Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
World If The US Didn't Become A Nation?  
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7832 posts, RR: 52
Posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1443 times:

Just a fun hypothetical. I couldn't really fit what I wanted to say in the title:

"What do you think the world would look like had the individual states gotten their independence but decided not to become one nation?"

Do you think we'd have wars between the states over the years? What states would have expanded into the West (if they were able to at all?) Would Mexico be a lot bigger than it is now? What would WWII have looked like?

Just some harmless Sunday fun. Hope it doesn't turn uncivil!  


Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineNSMike From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 251 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1404 times:

Canada, extending from the Arctic to Mexico, would be the world's largest superpower...

     



Pearl Snares, Taye Drums, Sabian Cymbals, Remo Heads, Los Cabos Sticks
User currently offline1337Delta764 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6446 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1389 times:

It seems that the EU is basically a modern version of the old Articles of Confederation. As with the EU, states under the Articles of Confederation were independent with their own militaries, however, they largely shared common interests.


The Pink Delta 767-400ER - The most beautiful aircraft in the sky
User currently offlinekiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7138 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1377 times:

You wouldn't have had the Civil War.

User currently offlinephotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2719 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1376 times:

The only way that would have happened, and following history, would have been if there was no American Revolution. If that were the case, you'd still be subject to British rule, or like Canada, part of the British Commonwealth. Which means as reply #1 suggests, the country of Canada from the Artic to the Mexican border. However the location of the Mexican border would likely be up around Oklahoma or somewhere.

User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12345 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

Quoting NSMike (Reply 1):
Canada, extending from the Arctic to Mexico, would be the world's largest superpower...

Well, that would have avoided the ugly health care debates we've had recently.  

And we'd have just one very big and bloated airline!  



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlinesignol From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2007, 2996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

You'd be in a situation somewhat similar to Australia. Individual states themselves deciding to federate, and pool resources and power. Happened in Germany and Italy, that a group of independant small states "joined forces". I think the end product would be similar to what the USA is today, but the Federation of the states just happening much later.

Quoting kiwiRob (Reply 3):
You wouldn't have had the Civil War.

True, it would have just been "War".  

signol



Flights booked: none :(
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

Quoting photopilot (Reply 4):

The only way that would have happened, and following history, would have been if there was no American Revolution. If that were the case, you'd still be subject to British rule, or like Canada, part of the British Commonwealth. Which means as reply #1 suggests, the country of Canada from the Artic to the Mexican border. However the location of the Mexican border would likely be up around Oklahoma or somewhere.

And under Brit Colonial Rule looking back at India and the rest...we'd be jacked - wait....there'd be no 'we'...

.. the world would be more of a absolute mess than it is now.


BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlinesignol From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2007, 2996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1290 times:

Quoting BN747 (Reply 7):
.we'd be jacked

India is just one example. Look at Australia, Canada...

signol



Flights booked: none :(
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7943 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1277 times:

There would be an American Union similar to the European Union.

North Korea would be twice as big.

WWII? No idea, perhaps some of the states would have joined Britain and other countries, while the SU would have occupied most of Germany, including Hamburg and thus have (had) access to the North Sea.
Perhaps I should say that *most* of the states would have joined after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor or one of the states. I think even with separate, independent states there would be a bond strong enough to join forces against a threat against any of the states. It is questionable,though, if separate states would have funded the Manhattan Project.

I remember there was a WWI too, which Germany might have won. To some extend, the Treaty of Versailles contributed to the rise of Hitler, although that wasn't the main reason.

Quoting NSMike (Reply 1):
Canada, extending from the Arctic to Mexico, would be the world's largest superpower...


That's another reason why I think the world would look worse than it does now.  



I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1268 times:

Quoting signol (Reply 8):
Quoting BN747 (Reply 7):
.we'd be jacked

India is just one example. Look at Australia, Canada...

Yes...both launched by Britain

..and both of which had incredible influential 'US of A' input -

Canada: every step of the way.

