Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cricket - England V. Australia At Lords.....  
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Posted (1 year 1 month 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1561 times:

Anyone else following this? What you could call an 'eventful' first morning, Australia took three early wickets but England are staging a bit of a 'fight-back' - score at lunch 80 for 3..........


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinesccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5499 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (1 year 1 month 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1535 times:

I still contend that the entire cricket -- watching world is making it up as they go. Two or three days of puttering around the pitch, and suddenly the announcers get all excited and declare the match concluded.  


...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlinekiwiinoz From New Zealand, joined Oct 2005, 2165 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (1 year 1 month 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1489 times:

Quoting sccutler (Reply 1):
I still contend that the entire cricket -- watching world is making it up as they go. Two or three days of puttering around the pitch, and suddenly the announcers get all excited and declare the match concluded

That is the beauty of the game. And it can be 5 days. And even after all that time it may still be a draw.

I have been watching. The first test was fantastic. I won some money on the poms but certainly got nervous towards the end. It looks like the Aussie bowlers are doing a good job this innings but the batsmen will not be able to back it up. They will get rolled for less than 200


User currently offlineDano1977 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Jun 2008, 486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (1 year 1 month 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1486 times:

What has happened to the Australian national side?


It wasn't too long ago they dominated the world stage and had an endless conveyor belt of talent coming through the junior ranks and state cricket.



Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
User currently offlineCPH-R From Denmark, joined May 2001, 5986 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (1 year 1 month 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1473 times:

Brilliant first day. Wickets, runs, baking sunshine, and even a visit from HM the Queen! Hopefully the next 4 days will live up to it - preferably with a hundred to the only Middlesex player left on the field, Chris Rogers! At least Finn will be allowed to play in the ongoing county fixture against Sussex.

Also full marks to the ECB for streaming the Ashes for free to us continental Europeans.

[Edited 2013-07-19 00:37:26]

User currently offlineaussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1745 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1442 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

England out for 361-Decent score considering how poorly they started. Australia need to get off to a good start in their innings.

User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 6, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1441 times:

England's tail wagged, they totalled 361. Australia will have to 'buckle down' and score runs for the next day or so. Can't believe the 'Australian weather' England seems to be enjoying so far. Anyway, good match, and either side can win from here.


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlinegemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5627 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1433 times:

Quoting sccutler (Reply 1):
I still contend that the entire cricket -- watching world is making it up as they go. Two or three days of puttering around the pitch, and suddenly the announcers get all excited and declare the match concluded

Just like American football! (Except that is such a short game, of course!). Not to mention ice hockey! What a way to f**k up a great game like hockey.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 8, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1428 times:

England's session - Australia one down and still over 300 runs behind.

Why do Aussie batsmen keep on wasting 'reviews'? Watson was so far back, and SO 'perfectly' lined up in front of the stumps, that it HAD to be 'out LBW'?



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineDano1977 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Jun 2008, 486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

I wonder why England didn't enforce the follow on?


Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12460 posts, RR: 46
Reply 10, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1361 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

What a crazy day at Lords! Oz all out for 128 (a 1st innings deficit of 233) and England 31-3. Whatever England score, I think it's going to be too much for Oz.

Oz seriously need some DRS lessons.   

Quoting Dano1977 (Reply 9):
I wonder why England didn't enforce the follow on?

I'd guess several reasons -
1 - Oz unlikely to bat as poorly again.
2 - It's very hot - why risk tiring your bowlers too much by having them bowl again immediately?
3 - The pitch will only get more difficult. Make Oz bat on it last.

I don't think this has anything to do with Cook being cautious, it's more about the way England play the game today. When you have as potent a weapon as Swann, you'd always want him bowling last if possible.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineRyanairGuru From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 5358 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1358 times:

Quoting Dano1977 (Reply 3):
It wasn't too long ago they dominated the world stage and had an endless conveyor belt of talent coming through the junior ranks and state cricket.

Unfortunately the second part of your sentence isn't quite on the mark. Succession planning was superficial at best, and Australia's approach for the best part of a decade was to use the same tried-and-true approach, and then wonder why it all went to s*** when that generation moved on



Worked Hard, Flew Right
User currently offlineaussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1745 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1344 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 8):
Why do Aussie batsmen keep on wasting 'reviews'? Watson was so far back, and SO 'perfectly' lined up in front of the stumps, that it HAD to be 'out LBW'?

Time for Watson to be dropped as he is a talented player but gets too many starts and fails to go on with a big total which Australia need, Not sure who they can bring in as everyone else is out of form. Also wasted that review was stupid he knew he was out like everyone else did.



Australian batsmen need to learn to be patient and not throw their wickets way so cheaply.


Its highly unlikely but Australia need to bowl England out for under 150 to keep the chasing total to under 400,Anything above that and its game over unless it rains for 2 days...


User currently offlineBarfBag From India, joined Mar 2001, 2207 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (1 year 1 month 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1336 times:

Adam Gilchrist - one of the only two recent Australian players I liked - has a very good article in cricinfo about the DRS after the huge controversy surrounding it in Trent Bridge, and again at Lords after Watson's injudicious use of it for himself:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/651695.html
The DRS is not the solution, it's part of the problem

He makes some excellent points, and increasingly supports the perspective both the BCCI and Indian skipper MS Dhoni have held, with respect to their opposition to DRS.



India, cricket junior and senior world champions
User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12460 posts, RR: 46
Reply 14, posted (1 year 1 month 13 hours ago) and read 1284 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, another very poor day for Oz. England score 302 runs for the loss of just two wickets. Now leading by an eye-watering 566, will England declare overnight or will the delightful Root be given the opportunity to turn his 178no into a double-ton? My money is on the latter.   


Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlinegkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24923 posts, RR: 56
Reply 15, posted (1 year 1 month 13 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

Australia really do suck nowadays...


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 16, posted (1 year 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 1262 times:

Quoting scbriml (Reply 14):
or will the delightful Root be given the opportunity to turn his 178no into a double-ton? My money is on the latter

Agree that England will probably bat on. In fact, they pretty well have to - with two full days to go, if they declared now it would be possible for Australia to 'dig in and win from here'?



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineaussie18 From Australia, joined Jun 2005, 1745 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (1 year 1 month 6 hours ago) and read 1257 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

England I reckon will bat for at least first hour which will give root enough time to get his 22 runs, Than give them a quick go at Australian batsmen before lunch.

I can not see Australia scoring 600+ in 2 days unless Clarke racks up another triple century but even than another 300 from the other 10 is highly unlikely.


User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 18, posted (1 year 1 month 5 hours ago) and read 1255 times:

Quoting aussie18 (Reply 17):
I can not see Australia scoring 600+ in 2 days unless Clarke racks up another triple century

Agree that it's highly unlikely, aussie18, but it remains 'possible' - and Cook would look awfully silly if he declares now, and it happens? On the other hand, he'll be wanting a win, not a draw. My guess is that he'll bat on to lunch, taking the lead to about 650 - that will still give him five full sessions to bowl Australia out?

[Edited 2013-07-20 21:02:31]


"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineDano1977 From British Indian Ocean Territory, joined Jun 2008, 486 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 1 month 2 hours ago) and read 1239 times:

Loved this comment off the BBC text feed today....

mmm..... what's that you say Skippy? The real Australian cricket team is stranded down an abandoned mineshaft?



Children should only be allowed on aircraft if 1. Muzzled and heavily sedated 2. Go as freight
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 20, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1216 times:

Quoting aussie18 (Reply 17):
England I reckon will bat for at least first hour which will give root enough time to get his 22 runs
Quoting RyanairGuru (Reply 11):
Time for Watson to be dropped as he is a talented player but gets too many starts and fails to go on with a big total which Australia need

Both of you were dead right. Cook declared as soon as Root got out, and Watson didn't last long at all..........



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineRomeoBravo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1215 times:

Was at the game yesterday.

Shame Australia aren't even making a game of it.



User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12460 posts, RR: 46
Reply 22, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1168 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 16):
with two full days to go, if they declared now it would be possible for Australia to 'dig in and win from here'?

A snowball has more chance in hell.   

In the end, a defeat by a massive 347 runs to go 0-2 down in the series. I'm really struggling to see where they can go from here. They've now lost six straight Tests.



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlinedavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7369 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1163 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting scbriml (Reply 22):
'm really struggling to see where they can go from here.

Locate 3rd umpires that can properly use the evidence for contentious decisions so that the correct outcome is made and recommend them to the ICC. It is a pity that with 8 of the 12 "elite" umpires being British/Australian, we are restricted to the havimg the remaining 4 throughout the series but with different roles for each test. DRS isn't the problem, it's the umpires (and to an extent, the injudicious use of DRS by Australia).

Then reverse the batting order as England is struggling to get the 10th wicket partnership so that when the alleged "proper" batsman come in, the bowlers may be a little tired.

For the next test, if I were Lehmann I'd be seriously tempted to play 2 spinners... Lyon and Ahmed. Reason? Lancs have been tending to play 2 spinners at home (Kerrigan in particular being in a golden patch of form). Agar will probably need to get more practice in as he's meant to be in the side for bowling and not to bolster the batting. Weather orecast for the period up to and beyond the game is for for sunshine and showers.


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9524 posts, RR: 42
Reply 24, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1156 times:

I'll have an Aussie staying at my place during the next one. Looking forward to it.   

User currently offlinescbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12460 posts, RR: 46
Reply 25, posted (1 year 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1124 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting david_itl (Reply 23):
Locate 3rd umpires that can properly use the evidence for contentious decisions so that the correct outcome is made and recommend them to the ICC.

Well, it seems to me the umpiring is the same for both teams. So I don't see how that especially helps Oz.

Quoting david_itl (Reply 23):
and to an extent, the injudicious use of DRS by Australia

That is their own doing. Watson's selfish use of reviews when he's been nailed in front of the stumps (again!) and Clark's speculative use of it when Oz are bowling has caused them problems.

I think Agar will be dropped - he's simply not ready as a bowler for Test cricket. His first innings should have been ended very early by the 3rd umpire. Personally, I'm hoping he stays in the team!



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Scotland Vs England: Almost At War! posted Thu Jun 29 2006 23:02:19 by Gkirk
Australia At Its Worst! posted Sun Dec 11 2005 08:46:46 by QANTAS077
England V Australia: 5th Test, The Oval posted Tue Sep 6 2005 10:05:11 by Banco
England V Australia, 4th Test posted Wed Aug 24 2005 11:21:41 by Banco
England V Australia: 3rd Test posted Thu Aug 11 2005 09:51:49 by Banco
England V Australia ODI posted Sun Jun 19 2005 13:04:11 by Steve7E7
Cricket:England Build Up Lead Of 239! posted Sat Jun 1 2002 03:14:39 by Donder10
Cricket - The Ashes, Australia V. England, 2010 posted Wed Nov 24 2010 03:58:18 by NAV20
Netherlands Beat England At Cricket posted Fri Jun 5 2009 13:05:48 by David_itl
Cricket Thread Part 5: England Beat Australia Finally!! posted Fri Feb 2 2007 13:38:05 by TSV