering mandatory post-marital sex in the law forbidding pre-marital sex then it might make sense. They
37 Aesma : But where is the good intention, exactly ? Premarital sex was frowned upon in the past, it was not illegal in most places, outside of the bible belt.
38 EDICHC : Love the pun there! I had a friend who went to one of the anti-Iraq war protests with a banner that read "Fighting for Peace? Isn't that like f*****g
39 soon7x7 : Apparently sean Parnell beleives abstinance is the good intention... Pre marital sex is none of the courts business nor anyone elses. Would you be co
40 Post contains images tugger : Funny!! So this has me wondering what his stance on divorce is. Tugg
41 DocLightning : oh, I very much hope he is. In my opinion ANY politician who runs on a "Family Values" platform automatically and willingly invites VERY close scruti
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Should Be In School Textbooks? posted Fri Sep 24 2010 05:01:49 by oly720man
Which New Interstate Routes Should Be Built? posted Thu Sep 9 2010 18:21:14 by BNAOWB
Social Networks. Should I Be Part Of It? posted Thu Jul 22 2010 07:30:39 by varigb707
Which Airline Exec. Should Be On Undercover Boss? posted Mon Mar 8 2010 20:52:59 by BOStonsox
The Way Health Care Legislation Should Be Passed. posted Thu Dec 3 2009 10:14:04 by DXing
People Of Maine Should Be Proud!(Acadia Park, Etc) posted Mon Nov 9 2009 04:00:20 by Airstud
The People Of Maine Should Be Ashamed Of Themselve posted Tue Nov 3 2009 23:11:44 by N104UA
So Who Else Should Be Sleeping By Now But Isn't? posted Sun Oct 18 2009 00:59:15 by FLY2HMO
Didier Drogba Should Be Fired. Discuss. posted Thu May 7 2009 03:38:50 by Swiftski
Oldies That Should Be Re-made? posted Wed Feb 18 2009 11:09:05 by Kaitak