Australia - really took off after WWII with US bases and military on their turf.

BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineLGWflyer From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2011, 2348 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1225 times:

Part of the United Kingdom! Haha interesting thought though.  


3 words... I Love Aviation!!!
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7832 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1219 times:

Quoting photopilot (Reply 4):
The only way that would have happened, and following history, would have been if there was no American Revolution. If that were the case, you'd still be subject to British rule, or like Canada, part of the British Commonwealth.

IIRC, and I should really read up on it again, there was talk of each state going its own way. I think it would be interesting to see the states race westward. I'd think 2 or 3 big states would gain a foothold over most the continent and regional alliances would be formed. Who knows, there could have been a greater Spanish speaking presence in the south and west, French in the northeast and near Louisiana, and English and maybe German in other places. I think we would've formed an AU (like the EU) and would be around where Europe is today... just interesting thought.



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinedreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8792 posts, RR: 24
Reply 13, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1200 times:

Quoting photopilot (Reply 4):
The only way that would have happened, and following history, would have been if there was no American Revolution. If that were the case, you'd still be subject to British rule, or like Canada, part of the British Commonwealth. Which means as reply #1 suggests, the country of Canada from the Artic to the Mexican border. However the location of the Mexican border would likely be up around Oklahoma or somewhere.


Actually Texas won their Independence from Mexico with minimal US involvement (apart from the fact most of the settlers came from there), became their own nation for about a decade, and negotiated their entry into the US, which is why, for instance, the federal government does not own a lot of land in Texas - Texans negotiated that all unclaimed land would become the endowment of the University of Texas, and other state uses.

In fact, I think Texas would have become the world's greatest Superpower, it's greatest president having been JR Ewing




Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4300 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Quoting dreadnought (Reply 13):
Actually Texas won their Independence from Mexico with minimal US involvement (apart from the fact most of the settlers came from there),

The settlers? You mean... the illegal immigrants, right? Who then promptly revolted against Mexican authority.  

Apologies for consciously divagating, but I could not let the irony of how history repeats itself escape.



My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8792 posts, RR: 24
Reply 15, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1138 times:

Quoting Derico (Reply 14):
The settlers? You mean... the illegal immigrants, right? Who then promptly revolted against Mexican authority.

A lesson for us to not let illegal immigration go uncontrolled, right?

Actually, the immigration was legal - the Mexican government eliminated restrictions on immigration in order to outnumber the indigenous Indian tribes which were violently revolting against Spanish/Mexican settlers. Immigrants from the US were given land grants to entice them to come.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlinepilotsmoe From United States of America, joined May 2005, 249 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1092 times:

Quoting LGWflyer (Reply 11):
Part of the United Kingdom! Haha interesting thought though.

Either that or you would be speaking German and driving on the right side of the road.   


User currently offlinetrav110 From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 536 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1085 times:

Well, we'd have to pick another name for Georgia pretty much immediately.

User currently offlinejcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 18, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1075 times:

Had the Revolutionary War not occurred, the US most likely would've become independent in the mid to late 1800s along the same lines of Canada. The big question is whether or not the Civil War would have occurred. IMO, if the Civil War occurred closer to the 20th century, it would've been so destructive that it's questionable if we'd have the same standard of living that we have today in the US. Which brings into question whether or not we would be able to field such a military to fight Nazi Germany and Japan. Either way, we'd most likely be a Commonwealth nation with a parliament and a prime minister.

Thankfully, everything went pretty well in our history and we don't have to pay homage to a vestige of Medieval Europe (see: the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha).



America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4300 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 15):
Actually, the immigration was legal - the Mexican government eliminated restrictions on immigration in order to outnumber the indigenous Indian tribes which were violently revolting against Spanish/Mexican settlers. Immigrants from the US were given land grants to entice them to come.

That is not what I remember, but I'll concede to you better knowledge on the specific status of the migrants during that period. I cursorily read somewhere that the ''anglo'' encroachment fundamentally vexed the Mexicans, which tried various means to counteract it, principally by vainly encouraging their own settlers north. But in general, their efforts were clearly desultory at best.



