Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Malaysian PM: Islam Should Use Oil As Weapon  
User currently offlineTwaneedsnohelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 2325 times:

Disturbing story out of Islamabad.

Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad, while traveling through Pakistan, advocated for the Islamic world to use oil as a weapon to be "effective in shaping world opinion on certain issues".

The Prime Minister: "A lot of people say that Muslims are being oppressed and Muslim countries are unable to do anything about themselves because they are all very weak. I have pointed out that they have the production of oil. That can be very effective as a weapon. If they come together they will be able to control the supply of oil to the whole world."

Other semi-coherent statements from the Malaysian leader rejected the association between Islam and terrorism.

"In Ireland, for example, the Catholics are terrorizing the Protestants for years but nobody calls them Catholic terrorists, nor do they call the Japanese groups Buddhist terrorists, [but] for unknown reasons an act of terror [which is] committed by a Muslim... they always relate it to the religion."

As to this reason, Mohammad suggested:
"We should correct it not by (expressing) our anger against people because that will have a negative effect."

Lastly the Prime Minister offered advice that would end "Muslim oppresion":

"We should show that Muslim countries are able countries, able to develop and capable like other countries. When we do that then our countries will become fairly strong and people will not try to oppress Muslims."

------------------------

I've got a lot to say on this matter, but I want to point out one discrepancy in the Prime Minister's thoughts. He first advocates use by the Islamic nation to use oil as a "weapon" to equal the playing field, but then cautions the Islamic world from getting "angry" at its predicament as it will only further alienate the Islamic world.

So which is it? Alienate the world by restricing the flow of oil, or open your societies, borders, and economies further to fight the false impressions of the Islamic world?

Also, I admit my ignorance on the subject but who are these "Japanese terrorists" the Prime Minister slams?

Does anyone else think this guy is really jet lagged?

TNNH

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineRai From Canada, joined Feb 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2275 times:

Mahathir Mohammad is famous for his outlandish remarks, so this is nothing new. But he should not forget that it is the Chinese minority of his country that controls the vast majority of the wealth.

By Japanese terrorists he means the Japanese Red Army, which was caught with explosives in New Jersey and is responsible for terrorist attack in Naples that killed five. There is also the Aum Sect, led by Shoko Asahara. In 1995, they unleashed sarin gas in the Tokyo subway system, killing 12, but injuring 6,000. Both groups are largely extinct now.


User currently offlineBravo45 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2165 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2260 times:

Oil as a weapon, to my understanding means placing sanctions on certain countries or making the oil cost for them higer in particular. While every industrial first world country has the right to place sanctions on certain countries, I think that the sanctions placed on these (first world) countries might sound "strange" to many people like you as proud as your are, I'd also like to point out that other than the contracts that have been signed, every OPEC country (and every other as well) has the right to choose not to export oil to any country for any reason.

User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2266 times:

Seems like smart politics to me. When you've got an ace card, you use it!


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineBravo45 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2165 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

Its is an ace card, just never used (perhaps once).

User currently offlineIndianguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2255 times:

When you are fighting a war, u use every weapon you have with you.

Islam and Christianity(West) are engaged in preparations for another big crusade, and Oil IS one of the weapons that the Islamic countries can use.

I think it would be pretty effective too. Nothing scares these Republican-types more than not getting to drive their big-fat assed SUVs to their neighbourhood grocery stores!

-Roy


User currently offlineMcdougald From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2244 times:

Sending the price of oil skyward would certainly create a short-term shock. In the long term, though, it'll probably be the best thing to ever come along to promote more efficient energy use, as long as the price is allowed to rise and fall according to supply and demand.

As for alleviating the short-term shock, perhaps it would be possible to pick out a nation in that pack in need of a favour in some other area (and therefore a potential source of leverage), and offer it a deal in exchange for undercutting its fellow oil producers.


User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2247 times:

I agree with Rai, I am anti- Mahathir....somehow... He is getting older now I think he doesnt know what he is talking about albeit he is (or used to be) very smart... Recent comments he made for political reason with no truth made all Malaysian require visa to enter Canada...

User currently offlineAC320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2224 times:

When you are fighting a war, u use every weapon you have with you.

Islam and Christianity(West) are engaged in preparations for another big crusade, and Oil IS one of the weapons that the Islamic countries can use.


Now I think that's blowing everything just a bit out of proportion. I really can't imagine a West-Pan-Islamic war is brewing.

their big-fat assed SUVs to their neighbourhood grocery stores

Hey, I like SUV's. Hope to get a Jeep Wrangler within a year.


User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

WHats the use of a SUV if you dont have fuel for it?


Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offlineAC320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2224 times:

There's plenty of fuel at about $1.51/Gal

User currently offlineADG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2204 times:

Actually, the countries with the oil have every right to choose what they wish to do with it. Its much better to use oil to make a point than to use a bomb.

We have an overabundance of uranium here, we do NOT blindly sell it to anyone who wants it. Money is not the be all and all .. If petrol gets to expensive (and we pay $1 a LITRE) then simply buy a smaller car. Your vehicle is not really an extension of "big jim" so in this day and age it's irresponsible to be driving great big gas guzzlers anyway.

and if all else fails .. buy a bike!





