Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Illegal To Help The Homeless  
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1737 times:

From back in March, but I couldn't find anything about this.

Yep, in New York City, you can't help the homeless. Sure, you can donate money that they will then use to buy drugs and alcohol, but you can't donate food anymore. Why? Because the government can't monitor the salt, fat, and fiber content of the food you're donating.

This is what happens when people can't make decisions for themselves and blame McDonalds for making them fat. No, its your own damn fault for not controlling yourself. I'll bet most homeless people are happy to get food and aren't worried about the exact nutritional value of it.

First no more large soft drinks. Now you can't give food to the homeless. What's next? Can't cook your own food in the kitchen, because you might put too much sugar in the sauce?

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/03/...ns-food-donations-to-the-homeless/

[Edited 2012-11-12 14:32:00]


The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRussianJet From Kyrgyzstan, joined Jul 2007, 7630 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1739 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

So buy them something from a restaurant or cafe. I'm happy to buy the odd person who really looks like they need it a hot drink or something.

But yes, not a good thing at all to ban people from making donations of food, allowing such basic assistance from those who want to give more than money.



✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1740 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):
What's next? Can't cook your own food in the kitchen, because you might put too much sugar in the sauce?

Do you live in New York City?



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting mt99 (Reply 2):
Do you live in New York City?

Why do you ask?



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1742 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 3):

Why do you ask?

To see how this impacts you personally...



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7276 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1742 times:

Quoting mt99 (Reply 4):
To see how this impacts you personally...

Why does it have to impact him for him to open up a thread? Should I never post in European threads? Should we tell the Europeans to stay out of US politics threads?



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8617 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):
This is what happens when people can't make decisions for themselves and blame McDonalds for making them fat. No, its your own damn fault for not controlling yourself.

That's the reason for obesity epidemics. If you have several multi-billion dollar corporations selling essentially addictive high sugar, high fat, high sodium fast "food" to people, give them free reign in ad-land (Playgrounds? WTF?!) as well as lobbyville and fail to educate your children on nutrition, you'll make your people sick. People don't need to be protected from themselves, they need to be protected from the onslaught of "Just grab a bite, it's so easy and cheap!" advertising.

As for giving McDonald's products to homeless people, that's just cruel. They'll feel even more hungry when the hyperglycaemia ends... which is the whole point of that rubbish in the first place.

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 5):
Why does it have to impact him for him to open up a thread? Should I never post in European threads? Should we tell the Europeans to stay out of US politics threads?

Well, for a kickoff he MIGHT (hypothetically speaking) be employed by a fast "food" corporation... are you familiar with the term "astroturfing"?

[Edited 2012-11-12 15:15:18]


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlinesomething From United Kingdom, joined May 2011, 1633 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1739 times:

This is probably the most ridiculous piece of right wing propaganda I have heard this week.   

Just as a general rule of thumb: When an article ends the sentences with exclamation marks and uses evocative terms like ''strikes again'', ''edict'', ''food police'' you are probably reading about the misinformed opinion of the author (who in this case appears to be 12 years old). Not about the facts.

By the way, I tried to google the issue as I had not previously heard of it and the only references to this I can find come from the same type of quality news.



..sick of it. -K. Pilkington.
User currently offlinelewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3592 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1739 times:

Good thing that such laws, despite the legal idiocy around CA, do not exist here yet. I have given out food to the homeless down the street many times, especially after company events when the options for left over food are "take home or throw away"

User currently offlineltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12880 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1738 times:

A sound reason for such a policy - food safety. This is probably to prevent any food borne diseases from unregulated preparers or facilities or from unsafe distribution (for example, foods that should be kept refrigerated are not).

User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8617 posts, RR: 43
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting something (Reply 7):
This is probably the most ridiculous piece of right wing propaganda I have heard this week.

Well, perhaps someone from New York City is able to find the actual "edict" behind this story?

[Edited 2012-11-12 15:22:55]


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlinerutley21 From United States of America, joined Apr 2009, 179 posts, RR: 31
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1742 times:

I was homeless for two years, and this makes me speechless. No one really understands it until you are living it.


