Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
You Filmed A Crash, Do You Sell Footage To Press?  
User currently offlinethesultanofwing From El Salvador, joined Dec 2012, 140 posts, RR: 0
Posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2486 times:

Good day,

this horrible crash in San Fransisco got me contemplating the following scenario:

Say it was you spotting / filming at an airport, and you happen to record a fatal crash; would you:

-Drop off the Memory Card at the nearest police station?
-Hurry home, inform the press and await the highest bidder......subsequently pocketing the money?
-Accept a high offer but donate the money to the victims instead?
-Make it public ASAP by posting it on Youtube; Facebook etc to keep it transparent?

It is possible that CNN paid a lot of money for this 1st Asiana footage; so I am torn:

Would you be able to justify keeping the money to yourself?
This is not a very far fetched scenario, as many of us shoot a lot of footage around airfields.

Your input would be most welcomed, thanks.


I feel like the A318 at times: I am probably worth more parted out than as a whole.
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7832 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2471 times:

Quoting thesultanofwing (Thread starter):
-Accept a high offer but donate the money to the victims instead?

I'd do this if I'm able. I don't care what they do with it then, though I'd make sure the authorities had a copy



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20394 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 weeks ago) and read 2459 times:

Quoting thesultanofwing (Thread starter):
-Hurry home, inform the press and await the highest bidder......subsequently pocketing the money?

I would do this without regrets, and stuff it all into my retirement account.

I would make sure that the investigators got a copy for free, but the victims will have deep pockets to make claims against. It's not like a natural disaster where the Red Cross would be asking for monetary donations, and that would really be the dividing line for me. In a natural disaster, I'd sell the footage, but give the money away.

The above is if I had truly sought-after exclusive video. Normal, everyday footage, I'd just give away to CNN's iReport or something.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2057 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (1 year 3 weeks ago) and read 2448 times:

I'd sell the video to the highest bidder. Obviously making sure that the authorities are supplied with all the necessary material first and foremost, but thereafter I'd just sell it.


Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2992 posts, RR: 37
Reply 4, posted (1 year 3 weeks ago) and read 2408 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

It would depend for me...
Something like this in SFO, i'd donate the money... or ask the media to make a donation in my name to get the footage an show the agency (like the Red cross) to donate to in their reports.
Something like Air France 358 at YYZ where no one died and it was well covered, yea I'd sell it and pocket it...



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlinetype-rated From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 4951 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (1 year 3 weeks ago) and read 2405 times:

But if you turned the original into the authorities for free, wouldn't they give a copy to the media for free?

Like the guy who took the video of the Asiana plane crashing. Did he turn it in for free? Is he a a.netter? (Very high possibility) Maybe he could tell us what he did?



Fly North Central Airlines..The route of the Northliners!
User currently offlineeinsteinboricua From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2010, 3001 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2393 times:

I'd sell it. What good will it do if I keep it? However, part of the deal would be to acknowledge me in the video.


"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
User currently offlineMaverick623 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 5569 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2388 times:

Quoting type-rated (Reply 5):
But if you turned the original into the authorities for free, wouldn't they give a copy to the media for free?

Yes, but then the media would have to wait until whatever authority has it, releases it; and they would release it to everyone that asked... i.e., you can't put the "exclusive" banner on it.



"PHX is Phoenix, PDX is the other city" -777Way
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2385 times:

Quoting type-rated (Reply 5):
But if you turned the original into the authorities for free, wouldn't they give a copy to the media for free?

Yes they would..and claim 'Ooops' later because they have a media liaison person that you have no idea what their relationship to the press is.

I was paid $1500 for footage of the Air Canada A340 that got jammed up in SFO spotters for sleeping at the wheel, because they would have had better quality footage than the fella yesterday.. but all in all..I'm glad someone got it on tape or card.


Given the poor quality of Asiana's incident, he could have (or would have) earned between 2500-10K because he was the only one with it.

But it would not surprise me if certain networks said 'no thanks' because they really don't think ahead in aviation situations, probably they don't understand a lot issues surrounding it.

