Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sam Jackson's "Wake The **** Up" Obama Ad  
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8299 posts, RR: 26
Posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3286 times:

Fresh from the Jewish Council for Education and Research PAC (funded by George Soros's son apparently) and with a sript from Adam Mansbach, who wrote the book "Go the F*ck to Sleep!", Sam Jackson has appeared in a satiric ad full of profanity encouraging voters to "wake the f**k up".

Honestly I'm really on the fence with this one and not sure how to react. I've been out of the states for awhile now but I don't really remember when it was OK to encourage kids as small as the girl in the ad to drop F-bombs. I enjoy political snark with appropriately-placed profanity as much as anyone, but part of me feels that even satirically the way this one is written is a little over the top.

No??

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate..._supporters_wake_the_f_ck_up_.html


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinecedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8202 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3276 times:

Little Susie's brother would appear to shave his legs. Other than that oddity, it's pretty good. I liked the book it's based on, Go The F*ck To Sleep.

PS Samuel L Jackson? In case you ever wondered what the L stands for? The answer is Motherf*cker.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10350 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3269 times:

All the political content aside, I laughed at it.

Can't say it's any worse than hundreds of movies and TV shows that come out every year....

"Say H*ll no motherf*ckers!!!"

  

Quoting cedarjet (Reply 1):
PS Samuel L Jackson? In case you ever wondered what the L stands for? The answer is Motherf*cker.

He also makes a pretty good beer....

[Edited 2012-09-28 19:09:28]


How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7982 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3257 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):
don't really remember when it was OK to encourage kids as small as the girl in the ad to drop F-bombs

Yeah, it was very partisan and that little girl saying the F word might've been a little much, but I thought it was kinda funny. Probably not important enough to warrant the huge political **** storm that will probably ensue, but I guess that's just the name of the game



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7279 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3249 times:

Even though I hope dems don't wake up  I thought it was funny. No one should make a big deal out if it. At least it was an attack or lie like so many other political adds.


"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6346 posts, RR: 33
Reply 5, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

I fear the US populace is just stupid enough to believe Obama is a good thing. But then I am perhaps just as that I didn't get Obamamoney or an Obamaphone and that the government made me pay my student loans and that I will not get free broadband Internet because I actually work to pay my bills. Under Obama I'm also working to support someone I will never meet. I'm sick of all politicians but especially sick of Obama.


Damn, this website is getting worse daily.
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8299 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3231 times:

Quoting IMissPiedmont (Reply 5):
Under Obama I'm also working to support someone I will never meet.

Ummm what? This is the case no matter where you live, I guarantee it. It has been the case under every President, Republican or Democrat. Yeesh. "I work only for myself and nobody else" is as much an entitlement mentality as food stamp recipients who complain about the kind of bread or meet they are allowed to buy with their e-card.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7982 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3209 times:

Quoting IMissPiedmont (Reply 5):
I didn't get Obamamoney or an Obamaphone

Sigh... it's "Barack-O Bucks" at least get it right  Yeah sure

[Edited 2012-09-28 20:28:58]


Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7279 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3197 times:

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 7):
Sigh... it's "Barack-O Bucks" at least get it right

You mean this? http://theblacksphere.net/wp-content/uploads/Food-Coupon-Obama.jpeg 



"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlineAesma From Reunion, joined Nov 2009, 6963 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3195 times:

It was shown on the evening news here on the public channel. The biped fucks were funny, you can say any lie in those ads, but god forbid you would use profanity !


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinen229nw From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 1972 posts, RR: 31
Reply 10, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3167 times:

I can see the idea that it's kind of borderline to use children this way. But hardly a big deal.
Also, while I agree with the content of the ad, it is nowhere near as funny as their last ad, with Sarah Silverman:

NSFW:

http://scissorsheldon.com/



It's people like you what cause unrest!
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2847 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3163 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

I often wonder if these actors and hollywood types actually understand what they're endorsing or if they just do it for a paycheck. If he really supports Obama though good for him for showing his support. But there had to be a more appropriate way. Imagine if there was a Romney support ad like this! There would be calls for his dropping out!
Blue



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8299 posts, RR: 26
Reply 12, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3159 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 11):
if these actors and hollywood types actually understand what they're endorsing

Are you suggesting that people with more money and free time than most of us are not capable of understanding something merely because they are entertainers?

Professional sports stars linking up with children's health advocacy groups, Bono doing his thing with medical relief and farming technique education in sub-Saharan Africa, Steven Spielberg serving on the board of liberal Jewish organizations....should these people not be doing these things and just live it up 24/7 instead? Seriously? Just wondering.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineAesma From Reunion, joined Nov 2009, 6963 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3151 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 11):
I often wonder if these actors and hollywood types actually understand what they're endorsing or if they just do it for a paycheck.

