Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Outrageous! Please Can Germans Confirm!  
User currently offlineAirways1 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 560 posts, RR: 0
Posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1042 times:

Read this short news article: http://news.excite.com/article/id/249335|oddlyenough|07-05-2002::08:10|reuters.html

In summary, it says in Germany, a (female) muslim teacher was forbidden from wearing her headscarf in school, as german children are entitled to an education free from the influence of foreign religions.

I would prefer a system where religion of any kind is forbidden from schools, or at the very least, as in England, where all religions are treated equally (in theory even if not in practise).

But I think it's outrageous that german schools are allowed to ram christiannity down the throats of the students, whilst outlawing the influence of foreign religions.

Can some germans please actually confirm that this is the case (as suggested by the article), or enlighten me to the real facts.

If this is true, does anyone else agree with me that this ruling stinks?

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1035 times:

Not FOREIGN religions, ANY religions. Actually read the article.

User currently offlineAirways1 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 560 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1020 times:

777236ER,

the last line of the article says:

The judge said while he did not think Ludin had missionary motives, pupils in state schools were entitled to an education free from the influence of foreign religions.

Maybe I misunderstood, but to me it sounds like foreign religions are being singled out.


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 34
Reply 3, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

I had to acquaint myself with this case quite a bit because I had to take an exam which was modelled after this case, a year ago or so.

1) The article gets it wrong: "pupils in state schools were entitled to an education free from the influence of foreign religions." - it has nothing to do with foreign religions, it´s religion per se, be it Christianity, Judaism or whatever. To illustrate this, there was a similar case which the Federal Constitutional Court had to decide: Bavarian law obliged schools to have a crucifix in each class room. This was found to be unconstitutional because it impedes the so-called "negative freedom of religion" of atheist pupils.

2) The headscarf case was basically the same: you have to weigh the would-be teacher´s religious freedom (i.e. her freedom to wear the headscarf) against the pupils´ above mentioned negative religious freedom (i.e. their freedom not to be exposed to religious symbols). If one takes into account that the Federal Law on Civil Servants (which include teachers) constitutes a comprehensive duty of neutrality to be fulfilled by civil servants, the issue is quite clear.

I hope I could restore your faith in the German legal system and convince you that this ruling does not stink.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Daniel Smile


User currently offlineAirways1 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 1999, 560 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 990 times:

Airsicknessbag, thanks, you cleared that up for me. I suspected that the article might be wrong because I would be surprised if Germany stooped that low.

OK, that's much better now.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineAirlinelover From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 5580 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 951 times:

Ok everyone.. Let's take a look at this for a second.. If this had happened in the US and someome posted it, the thread would've turned into a big flame war by now.. At the LEAST it would be getting pretty bad.. But it happened in Germany, and look at everyones responses..

Try to keep in mind that this DOES happen in all parts of the world, whether you know it or not..

Chris



Lets do some sexy math. We add you, subtract your clothes, divide your legs and multiply
User currently offlineAirblue From San Marino, joined May 2001, 1825 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 931 times:

In Italy all schools, hospitals, and public offices have a crucifix in each room without a specific law that obliged to keep it.
So few months ago a group of Muslims asked to a school if they could take away the crucifix. The school said no so they went to a court. The court at the end made a very strange sentence:
"even if Italian law doesn't oblige to keep crucifix, the court couldn't decide to take away crucifix from public place. Since Italy is a country with a long Catholic story crucifix is now part of the Italian culture. So they think it's possible not put any new crucifix in new place, but it's not possible take away crucifix from existing position".


User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 923 times:

IMO there shouldn't be a law to keep or remove the crucifix. If the owner of a shop, or a school, or an office wants to keep he/she should be allowed to do so. If not, he/she should be able to remove it.


Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 922 times:

Airlinelover: Ok everyone.. Let's take a look at this for a second.. If this had happened in the US and someome posted it, the thread would've turned into a big flame war by now.. At the LEAST it would be getting pretty bad.. But it happened in Germany, and look at everyones responses..

The interesting bit is where the initial flaming salvos are coming from, usually, in those cases you mentioned... Wink/being sarcastic


User currently offlineG-KIRAN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2000, 736 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 887 times:

entitled to an education free from the influence of foreign religions.

Does Christianity come from Germany?

Quite frankly if she does not start preaching the Koran than how can she influence her pupils?However Afghan law does not apply in Germany!