Rob



If you're not willing to give up everything, You've already lost.
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting aloges (Reply 6):
Well, for a kickoff he MIGHT (hypothetically speaking) be employed by a fast "food" corporation... are you familiar with the term "astroturfing"?

Yeah, as me living in NYC or not means I do or do not work for a fast food corporation? lol. No, I do not work for a fast food corporation.

Quoting mt99 (Reply 4):
To see how this impacts you personally...

Fair enough - but not your business.

Quoting something (Reply 7):
This is probably the most ridiculous piece of right wing propaganda I have heard this week.

Oh, ok. Well, here you go: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...erg-bans-food-donat_n_1367542.html

Is that better? At least it's liberal-er-ish.... 
Quoting aloges (Reply 6):
As for giving McDonald's products to homeless people, that's just cruel.

I agree. But the example cited in the article is bagels. I don't think there's anything cruel about bagels. Not sure who came up with the idea that this thread is referring to fast food only.

Quoting aloges (Reply 6):
That's the reason for obesity epidemics.

I disagree, the reason is because of stupid people who can't think further out than 5 minutes. Same with couples who get pregnant and shouldn't. It's not for lack of condoms. Anyway, neither here nor there I guess.



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlineQuokkas From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

It is not illegal to help the homeless. All the linked articles suggest is that donations of food are not accepted. You can still donate money (even specifying which shelter is to benefit); donate clothing, toys and furniture; donate tickets to social and cultural events, etc.

Of course, you can still offer people accommodation, skills training and a job, should you be in a position to do so. So there are plenty of ways to help people without taking yesterday's pizza or grandma's soup.

[Edited 2012-11-12 19:14:02]

User currently offlinetype-rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4845 posts, RR: 19
Reply 14, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

In Houston they had a law which stated if you were going to feed more than 6 homeless people you needed to have the food prepared by a professional commercial kitchen. The reasoning is that individuals and church groups might not prepare the food properly and make the homeless people sick.

This was in the past two years or so and I remember it caused a big uproar with charity groups.



Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offlinemt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6546 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1738 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DeltaMD90 (Reply 5):
Should I never post in European threads? Should we tell the Europeans to stay out of US politics threads?

Thats right! Thanks for agreeing with me



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlinefrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 3613 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

This is degrading to the homeless, as if they needed the extra depreciation.

We are now officially treating them like animals by trying to control the food they're fed.
How about we let them decide what they want to eat. They aren't forced to eat what's given to them. Why shouldn't they have the choice to accept the food that's given to them when the rest of have the choice of what we're eating?

On the other hand, when we give them money, they are free to choose what they're doing with it, so they can eat at McDonald's or, often, spend it at the liquor store...

Not sure if this is some sort of sensationalistic or agenda-motivated report, but if any of it is true, I think priorities need to be straightened.



Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
User currently offlinejohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2563 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting rutley21 (Reply 11):
I was homeless for two years, and this makes me speechless. No one really understands it until you are living it.

Hope things are going better for you now.


User currently offlineQuokkas From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting francoflier (Reply 16):
We are now officially treating them like animals by trying to control the food they're fed.

This is about food donations to shelters administered by NYC. It isn't about you giving something to someone that you meet.

I discussed food waste with EK lounge staff while in HAM last year and was advised that EK (and other caterers) can not donate unused food to the homeless or unemployed due to food storage and handling regulations. This is common practice in may countries.

There is no restriction on money being donated to shelters and that money being used to buy fresh products to provide meals. With private donations of food, unless it is in its original packaging, the centres have no idea of how old it is, whether it has been stored correctly or whether it is likely to cause food poisoning. It's not about restricting choice but assuring quality.


User currently offlinehelvknight From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting something (Reply 7):
This is probably the most ridiculous piece of right wing propaganda I have heard this week.   