BN747

[Edited 2013-07-08 16:56:53]


"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineeinsteinboricua From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2010, 3001 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2372 times:

Side note here: with many people filming takeoffs and landings, I'm surprised no one on the UA flight taxiing for takeoff was filming. That would have been the best video out there.


"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

The Air Canada A340 was in Toronto as you know, but by typing in the airport code in my post..it is eliminating the rest of my statement.

after jammed up in Toronto. CNN decided not to air it (but it was the exact same ship involved). I called CNN yesterday because I had heard the anchor state 'they could not see where the tail separated' .. I told them just look at the nose of the United 744 holding short. I then griped at some of the SFO vid spotters for sleeping at the wheel, because they would have had better quality footage than the fella yesterday.. but all in all..I'm glad someone got it on tape or card.



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 9):
Side note here: with many people filming takeoffs and landings, I'm surprised no one on the UA flight taxiing for takeoff was filming. That would have been the best video out there.

True, but the 'electronic device thing' has most videographers scared to do that, but the daring will do. But with iPhones and Galaxy's and their super megapixel cameras.. that would have been super dramatic footage, but would have shocked the shooter immediately as he started to shoot because sitting portside your view point would have been right when it hit the approach lights and sea wall right off the bat - that would fry your brain on the spot.



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8021 posts, RR: 26
Reply 12, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2315 times:

If it was truly exclusive - one copy to the media outlets asking, and one upload to the NTSB website.

Otherwise, no. Chances are pretty good someone aboard the UAL 747 or OZ 214 were filming the event. In the case of the latter, it's a matter of whether or not their camera still works or can be recovered from the aircraft if left behind.

[Edited 2013-07-08 17:57:44]


If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3611 posts, RR: 15
Reply 13, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2307 times:

I'd try to sell it for as much money as I could. The police and NTSB will get it for free anyway.

User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 14, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2293 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 12):
Chances are pretty good someone aboard the UAL 747 or OZ 214 were filming the event.

Actually those odds are very very low .. aviation shooters here in America aren't even remotely close to being as prolific as Japanese shooters. Most AV shooters are doing it outside(of the aircraft vs from inside) and over the fence and a fewer number will actually brave the wrath of FA's on a taxiing aircraft. There are threads here about people who've gotten in to it over using a cam on board after pushback. But with these great smartphones and after the 'FA's have been seated - then the only thing to fear is the evil eye of 'Johnny Rulebook' watching operate your device.. he may think you're a terrorist.

And with United, esp an Intl flight, like that 744..most likely no one was shooting. Given any luck, the guy shooting was most likely seated on the starboard side.

Any OZ shooter? ..well that oughta' be some interesting video..



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineAaron747 From Japan, joined Aug 2003, 8021 posts, RR: 26
Reply 15, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2270 times:

Quoting BN747 (Reply 14):
There are threads here about people who've gotten in to it over using a cam on board after pushback. But with these great smartphones and after the 'FA's have been seated - then the only thing to fear is the evil eye of 'Johnny Rulebook' watching operate your device.. he may think you're a terrorist.

There are tons of takeoff and landing videos on youtube from aboard 747s, DL, UA, etc, J class, Y class, doesn't seem to matter.



If you need someone to blame / throw a rock in the air / you'll hit someone guilty
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

Quoting Aaron747 (Reply 15):
Quoting BN747 (Reply 14):
There are threads here about people who've gotten in to it over using a cam on board after pushback. But with these great smartphones and after the 'FA's have been seated - then the only thing to fear is the evil eye of 'Johnny Rulebook' watching operate your device.. he may think you're a terrorist.

There are tons of takeoff and landing videos on youtube from aboard 747s, DL, UA, etc, J class, Y class, doesn't seem to matter.

