Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CNN Vs BBC Vs Al-Jazeera Vs Russia Today?  
User currently offlineAA7295 From Australia, joined Aug 2007, 615 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 7232 times:

I spend a lot of time watching and reading the news. I definitely have my opinions on news networks and was wondering which network you think is the best network?

I personally prefer CNN and BBC. CNN generally breaks the stories first although sometimes there are factual errors. BBC, generally good news, although scope is sometimes limited (the have BY FAR the best news app for iOS), Al Jazeera.... I still find their articles riddled with anti-US sentiment... for that reason I cannot take them serious. Russia Today.... I actually enjoy their articles... they provoke questions from articles that would be too politically INCORRECT for CNN and BBC.

Note: I only watch CNN International not the US edition.

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePHX787 From Japan, joined Mar 2012, 6959 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (1 year 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 7199 times:

Al-Jazeera is often inaccurate. I can't trust them.

Quoting AA7295 (Thread starter):
Note: I only watch CNN International not the US edition.

CNN USA is left-leaning and sometimes inaccurate as well. I've ran into a few snafus with CNN before, especially on its business reporting.

Russia Today has some interesting articles.

BBC has a very limited scope indeed. Unless I'm looking for Euro news, I rarely ever look at BBC.

*I get my news primarily from JapanToday, Asahi Shimbun, and the Associated Press applications.



One of the FB admins for PHX Spotters. "Zach the Expat!"
User currently offlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 2919 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 7186 times:

CNN USA is like all American media: full of fluff and generally garbage. Sad part is that it is the best US news channel.

CNN International and the BBC are great.

Al Jazeera is excellent too; I'm a big fan.

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):

Al-Jazeera is often inaccurate. I can't trust them.

Do you have examples of said inaccuracies?



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
User currently onlinezkojq From New Zealand, joined Sep 2011, 1063 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 7124 times:

I've always loved the BBC most - in particular BBC World News. Their journalism is top-notch, they have extensive worldwide coverage, lots of good journalists, plenty of good 'on the side' programs (such as Our World which i've learned a massive amount from over the last couple of years) and their website is great (though the videos are usually rather short or non-existent). Oh and they have by far the best sounding intro tune. http://bit.ly/11yRf0r Unfortunately one can't pick up a live stream or past programs from their website which, nowadays, is rather pathetic.

Al-Jazeera English is a very close second for me. Unlike the other channels, AJE shows what is actually going on in the world, not just what happens to be making news in the west. Their journalism is very good, hardly surprising as they seem to cherry pick the best from around the globe (one of their main presenters, Elizabeth Puranam, used to be a reporter for TV3 here in New Zealand), they aren't afraid to ask difficult questions. I also admire how balanced they manage to be, particularly on issues such as Israel/Palestine where one would think they would show a heavy bias. Their secondary programming is always interesting, in particular I enjoy Empire (roundtable of professors/journalists/generic experts discussing foreign policy), The Cafe (same as empire but with common-folk discussing local issues/news) and Al Jazeera World (documentaries). Unfortunately their website is still sub-standard, despite and significant update three weeks ago, and they don't seem to ever criticise Qatar (though plenty of guests on Empire do so).

Nothing wrong with CNN International, however I don't think it is as good as BBC, AJE or FR24.

I actually really dislike Russia Today.... all their international reporting is always geared towards blaming the US or are just full of anti-US sentiment/rhetoric. On the other hand, their opinion pieces are often an interesting read - even if one doesn't agree with them. Also they seem to be good at reporting on much smaller news stories that the other large international networks miss (or don't bother with).



repaint ZK-PBG!
User currently offlineAirPacific747 From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2316 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7109 times:

I think the BBC World News channel is broadcasting too many other things than news. Often when I watch BBC News, it is some kind of documentary which can be quite interesting, but there are not enough news on the channel.

I generally prefer BBC and CNN though, but sometimes I find Russia Today interesting to watch just to see how the Russians like to spin news stories. I also often wonder where they find the people they interview from Western countries that tend to have a different opinion regarding international matters than the general opinion in the Western world.

I don't watch Al-Jazeera very much.

[Edited 2013-04-23 08:22:42]

User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 26521 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (1 year 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7110 times:

The BBC still rules in terms of accurate and unbiased journalism. They still produce the best reports IMHO. I also watch Sky News alot which usually are the best for breaking news. I like their evening late night paper reviews also.

