virginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 945 posts, RR: 0 Posted (4 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3571 times:
Apple today announced their new OS - OS X Mountain Lion
A much earlier announcement than people were expecting especially considering the gaps between previous OS's were around 2 years. This has been less than a year! Although it won't come out until late summer, so we have a while to wait yet.
Some new features:
Messages - replaces iChat and now allows users to iMessage iOS devices ( iPhone / iPad / iPod Touch )
Haven't bought 10.7 yet. There was no meaningful upgrade over 10.6. It, like, scrolls windows more badly and that's it.
Just wait for a certain Mac partisan to show up and explain in excruciating detail why you need Lion NOW.
FWIW my wife just recently upgraded from Tiger to Snow Leopard. I predict she'll skip Lion and go to Mountain Lion if there's som great development she needs or, if like Tiger, it just becomes obsolete.
[Edited 2012-02-16 09:05:32]
South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
AKiss20 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 784 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (4 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3430 times:
Quoting Flighty (Reply 7): Haven't bought 10.7 yet. There was no meaningful upgrade over 10.6. It, like, scrolls windows more badly and that's it.
If you have an iPhone, the integration with iCloud is quite good, reason why I upgraded!
I like Lion overall, i've only been on it for a few days. There was a really annoying default behavior when you closed the laptop with an external monitor. SL went to sleep, Lion by default goes into clamshell mode. Apple offers no option to change this, but some smart people found you could change something in PRAM to go back to the SL behavior.
ML doesn't seem like much of a change. Surprised they are calling it a new OS and not just 10.7.4
Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are
Asturias From Spain, joined Apr 2006, 2159 posts, RR: 16
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3424 times:
Quoting AKiss20 (Reply 10): ML doesn't seem like much of a change. Surprised they are calling it a new OS and not just 10.7.4
Indeed, one possibility is to get users to pay 30 bucks every 12-18 months for minor OS upgrades, another far more likely possibility is to remove themselves from the Lion fiasco - the Vista of Apple.
Also to be more in sync with the latest cloud-fad, shopping "experience" and swipes one finds on the iOS gadgets.
Apple has stopped referring to the OS as Mac OS X, it is now just OS X; there is no server version, OS X is now the most "advanced" (yeah right) *desktop* OS according to Apple's own website; every update major or minor is just about ecosystem integration or shopping and the Mac App Store is being set up as the inevitable walled garden with Gate Keeper.
Apple didn't even bother to make an event or a presentation for the announcement of this "new" OS X. Just called the most egregious Mac sycophant on the planet and said: Meet us Gruber, we need to show you something to blog about.
flykev From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2006, 1400 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 3303 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW FORUM MODERATOR
When I first read about some of the features they are adding (notification center) I thought "oh great, they are making the desktop into a giant version of iOS"; kind of like how Microsoft is putting that nasty Metro UI on Windows 8 -
However on looking at the website, this seems to be the best parts of iOS being added to Mac OS X.
Notification Center looks quite useful to me, as does integrating iMessage.
I skipped lion, but if my Mac isn't too old I will be able to upgrade to Mountain Lion.
The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only
Why? No. Exactly like MS and Dell. Hence, insanely mediocre.
Quoting Ken777 (Reply 13): I have an 8 year old G5 iMac that I'll replace with a new one after the next upgrade. Will pass it on to the grandkids.
Cool story bro. What will the grandkids do with a machine that can't even run Snow Leopard? Leopard can't run the recent software. The best browser you can run is Firefox 3.6.26. That's the lastest browser of any kind that runs on PPC.
While an 8 year old Wintel can run XP, which can run the recent software, including the latest Chrome and Flash and whatnot them kids love these days. Apple: insanely obsolete.
Quoting Ken777 (Reply 13): That $30 price tag did shake up pricing. Makes it clear that an OS, including Windows, shouldn't be very expensive. Nor should there be multiple version for consumers to choose from.
People pay for Windows because they have to, not because they want to. Mac ... oops sorry OS X has always been considerably cheaper in retail than Windows. At least on the surface. As everyone knows, Windows isn't released that often, every 5 years or so on average. So the 120 bucks every two years for OS X was not that amazing considering the 500 bucks paid for Windows every 5 years. Besides, OS X has always been covered in part by hardware sales. In the end it doesn't matter what OS X costs or doesn't cost. At least not for the Windows price tag.