Yes I know, but .. 1- most begin on take off roll. Many guys get the pushback onwards (the best).. but given as many vids as you think there are .. their numbers vs the number of departures/arrivals per day.. it has to average 1 filming per 10,000 take offs - and that is a very conservative estimate. But it is indeed a HUGE impovement, I remember when it was more like 1 per 20-30,000. and this is every day. I have to disagree.. it's just not as widespread as it appears to be given the numerous flights - even with you tube. Just shooting outside form the fence - we have no dedicated shooters in all of Africa, 2 dedicated in GRU, 1 in BSB, Manaus, SDU and the rest of the continent is spotty, All Europe is covered, lost Madrid spotters, in Asia - Japan & Taiwan is totally covered, Hong Kong and the rest of Asia is spotty. Australia is covered very well as is Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal. In the States, best covered are LAX, MIA, BOS, ORD, SFO, JFK in that order other airports are totally spotty in consistent coverage. My point is those shooters (we'll call them 'outside' shooters) greatly outnumber 'cabin-window shooters). The outside guys are daily if not every other hour. The inside cabin-shooters are far far less in frequency...trust me, I'm all over this.

You want to see the ABSOLUTE best (non-pilot/cockpit) cabin shooter guy at cabin-window views from pushbacks, taxi, take off/arrival videos - look up user Bretdgod on YT. That guy is awesome at it!

BN747



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently onlineAR385 From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 6138 posts, RR: 30
Reply 17, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2209 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting thesultanofwing (Thread starter):
It is possible that CNN paid a lot of money for this 1st Asiana footage; so I am torn:

I kept hearing on CNN that it was an EXCLUSIVE video, so I suppose the guy sold it.

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
I would do this without regrets, and stuff it all into my retirement account.


     

Exactly. I would sell it to the highest bidder specifying in the exclusivity clause that it does not apply to authorities which I would make sure they receive a copy. However, I don´t know if those things must be turned in to the authorities by law anyway so maybe my point is moot. But yeah, I would sell it if the media outlet makes an exception on exclusivity for authorities.



MGGS
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39703 posts, RR: 75
Reply 18, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

How much would a news outlet pay for such a video?
Wouldn't the shooter want to get his/her copy out to the press as quick as possible just in case someone else comes forward with a better video?
I know this spotting location well and this man sounded like he was indoors which isn't the best vantage point for spotting at SFO.

Quoting type-rated (Reply 5):
Is he a a.netter? (Very high possibility)

Of all the A.net meets I went to in SFO, I don't recall anyone with that accent.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2066 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 18):
How much would a news outlet pay for such a video?
Quoting BN747 (Reply 8):

Given the poor quality of Asiana's incident, he could have (or would have) earned between 2500-10K because he was the only one with it.

Had his shot rivaled that of the National Airlines 744 at Bagram... he would have been on the higher end.

Quoting Superfly (Reply 18):
Wouldn't the shooter want to get his/her copy out to the press as quick as possible just in case someone else comes forward with a better video?

In this day and age, that's to be considered big time.. because that could happen and you missed the opportunity by holding out. I guess this is where it pays off on knowing in advance who to go to...and certainly NOT the local news! Go straight to the national networks.

Quoting Superfly (Reply 18):
I know this spotting location well and this man sounded like he was indoors which isn't the best vantage point for spotting at SFO.

yeah, Bayshore Park (I think that's the name ) or close to it. i've shot there as well as on the field at SFO. Looks like he shot it with the first camera ever made for a cell phone.



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlinephotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2719 posts, RR: 18
Reply 20, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2034 times:

Quoting thesultanofwing (Thread starter):
-Hurry home, inform the press and await the highest bidder......subsequently pocketing the money?

Basically correct.

Quoting type-rated (Reply 5):
But if you turned the original into the authorities for free, wouldn't they give a copy to the media for free?

Yes, therefore you DO NOT turn it over to the Authorities. (see below)

Quoting AR385 (Reply 17):
I would sell it to the highest bidder specifying in the exclusivity clause that it does not apply to authorities which I would make sure they receive a copy. However, I don´t know if those things must be turned in to the authorities by law anyway so maybe my point is moot. But yeah, I would sell it if the media outlet makes an exception on exclusivity for authorities.

Ok, I'm going to speak from direct personal experience.

When I was in first year university, I shot the images below. (pre-digital era, so it was on Tri-X)

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/Steve_YYZ/Misc_Photos/NNAWinner.jpg

This lady was killed when her chute malfunctioned. She tried to untangle the lines then finally did a cut-away but her reserve chute did not deploy. Impact was about 100 meters from where I was shooting from.