CNN I never watch these days unless there is nothing else. I used to watch them a lot more but they became boring.

Al Jazeera used to be good but then lost their way .

Russia Today HD is quite good . I watch it maybe twice a week . They cover stories that other networks don't.



AEGEAN-OLYMPIC AIR - ΟΛΥΜΠΙΑΚΗ " μέλος στη Star Alliance
User currently offlineWestJet747 From Canada, joined Aug 2011, 1805 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (1 year 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 7085 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Thread starter):
Al Jazeera.... I still find their articles riddled with anti-US sentiment... for that reason I cannot take them serious. Russia Today.... I actually enjoy their articles... they provoke questions from articles that would be too politically INCORRECT for CNN and BBC.

I find RT to be the most anti-US of all the mainstream news sources. They have really interesting exposés, but their reporting is just so in-your-face with anti-Americanism. The American reporters for them are the most guilty of it too.

Al Jezeera isn't my go-to, but I've never had a reason to not trust their reporting.

Quoting zkojq (Reply 3):
Unfortunately one can't pick up a live stream...from their website which, nowadays, is rather pathetic.

Is this not a live stream? http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldserviceradio



Flying refined.
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6127 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (1 year 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 7036 times:

Quoting zkojq (Reply 3):
Nothing wrong with CNN International, however I don't think it is as good as BBC, AJE or FR24.

I wondered if our new channel would get a mention.

To be honest I can watch English language programs without trouble and sometimes do during world events (Arab Spring comes to mind) but usually I'd rather watch French language ones, and mostly Euronews, because it's both geared to France but talking about Europe and world news at the same time, I like that balance.



New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29705 posts, RR: 59
Reply 8, posted (1 year 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 7001 times:

CNN today unfortunately isnt the CNN of twenty years ago.

Their product has gone downhill and they know it. Bringing Zucker on and letting him change it into another MSNBC isnt boding well for the future of that network.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 2919 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (1 year 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6987 times:

Quoting Aesma (Reply 7):

Forgot to mention FR24 in my post. Excellent channel.



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7008 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (1 year 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 6901 times:

If I want to watch the news, debates, politics or a live big news event I usually go with CNN. Some of their anchors are pretty good and they have the best graphics. Yes media is so bad that having good graphics means something. If its not CNN then it is Fox. The only time I really have the news on a lot is when a big thing is going on. Online I use a bunch of different sites. CNN, Fox, BBC, Local Papers etc.. Even just going on facebook or here on Anet is a news source. Anet has been the first place I became of a big news story a countless amount of times.

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 6):
I find RT to be the most anti-US of all the mainstream news sources. They have really interesting exposés, but their reporting is just so in-your-face with anti-Americanism. The American reporters for them are the most guilty of it too.


Oh, big time. They just hate the U.S. however at 1-3am it is interesting to watching some live T.V. coming from Russia.



"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (1 year 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6875 times:

I don't watch any of them. I was reading today how much of the Arab world distrusts Al Jazeera for reporting the Qatar view of things, CNN has been untrustworthy for years and the BBC really let me down several times, I think around the time of the Libyan air campaign. I have never seen Russia Today but sometimes watch CCTV for a Chinese view of things.
For anti-American bias, Canada's CBC ranks near the top.


User currently offlineWestJet747 From Canada, joined Aug 2011, 1805 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (1 year 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 6867 times:

Quoting flymia (Reply 10):
however at 1-3am it is interesting to watching some live T.V. coming from Russia.

Agreed, especially the mini-documentaries.

Quoting flymia (Reply 10):
Even just going on facebook or here on Anet is a news source. Anet has been the first place I became of a big news story a countless amount of times.

  

Quoting mham001 (Reply 11):
For anti-American bias, Canada's CBC ranks near the top.

How do you figure? The CBC is blatantly anti-Conservative, but I've never seen a hint of anti-Americanism from them (not that I regularly read/watch the CBC though).



Flying refined.
User currently offlineiFlyLOTs From United States of America, joined Apr 2012, 433 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6858 times:

When it comes to mobile news, I like to use Reuters, especially they're new app. When it comes to broadcast news I'll watch BBC or something.


"...stay hungry, stay foolish" -Steve Jobs
User currently offlinetu204 From Russia, joined Mar 2006, 1110 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (1 year 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6841 times:

I find the BBC to be the most neutral of them. CNN is a propaganda machine, more so than Russia Today. Haven't watched Al Jazeera in a while.


