Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Court: Obama N.L.R.B Appointments Unconstitutional  
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26166 posts, RR: 50
Posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

In what could muddy waters for the airline industry, Federal Appeals Court found that National Labor Relations Board decisions during the past year are invalid because President Obama exceeded his constitutional authority when appointing three member board last January while Senate was in recess.

Story:
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...-on-finance-protection-agency?lite

=


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN62NA From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4593 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1341 times:

At the risk of getting political, and I'm not holding this opinion because it was Obama / a Democrat that made these appointments, but to claim the Senate was in recess was so blatantly inaccurate... this would have HAD to be overturned at some point. Glad that the plaintiffs brought suit (and won).

User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1923 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1278 times:

What's the Constitution? That isn't still used in the US is it?


They're not handing trophies out today
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8965 posts, RR: 24
Reply 3, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1254 times:

Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter):
appointing three member board last January while Senate was NOT in recess.

Just correcting a typo, I suppose. Congress had reconvened after the holidays on Jan 3rd. Obama made the appointments on the 4th.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29839 posts, RR: 58
Reply 4, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1254 times:

I thinking is a big reach to get Obummer to follow the constitution.

This ruling is welcome but expect him to appeal.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5797 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (1 year 11 months 3 days ago) and read 1241 times:

I don't disagree in general but I do disagree with the tendency for legislatures to "hold hostage" and not approve anyone or allow anyone to be approved. It's game playing on both sides rather than actually working and getting the job of the country done.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8965 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1177 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 5):

I don't disagree in general but I do disagree with the tendency for legislatures to "hold hostage" and not approve anyone or allow anyone to be approved.

That is part of our checks and balances. Lacking a sufficient party majority, he must appoint people respectable and centrist enough to be approved.

As it is, last year the Republican-controlled House and the Senate passed a law reducing the number of positions requiring Senate approval by something like 20%. So it's hardly the GOP that is holding everything hostage. The Senate has approved, with GOP agreement, hundreds and hundreds of Obama appointees.

If he can't get some people passed, it indicates more of a problem with the candidates than with the process.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlinetugger From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 5797 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Quoting Dreadnought (Reply 6):
That is part of our checks and balances. Lacking a sufficient party majority, he must appoint people respectable and centrist enough to be approved.

As it is, last year the Republican-controlled House and the Senate passed a law reducing the number of positions requiring Senate approval by something like 20%. So it's hardly the GOP that is holding everything hostage. The Senate has approved, with GOP agreement, hundreds and hundreds of Obama appointees.

If he can't get some people passed, it indicates more of a problem with the candidates than with the process.

Yes and no. The problem is not "just" one side's (aka the Dems or he President's), the Republican's also appeared unready to accept anyone the President would have found acceptable. Remember a key Republican plank last term was to have the President "fail" and part of the form that took was essentially objecting to whatever the President offered. Almost every idea, almost every comment. I am trying to remember when the Republicans made any kind of conciliatory comments towards the President last terms. What there was was very few and far between. Most everything was attacked and criticized. And it still is. Both sides need to be willing to work together and that has not, and is not happening very often.

I am not laying all blame on the Republican's, I am merely responding to your comment which applied little to no blame there.

Tugg



I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21875 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Quoting N62NA (Reply 1):
At the risk of getting political, and I'm not holding this opinion because it was Obama / a Democrat that made these appointments, but to claim the Senate was in recess was so blatantly inaccurate... this would have HAD to be overturned at some point.

To claim that the Senate wasn't in recess is also pretty shady. If I'm not mistaken, all they did was have a couple of people there to gavel a session into order, wait around for a few hours and then adjourn for the day. Technically I guess they were in session, but I'd really like to see a rule that you need to have a quorum of members present on a particular day in order for it to be considered an actual session.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineokie From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 3190 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1148 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 4):
This ruling is welcome but expect him to appeal.

Just not sure exactly what there is to appeal unless that is a stalling process.
Article II, Sec 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution is pretty explicit. The only other president to try and get around Article II of the Constitution for appointments was Andrew Johnson whom was Impeached for bypassing Congressional approval for appointments.

Quoting L-188 (Reply 4):
I thinking is a big reach to get Obummer to follow the constitution

Was it not just in the last few days a graduate of constitutional law put his hand on not one but two bibles and swore to uphold the constitution or am I confused.

Okie


User currently offlineDreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8965 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (1 year 11 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1143 times:

Quoting tugger (Reply 7):
The problem is not "just" one side's (aka the Dems or he President's), the Republican's also appeared unready to accept anyone the President would have found acceptable.

It's the president's job to appoint people who are acceptable to the Senate. He can't just appoint any old clown (and he has tried to appoint a few of those - remember Van Jones, Cass Freeman, Erroll Sothers and others?)

Quoting tugger (Reply 7):
Remember a key Republican plank last term was to have the President "fail"

One senator's poorly chosen words are not a platform.



Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Obama's New Recess Appointments posted Sun Mar 28 2010 01:18:12 by MoltenRock
Supreme Court Justice Barack Obama? posted Fri Feb 19 2010 17:59:53 by ken777
Obama To Nominate Sotomayor For Supreme Court posted Tue May 26 2009 07:21:22 by Homer71
Supreme Court Rules 1st Amendment Unconstitutional posted Wed Dec 10 2003 17:37:07 by B757300
Court Rules Ban On Gay Marriage Unconstitutional posted Tue Nov 18 2003 17:36:03 by Delta777-XXX
Victory For Wisconsin: Court Upholds Union Limits posted Sat Jan 19 2013 17:55:45 by Aaron747
The NRA Is Now Using Obama's Children In Ad posted Tue Jan 15 2013 19:54:07 by 2707200X
Obama, To Impose Gun Control By Decree Part 2 posted Mon Jan 14 2013 18:23:39 by iowaman
Obama, To Impose Gun Control By Decree posted Wed Dec 26 2012 23:53:10 by AR385
Obama's Trip To Asia Region posted Sun Nov 18 2012 21:49:50 by propilot83