Aesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 4782 posts, RR: 9 Reply 5, posted (4 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1759 times:
I thought you didn't need any reason to fire somebody in the US ?
Looks to me like she was fired normally and sued in return alleging that some rule had been broken, and the courts decided there was no protection for her, which doesn't seem that far fetched.
New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
jetblueguy22 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 2021 posts, RR: 1 Reply 8, posted (4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1685 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW FORUM MODERATOR
Although it isn't right how she was fired, why would she want to work for someone like that anyways? I'd be more than happy to leave and work for someone who appreciates my skill and could keep it in their pants! Though I feel like this was an affair gone wrong...
Blue
Professor Foltz: You push down on that yolk, the houses get bigger, you pull back on the yolk, the houses get bigger.
vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 8203 posts, RR: 28 Reply 9, posted (4 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 1654 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Seems to me that she should have sued for sexual harrassment for the comments he made instead ("if you see my pants bulging" etc.). Probably would have been a stronger case.
"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
LMP737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (4 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1595 times:
Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 9): Seems to me that she should have sued for sexual harrassment for the comments he made instead ("if you see my pants bulging" etc.). Probably would have been a stronger case.
That's what I was thinking.
Quoting cmf (Reply 6): Right to work is the marketing name. It really should be called right to fire.
The same thing could have happened to her in a state that does not have right to work laws.
Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 8): Although it isn't right how she was fired, why would she want to work for someone like that anyways?
I'm wondering how many patients of his will decide to go elsewhere over this episode?
Aaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 7630 posts, RR: 28 Reply 11, posted (4 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 1586 times:
Wives are expendable. What a jerk - these two must be the gruesome twosome. Definitely think this employee should have filed a sexual harassment claim instead.
If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
steeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 8807 posts, RR: 19 Reply 12, posted (4 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1528 times:
Quoting JakeOrion (Reply 4): Very dangerous game Iowa is playing. If she can be terminated because she is "hot" then what is to prevent employers from firing ugly people now?
Do not agree with this ruling at all. At least we know who wears the pants in that home, what a weeny.
My sentiments exactly. So she has a good body. If she's a good employee, then why does it matter what she looks like? That boss is a putz, and his wife is an insecure not-too-trusting pain in the @$$...
Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
Darksnowynight From United States of America, joined Jan 2012, 979 posts, RR: 1 Reply 14, posted (4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1422 times:
Seems to me that she should have sued for sexual harrassment for the comments he made instead ("if you see my pants bulging" etc.). Probably would have been a stronger case.
Sounds about right. And I'm not sure there's anything stopping that happening in the future. She should bankrupt this toad.
Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 11):
Wives are expendable. What a jerk - these two must be the gruesome twosome.
Seriously. If she's so insecure that even the thought of competition does this to her, she has zero value as wife on that basis alone. I can only imagine what living with such a troll is like. But if he's willing to harm a 3rd party to appease that shrew, he deserves her anyway.
Posting without Talent is simply Tolerated Vandalism... We are the Vandals.
Pyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 3537 posts, RR: 28 Reply 15, posted (4 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1296 times:
Quoting JakeOrion (Reply 4): Very dangerous game Iowa is playing. If she can be terminated because she is "hot" then what is to prevent employers from firing ugly people now?
Not to defend this decision, which I find strangely odd, but discriminating someone based on looks happens all the time, particularly for sales / customer service positions. When was the last time you saw an unattractive waiter at Hooter's? If you are a bouncer in a night-club in NYC you are even allowed to discriminate based on gender, but just as long as it is against dudes I am sure it is fine.
Quoting jetblueguy22 (Reply 8): Although it isn't right how she was fired, why would she want to work for someone like that anyways? I'd be more than happy to leave and work for someone who appreciates my skill and could keep it in their pants! Though I feel like this was an affair gone wrong...
Not to mention the damage this public case has probably done to his dental practice.
Quoting LMP737 (Reply 10): The same thing could have happened to her in a state that does not have right to work laws.
Of course, but don't feed the trolls.
Quoting Revelation (Reply 13): I hope the Lamborghini got out of the garage from time to time..
That has got to be the best / weirdest comment of all.
Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2008, 154 posts, 
From Norway, joined Aug 2006, 3228 posts, 
From France, joined Oct 2001, 3195 posts, 
From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 3854 posts, 
Absolutely ! 
From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 7630 posts, 
From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 3537 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