I do not dream about movie stars, they must dream about me for I am real and they are not. - Alexander Popov
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 15, posted (1 year 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6835 times:

So many news sources available and it's foolish for anyone to rely on any one source of news when they have choices.
No one news source is perfect but if you do your own research and verify what other news outlets are saying and eventually you'll get to the truth.

I like Russia Today because they'll cover stories not covered by the BBC or in the major news outlets in the US. I've found Al Jazeera to be a good source of news on some topics.
CNN is a disgrace but I'll watch them when they have interesting people on their panel and then read other news sources to hear the other side of a given issue. CNN and MSNBC has fallen to the level of FOX but is the left-wing equivalent. At least with FOX, you know it's bias where as CNN and MSNBC tries to pass of as impartial.

Quoting tu204 (Reply 14):
CNN is a propaganda machine
Quoting L-188 (Reply 8):
CNN today unfortunately isnt the CNN of twenty years ago.

  

The best left-wing news source in the US is NPR (National Public Radio).



Bring back the Concorde
User currently onlinezkojq From New Zealand, joined Sep 2011, 1063 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (1 year 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 6833 times:

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 6):
Is this not a live stream?

 
Radio? Never heard of it.      

Quoting Aesma (Reply 7):
both geared to France but talking about Europe and world news at the same time, I like that balance.

DW does the same for Germany and I enjoy watching it every once in awhile. For some reason, I never actually watch euronews, other than a few video clips online.

Quoting mham001 (Reply 11):
I was reading today how much of the Arab world distrusts Al Jazeera for reporting the Qatar view of things

Thats Al Jazeera Arabic - far from unbiased, but (sadly) far less biased than the state media that many arabs would otherwise be watching/hearing. We are discussing Al Jazeera English above which is very highly acclaimed . If you want a crackpot crazy arab channel, try Rupert Murdoch's Rotana or alternatively Al Arabiya.

Quoting mham001 (Reply 11):
sometimes watch CCTV for a Chinese view of things.

   They are sometimes interesting too. Unsurprisingly, they seem to have much greater access to the DPRK than any of the main western networks which usually means their content on such matters is worth watching. Also their anti-US rhetoric is much more subtle than that of RT.

Quoting Superfly (Reply 15):

So many news sources available and it's foolish for anyone to rely on any one source of news when they have choices.
No one news source is perfect but if you do your own research and verify what other news outlets are saying and eventually you'll get to the truth.

 checkmark 

[Edited 2013-04-23 20:45:33]


repaint ZK-PBG!
User currently offlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 2919 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 6815 times:

Quoting mham001 (Reply 11):
CCTV

You complain about biases and then proceed to watch the Chinese state-run Communist network?

Truly, the perceptions of people on what has a political spin are truly skewed.



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
User currently offlineAA7295 From Australia, joined Aug 2007, 615 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (1 year 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 6784 times:

Oh come on.... CNN really isn't that bad.... they are just logical. I'm sorry but some of the things the "conservatives" say in America are so off the mark and down-right inappropriate... How CAN CNN make it sound neutral?

I agree with what you are saying about Russia Today about it being a bit anti-American. But they had some damn good stories and angles regarding the Boston bombers. What I liked was that they weren't afraid to "point to the pink elephant" and report it. Western networks would be too scared to be politically incorrect.

I have a friend who works for Al Jazeera English in Washington DC and from what she says... it is definitely not immune from the powers at be in Doha. So it may not be as anti-American as RT or as obvious.

CCTV - I don't consider a communist state-run news outlet news media.


User currently offlineU2380 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2010, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 23 hours ago) and read 6753 times:

I'm not entirely sure about BBC world news but in my opinion BBC in the UK has a severe left wing bias. I still usually watch the BBC news however its probably just about the best of the local news around here.

I get most of my news online really, usually from quite a wide range of sources. I quite like to get an overview of the local perceptive as it can be wildly different to how the national news represents it.

[Edited 2013-04-24 02:50:14]

User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8047 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (1 year 11 hours ago) and read 6663 times:

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):
CNN USA is left-leaning and sometimes inaccurate as well. I've ran into a few snafus with CNN before, especially on its business reporting.

Obviously you haven't seen MSNBC - they do news during the day and put in the "liberal" programs in the evening. But they do put both sides up during conversations (not debates). Michael Steele (former GOP National Chairman) is frequently there and presents a solid GOP point of view. Not necessarily a hard right position - more of a reasonable position. Maybe that is probably he was more successful than his successor.

