Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
China Bullet Train Derails  
User currently offlinedeltaownsall From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1173 posts, RR: 1
Posted (2 years 9 months 3 hours ago) and read 1832 times:

"A CHINESE bullet train derailed on Saturday with two of its carriages falling off a bridge but the number of casualties was unknown, the official Xinhua news agency reported."

http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking...ws/Asia/Story/STIStory_694001.html

Not many details yet, so let's see how this develops...hopefully not as bad as it sounds.

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinedeltaownsall From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1173 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (2 years 9 months 3 hours ago) and read 1805 times:

More from the Telegraph, including a picture: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...derails-and-falls-from-bridge.html

User currently offlineracko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4856 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (2 years 9 months 3 hours ago) and read 1761 times:

The one on the right (in the Telegraph picture) looks like a CRH2 (modified Shinkansen).

User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 18688 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1624 times:

Quoting deltaownsall (Thread starter):

Not many details yet, so let's see how this develops...hopefully not as bad as it sounds.

From the photos it looks pretty bad.

Derailment wasn't the cause. The cause was a collision between a stopped train and the train approaching from behind. The derailment was the (unsurprising) result.

There should have been several safety systems in place to prevent this from happening. This should be far less likely than a mid-air collision between two cruising airliner. Something is seriously wrong with their HSR system if this is even possible.


User currently offlinecomorin From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4869 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 3):
There should have been several safety systems in place to prevent this from happening. This should be far less likely than a mid-air collision between two cruising airliner. Something is seriously wrong with their HSR system if this is even possible.

A case of trying to run before you learn how to walk?


User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 18688 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1546 times:

This is just my conjecture: I think that the whole system was built hastily. People and resources were put under immense pressure with unreasonable deadlines. The price of failure is imprisonment and the consequences thereof.

So it got built hastily, probably shoddily, and the people running it were undertrained.

Now, I don't KNOW that's what happened, but that's my guess. I'd bet I'm right, too.


User currently offlineracko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4856 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1409 times:

I wouldn't rush to judgement. Accidents happen. Where humans are at work, they make mistakes. There is no fail-safe technology. It is entirely possible that this is a systematic failure because of a rushed implementation, but it is also possible that this was just an accident that happened because of a chain of innocent mistakes that can happen everywhere.

Edit:

Here's what I could gather from a bit of research.

There was a CRH1 (Derivate of Regina EMU built in Germany for Sweden) on the line followed by a CRH2 (Derivate of Shinkansen E2-1000, Japan). The CRH1 was hit by a lightning and apparently disabled, most likely resulting in an immediate brake application until it came to a stop. It then was rear-ended by the CRH2.

This shouldn't have happened as high-speed lines are protected by automatic train control systems (ATC), which China has (CTCS).

What should have happened is that upon the disablement of the CRH1

- the ATC either (if still working) should have transmitted its problems to the ATC system
- or, if it was disabled by the lightning strike, the signal to the ATC should have been lost

both should result in an immediate emergency brake application by the following CRH2.

If the ATC was taken out by the lightning strike as well, this would've resulted in a lost ATC signal in the CRH 2 -> Emergency brake.

So either the ATC malfunctioned, or the brakes in the CRH2 malfunctioned.

[Edited 2011-07-24 04:54:26]

User currently offlinejessbp From UK - Wales, joined Dec 2010, 75 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1390 times:

Wow. I'm with doc on this. The whole thing seems rushed, which is causing problems. If I recall, this isn't the first problems this line has experienced. A few weeks ago there were reports of passengers being stranded for several hours due to power issues. To follow with doc's thinking, stranded passengers complained that the stations were not fully fitted out, with a lack of facilities. One woman had to walk into the nearest village just to use the toilet.

It seems that china is trying to run before it can walk.

Jess B


User currently offlineB2443 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 697 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

Quoting racko (Reply 6):
So either the ATC malfunctioned, or the brakes in the CRH2 malfunctioned.

According to sohu.com (in Chinese), there were 4 other trains (2 to Wenzhou and 2 to Fuzhou) en route to the accident spot but they were stopped in time.

And BTW, this line is NOT a high speed line, with a max speed of 180 km/h, unlike Beijing -Shanghai's 300 km/h or Wuhan-Guangzhou's 350 km/h.

Quoting jessbp (Reply 7):
To follow with doc's thinking, stranded passengers complained that the stations were not fully fitted out, with a lack of facilities. One woman had to walk into the nearest village just to use the toilet.

True maybe but this alone shouldn't have caused the accident.


User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2851 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1218 times:

Quoting racko (Reply 6):
What should have happened is that upon the disablement of the CRH1

- the ATC either (if still working) should have transmitted its problems to the ATC system
- or, if it was disabled by the lightning strike, the signal to the ATC should have been lost


I was going to extrapolate on this earlier racko. After extensive work dealing with Chinese written programing and PLC logic I would speculate that they were only relying on the signal to be transmitted if there was a problem. Obviously could not happen with no electricity or loss of back up. The concept that the next section would have to be in communication, functional and clear would escape their process.
I am not trying to take anything away from the Chinese but they are several generations behind in fail-safe logic and safety largely due to no Tort laws.
I am just speculating of course from my previous experience

Okie


User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 7951 posts, RR: 26
Reply 10, posted (2 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 1174 times:

Recent adventures in nuclear plants notwithstanding, Japan really did achieve fail safe standards with its high speed rail systems. In nearly fifty years of Shinkansen service there have been no serious derailments and not a single service-related fatality. All of this while maintaining on time performance measured in tenths of seconds!


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Train Derails In Lake District posted Fri Feb 23 2007 22:07:09 by ThePRGuy
Whoa! Shinkansen JR 500 Bullet Train posted Sat Dec 16 2006 01:48:09 by AsstChiefMark
Breaking News: Amtrak Train Derails In Mississippi posted Wed Apr 7 2004 04:09:11 by CcrlR
"Disney Plays Hard Ball Over Bullet Train" posted Mon Dec 30 2002 04:09:52 by STT757
Anybody Taken A Train In Western China/Kazakhstan? posted Thu Jan 24 2008 14:50:37 by MaverickM11
Anyone Took The Trans-Siberian Train To China? posted Mon Jan 19 2004 08:53:07 by UTa_FLYinghigh
Fake Apple Stores Found In China posted Thu Jul 21 2011 14:45:39 by Springbok747
Cool Snow Train posted Thu Dec 23 2010 07:54:38 by keesje
Tibet-China History--any Good Books? posted Thu Dec 9 2010 08:22:51 by MaverickM11
China Awarded Its Own Pirated "Nobel Prize" posted Wed Dec 8 2010 07:11:46 by L410Turbolet