Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another World's Tallest Building  
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6840 posts, RR: 11
Posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1939 times:

This time in Saudi Arabia. The Mile Tower which is, you'll never guess, a mile high. Wonder what the penthouse suite will be for?

Anyway, our friends in SA seem to have money to burn on rather extravagant ventures.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...mily-plans-mile-high-building.html

Helpful stats are that it'll take 12 minutes to get to the top by lift and it's twice the height of the Burj in Dubai.


wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9103 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1929 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting oly720man (Thread starter):

Soon we can walk up to the moon... Where does this all ends? They money is in need at other places and not in a weird high building...

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlineJetBlue777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 1463 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1916 times:

WOAH. The Burj looks so tiny! Well, if they do build it and finish it, it's gonna be a great sight and it'd be neat if they add an observation deck.

BTW isn't it a hazard to A/C? Or No?



It's a cultural thing.
User currently offlinewilco737 From Greenland, joined Jun 2004, 9103 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1918 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting JetBlue777 (Reply 2):
BTW isn't it a hazard to A/C? Or No?

THe minimum altitudes around that building will be higher for sure. In DXB they are higher already because of that weird high building.

wilco737
  



It it's not Boeing, I am not going.
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11690 posts, RR: 60
Reply 4, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1853 times:

The (lack of) efficiency of these structures is simply ridiculous in my view. The Burj's design cleverly compensated for this very elegantly, but a predominantly phallic elevation wastes most of the space on the lower floors simply getting services and people to the upper floors. It's going to present some interesting challenges, not least how to pump concrete a mile up into the air, and how the local geology is going to react to the loaded weight of the structure. As an estimate I'd say this will weigh almost four million tonnes, based on a quick visual assessment of how much bigger it is than the Burj and presuming a similar floor density. So far as I know, that much weight has never been focussed in one spot before, distributing it could be interesting if the sediment layer on top of the bedrock (Gneiss, I think for the Arabian shield?) is very deep.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6840 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1827 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 4):
So far as I know, that much weight has never been focussed in one spot before

How will the building itself cope? That's a hell of a lot of weight to be supporting.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16892 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1820 times:

Imagine if they spent that money feeding the hungry, or caring for the sick and disabled of the world.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7972 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1806 times:

Not to doubt anyone's abilities, but is that even possible? I mean it is not just a bit bigger, this is a massive leap!


Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinePC12Fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 2457 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

Are they trying to compensate for something?   

  



Just when I think you've said the stupidest thing ever, you keep talkin'!
User currently onlinebananaboy From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 1586 posts, RR: 22
Reply 9, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1708 times:

The article says that you will reach the top by escalator in 12 minutes. Surely not...

Mark



All my life, I've been kissing, your top lip 'cause your bottom one's missing
User currently offlineGreaser From Bahamas, joined Jan 2004, 1101 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1707 times:

I'd hate to be pessimistic but this is pretty bad timing from a royal family under political siege from the local populace.


Now you're really flying
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21801 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1662 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 6):
Imagine if they spent that money feeding the hungry, or caring for the sick and disabled of the world.

   This is pretty much the textbook definition of a boondoggle. Massive engineering requirements on top of the massive cost means massive cost overruns, and all for a little chest-thumping.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20246 posts, RR: 59
Reply 12, posted (3 years 7 months 3 weeks ago) and read 1636 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 4):
It's going to present some interesting challenges, not least how to pump concrete a mile up into the air,

And what materials can withstand the pressures of the overlying structure down in the basement without liquifying?

I'm starting to envision such Sci-Fi goodies as artificial diamond and nanotubes.

Does anyone know what materials will need to be used? I can't imagine old-fashioned concrete and steel are up to the task.

Quoting PC12Fan (Reply 8):
Are they trying to compensate for something?

Yes.


User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10925 posts, RR: 37
Reply 13, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1553 times:

Another folly by Prince al Walid bin Talal the man who owns his Flying Palace private A380.

I hope this new tower will never get built. More slave labour. I can't imagine these poor slave labourers paid a penny a dozen working in the blaring Saudi heat the same they did building the Burj Khalifa. How can they do this to people?

The Saudi Prince owns the Fairmont MonteCarlo (former Loews) the only place in Monaco with a mosque (totally private for the sole use of the Prince and his people). bin Talal has his own quarters at the Fairmont. He owns some of the world's most beautiful hotels among which the George V in Paris managed by Four Seasons Hotels.

              



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlineSevernaya From Russia, joined Jan 2009, 1428 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

This bit of information is most interesting:

Quote:
Skyscraper specialists Emaar, which built the Burj, are understood to have won the contract to construct the Kingdom Tower, which will be built outside the Red Sea port city of Jeddah as the centre piece of a new 80,000 population city.

So it will be built outside Jeddah, with plenty of available space? I was always taught to build high buildings when you're short on available land lots. 1600m high buildings are nice for tourists to have a look at, but they don't serve any other purposes at places where availability of land is not an issue. A total waste of money.



