Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Pixar's "Cars" Spin-Off: Planes  
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4557 posts, RR: 14
Posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3512 times:

Anyone else on the forum read about this?

Apparently Disney is making a sequel to Pixar's "Cars" entitled Planes. Actually there's two "Planes" movies planned, the first of which is coming out next year.


"From high above the world of "Cars," flies "Planes," Disney's upcoming animated action-packed comedic adventure starring Dusty, a big-hearted, fast-flying crop duster who dreams of competing in the most exhilarating around-the-world air race in history. There's only a couple of not-so-small problems - Dusty is not exactly built for racing and he also happens to be afraid of heights.

Despite his fear and with encouragement from his mentor, a naval aviator named Skipper, Dusty narrowly qualifies for the big competition. Dusty's sportsmanship and speed begin to rattle the defending champ of the race circuit, Ripslinger, who will stop at nothing to see Dusty fail.

People seem to be divided over this film. Some are calling it the beginning of the end of Pixar-related films being "good." And they have good reason to worry, with DisneyToon Studios (aka the "Sequel Factory") producing this, some are expecting something along the same lines of awfulness as Tarzan 2.

The fact that it's a direct-to-DVD release also doesn't inspire much faith for some, but I've just watched a short called "Air Mater", which gives us a little taste of what "Planes" might be like. And it actually isn't that bad...a little cheesy perhaps...but definitely starting out stronger than expected in this little preview. Have a look here:


With all the planes we saw in the Cars movies, I'm glad that they are doing a movie about the aviation side of the Cars world. I just hope they do it justice. The plot has potential. Will the execution deliver?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 8384 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3488 times:

Hm....this sounds interesting...

Do they have a Convair 880 named "Convy" who crashes a bunch?   

Follow me on twitter: www.twitter.com/phx787
User currently onlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 4093 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 3470 times:

I'm kind of excited about this, I thought the Cars movies (particularly the aviation aspects) were excellent. Although they were kids movies there was so much in them for us adult kids, and the short film you posted is excellent! So much detail, so much aviation insider references. They must have had some pilots on the creative team.
Propwash junction! LOL


All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlineelbandgeek From United States of America, joined Jun 2008, 778 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3394 times:

The Cars franchise as a whole is pretty polarizing. Pixar is held to a very high standard and people expect everything they do to be groundbreaking oscar-bait, which neither Cars movie is. The thing is though, John Lasseter never claimed everything they do had to be like that and he pretty much said Cars was made because he wanted to do something fun because he thinks cars are cool. That's what they did and it proved popular enough, especially with kids, for Disney to push the merchandise hard. Then when Cars 2 came around people thought they were just milking it, and while that's probably true to an extent, it was more a case of Lasseter wanting to do a spy movie and realizing he could make it work in the Cars universe. Again, it's not groundbreaking cinema like Wall-E or Up, but if you take it for what it is, it's still a good movie.
So as far as Planes go, I actually think it's a neat idea, and I hope it does well. I think anyone who regulars this site would be in the target audience of "people who think planes are cool". DisneyToon Studios is never going to be making stuff on the level as Pixar or Disney Feature Animation, but stuff like Planes and the Tinkerbell movies are a much better use of their time compared to pumping out awful direct-to-dvd sequels like they used to.

User currently offlineltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13856 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3360 times:

Disney - go for it. I think is is a good idea, it uses one of the most popular movie story lines of the underdog vs the world. I am quite sure they can make it so the American plane is a play on Boeing or an extinct brand (like McDD) name is going after an aircraft named on a play on Airbus. Of course they could have a sexy sounding Italian a/c, a stiff upper lift British one and of course a technocrat German one. It could work for kids and adults if done right.

User currently offlineeinsteinboricua From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2010, 4849 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 3241 times:

I was turned off the moment it had the words "racing" and "dust-cropper". I thought it would go along the lines of...I don't know...not racing.

"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
User currently offlinevirginblue4 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2008, 945 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (3 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 3178 times:

Looking forward to it!

Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 5):

The second one is called Planes 2: Fire and Rescue

The amazing tale of flight.
User currently offlineatct From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2593 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

Ive met the producer of the two movies and its going to be an exciting series. I cant go much more than this but the background investigation is spot on reference us aviation geeks. From what I saw and discussed their first priority is realism (if youve seen Cars you understand) as it comes to "life like" objects. Non-disclosure sucks but believe me that its going to be a must see for aviation wackos.


Trikes are for kids!
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4557 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (3 years 11 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2690 times:

Quoting atct (Reply 7):
the background investigation is spot on reference us aviation geeks.

It's too bad it won't get a theatrical run, then. Looks to be worthy of it. I guess it'll become a cult classic here?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Do We Get Off On Planes? posted Tue Apr 1 2003 14:50:44 by QANTASFOREVER
The Ugly Cars In Production Thread posted Wed May 9 2012 14:54:23 by zippyjet
The Flip Off Thread posted Wed Dec 29 2010 19:30:58 by Super80DFW
Cars Most Likely To Get A Speeding Ticket, posted Tue Nov 30 2010 07:02:43 by dxing
7 Planes Perfectly Designed To Kill posted Sun Nov 28 2010 16:48:59 by airportugal310
Sen. Rockefeller: Get FOX/MSNBC Off Air posted Fri Nov 19 2010 10:37:55 by Aaron747
F1 2010-2011 Off Season posted Mon Nov 15 2010 10:32:02 by sudden
Has Mitch McConnell Gone Off The Deep End? posted Fri Nov 5 2010 06:59:17 by Cadet985
Insurance Rip Off - Encourages Dishonesty? posted Wed Oct 6 2010 19:27:53 by YVRLTN
Ford Killing Off North American Ranger After 2011 posted Tue Sep 21 2010 12:56:37 by PHLBOS