Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Speed-Limited Cars: Yes Or No?  
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4887 posts, RR: 19
Posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3236 times:

The "gentleman's-agreement" among German manufacturers to limit all cars to 250 km/h is about to break. The Mercedes-owned AMG changes the limit of the SL 55 AMG to 280 km/h (It could do more than 300, but the tires are only certified for 280) and VW is thinking about dropping it for the Phaeton W12 and the Audi RS6. BMW says that they obey at the moment, however if other manufacturers won't obey it in the future, they will remover the limiter in the M cars, in the X5 4.6is and in the 7er series, too.

If you ask me, it's a matter of time until the manufacturers decide on one of their regular meetings to end the gentleman's agreement. German manufacturers have reacted to the invasion of asian cars by producing better and more luxuriantly high-quality cars, and they did very well with that strategy. IMHO removing the limiter is just the next logical step. I doubt that it's a big risk, most people will never bring their car to the limit, it's just the good feeling that they could if they wanted to. And you can't really do these speeds anywhere expect on the Autobahn and on a race track legally.

What's your opinion on this issue, should cars be limited or not ? Trucks are a different case, I support the EU limiting all trucks.

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3222 times:

I don't like it.

They have to stop the ones who ride 100 km/h on a way of 50 km/h, not the ones who ride 60 on a road with a limited speed of 50.


User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

Relax. If the Government really wanted us to have speed-governed vehicles (and cared about stopping the "speeding" plague), they would've done it years ago. Not only would all cars have governers limiting the speed to 65MPH, but the tampering with one would've become a Federal offense.

Rest assured, there will not be speed restricted passenger vehicles sold in the USA anytime soon (if ever).

The reason is simple economics:


Speeders and other traffic offenses are the bread and butter of our judicial system. Without going into a long dissertation as to why, just trust me when I say that if speeders were to go away tomorrow, our entire court system would collapse, massive unemployment would begin, and our taxes would be raised to the moon.

So no speed restricted vehicles in the USA anytime soon.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4887 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3180 times:


it's not that any government want to limit the speed (I think you make a good point about speeding tickets), it were the car manufacturers themselves who decided to limit their cars to 250 km/h.

User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7907 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

Matt, hate to break this to you... but most cars sold in the US are equipped with governors. But this is not to keep you from speeding. Most governors are designed to keep the car below speeds for which the original equipment tires are designed for.

Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

I've never heard anything of that. Can anyone else substantiate that?

What kind of governer are you talking about? Something that limits the car to <150MPH or something like that?

If that were the case, then it really doesn't matter. Even your most brazen speeders here (like the ones you see on I-15 between Barstow and Las Vegas) seldom exceed 120.

I'm referring to governers similar to those found on Semi-Tractors, that limit the speed to only 55 or 65.

THOSE are the ones you'll likely never see.

User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3081 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3159 times:

Most of our buses are governed somewhere around 60. Driving on the freeway (limit 55) is quite peaceful actually. My previous schedule had a deadhead trip where I'd get on the freeway and go for a ways and have to make an exit to the left. So I would just swing over to the far left lane as soon as I cold and keep it there with the petal to the metal. It was a blast watching all the suburbanites in their SUVs bust balls to get around me in the right lane since I was only going a mere 5 mph over the limit.

User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 3170 times:

The new Mercedesses have an adjustable limiter. I never use it here in Germany, because doing up to 20 km/h over the limit is OK, financially-wise.

But last weekend, I had to drive diagonally through Austria. I didn´t want to break their 130 km/h limit one bit, because Austrian cops are said to be not very kind towards Germans. Anyway, meticulously maintaining one speed level over hours is very tiring and gives you cramped feet. So I set the limiter to 130 km/h, floored the pedal and relaxed. I really came to appreciate this invention.

Concerning the 250 km/h general limiters: I couldn´t care less, I have reached this level only once so far, and I don´t live to go faster than that. I´m fine and comfortable with 220 km/h give or take.

Daniel Smile

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3157 times:

To be fair Racko, it is only the German manufacturers who have this "gentlemen's agreement". For example, I think TVR or Ferrari would rather remove their kidneys with a spoon that limit their top speeds. And limiting it to 155 mph is pretty pointless anyway. So I don't really see why it is a topic of argument amongst them - nor indeed, why they did it in the first place.