My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlinephotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2719 posts, RR: 18
Reply 20, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1024 times:

Quoting BN747 (Reply 10):
..and both of which had incredible influential 'US of A' input -

Canada: every step of the way.

Australia - really took off after WWII with US bases and military on their turf.

Gawd.... talk about unbridled American jingoism. While the USA has been a good trading partner of Canada, and no doubt there are some mutually beneficial treaties, Canada developed quite nicely by itself, after Canada/British whipped the USA's ass in the War of 1812. Do I have to remind you that it was Canadian/British troops from Upper Canada that came down to Washington and burnt your White House to the ground.
Tell us.... what part of Public Health Care that all Canadian enjoy was in any way influenced by the USA?
Tell us.... what part of our Parlimentary Democracy (you know, a Prime Minister) was in any way influenced by the USA?
Tell us.... what part of Canadian Laws (Based on British Common Law) was influenced by the USA?
Tell us.... what part did the USA play when Canadian troops were fighting at Dieppe, long before you Yanks even thought of joining that little European conflict called WWII?

Brush up on your history lad before you completely prove your lack of knowledge.

ta....


User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (2 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1005 times:

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
Quoting BN747 (Reply 10):
..and both of which had incredible influential 'US of A' input -

Canada: every step of the way.

Australia - really took off after WWII with US bases and military on their turf.

Gawd.... talk about unbridled American jingoism. While the USA has been a good trading partner of Canada, and no doubt there are some mutually beneficial treaties, Canada developed quite nicely by itself, after Canada/British whipped the USA's ass in the War of 1812. Do I have to remind you that it was Canadian/British troops from Upper Canada that came down to Washington and burnt your White House to the ground.

That doesn't mean a diddly squat. Canada is still a quintessential Brit-US hybrid.

Canadian Cities (except Montreal) resemble American cities more than any British city or town. Robust advancing urban iconography of the US is more so repeated in Canada than any nation outside the US. Ever see a red double-decker bus in Toronto? No. Driving on the left? No. Nearly everything in modern Canada is most likely to be patterned after an American city (as is the way of life) than in anything in the UK. Parliament? the Brits are more than welcome to claim that.

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
Tell us.... what part of Public Health Care that all Canadian enjoy was in any way influenced by the USA?

As far as actual patient care..they're probably identical, but as far as administration is concerned, yeah...we've been sold out to Corp (Medical) interest - the Canucks are more honest in that dept. No argument there. Everyone knows Not much trumps American greed.

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
Tell us.... what part of our Parlimentary Democracy (you know, a Prime Minister) was in any way influenced by the USA?

Addressed above, and not something you'd witness or see walking down the street of any Canadian town - WHICH would be damn near identical walking the street of an American town.

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
Tell us.... what part of Canadian Laws (Based on British Common Law) was influenced by the USA?

Law schmal...

You go to jail for drinking & driving or underaged sex in both places. Eye in the sky spy cams/traffic cams exist in both places - big deal.

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
Tell us.... what part did the USA play when Canadian troops were fighting at Dieppe, long before you Yanks even thought of joining that little European conflict called WWII?

Of the many battles on the Normandy coast and you're going to fly off and claim the Canadians won WWII??? Do you have any idea how many decisive battles from North Africa, to Italy and in the North Atlantic occurred that over shadow Dieppe? I guarantee you that 99% of A.net never even heard of Dieppe before your post...

..so I'd suggest you expanded your 'historical understanding with respect to the larger picture' than little nuggets you're trying to amplify to levels of global awareness and global importance.

BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlinecanoecarrier From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2839 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 906 times:

Quoting BN747 (Reply 21):
Canada is still a quintessential Brit-US hybrid.