So seeing as the main features of OS X Mountain Lion is a handful of shareware-class apps and the ability to mirror the monitor wirelessly, with a bunch of half-assed iOS "features" being jammed in there for no good reason, and that Lion was Apple's Vista, let's see if 30 bucks won't turn into 0 bucks as they just decide to give the OS away. I wouldn't pay more than zero for it anyway.
Quoting Ken777 (Reply 13): So let's see if MS is able to deliver an OS at the same price points. Maybe with Longhorn.
Apple is big and important today, more so than I ever could imagine. Yet in the space of desktop OS, Apple is rather insignificant and Microsoft holds the monopoly. Perhaps if OS X could run on generic peezoids, the pricing of it could affect the pricing of Windows, but in the current situation the two just don't affect each other.
Look at Mac sales compared to PC sales for the past few years. Lion seems to be selling pretty well, as do Macs loaded with Lion.
Quoting Asturias (Reply 16): Yet in the space of desktop OS, Apple is rather insignificant and Microsoft holds the monopoly.
Macs are profitable. OS X is profitable. iOS devices are profitable. What appears to be insignificant is the five year performance that MS has delivered to it's shareholders.
Reality is that a business does not have to be the biggest in order to perform very well and be very profitable. Look at how well the PC makers are doing. Their margins? Their ability to deliver new products that change the market?
So Apple is insignificant in some areas? And they are laughing all the way to the banks - as are their shareholders.
And their customers continually rank the company ahead of the competition.
jwhite9185 From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 1586 posts, RR: 4
Reply 24, posted (4 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2921 times:
I imagine there will be a host of new features announced in time. Chances are iOS6 will be out around the same time so theres probably a few features that both will have they want to keep under wraps for the time being.
: Maybe they should make Black Cat, the unlucky OS...
: Well well well..........what have we here ? A bunch of Apple devotees, yes sireee ! While all of you windows fanatics are busy bashing all things Appl
: Of course I don't have to worry about paying to have it fixed, or taking it anywhere for that matter. I fix it myself. Paying to have your PC fixed m
: When the Mac line has growth rates significantly greater than the PC world I would consider them to be around for a long time. Look at the PC OEMs an
: Im not totally sure about the desktop .. at latest corporate gig I have no desktop. Just a Dell winbook and some monitors. At home, no desktop. I don
: I use a Mac, geezur. I've used Macs exclusively since 1994. I'm writing this on a G4, running Leopard. It's a ten year old machine. Not my main machi
: Apple has continued development of the Mac lines - just look at the MacBook Air. At the same time, Apple has grabbed the Tiger by the tail in the mob
: Well, none of us can really look into the inner minds of the top brass at Apple, but anyone can look into how their products are actually designed an
: Whether one can or cannot look into the minds of Apple's top brass is neither here nor there - but your claim is quite unsubstantiated that quality l
: Pretty much sums it up. The main difference is that for Mac Apple controls everything so drivers, etc work better. No different from Dell and Lenovo.
: One would think so, and indeed that is the case in many instances, but counter-intuitively that isn't even the case in some rather fundamental instan
: No rule without exemptions But my comment was targeted at crashes, not performance. For raw performance you can build far superior windows systems th
: When did Apple's "influence on the computing field" decline? Why even include that element in your reply? Lots of companies have "declines" in influe
: That, price and the inconsistent GUI are my main complaints about OS X.