CNN also has a long history of presenting both the right and left sides. Started big time with Crossfire, which was a battle of a show. They let both sides go for it during the campaign & election series in a very balanced manner. Other times the political side is pretty boring outside of the major issues.

Quoting L-188 (Reply 8):
CNN today unfortunately isn't the CNN of twenty years ago.

Some parts are gone (and people have died) and there have been changes in technology. I'm tired of their visual format - but then it has always been a dud for me. For breaking news they do have a lot of assets in place around the world and there are intelligent talking heads. I'd put them as the more reasonable 24 hour US news channel.


User currently offlineaflyingkiwi From New Zealand, joined Nov 2010, 513 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (1 year 11 hours ago) and read 6656 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Reply 18):
Oh come on.... CNN really isn't that bad.... they are just logical. I'm sorry but some of the things the "conservatives" say in America are so off the mark and down-right inappropriate... How CAN CNN make it sound neutral?

Keep in mind that CNN international is quite a bit better than CNN USA which is quite left-leaning (not to the extremes as FOX & MSNBC though). Also I think you'd find that CNN doesn't really cover some of the more outrageous things liberals say.

As Superfly said above, I think the best option is to use a variety of news options both left & right. That's the only way to be as 'fair' as possible.


User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7294 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (1 year 10 hours ago) and read 6642 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Reply 18):
Oh come on.... CNN really isn't that bad.... they are just logical.

They did a pretty horrid job reporting the Boston bombings. Though most media outlets (sadly) tend to do what they did, this case being especially atrocious



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineflymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7008 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (1 year 10 hours ago) and read 6633 times:

Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 12):
Agreed, especially the mini-documentaries.

Agreed. Ironically the day before the Marathon Bombing I watched one on Chechnya. Very interesting. But for any news which deals with America I usually can't stand to watch it.



"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
User currently offlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 2919 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (1 year 8 hours ago) and read 6608 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Reply 18):
Oh come on.... CNN really isn't that bad.... they are just logical. I'm sorry but some of the things the "conservatives" say in America are so off the mark and down-right inappropriate... How CAN CNN make it sound neutral?

This is exactly the case with outlets such as NPR. The second the tea partiers hear something they don't like it's the "liberal media''.

MSBC has a real slant; and I can't stand it.

NPR isn't 'left-wing', but since they don't feature O'Riley they are liberals.



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 25, posted (1 year 6 hours ago) and read 6646 times:

I've seen Russia Today clips on YouTube. Is it an actual news channel that you can get on cable?

User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1812 posts, RR: 1
Reply 26, posted (1 year 5 hours ago) and read 6629 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Reply 18):
Oh come on.... CNN really isn't that bad.....



Even when you remove the political news and viewpoints, it is clear that the CNN network has gone down hill. Their domestic news coverage is full of over exaggerated, sensationalized news. Everything now is "breaking news". In many cases, I find their coverage to be irresponsible journalism. They are so interested in trying to be the first to report news, that they often run over the reputation of someone without having confirmed the validity of the story. In addition, instead of reporting the news for what it is, they too frequently try to "create" a story without knowing the full details.

The only credible, largely unbiased news organizations left in the U.S. is 60 Minutes and the evening network news (ie. NBC Nightly News, CBS evening news, etc.).

When you compare the quality of the news stories on BBC to CNN, you can see a clear difference between the quality of both networks.


User currently offlineandrej From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 866 posts, RR: 0
Reply 27, posted (1 year 2 hours ago) and read 6660 times:

Hey all,

these are my subjective notes on major news outlets.  

CNN (US) is a joke, like their top competitors (be it FoxNews, or MSNBC). They gave up on journalism long time ago, and now it is about 'stories', too much of op-ed, and talk shows. Certain programs are watchable.   My subjective opinion is that AC360* is CNN's best show at the present; I can not stand Richard Quest and most of their anchors. I watch CNN International very rarely, as their show line up does not interests me.

BBC News / Sky News -> sole focus on the U.K., which is fine as I get up-dated with their current problems and issues.

BBC International -> as I currently reside in Central Europe, there is not much information from this region. On the other hand, there is certainly too much focus on South-East Asia, and Africa. Maybe it has to do with historical focus on former colonies, regions under British influence. If something major happens, I do watch them as they have plenty of reporters on the ground. Through the years, I fear that their journalistic independence gave way to represent the view of the UK. I really like 'Click' show.