Всяк глядит, да не всяк видит.
User currently offlineoly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6840 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1528 times:

Looking on Google Earth (and with the insert being the image from the blurb in the Mail link) it seems that it's going to be just over 2.5 miles west of the airport. Assuming it's the same bulge of land with a river next to it

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/oly720man/jeddatower.jpg


Also, that location is about 50 miles from Mecca. I wonder if you'll be able to see the Mosque from the top of the tower on a clear day.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10925 posts, RR: 37
Reply 16, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1514 times:

How many workers will die while from beginning of construction to the end? I bet many.

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2006/11/1...e-workers-abused-construction-boom

Only we will never be told. How they treat these workers and such low wages are shameful. Human exploitation at its best.

Quote:
“I work at the Burj Dubai site. I earn 38 AED [$10.50] for eight hours of work daily. My pay is higher than workers who arrived recently because I have been with the company for 11 years. New workers are paid 28 AED [$7.60] daily and they are unhappy about it.”

http://kasamaproject.org/2010/01/05/...dden-stories-of-capitalisms-tower/

 Wow!



There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlinewn700driver From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 6):


Imagine if they spent that money feeding the hungry, or caring for the sick and disabled of the world.

Or built a really tall building? How is this related?

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 12):

I'm starting to envision such Sci-Fi goodies as artificial diamond and nanotubes.

AFAIK, those aren't SciFi any more. Just expensive. I know industrial diamonds have been around for quite a while. . .

Quoting MadameConcorde (Reply 13):

I hope this new tower will never get built. More slave labour. I can't imagine these poor slave labourers paid a penny a dozen working in the blaring Saudi heat the same they did building the Burj Khalifa. How can they do this to people?

Yeah, there's no way the labor is going to be paid fairly. This is, after all, the "kingdom" of saudi arabia, and in so being, we will also likely never know what the real human toll will be. Of course, it will be apologized for with the typical "They're not slaves, they had a choice" bs, no doubt. As though. . .


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31702 posts, RR: 56
Reply 18, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1488 times:

Reminds me of a Story in the Bible  


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11690 posts, RR: 60
Reply 19, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

Quoting oly720man (Reply 5):
How will the building itself cope? That's a hell of a lot of weight to be supporting.
Quoting DocLightning (Reply 12):
And what materials can withstand the pressures of the overlying structure down in the basement without liquifying?

It's possible, but it comes back to my point about the lower floors being essentially useless. To simplify the problem; say the Burj has 1m diameter supporting columns at 6m intervals, this new structure may require them to be at 3m intervals to distribute the weight, so you immediately loose a large percentage and usability of the tower's footprint on the lower floors just to hold the weight of upper floors, and that is before consideration for services, lifts, stairs etc... Depending on the mix and quality of materials concrete can have an insane compressive strength, up to the100MPa range for construction, but the increased curing time of some types can make it unfeasible. Going much above this and you'll start to exceed the compressive strength of the rock you are building on anyway, which I think could be limiting factor here.


Dan  



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineMadameConcorde From San Marino, joined Feb 2007, 10925 posts, RR: 37
Reply 20, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1470 times:

If access to Saudi Arabia is as restricted as it is now, only a limited number will be able to see this building when finished. I will not be admitted into Saudi Arabia as a single woman. I doubt this will change. The only way would be to see it from the air while flying over.


There was a better way to fly it was called Concorde
User currently offlineImperialEagle From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2630 posts, RR: 23
Reply 21, posted (3 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1408 times:

Quoting Greaser (Reply 10):
I'd hate to be pessimistic but this is pretty bad timing from a royal family under political siege from the local populace

Yeah. I was thinking the same thing. I guess they feel invincible.



"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FINALLY: WTC To Include World's Tallest Building posted Fri Nov 22 2002 21:08:48 by FlyVirgin744
Which Is The World's Tallest Residential Building? posted Wed Sep 12 2007 10:16:05 by United Airline
"Burj Dubai" Now Tallest Building In The World posted Sat Jul 21 2007 15:27:29 by PlaneHunter
HK Will Have The Tallest Building In The World? posted Tue Apr 23 2002 09:15:33 by United Airline
The Tallest Building In The World posted Sat Nov 24 2001 05:24:08 by United Airline
What Is The Tallest Building In The World posted Sat Nov 10 2001 20:47:20 by 767-332ER
Gibson, World's Tallest Dog, Dies posted Thu Aug 13 2009 03:25:22 by Levent
Economic Woes Halt Work On World's Tallest Bldg posted Wed Jan 14 2009 15:31:07 by Lumberton
LA Next Tallest Building? posted Tue Oct 2 2007 17:53:48 by 747400sp
Dutch Are The World's Tallest People posted Sun Sep 17 2006 05:36:34 by DeltaOwnsAll