And, in our hypothetical situation the Louisiana Purchase would likely have never occurred. Napoleon needed money, which any one state at the time would not have had. So, it would have been taken from him inevitably when France lost any one of the next several wars they fought against Great Britain. So, Canada might now stretch through the heartland to New Orleans. People in Calgary would be making fun of those "southerners" in Denver.

Also, we might never would have had the Alaska Purchase in 1867 if all the independent states never formed a union. Then the now great superpower Canada would have be stationing troops during the Cold War in Dawson City waiting for the Soviets to attack from Tok.

There's a book on my Kindle list I haven't read yet slightly along these lines by an Australian author, John Birmingham called "Without Warning" Although, it occurs in 2003 on the eve of war in Iraq and most of Canada, Mexico and the US population disappear leaving the rest of the world to fend for themselves.



The beatings will continue until morale improves
User currently offlinekiwiRob From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 7138 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 904 times:

Quoting BN747 (Reply 21):
Canadian Cities (except Montreal) resemble American cities more than any British city or town. Robust advancing urban iconography of the US is more so repeated in Canada than any nation outside the US. Ever see a red double-decker bus in Toronto? No. Driving on the left? No. Nearly everything in modern Canada is most likely to be patterned after an American city (as is the way of life) than in anything in the UK. Parliament? the Brits are more than welcome to claim that.

I would guess that since Canadian and American cities developed pretty much at the same time in broadly similar environments it's fairly natural that they would have ended up looking pretty similar, with the exception of Montreal. So it's not really a case of Canadian cities looking like American cities.


User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 24, posted (2 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 822 times:

Quoting kiwiRob (Reply 23):
I would guess that since Canadian and American cities developed pretty much at the same time in broadly similar environments it's fairly natural that they would have ended up looking pretty similar, with the exception of Montreal. So it's not really a case of Canadian cities looking like American cities.

Well they didn't do everything simultaneously, one mimicked the other.

Nothing was stopping Canada from being a carbon copy of London, Manchester or Birmingham.

As far as one mimicking the other, that means one was blazing the trail. That had to be the more industrious USA.

In Canada today you see influences of older home and building designs reflective English appeal..but the lay pf the land is more wester, more American. When you land in a Canadian city, you don't 'see' laws or other intangibles that make them more English like, you see images that makes you think you're still in America, until someone speaks... the people are nicer.

Quoting canoecarrier (Reply 22):
So, it would have been taken from him inevitably when France lost any one of the next several wars they fought against Great Britain.

No question about it..the Brits could have unleashed all that 'rebel firepower' on their French cousins and surely would have taken their North American claims away from them...we are talking about the rising British Empire after all..

BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
25 sw733 : Here's kind of a funny one from an African point of view: Liberia would not be a country as it currently is (formed by freed American slaves), and Mon
26 canoecarrier : Well, it's arguable that the British Empire was really rising at that point. The 1700's were far better than the 1800's to Great Britain's colonial e
27 BN747 : No, they clearly have their Canadian flairs.. but are more identifiable with US metropolises than any UK or british city. Yep and they resemble their
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
If The US Presidential Election Were Today... posted Sat Nov 15 2003 16:50:13 by LHMark
What If The US Became Separated posted Thu Sep 25 2003 21:49:43 by Gc
If M.A.N Import The Lion To The US posted Sat Aug 29 2009 21:00:10 by 747400sp
Cricket--Why Did It Never Become Popular In The US posted Sat May 16 2009 10:18:32 by CaliAtenza
Could Van Hool TD 925 Become A Success In The US? posted Mon Aug 18 2008 08:36:59 by 747400sp
World Cup TV Ratings Up In The US... posted Thu Jul 13 2006 21:41:47 by AirRyan
What If This Had Happened In The US Tonight? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 07:31:11 by Derico
So This Is What The World Thinks About The US Now posted Sun Sep 4 2005 17:40:22 by VSLover
Proof: The Wars Didn't Make Us Safe posted Thu Jul 7 2005 15:17:39 by 777236ER
How Would The World Vote In US Elections? posted Fri Sep 10 2004 18:12:10 by Danny