Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
U.S. Considers 2014 Afghanistan Withdrawal  
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20822 posts, RR: 62
Posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1294 times:

Things haven't been going well between U.S. President Obama and Afghanistan's President Karsai lately. Plans are now apparently afoot to reduce the U.S. presence from a current force of around 63,000 to a small residual force of 8,000.

Reuters: U.S. considers pulling all troops from Afghanistan: officials

Quote:
The United States is considering pulling out all its troops from Afghanistan next year, U.S. officials said, amid tension between the President Barack Obama's administration and Afghan President Hamid Karzai's government.

Obama is committed to wrapping up U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan by the end of 2014, but the United States has been talking with officials in Afghanistan about keeping a small residual force there of perhaps 8,000 troops.

U.S. officials did not deny a report that Obama has become increasingly frustrated by his dealings with Karzai. Their relationship fell to new depths after last month's U.S. move to open peace talks with the Taliban, which led Karzai to suspend talks on a security pact between the two allies.

I'm not really sure what we're accomplishing in Afghanistan at the moment other than keeping the Taliban at bay. But there's got to be a time when the Afghan's take charge of their own destiny.


International Homo of Mystery
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineseb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11796 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1289 times:

The right will never go for that. It will reduce the deficit. They want low deficits when a right-winger is in the White House but scream about how high the deficits are when a Democrat is in office.


Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8474 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1253 times:

The only problem with leaving totally is that there have been some major natural resources found there a few years back and those would be a major power in supporting terrorism. If that becomes an issue ewe could, of course, bomb those resources and their delivery systems.

Otherwise I believe that it's time to move out as fast as we can pull out ALL of the military assets, including jeeps & trucks.

We can also cut off any funding when we leave - they now have the assets.

As far as the Taliban, tell them we are going, but will respond with vigor if they play games. That's what drones are for.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (1 year 5 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1246 times:

Three words come immediately to mind....CUT AND RUN

Obama has so mismanage Afghanistan it is pathetic.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinedreadnought From United States of America, joined Feb 2008, 8954 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1231 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Thread starter):
I'm not really sure what we're accomplishing in Afghanistan at the moment other than keeping the Taliban at bay.


Hardly at bay. The US is now in direct talks with the Taliban, and the Afghan government is being cut out of the talks - hence Karzai's anger. Basically the US is getting ready to throw the Afghan government under the bus - the Taliban will charge in as soon as we leave.

But frankly, I don't care anymore. Let them kill each other. And if another terrorist group starts making a problem of itself and starts attacking us or our allies from Afghanistan, we should tell them right now in no uncertain terms that we will not go in with troops, and conduct a restrained operation of trying to avoid any civilian casualties. We will level the cities and towns where we feel the attacks came from. And if the government appears to be supportive of the terrorists, as in 2001, Kabul goes bye-bye.

[Edited 2013-07-09 10:18:22]


Veni Vidi Castratavi Illegitimos
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7978 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1220 times:

Quoting seb146 (Reply 1):

The right will never go for that. It will reduce the deficit. They want low deficits when a right-winger is in the White House but scream about how high the deficits are when a Democrat is in office.

Actually I've heard a ton of "right wingers" say they want to withdraw from Afghanistan. A lot of them add their 2c about the President in their reasoning, but out is out. Where do you get your right-wing information from? A lot of it is the extreme 1% or just plain flawed...



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinePvjin From Finland, joined Mar 2012, 1415 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

I hope the new future Taliban government would understand that supporting terrorism against west just isn't worth it and would just concentrate on their goal of keeping Afghanistan in stone age and under strict Islamic laws. If they do that then USA or anyone else should have no reason to attack them any way.


"A rational army would run away"
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8474 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1175 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 3):
Obama has so mismanage Afghanistan it is pathetic.

IIRC correctly it was Bush/Cheney/Rummy who sent the troops to Afghanistan in order to go after OBL.

Then the Administration redirected their attention to Iraq, basically turning their back on Afghanistan, leaving it to Obama to go (successfully) go after OBL.

So for me the mismanagement was the initial ignoring the real job of going after OBL and going after OIL instead in Iraq.

Mismanagement in terms of the supposedly WMSs in Iraq is something that any reasonable and responsible American will find unacceptable.

