Jcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 38
Reply 4, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2333 times:
WHAT EVER IRAQ DOES WILL NEVER BE ENOUGH FOR ME.
Hmmm....is the fact that they have strains of killer viruses and could put them in weapons good enough for you? I know you live in HKG...but it is awfully easy to for viruses to spread especially with airtravel. Think before you type.
As TWAL1011 said, what have you ever done in your life to qualify yourself to make such a statement?
National_757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2306 times:
America has strains of killer viruses that can be spread easily as well
Are you for real ADG? What's next, you are going to tell me that the US has nuclear weapons too?
Think about it, both IRAQ and the US have biological and nuclear weapons, if Iraq didn't have anything, then why are 12 sq. miles off limits to the UN inspectors? It's all a matter of who will seriously use the weapons. I can tell you this, the US will use them as a very last resort when all, I mean all other methods have failed. You don't have to be a dept. of defense official to figure that one out. Can we say the same thing about Iraq and Saddam? I highly think not.
KAUSpilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1969 posts, RR: 31
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2305 times:
BUSH DOES WANT UNINHIBITED WEAPONS INSPECTORS. Is this hard for you to understand VH-ADG? And yes he also wants to DEPOSE SADDAM. Another tough concept?
The point is we have no intent to use those viruses to kill civilians whereas Saddam has proven he will do just that. You act as if the antrhax terrorist was sponsered by the US government. Can you hear the black helicopters coming to get you now? And as much as you love to vilify the US we are only acting in self defense and such preemptive action is necessary and justifiable.
Super Em From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 450 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2298 times:
All this UN talk is all BS because as posted above, nothing but the removal off Saddam will be sufficient for Bush. Bush is hoping that Saddam being Saddam will make a wrong move and that will give the US the green light to go in. Surprisingly, Saddam has been quiet the whole time. I'm glad people are starting to see right through Bush.
We're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 18
Reply 10, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2271 times:
Bush is playing off all the fear and will try to trump it up as long as he can. However by the time 2004 comes around, and people are thinking about things again, the economy and the host of other things that schmuck has managed to fuck up will crucify him. Good riddence to bad rubbish.
Udo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2227 times:
If the Iraq threat is so big, I'm wondering why Bush wasn't really much concerned about it before Sept.11...
I just have the impression that he wants to get rid of an old enemy (of his family) and tries everything to justify a depose of Saddam under the war against terrorism...
Why aren't there clear proofs for the threat, if it is as big as claimed? We don't want to hear phrases, but see proofs.
And what about the consequences of an Iraq attack? What will happen in the Arabic world? Al-Quaida will look like a school class compared to the massive uprise against the US in the whole Arabic world. More hatred, more terrorism, more killings. What about the oil price? It could easily go over 1990/91 levels and that would blow out the worldwide economy. What then?
And another thought: even if Saddam had the dangerous weapons Bush is talking about: what would happen if he used them? Israel and the US would blow out the country and send him to moon. Does he want to commit suicide? No, he has to much been a dictator enjoying his power than to commit suicide...
GD727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 925 posts, RR: 10
Reply 17, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2144 times:
More anti-Bush sh*t? When the hell are you people going to except that Saddam is an evil terrorist that should have been killed years ago! That Iraqi SOB would use those chemical weapons as soon as he can!
KaiTakFan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1588 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2146 times:
>>"George W(for War) Bush" How creative ADG!! I can imagine you almost had a brain hemorage trying to think that one up! Anyways, what I think is the best part of this is all you people who bitch and complain dont realize, Bush is gonna do what he wants! All the power to him! And What ever he does, I will sit back and laugh at how all your people get so furious over it! God Bless Dubya and all the anger he raises in all of you!
Stretch 8 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2568 posts, RR: 16
Reply 19, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2127 times:
Hooray for President George W. Bush and those who advise him. It is so wonderful to have a real president again. It is alarming to see the high number of Neville Chamberlain-minded guys on this thread . . . appeasement of this monster Saddam will never work.
"First you cut it off, then you kill it." General Colin Powell, 1991
Maggs swings, it's a drive deep to left! The Tigers are going to the World Series!!!
Udo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (12 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2113 times:
What will follow after Iraq? Iran? Syria? Libya? North Korea? Cuba? Yemen? Sudan? California (that state where always terrorist Democrats are in power)?
Oh man, some of you think you can drop the bomb on anything and the problem is solved. A war in Iraq would start a new wave of terrorism which would let bin Laden appear as a school boy.
Why don't you war fans answer to critical questions? Oil crisis? Worldwide Economy? Uprise in the Arabic world?
What about a revolution like in Iran in some other countries? What happens when raging people overthrow the monarchies in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar? The f.... oil in the hands of Mullahs?
Damn, can't you add one plus one? Aren't you able to think forward just a little bit, maybe just a bit over the top of your Texas hamburger?
I spent several weeks in California and I was surprised how many people know that kind of chain reaction which could follow. But you are blind, just like your beloved election cheater.