User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Reply 10, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 874 times:

This is why I'm not religious......


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineAlaska739 From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 874 times:

*sigh*

I just don't understand why people always get all worked up over the domestic practices of other countries, such as Germany in this case. If Germany wants to bar foreign influences and keep Christianity, more power to them. If they want to allow all religions in, more power to them. If you don't like it, don't move there.

Where is the outrage over Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq & Iran, all of which, I'm sure, ban foreign religious influences?

Keep your nose in your own domestic affairs.



north dakota sucks.
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 12, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 872 times:

Alaska739 I see your point but Jordan, Iraq and Iran are tolerant countries as they have big Christian populations. There are huge churches in all of these countries. Saudi on the other hand bans Christianity, which is against human rights.


Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 869 times:

Airways1,

I don't understand why you're so outraged by this decision! The court wants to maintain neutrality in public schools. If you want to ban any Christian influence, you have to do the same with every other religion or else that would be hypocrisy! Don't you agree?



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineAlaska739 From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 868 times:

I wouldn't call Iraq and Iran tolerant countries.... but that is beside the point. I don't care if those countries ban foreign religious influences or not-- they're Islamic Republics! As for Saudi Arabia, they give money to families of homicide bombers, so they're just wack anyway.

To each his own.



north dakota sucks.
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 15, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 866 times:

I wouldn't call Iraq and Iran tolerant countries....

I'm an Assyrian, and we are a non-Arab Christian minority in Iran/Iraq/Turkey. While there is a lot of persecution going on because we're Christians, we do have rights and the government has built churches in the past for the Christians. Iran is probably stricter, but in Iraq there are about 2-3M Christians! So I do have background knowledge and I do know what I'm talking about. It's not the freedom people enjoy in Europe/USA but it's not as bad as Saudi.



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineAlaska739 From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 849 times:

Oh, I'm not questioning you on the fact that you are allowed to worship, I'm merely stating that I wouldn't call those countries tolerant. That may sound like an oxymoron, but it really isn't. As you say, you are allowed to worship, yet there is still some persecution in less tolerant nations, I'm sure.

Best of luck to you...




north dakota sucks.
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 843 times:

I do agree with what you were saying though.


Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4856 posts, RR: 20
Reply 18, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 816 times:

Here is a quote of a German AP article:

"In der Urteilsbegründung hieß es, das Grundrecht der Klägerin auf Glaubens- und Bekenntnisfreiheit müsse hinter die Rechte von Eltern und Schülern und die Pflicht zur strikten Neutralität im Schulwesen zurücktreten."

It basically says, Parents and pupils have the right of Neutrality in the school, and that this is more important than the fundamental right of religious freedom.

Nothing about foreign religions, same applies for Catholics or Protestants (as a native German religion) etc. as pointed out by Airsicknessbag.



User currently offlineJetguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (12 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 820 times:

Once again, I see that it's time to post my German joke. Enjoy.
Jetguy
############################################################

The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5 year phase-in plan that would be known as "EuroEnglish":

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c".. Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favor of the "k". This should klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with the "f". This will make words like "fotograf" 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e"'s in the language is disgraceful, and they should go away.

By the 4th yar, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters.

After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubls or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech ozer.

ZE DREM VIL FINALI KUM TRU!




Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Please Can Someone Help Me Identify This Song! posted Sun Feb 19 2006 12:52:38 by GSM763
Help From The Germans, Please posted Sat Mar 7 2009 09:55:29 by Seb146
Can Anyone Identify This Font Please? posted Wed May 2 2007 16:41:20 by RobK
Can Someone Please Explain (TV In The USA) posted Wed Feb 28 2007 15:27:30 by 53Sqdn
Can Someone Please Help With IE7 posted Mon Jan 15 2007 13:16:49 by Joffie
Can Any Germans Help Me Pls? posted Sat Dec 16 2006 14:33:21 by AirKas1
Can I Have Syrup With My Wafflers, Please posted Tue Dec 5 2006 20:58:51 by YooYoo
Can I Have Those Fingers Please (quitar) posted Fri Dec 1 2006 19:03:30 by BR076
Can I Bring Cheese To Canada? Please Help posted Fri Aug 4 2006 19:45:20 by Gr325
Montréal- can you please give me some tips? posted Mon Feb 6 2006 01:46:33 by AC_A340