Euronews -> interesting round up of news within the region and global news. I wish they would do more reporting from within Europe, and do less news recycling (for hours they repeat the same 'news'). Again, living in Europe, I want to know more what is going on in the region, rather than in India, Thailand, or South Africa. Unless it is top news, it really does not interest me, like I am sure, people in South Africa do not really care what is going on in the Czech Republic or Slovakia, but rather what is happening in their region.

Al-Jazeera English -> I take moderate view of them. They have different opinions at some cases (i.e. Palestine), and share same opinion on other issues (i.e. Syria, Libya). However most of their news are pretty much focus on top news of BBC Int., CNN, etc. Some of their shows are interesting (Frost Over the World, Listening Post). I welcome their focus on Middle East, Africa, GCC and South-East Asia.

Russia Today -> good to watch to see 'what other side thinks'. News from Russian perspective, and their reporting is done in such a way. Independent? Much as BBC or CNN, spinning the news from their point-of-interest.

Having said that, I prefer news, which gives me facts, what happened, where, why (if known), and how. I can form my own opinions, based on these facts mentioned. Do not spin the news, give me straight facts.

I have a benefit to use Bloomberg Terminal at my line of work, so I do have access to the raw news. I gave up on most of the major news outlets a long time ago. Again for my work, I watch business news outlets, and I do like their style reporting (although that is changing as well, which is a shame).

CNBC -> their Europe's morning show programming is really good (Capital Connections, and Squawk Box Europe) and I like the format and news reporting (they have relevant guests, and speak to the point).

Bloomberg TV -> was my favorite news outlet for a long time. Their European studios are weak though, and have gone from good to bad. News recycling (focus on top 3-4 news), guest appearance is weak, and overall quality seems to be going down. US programs are quite good, especially Pimm Fox's Taking Stock, Lunch Money, and Bloomberg Bottom Line. Overall, not every change they have presented was for better (could live without Bloomberg West for example). I really liked their older anchors, and news reporting style.

Overall, CNBC and Bloomberg remain top news outlets for me. They do less news spinning, and limit their opinions to minimal. There are several other regional news outlets that are worth to watch, like CT24 (but it is not in English, and thus not really a comparable to other mentioned).

Cheers,

Andrej


User currently offlineVinniewinnie From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 770 posts, RR: 0
Reply 28, posted (12 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6609 times:

Quoting Braniff747SP (Reply 9):
Forgot to mention FR24 in my post. Excellent channel.

France24 suffers from a massive french bias (to the point of being ridiculous) together with a lack of financial means. It's repetitive, their guests are usually poor and suffer from a lack of diversity (Mostly french, some not able to speak good english at all)

In terms of the others:

- I didn't even know the existence of Russia Today! Oh wow!

- CNN International is pretty good although too focused on advertisement (as is every american channel)

- BBC news is interesting though plays it too safe

- Al Jazeera English is edgy. Definitely has a better world view than the others I know. They are much more balanced in the sense that they talk more about developing nations whether they are in the Middle-East, or on the Africa & Asian continents.


User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 29, posted (12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6563 times:

Quoting Braniff747SP (Reply 17):
You complain about biases and then proceed to watch the Chinese state-run Communist network?

I know all that going in. Like I said, the Chinese view of things.

Quoting Braniff747SP (Reply 24):
NPR isn't 'left-wing', but since they don't feature O'Riley they are liberals.

Bias can be much more subtle. It does not need to be openly displayed, it can be more about what gets reported and for how long.

Quoting EricR (Reply 26):
The only credible, largely unbiased news organizations left in the U.S. is 60 Minutes and the evening network news (ie. NBC Nightly News, CBS evening news, etc.).

I'm not sure how anybody can say the networks are without their agendas, remember Dan Rather? We do have the McNeil/Lerher News Hour on PBS which I believe is quite good.

[Edited 2013-04-25 09:39:15]

User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1812 posts, RR: 1
Reply 30, posted (12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6548 times:

Quoting mham001 (Reply 29):
I'm not sure how anybody can say the networks are without their agendas, remember Dan Rather?




But keep in mind that Dan Rather's viewpoints lead to his departure as anchor of the evening news.