I doubt there's a check involved, at least not from the PAC to the actor (maybe the other way around).

In the same reportage about this ad it was said that George Clooney made Obama 15 millions in one dinner.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2847 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3138 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 12):
Are you suggesting that people with more money and free time than most of us are not capable of understanding something merely because they are entertainers?

Professional sports stars linking up with children's health advocacy groups, Bono doing his thing with medical relief and farming technique education in sub-Saharan Africa, Steven Spielberg serving on the board of liberal Jewish organizations....should these people not be doing these things and just live it up 24/7 instead? Seriously? Just wondering.

I never said they were unable of understanding something. But how many of these entertainers do you think could actually tell you about something Obama has accomplished outside of Obamacare and getting Bin Laden? Honestly. There are plenty of celebrities who do great things with charities. It is great that they do! They have all this money and pull with regular people. But how many of these celebrities actually oversee the day to day operations of their organizations? I'm sure some do, but most don't. After all they have this free time on their hands.

Quoting Aesma (Reply 13):
I doubt there's a check involved, at least not from the PAC to the actor (maybe the other way around).

In the same reportage about this ad it was said that George Clooney made Obama 15 millions in one dinner.

If there wasn't I feel a little better about his endorsement. Good for George! That is what I mean when I say do something more appropriate. You can't tell me Samuel couldn't have pulled together people to raise money instead of doing this ad.
Blue



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21880 posts, RR: 55
Reply 15, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3126 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 14):
But how many of these entertainers do you think could actually tell you about something Obama has accomplished outside of Obamacare and getting Bin Laden? Honestly.

A lot of them. Honestly.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2847 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3121 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting Mir (Reply 15):
A lot of them. Honestly.

I must just not be paying attention then.
Blue



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13202 posts, RR: 16
Reply 17, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3053 times:

If the Republicans were smart, they would bring attention to these profanity loaded ads to note their offensiveness, the use of 'Hollywood' celebs and the use of children in ads with such content. As a lifelong Democrat, I don't like these ads being used by them, it speaks of a certain desperation, of trying to cut through the clutter and it may turn off some from supporting the party.

User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7982 posts, RR: 51
Reply 18, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2996 times:

Quoting ltbewr (Reply 17):
If the Republicans were smart, they would bring attention to these profanity loaded ads to note their offensiveness, the use of 'Hollywood' celebs and the use of children in ads with such content.

Noooo! The last thing we need are more distractions in this election

As questionable as some of these ads are, I think if the Republicans ran with them more people will just think the Republicans are prudes than get mad at the Democrats, JMO



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 20365 posts, RR: 59
Reply 19, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2946 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 16):
I must just not be paying attention then.
Blue

You aren't.

And if Obama's accomplishments are limited, it is because the GOP has decided that they hate Obama more than they love America. And so to that end, they have blocked just about every piece of legislation he's offered, even when the legislation was written by Republicans, just so that they can accuse him of being unproductive.

It's what Obama has tried to do in spite of GOP opposition that matters more than what he has done. His failure to do so is the fault of a malicious GOP that is trying to sink the country so that they can take power. They even said so outright. And they need to be ousted.


User currently offlinejetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2847 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2928 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting DocLightning (Reply 19):
And if Obama's accomplishments are limited,

To be clear I never said Obama had a lack of accomplishments. I may not agree with some of what he has done, but I'm not one to run around saying he golfs too much and isn't focused on American issues. And in regard to it being the GOP's fault. I would have to disagree a tad. It is both their fault. They're both too blind to make compromises just so they can say it was their bill. The GOP yes has been worse than the democrats. But it is far from limited to just the GOP.
Blue



All of the opinions stated above are mine and do not represent Airliners.net or my employer unless otherwise stated.
User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1413 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2889 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 9):

It was shown on the evening news here on the public channel. The biped fucks were funny, you can say any lie in those ads, but god forbid you would use profanity !

It's an America thing. We have very polarized and often inconsistent views on "swearing."

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 14):

I never said they were unable of understanding something. But how many of these entertainers do you think could actually tell you about something Obama has accomplished outside of Obamacare and getting Bin Laden? Honestly.

A lot of them. In fact, chances are they may know a thing or two more than the average man in the street. I say this because if I'm going to invest my time and money in a cause, I'm not going to do so without a lot of knowledge.

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 14):
But how many of these celebrities actually oversee the day to day operations of their organizations? I'm sure some do, but most don't. After all they have this free time on their hands.

How much do I oversee what goes on in my mutual funds? Because I'm too busy to do so religiously, am I not entitled to what I make off them? Same principle here.

