brilondon From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 3175 posts, RR: 1 Posted (7 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1606 times:
I think that Jerry Sandusky got off lightly. He should have been given life in prison. Hopefully his cell mate will do to him what he did to those young boys.
DeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 5309 posts, RR: 47 Reply 4, posted (7 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1565 times:
He's a child molester in prison... for the rest of his life (unless he lives to be 98 or 128 if he doesn't get parole)... he's not going to enjoy the rest of his life, I can assure you (child molesters are hated by inmates)
BMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 14337 posts, RR: 26 Reply 6, posted (7 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1522 times:
Quoting Revelation (Reply 3): Not yet, but I'm almost positive he'll end up being some bull's bee-otch in the big house.
I want to say that after he was found guilty he didn't understand why he wasn't in the main jail area. To me, that would be an indication of just how sick and twisted he is if he doesn't understand why he would be in danger.
Quoting Revelation (Reply 5): They'll say helpful things like "It's shower time, Jerry - don't forget the soap!"
Just some rhythmic slapping sounds. And some horseplay, you know, boys will be boys.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
Chances are there's a shiv or pecker erect in his near future. From what I've read and understand on jail house culture Short Eyes kiddy perv diddlers are at the bottom of the incarceration food chain and usually meet up with that special prison Welcome Wagon.
ltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12335 posts, RR: 12 Reply 9, posted (7 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1501 times:
It is too bad that he wasn't caught, tried and convicted 15-20 years ago and got a 50 year sentence. He was able to get away with his crimes for at least 30 years so no sentence will be sufficient for the obscene damage he did to those then kids who have to live with the abuse for all their lives which could be 60-70 years.
As much as many of us want him to be raped in prison like he did to those boys, better would be to be put into solidarity, alone with no human contact but his guards, no tv, no radio, a bare single cell in the darkest place in the prison serving 'penance' to his death.
It will be interesting the sentences to the Penn State officials who covered up Sandusky's crimes to 'protect the school'. They also need to go to jail for the rest of their remaining lives for their gross crimes. If they did the right thing over 10 years ago, so much suffering could have been prevented.
BMI727 From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 14337 posts, RR: 26 Reply 12, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1461 times:
I hope that if Jerry is abused in prison someone notices and reports it at which point the offender(s) is promptly dealt with. That would be a much nicer "F*** You" to Sandusky and the Penn State deniers.
Why do Aerospace Engineering students have to turn things in on time?
seb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9826 posts, RR: 17 Reply 13, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1457 times:
*Some* molesters show remorse. *Some* molesters know they broke the law. This guy thinks he is the victim. Life in prison is too good for him. This man is touched in the head.
Revelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 10468 posts, RR: 20 Reply 15, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1396 times:
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 11): Who cares about that 8th Amendment though.
Apparently Sandusky didn't think raping defenseless victims was was cruel or unusual.
Maybe he'll change his mind when he's on the receiving side.
As above, he still accepts no responsibility for his crimes, and states all he did was help these boys.
I doubt years of solitary confinement will change his mind about it, but who knows...
QFA380 From Australia, joined Jul 2005, 2029 posts, RR: 1 Reply 17, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1384 times:
Quoting Revelation (Reply 15): Apparently Sandusky didn't think raping defenseless victims was was cruel or unusual.
I've never understood this line of thinking. Of course he didn't think it, however he has had his rights removed because of it. Why don't you go rape him yourself if you think thats what he deserves? Of course you wouldn't, just like you would probably not pull the trigger or push the needle into someone. You wouldn't do it because you're a rational, reasonable human being with a conscience.
Now tell me what the difference between you doing it personally and you de facto authorising someone else to do it is?
The whole reason cruel and unusual punishment is banned, is to separate the nation from the criminal, a critical distinction, otherwise you're just as bad as them.
falstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 5673 posts, RR: 29 Reply 18, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1384 times:
Quoting D L X (Reply 7): Do you think 68 year old Jerry Sandusky is going to live to 98-128?
Pretty unlikely. Especially with, you know, how child rapists are treated in prison.
Statistically he has around 10 years left, so it is unlikely he'll ever get out of prison. I am sure he'll get what he deserves in prison, hell; he could end up dead.
Quoting Max Q (Reply 14): Sandusky should have been executed.
I agree, but you can't be executed for that crime. I would like to see one the one bullet in the back of the head treatment to a lot of these guys and if they don't die let them bleed to death in a gutter.
Sandusky may be executed yet... Remember Jeffery Dahmer? That guy was beaten to death in prison with a mop, which had to take a while.
Ken777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 7458 posts, RR: 5 Reply 19, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1376 times:
Who cares about that 8th Amendment though.