User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 31, posted (12 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 6508 times:

Quoting EricR (Reply 30):
But keep in mind that Dan Rather's viewpoints lead to his departure as anchor of the evening news.

Irrelevant. He led an on-air vendetta based upon discredited information. The network allowed it.
I really, really don't want to know the politics of the newsreader. If I do, then it is a jaded newscast. I simply cannot trust what they say about anything. Diane Sawyer is another one. She will occasionally phrase something or use inflection in a way to portend her approval or disapproval of the subject. Remember, these are also the people who choose what to report.


User currently offlinekingairta From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 458 posts, RR: 0
Reply 32, posted (12 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 6397 times:

Quoting AA7295 (Thread starter):
CNN generally breaks the stories first although sometimes there are factual errors.

I don't care who breaks the story first. Because chances are I won't here it for hours later anyways. I would much prefer getting the facts right over who is first.

I believe this is a huge problem with the media today. Everyone wants to be first so damn the facts we can always correct later attitude. Unfortunately people then start second guessing what the "real" story is.

The industry needs to create it's own group to perform "oversight" and penalize those who knowingly present false facts or present facts based on speculation.

Also I think the media needs to let people know that what they are watching or reading is an opinion based article or one based on real facts. They can put so much on a screen now they should put "our opinion" or such when they start "speculating" Because a vast amount of viewers are idiots and can't tell opinion from fact.


User currently offlineb787900 From Canada, joined Sep 2011, 25 posts, RR: 0
Reply 33, posted (12 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6402 times:

I find BBC and CBC to be the most rational and informative of them all. CBC tends to report on a lot of important socioeconomic problem that exist in Canada/rest of the world.

CNN and RT contain way too much propaganda and inaccurate information. Not to mention, neither of them report on the issues concerning Canada. Don't know much about Al-Jazeera.


User currently offlineEricR From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 1812 posts, RR: 1
Reply 34, posted (12 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 6370 times:

Quoting mham001 (Reply 31):
Quoting EricR (Reply 30):
But keep in mind that Dan Rather's viewpoints lead to his departure as anchor of the evening news.

Irrelevant. He led an on-air vendetta based upon discredited information. The network allowed it.




I wouldn't call it irrelevant at all. The network made management changes after they discovered the inaccurate information. Had the network had an "agenda" as you put it, then they would not have made any management changes after discovering the inaccuracies of this information (unlike CNN).


User currently offlinemham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 35, posted (12 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 6340 times:

Lifted from another thread. Several highly regarded news people who have come out and publicly admitted left wing bias in US media.

“For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights. Whether you agree with abortion or not, I do think there’s a direct connection between the media’s failure to cover this and our own political commitments on the left. I think it’s a bad idea, I think it’s dangerous, but I think that’s the way it is.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ade-a-decision-to-not-cover-trial/


User currently offlineTIA From Albania, joined Mar 2006, 524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 36, posted (12 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6275 times:

Quoting zkojq (Reply 3):
I actually really dislike Russia Today.... all their international reporting is always geared towards blaming the US or are just full of anti-US sentiment/rhetoric.

Exactly. And maybe things have changed the last couple of years, but when it first started out (I remember first getting it on cable in the US around 2007 or so), RT was nothing more than Putin's mouthpiece. It was pure propaganda being passed on as news. Obviously each news channel has its own agenda, but RT was unbearable to watch with its twisted facts and lies.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CNN Vs Al Jazeera posted Mon Apr 5 2010 14:42:49 by racko
Al Jazeera posted Sat Nov 22 2008 12:00:47 by KAUSpilot
Al-Jazeera - Shame Of Islamic Community posted Wed Oct 24 2007 11:24:09 by Cfalk
What Do You Think Of Al Jazeera? posted Thu Jun 21 2007 04:05:54 by ConcordeBoy
Egypt Seizes Al-Jazeera Reporter posted Thu Feb 22 2007 00:28:37 by Aloges
Al Jazeera English, The Daily Show Makeover posted Mon Jan 8 2007 20:03:41 by Bravo45
Al Jazeera English Launches posted Wed Nov 15 2006 16:58:42 by GSM763
Al Jazeera Sets English Launch Date posted Fri Nov 3 2006 14:57:40 by Cedars747
Lucia Newman To Head Al-Jazeera's New Bureau? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 05:41:58 by Derico
Amazing Al Jazeera Broadcast posted Thu Mar 23 2006 08:10:12 by Cfalk