Those decision in the Bush/Cheney Years will cost US taxpayers trillions over the years - 4, 5, or 6 trillion dollars? Doesn't matter really as any of those future costs equally demonstrate the mismanagement of the W Administration.


User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1154 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 3):
Obama has so mismanage Afghanistan it is pathetic.

True, but he is following along nicely in the dishonourable footsteps of his predecessors. Iraq and Afghanistan are clearcut examples of what happens when a countries base their foreign policy on cultural ignorance, an appalling lack of historical knowledge, and wishful thinking about the potential outcomes.

Given more than 100 years of failed British interventions, PM Harold MacMillan said in the 1950s that the first rule of politics was, never invade Afghanistan. It doesn't surprise me that Bush/Cheney would be ignorant of that maxim, but how in God's name could Blair have been unaware of it?

What a sorry mess was made over there -- and at the cost of so many many lives.



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlineeinsteinboricua From Puerto Rico, joined Apr 2010, 3375 posts, RR: 8
Reply 9, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1121 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 3):
Obama has so mismanage Afghanistan it is pathetic.

I'm sorry...I must be in an alternate universe. Was it Obama who invaded Afghanistan and then went to Iraq?



"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
User currently offlineDeltaMD90 From United States of America, joined Apr 2008, 7978 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Reply 7):
IIRC correctly it was Bush/Cheney/Rummy who sent the troops to Afghanistan in order to go after OBL.
Quoting einsteinboricua (Reply 9):
I'm sorry...I must be in an alternate universe. Was it Obama who invaded Afghanistan and then went to Iraq?

Not taking any sides here, but he is saying that since the period of transition from GWB to President Obama and after the initial getting into office/getting acquainted with everything, he has mismanaged it. I doubt he's blaming President Obama for stuff that has happened before or right as President Obama took office



Ironically I have never flown a Delta MD-90 :)
User currently offlinezkojq From New Zealand, joined Sep 2011, 1354 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1071 times:

Once Western Nations leave, have a look at the people who will take control of the security arrangements....what a mess.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja5Q75hf6QI



First to fly on the Boeing 787-9 with Air New Zealand and ZK-NZE; NZ103, AKL-SYD, 2014/08/09. I was 83rd to board.
User currently offlinecasinterest From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4792 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (1 year 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1034 times:

Quoting dreadnought (Reply 4):
Hardly at bay. The US is now in direct talks with the Taliban, and the Afghan government is being cut out of the talks - hence Karzai's anger. Basically the US is getting ready to throw the Afghan government under the bus - the Taliban will charge in as soon as we leave.

It's not that Karzai is getting cut out of the talks, it is that he is trying to make demands on the US that would further our involvement in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Basically Karzai wants the US to declare Pakistan as the greatest threat and ensure the security of Afghanistan. Karzai wants all the benefits of leadership with none of the work. His government will not stand under that type of setup. The Taliban unfortunately wields power of fear and ignorance in Afghanistan and I do not see that changing in the next few decades.



Older than I just was ,and younger than I will soo be.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Healthcare In Ohio To Increase 85 % In 2014 posted Wed Jun 12 2013 01:13:36 by Geezer
World Cup 2014: Your Predictions posted Tue Jun 11 2013 19:37:13 by klmcedric
World's Best Seller - 2014 Toyota Corolla Unveiled posted Fri Jun 7 2013 20:31:24 by stasisLAX
Meanwhile In Afghanistan... posted Tue Apr 16 2013 04:25:05 by TS-IOR
Jurassic Park 4 On The Way In 2014 posted Wed Apr 10 2013 18:22:05 by Aloha717200
Cadillac Unveils 2014 CTS At New York Auto Show posted Tue Mar 26 2013 07:18:38 by stasisLAX
Chrysler Unveils The 2014 Jeep Cherokee posted Fri Feb 22 2013 19:52:05 by stasisLAX
Chevrolet Launches "4 Door Corvette"-2014 SS Sedan posted Sat Feb 16 2013 11:48:32 by stasisLAX
New Cruise Ships Coming, Due Fall Of 2014 posted Sun Feb 10 2013 13:37:51 by Geezer
2014 Chevy Silverado/GMC Sierra Trucks Unveiled posted Thu Dec 13 2012 18:32:13 by stasisLAX