Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are They Nuts?  
User currently offlineSoJo From UK - England, joined Nov 2012, 206 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2318 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-22308165

Good old UK. If I was buying this product I think I may have a clue as to whats inside  


RAF Abingdon 1967. I met Beverley from Blackburn. Fantastic!
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineBraybuddy From India, joined Aug 2004, 5793 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2293 times:

Quoting SoJo (Thread starter):
Good old UK. If I was buying this product I think I may have a clue as to whats inside

I've seen this here too. A packet of branded nuts, and on the back the rider "Warning: this product contains nuts".
Hilarious . . .


User currently offlinecptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2187 times:

Quoting Braybuddy (Rep 1) "...Warning:this product contains nuts". Hilarious.

Maybe, maybe not considering there probably is a warning regulation (even though it may be obvious as to what the product is) and manufacturers are deathly wary of the inevitable fines they could receive, not to mention the inevitable private law suits they would have to defend. Not knowing how serious some allergic reactions to nuts (especially peanuts) some people can have from not only ingestion but simple contact, I didn't think highly about Southwest Airlines discontinuing the free peanuts from their flights. I understand now. I have a helper here on the farm who can't even get peanut butter on his fingers without choking.

But...I agree that some warning labels are really a bit over the top. Walmart (and other store's plastic produce bags here in the U.S.) have danger of suffocation for babies and children printed on them including "This bag or any of its components may cling to the nose and mouth and prevent breathing." One would think a person ignorant enough to not know this, he/she wouldn't be able to read anyway. best regards...jack



all best; jack
User currently offlinemoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 4061 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2180 times:

Yes, this product contains nuts - but the article specifically says "the presence of peanuts was not declared on Booths' own brand packets of monkey nuts", which is the reason the product recall was issued.

Why is this important?

Because not every nut allergy sufferer suffers allergies to every type of nut - "monkey nuts" can be peanuts, certainly, but they can also be pine nuts and a number of other nuts.

Now, it may seem fecking obvious to you and I that the vast majority of monkey nuts sold are peanuts, but what about a carer for a child who has just been told that the child has an allergy to "peanuts", and thinks monkey nuts are perfectly acceptable as they don't know that they are infact peanuts 99% of the time? Hell, I had to double check to make sure monkey nuts were indeed peanuts!

So on the face of it, yes its a stupid recall, but when you actually look at it there is reasoning behind it.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2156 times:

"Peanuts" aren't nuts, actually. They are related to peas and beans.

Almonds aren't nuts either.

So some declarations are not quite as obvious as they may seem and allergies can be specific.


User currently onlineBraybuddy From India, joined Aug 2004, 5793 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 4):
"Peanuts" aren't nuts, actually. They are related to peas and beans.

Almonds aren't nuts either.

You learn something new every day. Great question for a table quiz!


User currently offlinecptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2091 times:

RE: Klause (Rep 4)..."Peanuts" aren't nuts, actually...."

Right. They are legume family, but how many times have we seen, say, a bag of "Dry Roasted Legumes"?  

regards...jack



all best; jack
User currently offlineRussianJet From Belgium, joined Jul 2007, 7714 posts, RR: 21
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2043 times:

This is nothing. Smoked salmon apparently contains fish - or so the label says anyway.....


✈ Every strike of the hammer is a blow against the enemy. ✈
User currently offlineafterburner From Indonesia, joined Jun 2005, 1216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 20 hours ago) and read 1893 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 4):
"Peanuts" aren't nuts, actually.

Neither are coconuts. 


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 14 hours ago) and read 1834 times:

Quoting afterburner (Reply 8):
Neither are coconuts.

Sounds about right. 

What group do they belong to, then?


User currently offlinejagflyer From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 3568 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 14 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

"Cigarettes cause lung cancer"...no kidding
"May contain traces of dairy" (on a yogurt drink)...you don't say?
"Pinching hazard" (on a hydraulic press)....a press applies pressure by sandwiching two things together...



Support the beer and soda can industry, recycle old airplanes!
User currently offlinemoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 4061 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (1 year 7 months 13 hours ago) and read 1816 times:

Quoting jagflyer (Reply 10):
"May contain traces of dairy" (on a yogurt drink)...you don't say?
"Pinching hazard" (on a hydraulic press)....a press applies pressure by sandwiching two things together...

Yup, agreed with both of these examples, but...