Sandusky received a fair trial and the punishment he is receiving is reasonable when compared to his crimes. He was eligible for a sentence of up to 400 years.
Cruel & unusual are the attacks that Sandusky carried out on young bouts. If he believes anal rape is "normal" then he will be most comfortable in prison.
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): just like you would probably not pull the trigger or push the needle into someone. You wouldn't do it because you're a rational, reasonable human being with a conscience.
A lot of folks in Oklahoma (including me) would have had no problem pushing the needle on McVey.
Actually, yes, there are precious few criminals who are convicted of a crime and, later understand they did something wrong and actually try to change. Not many, but it does happen.
Also, this is one reason I don't believe in the death penalty. Criminals should just sit in a cell and be left to think about what they did and how it affects the loved ones.
But, Sandusky is such an ego maniac, he will never understand he did anything bad or wrong.
falstaff From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 5673 posts, RR: 29 Reply 21, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1340 times:
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): Why don't you go rape him yourself if you think thats what he deserves?
That isn't my thing, but I would hit the guy with a pipe or a chain if I had the chance.
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): Of course you wouldn't, just like you would probably not pull the trigger or push the needle into someone
I'd do it in the blink of an eye if I needed to and the guy deserved it. If I saw a guy like Sandusky doing great bodily harm to somebody I would not hesitate to pull my gun on him and shoot him. Deadly force is ok to use when you or someone near you is in a possible life threatening situation. If I saw some dude, raping a child I would probably shoot him because a reasonable person would think there is a fair chance that kid will end up dead. The news is always reporting a story about a child who has been raped and murdered.
Quoting Ken777 (Reply 19): A lot of folks in Oklahoma (including me) would have had no problem pushing the needle on McVey.
I bet that some people thought that was even too good for that guy.
AviRaider From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 163 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1339 times:
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 11): Here come the knee jerkers every time we have a high profile crime/criminal...
How is that a knee jerk reaction? That should be everyone's reaction. Of course the court isn't sanctioning that kind of punishment, it will happen away from the guard's eyes though. And while I wouldn't wish anyone to experience rape, I can't say I have any ounce of sympathy for him. What he did was unconscionable and he deserves whatever comes to him.
Revelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 10468 posts, RR: 20 Reply 24, posted (7 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1327 times:
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): Of course he didn't think it, however he has had his rights removed because of it.
Not sure why you are saying he's had his rights removed.
Certainly not because I posted a vengeful opinion on an Internet forum, I hope.
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): Why don't you go rape him yourself if you think thats what he deserves?
I'd not do that for the obvious reason, but this is a case where I'd personally administer pain to the best of my ability. We're talking about an adult scum who has been committed repeated crimes over decades of time and has no remorse for his juvenile victims. Justice is not being served in this case.
Quoting QFA380 (Reply 17): The whole reason cruel and unusual punishment is banned, is to separate the nation from the criminal, a critical distinction, otherwise you're just as bad as them.
I'm a human being having a vengeful thought, one that I think is very well provoked by this man's actions.
It happens.
Personally, I do not think justice has been served in this case, because I do not see how living his life out in prison is going to change his state of mind one bit, nor make much of an improvement in the lives of his many victims. However, I can see how him getting a bit of "prison justice" just might.
Inspiration, move me brightly!
25 QFA380: One's rights are rather curtailed in prison... Perhaps you should move to Saudi or somewhere where the punishment is more befitting of the crime and
26 stratosphere: I am a die in the wool person who supports the death penalty but I am satisfied with what he got.. He will never see the light of day at his age and h
27 Revelation: I know a blast of righteous indignation when one is fired at me. Congratulations to you for your ability to stay detached.
29 zippyjet: Got a great idea! Put Sandusky in a room and play over and over again 1. The Macarana 2. Mambo # 5 3. Move Like Jagger 4. Who Let the Dogs Out 5. That
30 BMI727: We can have the guys at Gitmo pass along a playlist.
31 MaverickM11: He probably is in the right place but I find it hard to believe that anyone in their right mind would molest children, which makes the situation more
32 BMI727: He was caught earlier, but it was covered up to protect the Penn State football program. Rather than recognizing that, many Penn State people seek to
33 zippyjet: For Penn State, their football program was their "state religion!" Whistle blowers or anyone who wanted to sing like a canary were offered deals they
34 MaverickM11: This is why I can't really get on-board the hope-he-gets-raped train. Sandusky is awful but I wonder if he could control his urges. The Penn State of
35 zippyjet: Or at least be made to fear getting "Sanduskied" themselves. Sorry to rag on you but State College, PA. is in the heart of nowheresville! There's not
Sponsor Message: 
From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 3175 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 14337 posts, 
From Australia, joined Jul 2005, 2029 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