Just as a general rule of thumb: When an article ends the sentences with exclamation marks and uses evocative terms like ''strikes again'', ''edict'', ''food police'' you are probably reading about the misinformed opinion of the author (who in this case appears to be 12 years old). Not about the facts.

It's very similar to the anti-EU articles you get in British papers like the Mail or the Express,

Take a regulation, apply the most bizarre interpretation that you can think of to it and then publish.

I have a strong feeling that the OP got this from an email sent through the Conservative Email Forwarding Network.


User currently offlineunattendedbag From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 2311 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):
Sure, you can donate money that they will then use to buy drugs and alcohol, but you can't donate food anymore. Why?

Not once in your opening post did you mention "shelters" or the distinction in the article between donating to shelters or directly to the homeless. Why?



Slower traffic, keep right
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting unattendedbag (Reply 20):
Not once in your opening post did you mention "shelters" or the distinction in the article between donating to shelters or directly to the homeless. Why?

It is the homeless people that are affected in the end. Surely you realize that not every religious organization can afford the time or effort to hand out the left-over food to each individual homeless person on the street. If they can't donate it to shelters anymore, then they can't donate food.

Look, we hear all these stats about 'food insecurity' and starvation and people going hungry. Now I'm getting the feeling from this thread that it's not a big deal - homeless people can get food without the help of donations of leftover food. Which is it? Can't have the cake and eat it too. Either the starvation stats issued are wrong and a discredit to the organizations that produce them, OR this is a big deal.

If shelters don't get enough food, then homeless will turn elsewhere - including dumpsters behind stores and restaurants. Anybody want to condone that?

For those of you saying, "you can still donate money", the point is people donate left-over food and may not or will not donate money. This law prevents a source of food from being donated now. I doubt these organizations that can no longer donate will say "oh, ok, we'll just donate money now" - because they don't have that money to donate necessarily.



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8617 posts, RR: 43
Reply 22, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 21):
Look, we hear all these stats about 'food insecurity' and starvation and people going hungry. Now I'm getting the feeling from this thread that it's not a big deal - homeless people can get food without the help of donations of leftover food. Which is it?

How about a social security system that does away with the need for food donations?



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 23, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting aloges (Reply 22):
How about a social security system that does away with the need for food donations?

The pre-requisite for doing away with the need for food donations is to have such a system in place. Which we don't have.

You don't jump out of an airplane and then ask for a parachute.



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8617 posts, RR: 43
Reply 24, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 23):
You don't jump out of an airplane and then ask for a parachute.

Nicely put. The same applies to giving out food in shelters without being able to vouch for its safety: you don't give people health problems and then start caring about the safety of that food - which is probably the background of the article.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlinecmf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 25, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1755 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 21):
Surely you realize that not every religious organization can afford the time or effort to hand out the left-over food to each individual homeless person on the street. If they can't donate it to shelters anymore, then they can't donate food.

Have you thought about the cost to the shelters for sorting and verifying food donations?

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 21):
the point is people donate left-over food and may not or will not donate money.

Maybe it is time to stop ordering a lot of food, because we just give leftovers to the homeless. Stop the waste. Order what you need. Give the money saved to the shelter. It will feed a lot more homeless.


User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7917 posts, RR: 12
Reply 26, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week ago) and read 1760 times:

Quoting aloges (Reply 22):
How about a social security system that does away with the need for food donations?

I'd embrace it; sadly we don't have such a system here in Germany. To the contrary, the number of those in need has constantly raised over the past years to now 1.5 million. At the same time, the Bavarian State Revenue Office wanted to impose VAT (7%) on those food donations. Granted, the idea died a quick (albeit not painless) dead, but I sure wish it wouldn't have been brought up in the first place.



I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 27, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

Quoting cmf (Reply 25):
Maybe it is time to stop ordering a lot of food, because we just give leftovers to the homeless. Stop the waste. Order what you need. Give the money saved to the shelter. It will feed a lot more homeless.

Hey, if you can come up with a sure-fire way of ensuring that guests eat ALL food that is there, and at the same time don't ever want any more than what was there, you could probably be a rich man.