She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineHepkat From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 2341 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3125 times:

Why not just get a car with cruise control Airsicknessbag? It's much more practical than having to adjust the speed governor. Anyway, I agree with you that anything over 220kph on a public highway is pure madness. I've gone as fast as about 210kph, but then I realized it was just too dangerous to maintain this speed any longer than a minute or so. I think the perfect compromise between speed and safety is somewhere between 160-170kph (100-105mph).

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4887 posts, RR: 19
Reply 10, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3120 times:


TVR and Ferrari are Sports-car manufacturers - so is Porsche, and Porsche does not limit their cars either.

I don't really know why the other manufacturers did it in first place, maybe because there was a "green movement" in Germany of environment-savers and they were afraid of the Government forcing them to limit their cars. (The Government will never do this, nor will they introduce a speed-limit on the Autobahn, but maybe they feared a government could get this sick idea.)

User currently offlinePPGMD From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (13 years 8 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 3099 times:


All BMWs have speed limiters, mine was set to 118mph, some are at 125mph, most are just there to prevent you from damaging any part of the car.

At worst, you screw up and die.
User currently offlineCaptaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (13 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3092 times:

The gentlemen's agreement had a lot to do with environmental issues, along with others as well, I'm sure. And Matt D, there are many cars these days, not just the Germans that have governors. My dad's Passat for instance is governed to 130 mph, which is what H rated tires are good for anyways. Most BMW's are governed to 130 as well, and many American vehicles I've seen rated to 112 or something like that.

"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8363 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (13 years 8 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

There's actually a good reason for the speed governors--to avoid exceeding the limit of your tires.

What is not so well-known is that many smaller European cars have 180 km/h (112 mph) or 190 km/h (118 mph) speed limiters to prevent exceeding the SR or TR speed ratings of tires.

I think you will still see a speed limit of sorts on German cars, but the limit will be raised from 250 km/h to 270 km/h (155 to 168 mph). This is due to the fact that modern high-speed tires can now safely run at 168 mph all day without damage.

It's going to be fun to have Porsche 911 drivers no longer being able to regularly out-run BMW M3 or Mercedes-Benz C32 Kompressor drivers, since with the "gentlemen's agreement" removed the M3 and C32 Kompressor will easily keep up with the current model 911 all the way up to the top speed limit (around 270-275 km/h).

User currently offlinePacific From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2000, 1126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 8 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 3070 times:

My biggest gripe about limiters are the buses in HK. The 6-speed Tridents have them so the 6th gear is a joke. This is why it takes ages to get to the airport.....


User currently offlineAirsicknessbag From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 4723 posts, RR: 31
Reply 15, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

I´ve tried out cruise control as well, Hepkat, but I liked the limiter better:

if I want to slow down without braking I just need to raise my foot off the accelerator pedal, which is my natural reaction. If I have cruise control activated, I need to disable it first.

If I have to brake, I want my feet at the pedals. Cruise control would make undisciplined people (read: "ME") place their feet too far away from the brake.

If an emergency arises, I don´t want to have to think through lots of things before I react – I´d rather act according to my instincts. Hence, cruise control is just too much "food for thought" for me and would put me in a situation to which I´m not accustomed.

Daniel Smile

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Speed Limit On Highways YES Or No? posted Tue Aug 7 2001 17:39:54 by Luxair
Speedlimit On Motorways, Yes Or No? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 23:14:42 by TheSonntag
Condoms: Yes Or No? posted Thu Mar 23 2006 21:50:17 by 9VSPO
2012 Olympics In New York. Yes Or No? posted Thu Jun 2 2005 20:38:39 by Csavel
Help Me Out With Something - Yes Or No? posted Mon Mar 21 2005 18:45:22 by 777236ER
Death Penalty - Yes Or No? posted Mon Feb 7 2005 19:12:24 by Airbus3801
Yes Or No: Body Hair posted Tue Dec 7 2004 21:11:36 by BCAInfoSys
Is The US A Beacon Of Peace? Yes Or No? posted Sat Sep 18 2004 23:29:09 by Northwest717
Immigrants From Latin America Yes Or No posted Wed Jun 16 2004 01:02:26 by Airbus3801
Mile High, Yes Or No? posted Tue Sep 2 2003 05:28:45 by Cancidas