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 14):
You can't tell me Samuel couldn't have pulled together people to raise money instead of doing this ad.

And? This is what he wanted to do, & how he wanted to do it. Good on him.

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 20):
It is both their fault. They're both too blind to make compromises just so they can say it was their bill

Not really. Obama has compromised on goals a great deal more than the GOP occupied congress has or will. To the point that the Affordable Healthcare Act had the two most important parts removed. What equivelant compromise has the GOP made? It's all well and good that we're going to get four more years in the Oval Office, but the real work lay in getting congress back to an acceptable representation of the people. We'll see how that works out.



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4070 posts, RR: 30
Reply 22, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2875 times:

Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 11):
I often wonder if these actors and hollywood types actually understand what they're endorsing or if they just do it for a paycheck.

There is a really interesting video on YouTube about Will Smith defending the "patriotism" of paying high taxes in a French TV show that is very informative about that respect.

Quoting Darksnowynight (Reply 21):
GOP occupied

Wait, I thought you guys were all in favor of occupying things? Oh, I get, occupying private property and shitting on police cars good, legitimately holding office after being elected bad (if someone doesn't share your opinion, of course). Ah, the tolerant left.



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 40076 posts, RR: 74
Reply 23, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2869 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Thread starter):



It's not appropriate for a young child to use this kind of language in regular Hollywood trash movies and certainly not at school. Now to have this in a political advertisement is totally unacceptable - especially endorsing the President. Any person of decency would condemn this commercial but I wouldn't expect that from Obama. Since it's all about him, it's ok in his eyes and his supporters.

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 22):
There is a really interesting video on YouTube about Will Smith defending the "patriotism" of paying high taxes in a French TV show that is very informative about that respect.


...and check out how shocked he was when he found out how much he would be taxed if he lived in France under Hollande.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TwwEGjoRMo



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineDarksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 1413 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2830 times:

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 22):

Wait, I thought you guys were all in favor of occupying things?

Which "you guys" would that be?



Posting without Knowledge is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
User currently offlineAesma From Reunion, joined Nov 2009, 6963 posts, RR: 12
Reply 25, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 2850 times:

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 22):
There is a really interesting video on YouTube about Will Smith defending the "patriotism" of paying high taxes in a French TV show that is very informative about that respect.

I voted for Hollande but I thought that 75% tax bracket was stupid. He knows it (he's an economist) but it's a promise so it is included in the budget that has just been presented. It has been mitigated as much as possible without looking like it was a renunciation, by including other taxes in it and making it a special tax only for two years.

In my opinion it would have been much better to make a new tax code from scratch like he also promised initially (but that promise wasn't in his platform), and the 45% bracket would have been enough once most loopholes are plugged. Reality is that money is needed right now to get to a 3% deficit target in 2013 so there is no time to lose on designing a new tax code. By comparison the US has a 5,5% target and no budget to make it happen so far.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7982 posts, RR: 51
Reply 26, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2836 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 25):
75% tax

75%!?!?!??!?!??!?!  Wow!  Wow!  Wow!

To be fair I personally don't want to make a large amount of money (just enough to comfortably get by, I think tons of money is no good) but geez 75% is insane! Are there any other countries that high?



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4070 posts, RR: 30
Reply 27, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2837 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 25):
He knows it (he's an economist)

No he is not (a real one, anyway), he is an ENA-rque. Your run-of-the-mill functionnaire who has never had a real job.

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 26):
Are there any other countries that high?

Depends on how you measure it. Once you add in other payroll-related taxes that are effectively paid by the taxpayer but hidden as "employer contributions" (hint: there is no such thing) many countries get close to that, although (I believe) that 75% is still subject to other taxes (like employer and employee contributions to social security) so the real number is even higher.



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineAesma From Reunion, joined Nov 2009, 6963 posts, RR: 12
Reply 28, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2817 times:

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 26):
75%!?!?!??!?!??!?! Wow! Wow! Wow!

It's a marginal rate above 1 million euros income, only about 2000 people will get hit. Some who already have said they're fine with it, including one member of the Rothschild family. To note is that since recently income means all income, including from investments.

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 27):
No he is not (a real one, anyway), he is an ENA-rque. Your run-of-the-mill functionnaire who has never had a real job.

Well, before getting into ENA you have to get a good diploma, he actually got three, one in law (he could be a lawyer with it), one in politics, and one in economy (from HEC, a school giving France and the world many CEOs). He taught economy, and was an "accountant" at the cour des comptes (roughly equivalent to the US GAO), giving him a serious background in fiscal matters I would think.