Quoting aloges (Reply 24):
you don't give people health problems and then start caring about the safety of that food

People are trying to prevent health problems from starvation when they donate food. So, to prevent potential health problems from unsafe food (which, in my opinion, is more likely to come from random strangers donating food to a single homeless person than from an established organization donating some leftovers), we just starve the homeless.

Wow, good plan.

Obviously we don't see eye-to-eye on this.  



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlinelewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3592 posts, RR: 5
Reply 28, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1758 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 27):

Hey, if you can come up with a sure-fire way of ensuring that guests eat ALL food that is there,

  

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 27):
People are trying to prevent health problems from starvation when they donate food.

I would also add that the pizzas and fancy sandwiches we bring in the office through catering are clean and much better than food leftovers extracted from a trash bin. It is something that we often take home with us at the end of the day, not something that is inedible. But, if people would rather see that thrown in the trash, fine by me, i won't insist on giving it to someone who will end up sleeping on an empty stomach.


User currently offlinecmf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 29, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1758 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 27):
Hey, if you can come up with a sure-fire way of ensuring that guests eat ALL food that is there, and at the same time don't ever want any more than what was there, you could probably be a rich man.

Why do you jump to extremes? You did it in the OP. For example, stating you can't give food to homeless when clearly it is that certain shelters will not accept it, BIG difference. Even worse, the suggestion that giving money is equal to buying drugs and alcohol.

What I stated was to stop the wasteful over ordering justified by claiming that anything extra isn't really wasteful because it is given to the homeless. Don't turn that in to crazy extremes.


User currently offlinealoges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8617 posts, RR: 43
Reply 30, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1755 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 27):
So, to prevent potential health problems from unsafe food (...), we just starve the homeless.

one question:

Quoting cmf (Reply 29):
Why do you jump to extremes?



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineALTF4 From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1199 posts, RR: 4
Reply 31, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1754 times:

Quoting cmf (Reply 29):
clearly it is that certain shelters will not accept it

No, that is not true. You're the one twisting the truth here. There is, according to the article, a LAW saying they CANNOT accept it. Far, far, far different from shelters just "not accepting" it. If individual shelters decide not to accept food, that is fine. But to have a blanket ruling from the government saying "no more leftover food donations" is quite a different story.

Quoting cmf (Reply 29):
Even worse, the suggestion that giving money is equal to buying drugs and alcohol.

So, what do you think homeless people do when you give them $20 on the side of the road? Donate it to the red cross? Use it to buy a book? Yes, donating money to a shelter ensures it is put to good use, but the whole point is people donating leftover food without having to donate money. They're still helping how they can.

Quoting cmf (Reply 29):
What I stated was to stop the wasteful over ordering justified by claiming that anything extra isn't really wasteful because it is given to the homeless. Don't turn that in to crazy extremes.

So, let's say your hypothetical daughter was getting married. Wouldn't you err on the side of too much food, because you want to make the guests happy and your daughter happy? Or would you err on the side of too little food and would tell the guests "too bad. You can go home and eat, or there's a Wendy's down the road". I don't get the impression from the article that the gentleman noted was giving hundreds of bagels at once for years and years.

Quoting aloges (Reply 30):
one question:

As I said before, which everybody conveniently over-looked, there are organizations that claim we have a huge problem with hunger both in the U.S. and around the world. If we take away a potential food source for hungry people, we make the problem worse. I fail to see how that is an extreme thing to say.

So, either denounce those organizations as liars, or face the fact that a law like this right now only makes the problem worse. Should we be worried about food safety for everybody? Yes, of course. I never said otherwise. Is it right to take away food like this just because it might possibly (but probably not) be unsafe? I don't think so, because in doing so, we make people go hungry.



The above post is my opinion. Don't like it? Don't read it.
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6109 posts, RR: 9
Reply 32, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

I'm not sure how left-overs got into the discussion, because there is no way to donate such safely, outside of just inviting the homeless in your restaurant at the end of the shift or something similar (that some places do). Left-overs are to be eaten right away or discarded. In fact since McDonald's has been mentioned, they put burgers in the trash if they have been sitting for something like 10 minutes.