: Ugh, the inconsistent GUI is such a mess it's worth another thread entirely!! It's always been eye candy over function. It's a mess. The Apple faithf
: You have a point in that you can't usually build your own laptop, which is why a lot of manufacturers seem to be offering lots of customization optio
: Well, you simply don't know the platform then. (I still don't get why you keep constantly whining and whining about absolutely everything Apple at th
: Not kidding. Windows is far more consistent. Maybe you have become to used to them to notice. Apple never offer the highest performance possible, the
: Across actual, real-life applications? Since when? User interfaces and usage conventions vary wildly between applications; Even Microsoft itself does
: But now you're changing the criteria. Apple has a great line up. But it isn't everything and not for every situation. Because Windows has more OEMs w
: Evidently I know it better than you - which is probably not saying much considering you seem to constantly go blank when people present any concerns
: As a service manager and owner of an Apple Store, I really enjoy this threads of NO MATTER WHAT APPLE DOES, THE MAC MUST DIE !!!. Apple has the mp3 ma
: They do???? Apple is certainly doing great. But there is another line that is doing pretty darn well too. Even selling more units in most markets. Ma
: No, that you will usually be able to find a machine which will indeed exceed the respective Mac in at least one respect is just agreed – I was just
: The mac is the past. I have used it for 25 years pretty heavily. For about the last 5 years, Mac OS has stagnated and development has basically stall
: The criteria was raw performance and Apple has never been the leader in that. The closest you can get to define Apple products in niches is based on
: Why would Apple want to spend the money for full repair facilities in all stores? A quick fix, like a HD that goes bad, is fine for local repairs. Ot
: Since there is very little demand for machines where that is the only criterion. Machines where that is a major criterion with several others still b
: There you go. Trying to change away from the criteria again. So you agree on price. Very few Macs are bought on performance. Looks (design) yes but p
: My housemate got an iPad for Christmas and exchanged it for a Samsung Galaxy S2. He was annoyed that he couldn't drag and drop files onto the iPad lik
: I'm not "changing" anything, I simply see and emphasize some aspects differently than you do. Very few computers overall are bought exclusively on on
: That's quite a spin there, and I'm sure it's great for Apple's customers just to get a new device (I know I was when it happened to me) but obviously
: My son-in-law has been involved in studio work for a long time and "Performance" in that market is the reliability that Macs delivered over PCs. The
: So guys I'm in the market for a new computer... I'm really thinking about biting the bullet and buying a 12 Core Mac Pro... Do you think I can get 5 y
: As a technician that repairs 30 apple products each week, I can laugh at your ignorance. Yes Apple has changed the design to make the macs more diffi
: I would definitely wait until the new model comes out. The current one is reaching the end of its model cycle, and the new one will be upgraded to th
: Yup; i'm thinking christmas gift to myself this year. Bud of mine bought his dual G5 back in 03 as well; and his is still chugging along. So thinking
: LOL. I see the rainbow wheel of gay porn as often (probably should say rarely) as I have problems on windows. With windows I also get access to the f
: Actually I was thinking of a consumer desktop machine or laptop and yes, a Samsung would be more easy to repair in that case. A tablet from any manuf
: IBM PC had more market share than Apple. So did Compaq. How many companies can you name with greater market share that are no longer in the PC Busine
: Mine would be too, but the new iMac is just a lot faster and a lot more power-efficient, so I retired it for the time being. Close to the low end of
: Not too worried about the power, it's only money right? But I'm spoiled and I love my 3 display setup. See note about about displays...Currently I ha
: The real question is how much RAM does Safari need before it stops beachballing. More than 4GBs, that I know. Actually, more than 16 GB isn't support
: Then why argue? If the user is stupid enough to open its Mac and void the warranty is that Apple´s Fault? you can spin any info on the subject, bott
: So we agree. Your statement, that I disagreed with, wasn't too smart. There are also reports that Foxcomm reassigned people to other factories before
: Does this also fail to indicate quality? That is the level of effort and quality put into the MacBook Pros, from the cheapest Airs on up. How does th
: Not just. It's also an environmental issue. Although a replacement machine will of course add its manufacturing to the balance sheet. But the lines d
: Sure, but I wasn't the one huffing and puffing about fixing 30 Apple products a week and then making up some outlandish story about why Apple was mak
: Obviously incorrect. Apple very clearly cares quite a lot about that, which is obvious by their ultra-accessible designs like almost all their PowerM
: Wrong, actually. Safari is capable of beachballing with just one window open. It isn't just a memory thing with Safari, though it beachballs less on
: Which you know exactly how to that certainty? Replacing the harddisk through Apple would still be much, much cheaper, so the incentive to throw the e
: Nonsense, Apple's Mac Pro (to be discontinued?) is no indication of the company's attitude. The Mac Pro is also really large, heavy and thick. Are yo
: Clearly, but that wasn't the point - you seem to have a real talent of missing points - the point is it wasn't because of eco-fascists that Apple dec
: Incorrect. I clearly disagree with various claims you've made and I have my doubts about your foundations for making such claims. Some of your claims
: Oh all right, then I obviously didn't accuse you of lying, I just pointed out that you must be anatomically special. No Klaus, there's no getting aro
: There eis no custom cable a regular sata connector but since I do not know nothing I may be lying or simply I enjoy spreading false information for m
: Meh; I recycle... So stupid question for you 3 or 4... who actually works for apple here?
: You have an edit window of 60 minutes from the time you make a post in which to add or remove any additional comments or information into/from your in
: …your electricity as well…? I'm not saying that power consumption should be the all-overriding concern, especially since production of a new mach