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 27):
although (I believe) that 75% is still subject to other taxes (like employer and employee contributions to social security)

No, that's why I said it had been mitigated. The 75% includes the CSG and CRDS taxes, unlike the 45% bracket.

Really that tax was a political coup, and I think if it had been met with indifference from the left he would have dropped it, but since it proved extremely popular with more than 80% of the electorate from far right to far left, he had to do it. A relatively easy promise to keep.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4070 posts, RR: 30
Reply 29, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2810 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 28):
He taught economy, and was an "accountant" at the cour des comptes (roughly equivalent to the US GAO), giving him a serious background in fiscal matters I would think.

Wasn't he also the idealogue behing Miterrand's disastrous privatization campaign? That should disqualify him from ever making any comments on economics ever again.

Quoting Aesma (Reply 28):
only about 2000 people will get hit

Didn't they specifically come up with exemptions for "entertainers" and professional sportspeople? Think I read it somewhere. If that is the case, how is that even constitutional? Different tax rates depending on what you do for a living? Who defines what is an "entertainer"?

Quoting Aesma (Reply 28):
since it proved extremely popular with more than 80% of the electorate from far right to far left

The French far right is as ignorant about economics as its far left, as the insistence in ridiculous protectionism shows.



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7982 posts, RR: 51
Reply 30, posted (2 years 2 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2797 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 28):
It's a marginal rate above 1 million euros income, only about 2000 people will get hit. Some who already have said they're fine with it, including one member of the Rothschild family. To note is that since recently income means all income, including from investments.

I mean I'd be fine with it, the max I'd ever want is maybe 150,000 USD (maybe, not there yet, but that seems like more than enough) but even 1 million euros doesn't seem like that much. You only have 2,000 of them in France? Well at least they're fine with it  



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinecws818 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 1176 posts, RR: 2
Reply 31, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2667 times:

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 29):

Quoting Aesma (Reply 28):
He taught economy, and was an "accountant" at the cour des comptes (roughly equivalent to the US GAO), giving him a serious background in fiscal matters I would think.

Wasn't he also the idealogue behing Miterrand's disastrous privatization campaign? That should disqualify him from ever making any comments on economics ever again.

You seem to have a problem with freedom of speech. Perhaps you should conduct a reassessment.



volgende halte...Station Hollands Spoor
User currently offlinewindy95 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 2755 posts, RR: 8
Reply 32, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2607 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 9):
The biped fucks were funny, you can say any lie in those ads, but god forbid you would use profanity !

Exactly. Noboby was calling out Jackson for the bullshit and lies in his ad. Just the language. But with the child in the ad it was done in poor taste and never should of been done.. What was really funny was the millionaire Jackson calling out?? Millionaires. I wonder how much he donates to the Fed every year?



OMG-Obama Must Go
User currently offlineslider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6924 posts, RR: 34
Reply 33, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2535 times:

Welcome to the Demcoratic Party, circa 2012.

A party representing special interest groups.

They're the party of "Wake the F Up", free birth control, Obamaphones, Mitt Romney killing a guy, Paul Ryan throwing Grandma off the cliff and other chart-topping hits.

It's all they have left, really. Pathetic.

But what do you expect? When the record of EPIC FAILURE is as monumental as Obama's is, you have to run on demagoguery, deflection, deceit and distortion.


User currently offlinecws818 From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 1176 posts, RR: 2
Reply 34, posted (2 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Quoting slider (Reply 33):
Welcome to the Demcoratic Party, circa 2012.

A party representing special interest groups.

Does the Republican Party not represent other special interest groups?



volgende halte...Station Hollands Spoor
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Most Offensive Ad Ever? posted Tue Aug 25 2009 12:58:24 by BMIFlyer
ABC Tries To Cover Up Obama's "glance" posted Fri Jul 10 2009 07:03:16 by JakeOrion
NOM-The Gathering Storm Ad, Gone Too Far? posted Tue Apr 14 2009 10:05:46 by Dtwclipper
The New Pontiac Ad - Arggggggh! posted Thu Sep 27 2007 06:13:03 by AsstChiefMark
EWS / Lew - The New A.Net 'Ad' Man? posted Sat Aug 5 2006 12:27:12 by BMIFlyer
What's The Song In The New Seat Ad Called? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 21:29:54 by TheSorcerer
Last Week's "The Apprentice" Ad Campaign Project posted Tue Feb 15 2005 18:05:37 by EA CO AS
Michael Jackson: "I'm The Victim" posted Mon Jan 31 2005 11:15:56 by 777ER
The Evil Kangaroo Ad posted Fri Jul 23 2004 23:27:01 by ConcordeLoss
Aristide Spews It Out And Jackson Soaks It Up. posted Wed Mar 3 2004 06:52:18 by AWspicious