Quoting jagflyer (Reply 10):
"Cigarettes cause lung cancer"...no kidding

... not so much this one.

Its far from "obvious" that smoking does anything at all - the other examples given in this thread largely have a direct consequence to them, be it a crushed body part, an allergic reaction or whatever, but smoking does not cause cancer immediately and thus the correlation is not there for someone to make without ample amounts of research.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21495 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (1 year 7 months 13 hours ago) and read 1798 times:

Quoting jagflyer (Reply 10):
"Cigarettes cause lung cancer"...no kidding
"May contain traces of dairy" (on a yogurt drink)...you don't say?
"Pinching hazard" (on a hydraulic press)....a press applies pressure by sandwiching two things together...

Yeah, but when you're allergic to pea"nuts", you're actually not necessarily allergic to nuts, or vice versa. Almonds are another thing again.

Common language use is sometimes not clinically precise, and what we commonly call "nuts" is a prime example of that.


User currently offlineSoJo From UK - England, joined Nov 2012, 206 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (1 year 7 months 11 hours ago) and read 1775 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've got a bag of nuts. Thankfully my other half isn't allergic to them   


RAF Abingdon 1967. I met Beverley from Blackburn. Fantastic!
User currently offlineSmittyOne From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (1 year 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1711 times:

TIL that you can legitimately call peanuts "Monkey Nuts".

I'm going to drop this gem on some people at work today and see what we get...


User currently offlineoffloaded From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2009, 893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1517 times:

I bought a bottle of water from Morrisons. It's labelled "suitable for vegetarians."


To no one will we sell, or deny, or delay, right or justice - Magna Carta, 1215
User currently offlinelewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3672 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

I have seen such warnings on peanut bags and I find them ridiculous too. If someone with allergies or their caretaker do not know what constitutes a peanut they should maybe start from the list of ingredients.

The worst offender for warnings can be found in CA:
"WARNING: This building contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm."

It is very hard to find a single building/indoor area that does not have this warning, so, in the end its pretty pointless to have. At the same time, please do not let us know which food products we eat contain GMO crops, apparently that would constitute excessive labeling and burden us with unnecessary costs!

Quoting cptkrell (Reply 2):
I didn't think highly about Southwest Airlines discontinuing the free peanuts from their flights.

I am pretty sure I had free peanuts on my last Southwest flight.


User currently offlineBraniff747SP From United States of America, joined Oct 2008, 3006 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1460 times:

Quoting lewis (Reply 16):

Yeah, those Prop 65 warnings are absurd... but we can't have GMO labeling. Go figure.



The 747 will always be the TRUE queen of the skies!
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20784 posts, RR: 62
Reply 18, posted (1 year 6 months 3 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1444 times:

Quoting Braniff747SP (Reply 17):
Yeah, those Prop 65 warnings are absurd

Gov. Brown is proposing a host of changes to Prop. 65:

Prop. 65 changes proposed by Jerry Brown

While I'm generally not a fan of changes to voter approved legislation, the law has been around since 1986, I voted for it, and the time has come to tighten it up after over a quarter century of practical application. A lawsuit against a bank for not posting Prop. 65 signs regarding the dangers of second-hand smoke near its outdoor ATM machines, for example, is pretty ridiculous.

Go Jerry.



International Homo of Mystery
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Are They Hanging? posted Sat Apr 20 2013 16:02:50 by Ken777
Internships; Are They Impossible To Get? posted Sat Dec 12 2009 13:26:38 by JRDC930
Bank Charges UK (Outside UK What Are They Like?) posted Wed Nov 25 2009 00:22:01 by MWHCVT
What Are They Trying To Hide From Us? posted Tue Oct 6 2009 10:57:10 by KC135TopBoom
Talking Elevators - Why Are They So Rare? posted Fri Aug 15 2008 18:21:55 by 1337Delta764
Moonvertising... Are They Serious? posted Mon Mar 17 2008 02:49:59 by Francoflier
B Movies: Why Are They Even Made? posted Fri Feb 1 2008 19:53:30 by Alberchico
Volvo And SAAB. How Are They Doing In The US? posted Sat Dec 1 2007 12:59:01 by Bofredrik
What Are They Smoking Up In Alaska? posted Tue Nov 6 2007 21:17:27 by RJdxer
War Cowards Are They? posted Fri Jul 20 2007 00:16:49 by Tsaord