First... the police tried to confiscate my film at the scene because it was "evidence of a fatality". I refused as the film was my personal property and the police have absolutely no legal right to my property. The police realizing that I wasn't going to be bluffed out of my film did not pursue it further.

Next, I contacted several media outlets by phone, discussed the situation and then went to one newspaper (largest in Canada by the way). We agreed that they would process the film so we could see exactly what I had captured and ONLY then would we negotiate any rights/payments. We clearly agreed that the act of processing the film did not constitute any rights of publication or sale.

After we had real images to deal with, we struck a deal in which I granted (sold) them First Day Exclusive Publication Rights only. Thus, after 24 hours, the rights reverted to me for subsequent sales. The deal also specifically excluded the newspaper from providing any images to any other distribution source. (such as wire services, etc).

One day later I had a line-up of offers for subsequent sales and did quite well off them. Then approximately one week later, I negotiated a syndicate deal (for a percentage) for worldwide rights.

End result... with residuals over the following year, I FULLY PAID for an entire year of my University education, including tuition, apartment, food, sundries, etc. Imagine that... a full year of my life paid for for basically 3 photos!!!

Now.... what did I do about the authorities. I made them aware of the images (post first day publication) and at the Coroner's Inquest into the fatality, I provided any and all images they required (they could have issued a subpoena if I refused) for the inquest. Also, the Coroner's Inquest was some months after the incident so I was no longer worried about any possible release of the photos to the media. By then, it was old news and I'd made my money).

Do I think about this incident and the fact I made money off this lady's death? Yes, occasionally I do. Her name was Mary Ross and she was 46 years old, a mother and wife. I do feel sorry for her family but as a former journalist (spent 20 years in the profession after university) I also realize that my job was to document life, both good and bad. There was nothing I could do to either help or assist the situation when her chute didn't open. So you don't think.... you keep the cameras running. Do your thinking later.

In summary... take the money, just as much as you can get.


User currently offlinerfields5421 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 7607 posts, RR: 32
Reply 21, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 9):
I'm surprised no one on the UA flight taxiing for takeoff was filming. That would have been the best video out there.

The angle was wrong.

The cockpit crew saw the approach - but they were working to straighten out weight/ balance and hazmat cargo paperwork (Reported on several forums - I have not seen a statement to that effect from the NTSB or United). The cockpit crew should not have been filming. Admitting they were filming and posting pics/ video might be career ending.

By the time the tail structure shattered and the wreckage got to the piano keys - it would have been out of view of the cockpit except the captain turning almost completely around. It would have gone completely out of view in only one or two seconds

The passengers view of the accident would have been also only one or two seconds as the wreckage slide past the aircraft.

But since they sat in place almost three hours before the tug came out to turn the airplane and tow them back to gate 101 - the passengers may have some interesting video/ pictures of the rescue efforts, the runway walk for victims, and closeup of the burned out shell.

However by the time they got back to the terminal, there were already so many pictures out - no one would be interested in buying those from the UA aircraft.


User currently offlineBN747 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5613 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1952 times:

Quoting rfields5421 (Reply 21):
The passengers view of the accident would have been also only one or two seconds as the wreckage slide past the aircraft.

That depends on where you were seated.. as the contour of the 747 comes to the nose it bends plus 744 is on the taxiway with at least 300 -400 feet of separation from 28L .. that's a lot viewing space as I stated earlier someone seated ahead of the wings up to first would most likely have seen it come into view just as the 777 started skimming the approach lights..I've take that shot a lot!



"Home of the Brave, made by the Slaves..Land of the Free, if you look like me.." T. Jefferson
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11214 posts, RR: 52
Reply 23, posted (1 year 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1879 times:

Don't give it for free. The news media is making a ton of money off your freebies. (The fact that so many people do those iReports has always bothered me as people giving up valuable intellectual property.)

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 2):
Quoting thesultanofwing (Thread starter):
-Hurry home, inform the press and await the highest bidder......subsequently pocketing the money?

I would do this without regrets, and stuff it all into my retirement account.

I would make sure that the investigators got a copy for free, but the victims will have deep pockets to make claims against. It's not like a natural disaster where the Red Cross would be asking for monetary donations, and that would really be the dividing line for me. In a natural disaster, I'd sell the footage, but give the money away.

