Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Has Mercury Vapor Been Banned?  
User currently offlineGrisee08 From United States of America, joined Mar 2013, 353 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Hello, I am really sorry for all the questions, but this is my last one for now.

I have attempted to do some research, but can't find a complete explanation. I am wondering why the production of Mercury Vapor lighting fixtures have been banned. I do know some manufacturers still produce bulbs for support of existing fixtures, but companies (example: General Electric's 201 model hood) are not allowed to manufacture Mercury Vapor light kits.

The electrical company I am under (Ameren Illinois) used to come out when a MV light was burned out, and simply replace the bulb. Now, even though the bulbs are still produced, under limited quantities, they simply replace the fixture with a 100w HPS fixture. Just yesterday, I watched as the journeyman technician removed an entire 175 watt MV assembly, and replace it with a brand new 100 watt HPS assembly (The only problem with the assembly itself was nothing, except it needed a new photoelectric control, as the other one was exhibiting fail mode by staying on all day).

So can anybody answer this. I am aware Mercury is an element that is harmful, but that does not stop the production of flourescent tubes, Metal Halide, and High Pressure Sodium lamps and assemblies, ALL of which still contain minimal amounts of mercury,


You're Losing The Game!
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAesma From France, joined Nov 2009, 6537 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

They're less efficient than other kinds of lamps, that's the reason. In the EU even incandescent bulbs have been banned.


New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21418 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

Quoting Grisee08 (Thread starter):
So can anybody answer this. I am aware Mercury is an element that is harmful, but that does not stop the production of flourescent tubes, Metal Halide, and High Pressure Sodium lamps and assemblies, ALL of which still contain minimal amounts of mercury,

Toxicity and inefficiency are the main reasons – they are already in the process of being replaced by LED lamps, but the transition will take a few years.


User currently offlineGrisee08 From United States of America, joined Mar 2013, 353 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1401 times:

Would I be correct in my math to say that replacing a 175w mercury vapor fixture with a 100w HPS fixture (even though it would be more expensive to do so initially) would be more economical in the long run? (At last check, a 175w Mercury bulb cost about $9.00 and a 100w HPS bulb costs about $23.00 a pop)


You're Losing The Game!
User currently offlineltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13042 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

Over the last 20 years, we have far less tolerance for mercury in all products as we understand better the huge environmental and medical problems they create, especially with children. In the case of mercury vapor lamps, the quantity of mercury, especially if the lamp is broken, the difficulty in properly disposing them, even if intact, is too difficult and expensive to allow their continued use. Further, more efficient style lamps have been developed for the most common uses of mercury vapor lamps so the electricity costs are reduced, enough to offset the higher costs of the replacement lamps. As to other forms of lamps, including florescent lamps and their mercury content, over the years the content of mercury has been significantly reduced although it is much less.

User currently offlinebristolflyer From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 2290 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1156 times:

Quoting Grisee08 (Reply 3):
Would I be correct in my math to say that replacing a 175w mercury vapor fixture with a 100w HPS fixture (even though it would be more expensive to do so initially) would be more economical in the long run?

Yes it would, assuming that the HPS provides sufficient light. My calcs:

175w MV uses around 210w (extra is due to an inefficient ballast). Based on 10c/kwh and 12,000 hrs operating life it will cost around $250 to run. The 100w HPS will cost around $140 based on the same assumptions.



Fortune favours the brave
User currently offlineSkydrol From Canada, joined Oct 2003, 964 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (1 year 1 month 1 week 1 day ago) and read 1082 times:

Quoting bristolflyer (Reply 5):
175w MV uses around 210w (extra is due to an inefficient ballast). Based on 10c/kwh and 12,000 hrs operating life it will cost around $250 to run. The 100w HPS will cost around $140 based on the same assumptions.

I believe the mercury vapor lamps and bulbs are still available here in Canada. We have many of the MV yard lights, and I have to be honest, the pink-orange light output from 150W HPS units doesn't compare with the bright blue-white light output from the 175W MV yard lights. There is a huge difference between areas with night illumination of MV or HPS when viewed through a security camera. The white balance is terrible with HPS.

For sure white LEDs are the best for color temperature, efficiency and lifespan. But until their price comes down A LOT, we will stick with mercury vapor yard lights.





LD4



∙ ---{--« ∙ ----{--« ∙ --{-« ∙ ---{--« ∙ --{--« ∙ --{-« ∙ ----{--« ∙
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Has Anyone Ever Been On The Greenbriar Bunker Tour posted Sun Jul 26 2009 18:55:00 by 76794p
Why Has The DAX Performed Much Better Than Others? posted Fri Jan 11 2008 13:06:16 by LHStarAlliance
Why Has IPod Got No Bluetooth? posted Wed Feb 21 2007 10:33:51 by Cumulus
Why No Stars Can Been Seen In Outerspace Pics? posted Thu Sep 8 2005 08:29:21 by Whataboutme
Have You Ever Been Banned? posted Sun May 22 2005 09:05:46 by Kieron747
Has Anyone Here Been To Cuba? posted Fri Oct 22 2004 06:38:06 by Mirrodie
Why Has Literacy In The US Sunk To Such Lows? posted Thu Jul 29 2004 07:47:27 by MD-90
Has Anyone Here Been To Qatar? posted Sun May 9 2004 18:45:33 by ACAfan
Has Anyone Ever Been A Security Guard? posted Fri Jan 30 2004 14:09:12 by LHMark
Ever Been Banned Or Suspended? posted Wed Apr 9 2003 13:31:33 by Mas a330