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):
First no more large soft drinks

A perfectly reasonable thing in my opinion. In fact those were never sold here to begin with (without the need of a regulation, just common sense).

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):
blame McDonalds for making them fat

In a country where you can actually put McDonald's in front of a court for that, why not do it ?



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlinecmf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 33, posted (1 year 5 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1746 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 31):
No, that is not true. You're the one twisting the truth here.

I'll be happy to be proven wrong but my understanding is that it only affects public shelters.

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 31):
So, what do you think homeless people do when you give them $20 on the side of the road? Donate it to the red cross? Use it to buy a book? Yes, donating money to a shelter ensures it is put to good use, but the whole point is people donating leftover food without having to donate money. They're still helping how they can.

Most of them buy food. If you worry so much about them buying drugs and alcohol then give the money to the shelter. They will get much more for those $20 than you or the homeless will.

Quoting ALTF4 (Reply 31):
Wouldn't you err on the side of too much food, because you want to make the guests happy and your daughter happy?

I'm coming from a restaurant family. Throwing away food is extremely expensive so there are tight controls. A wedding is actually a simple event to predict as you know how many people will be there and almost always it is a set menu.

But back to your point. It isn't that there is no overage. It is that you do keep the overage at a minimum. You do not justify a lot of overage with that "the food isn't wasted because we give it to the homeless."

As I said, order a little bit less, it will be enough, and give the money saved to the shelter. They will get much more food for that money than you would.


User currently offlinezippyjet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 5404 posts, RR: 12
Reply 34, posted (1 year 5 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1744 times:

Quoting ALTF4 (Thread starter):



You can thank those Blank damned lawyers!. Even before Nanny Bloomberg came to rule NYC, thanks to our sue happy society and those leeches called attorneys, good food has to go to waste. Besides the homeless getting short sh-rifted, the good old days of taking home good left over food are long gone. I'm old enough to remember my Bar Mitzvah (back in 1969). My parents worked hard and scrimped so I could have a nice one. The caterer had tons of left over food. My parents loaded up the Country Squire wagon and hauled the goodies home. They froze it and we enjoyed special treats for months and none of us got those nasty evil food diseases the lawyers and nannies proclaim are ever present. My parents had the common sense how to handle food. Most of us in this country have the common sense on how to handle food in spite of our being dumbed down to such sh*t as Honey Boo Boo, Twilight, Justin Bieber and stupid obnoxious marathon Black Friday cattle car sales. NYC, you should be ashamed of yourself for such stupidity. What now? Are you going to deny food to those poor sould who were maimed by Hurricane Sandy because there's the fear of too much salt, sugar and trans fats? Shame on you Mayor Nanny Bloomberg.



I'm Zippyjet & I approve of this message!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Top Ten Ways To Help The New Orleans Saints posted Tue Nov 22 2005 22:17:50 by MSYtristar
Fox Network Wanted To Sue The Simpsons Now? posted Thu Oct 30 2003 03:53:55 by Superfly
Now, Time To Face The "Fiscal Cliff"! posted Wed Nov 7 2012 04:30:15 by Revelation
It's Now Illegal To Annoy Folks On Forums. posted Mon Jan 9 2006 23:08:02 by LHMARK
Possible Way To Help Clean Up The Water posted Mon Sep 5 2005 02:20:49 by DLKAPA
What To Do About Illegal Immigration In The US? posted Mon Jun 20 2005 02:09:00 by FlyingTexan
Trying To Help Understand The War posted Thu Mar 20 2003 21:15:21 by Galaxy5
Girl Help, The Problems Worse Now. posted Sun Aug 26 2001 07:29:00 by Kcle
What's Up With SS United States And The QE2 Now? posted Sat Nov 10 2012 21:29:53 by United Airline
Hurricane Sandy To Help Obama? posted Wed Oct 31 2012 09:49:44 by bmacleod