The above is if I had truly sought-after exclusive video. Normal, everyday footage, I'd just give away to CNN's iReport or something.

This. You'd have to think about timing for a news item. A poor video (as this one was) would need to be sold fairly quickly lest another video pop up of better quality. But if it is a good quality video, say using a zoom lens, its value will last longer.

But whatever you do, make sure the authorities get it. You should be compensated, but victims and future travelers should also be helped.

Quoting Maverick623 (Reply 7):
Yes, but then the media would have to wait until whatever authority has it, releases it; and they would release it to everyone that asked... i.e., you can't put the "exclusive" banner on it.

If it's not exclusive, you're not going to get much for it.

Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 9):
I'm surprised no one on the UA flight taxiing for takeoff was filming. That would have been the best video out there.

"Please turn off electronic devices until informed that you can use them by your crew."

Quoting Superfly (Reply 18):
How much would a news outlet pay for such a video?

Well, my somewhat related story is this:

I shot the last photo of the Continental 737 that crashed on takeoff at DEN in 2008. CNN found my photo and contacted me asking if they could use it. I said of course, and that I would ask $250. (It was not a photo of the crash, but rather of the jet in normal operation, and I found 11 other quality photos of it online.) My reasoning is this: I have to pay for my equipment, which I did not get for free. I have sold other photos for between $100 and $500 to pilots and trade journals.

In the end, CNN stonewalled me and refused to give me any money, even when I pointed out that they were going to use my photo commercially. So, my photo in turn did not air.

I am certain that if the photo were of the actual incident, they would have paid much much more than $250 for it.

Quoting photopilot (Reply 20):
After we had real images to deal with, we struck a deal in which I granted (sold) them First Day Exclusive Publication Rights only. Thus, after 24 hours, the rights reverted to me for subsequent sales.

This is good. News organizations make money off of how new information is -- old news is not news. Getting the reversion was smart.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineeinsteinboricua From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2010, 3001 posts, RR: 8
Reply 24, posted (1 year 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

Quoting D L X (Reply 23):
Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 9):
I'm surprised no one on the UA flight taxiing for takeoff was filming. That would have been the best video out there.

"Please turn off electronic devices until informed that you can use them by your crew."

Try telling that to all those in YouTube.



"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
25 PHX787 : My opinion- if there's deaths on board, yeah I'd donate some money to those families. But if it's like the AF crash in YYZ, where there's no deaths, t
26 RubberJungle : The opening post misses out the option that seems to be the most common: Act like a lemming and fall over yourself giving your photos and footage to a
27 AeroWesty : Not in this lifetime if those who've lost loved ones have an insurer to go against. Here's how it works: They'll be using your photos and videos in c
28 stlgph : Times are different these days. Most of the time, the "exclusive" video is just handed over or submitted by the person taking it. They just want the r
29 skywaymanaz : Slightly off topic but also probably why there seems to be only one photographer at a considerable distance away. Aviation enthusiasts aren't well rec
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Do You Remember The Song You First Got High To? posted Mon Apr 6 2009 05:27:03 by SKYYBLUE
Funny Pranks That You Enjoyed Being Done To You posted Mon Jul 14 2008 19:56:20 by MCOflyer
You Don't Want This To Happen To Your New Bike posted Mon Mar 10 2008 13:18:39 by Umfolozi
Have You Ever NOT Been To Starbucks? posted Tue Jan 29 2008 22:32:08 by SAN787
Perhaps You Were Wondering How To Compose A Fugue? posted Mon Dec 3 2007 14:28:16 by LHMARK
If You Die And Go To Heaven.. posted Thu Nov 29 2007 04:50:10 by Airlinelover
For All Of You Who Are Planning To Travel To Switz posted Wed Aug 15 2007 14:37:46 by RootsAir
What Do You Struggle With Day To Day? posted Sat Mar 3 2007 22:00:04 by Speedbird747BA
Do You Find It Hard To Trust? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 06:26:07 by Christa
You Hear "Death To Israel"? - Smile! posted Wed Oct 25 2006 12:20:19 by 7474ever