Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A New Fix For Ionization-type Smoke Alarms?  
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6386 posts, RR: 2
Posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1821 times:

As I have stated in a previous thread, I have been opposed to ionization-only smoke alarms due to their ineffectiveness at detecting slow smoldering fires compared to photoelectric or dual sensor alarms.

However, it looks like Universal Security Instruments (USI, the #3 player in the smoke alarm industry behind Kidde and BRK/First Alert) has come out with a new patented ionization technology known as IoPhic:
http://www.universalsecurity.com/iophic.htm

According to USI, the new IoPhic models are more effective than dual photoelectric/ionization models at sensing both fast flaming as well as slow smoldering fires, yet costs less than competing photoelectric-only models. USI also claims it is less prone to false alarms than a standard ionization smoke alarm.

This looks like it could be a good solution, however, as with any claims by a company, it should be taken with a grain of salt. Also, some will still be uncomfortable with the americium that is used in any type of ionization alarm. Since this is a closed patent by USI, neither Kidde nor BRK are allowed to come up with competing models using the same technological improvements, otherwise it would violate USI's patents.

For our new house in Gilbert, since it will have Kidde alarms, we just bought a Kidde PI2010 dual-sensor hardwire alarm (brands must match when interconnecting). However, the house that my brother lives in has USI alarms (one photoelectric, the rest ionization), and maybe if one of those ionization alarms fails or breaks a new IoPhic model would be an option.

What does anyone think about this?


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWarRI1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 8510 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

I think that you should have an assortment of available alarms to keep your family safe. I do not care for the Ionization alarms myself, as I previously stated. I have both photo-electric and Ionization types. One cannot be too careful when it comes to fire, especially with children in the home.


It is better to die on your feet, than live on your knees.
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6386 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1786 times:

One thing I am curious about is whether or not these USI IoPhic alarms will get approval in the four states that require photoelectric or dual-sensor alarms. Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont require photoelectric, while Iowa requires dual-sensor. I think someone on YouTube should try the Aquarium Test on one of these alarms to see if it works as advertised.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlinetype-rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4843 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1696 times:

And for heaven's sake, replace your batteries in your detectors once you have them. There have been many fires in homes where there were smoke detectors and either the batteries were dead or the people in the home have disconnected them!


Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6386 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (2 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1689 times:

Quoting type-rated (Reply 3):
And for heaven's sake, replace your batteries in your detectors once you have them. There have been many fires in homes where there were smoke detectors and either the batteries were dead or the people in the home have disconnected them!

Preferrably, buy a lithium battery where you don't have to replace it for many years.



The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A New Fix For Ionization-type Smoke Alarms? posted Mon Jul 25 2011 20:06:35 by 1337Delta764
US Planned "New Finland" For Refugees In Alaska posted Sat Oct 23 2010 14:27:21 by Andaman
Need New Music For Spotify, What Shall I Get! posted Thu Apr 22 2010 09:28:42 by LHR380
New Weapons For German Army In Afganistan posted Thu Apr 15 2010 03:47:19 by columba
A New Reason For Conservatives To Hate Obama posted Sat Dec 26 2009 23:32:38 by DocLightning
Considering A New Car For 09? posted Fri Dec 19 2008 10:21:06 by Winglet
Toyota's New Car For 2009 posted Wed Oct 22 2008 08:13:29 by Oa260
The Polish Missile-shield :new Reason For Trouble posted Fri Aug 15 2008 07:28:33 by Beaucaire
New Season For The A.net Fantasy Soccer League posted Tue Nov 20 2007 14:21:18 by N1120A
New Shotgun For My Son! posted Tue Nov 20 2007 08:47:39 by AGM100