VH-ADG


User currently offlineAC320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

What you drive is simply based on your personal preference, I like some SUV's over other cars that I can afford so more power to me. My true love is the BMW 7-series, one day she will be mine!

User currently offlineKLAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2191 times:

How can people complain about SUVs! Think of how much fuel is burned whenever a 747 enters a holding pattern for Heathrow or JFK. Alot more then the SUV will use in a year  Big grin

-Clovis


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 14, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Clovis, a 747 is more fuel efficient than is an SUV even if it has to hold over an airport for a bit.
They use less fuel per passengermile on their designed routes than does any other form of transportation.

The idea that aircraft are the worst form of transport in terms of polution is blatantly wrong... The worst are probably electric trains in fact (unless the electricity is generated using nuclear power which in many countries it is not), not only do they use a lot of power, but only about 30% of the energy contained in the fuel for the powerstation reaches the train...



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineKLAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2179 times:

Yeah, I guess you're right in that respect, but they still use massive amounts of fuel. Interesting about the electric trains, I never knew that before.

-Clovis


User currently offlineTwaneedsnohelp From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2175 times:

nevermind about the effects on our global economy...

just that ADG can recomdend the world rides a bike instead!

silly people you are
tnnh


User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2166 times:

Seems the krux of Muslim oppression is other muslims and extreme-religion, not oil and SUVs.


"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 18, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2139 times:

What's funny is that if it weren't for the USA a lot of Muslim countries wouldn't exist today (Pakistan was helped in its earlier wars against India or else it would have been swallowed by India, the CIS countries, etc). So who really is the enemy? The people trying to help them get rid of terrorism, or the terrorists?

By the way the PM's comments about Catholic/Protestant/Buddhist terrorism was so stupid that there's no need to comment on them.



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (12 years 2 months 4 days ago) and read 2133 times:

"Oil as a weapon". That's funny.

Cut off Western oil revenue and watch your own economies and societies collapse.

Face it. You think we're imperialist infidels, we think you're barbarian thugs. But the oil economy is the vital evil for both of us.


User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2116 times:

Well he need not look too far.... he's using water as a weapon with my country.....

User currently offlineFDXmech From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 34
Reply 21, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2105 times:

We're Nuts: Seems like smart politics to me. When you've got an ace card, you use it!

Actually very poor politics and business. In the 1970's, everyone thought OPEC had the world over a barrel. But this unwise practice (the oil embargo's) actually led to the record low oil prices during the 1980's oil glut and historic low price for a bbl of oil today (inflation taken into account).






You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 22, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

I'm sure Russia would love it. They would be more than happy to take over supplying the United States with oil. It's believed they have more oil then the Middle East, just not the money to tap it.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2099 times:

"I think it would be pretty effective too. Nothing scares these Republican-types more than not getting to drive their big-fat assed SUVs to their neighbourhood grocery stores!"

Rather be driving the Yukon than a Opel Corsa...

Nice generalization....  Yeah sure


User currently offlineAlessandro From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2087 times:

I remember an interview of the oil-minister in Saudi-Arabia during the 1970ies,
he was a very clever guy. When Libya and other countries wanted to push up the oil prize even futher, he just told them,-If oil become too expensive, then
people in the West will find other sources of energy.
That´s the story, when oil/LNG become too expensive, then people are prepared to open their wallets and spend money to save fuel. Otherwise not.....


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 25, posted (12 years 2 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2074 times:

You're right - if oil goes to $100 per barrel levels, you will see the US (and maybe some other countries) launch a project on the same level as the Manhatten or Apollo projects, to develop practical fusion reactors, which is the only long term energy solution. I am convinced that it will happen one day, anyway. Maybe in 50 years, the UN will be informed that 10 years later, there will be no more oil, and people will start investing in fusion.

Charles


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Use Economic Weapons Against US, R.Malaysian Pm posted Mon May 10 2004 11:11:03 by Greaser
So Should I Take This As A Sign That I Need A G/F? posted Tue May 30 2006 09:45:45 by L-188
Iran: Do Not Use Nonproliferation As Tool posted Sun Feb 12 2006 18:49:01 by AerospaceFan
Oil As A Renewable Resource? posted Tue Sep 6 2005 22:11:42 by Bezoar
Australian Pm Told To Convert To Islam posted Thu Jun 15 2006 07:00:33 by VHVXB
Should Law Enforcement Use Luxury Vehicles? posted Mon Nov 7 2005 08:53:15 by UTA_flyinghigh
Oil In Utah - Delta Should Buy It All... (LOL) posted Thu May 5 2005 02:06:37 by Boeing7E7
Should UTA Be Burned At Stake As An Heretic? posted Wed Feb 9 2005 17:27:24 by 707CMF
Corrupt French Ex-PM Quits As Mayor posted Fri Dec 3 2004 10:55:07 by UTA_flyingHIGH
Should We Use The Euro In The US? posted Thu Apr 1 2004 22:31:29 by North County