Tbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7011 posts, RR: 28 Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 677 times:
Urg, the topic should say "Muslim Extremists: Interesting Article". Sorry folks.
JetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 13 Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 622 times:
Damn folks. The article was obviously lathered with sarcasm, but why is it so difficult for you to discuss muslim extremism? Its a reality in our world. If anyone should be discussing it, its the peaceful muslims, but that's completely their call. Mxboy, if political-correctness compels you to have to give Christian extremism equal time, then so be it, but I can assure you that I would never paint you as a bigot if you didn't. I hope you guys can see the difference between the wacky extremists and the peaceful folks as well as I can. Your response makes me wonder. You seem to assume there is only one flavor and when discuss one, you discuss all. Not so.
Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 623 times:
The intent of the article is to show how partial, liberal, and biased the New York Times has become. 30-40 years ago, it was one of the best newspapers in the world - the equivalent to The Times in the U.S.. But now it's little more than a cross between a Democratic propaganda rag and a tabloid.
David b. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 6 Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 595 times:
The New York Time is a piece of crap. I would not read that crap even if someone paid me. Hell, even the daily news is better.......but not by much.
Tbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7011 posts, RR: 28 Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 587 times:
Mx5,
You just proved the whole point of the article! Read it again, and try to tell me that it doesn't have a point.
Galaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 27 Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 511 times:
well i 95% agree with the article. It was a farce for the media to be PC during the investigation and now the upcoming trial. Lets call a pig a pig and not a horse.
"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
Delta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7 Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 491 times:
It's not a farce, but a political satire. And a damn good one, too!
It really has nothing to do with the New York Times, the NYT is only used as a metaphor for the "liberal media".
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7011 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
, don't want you to feel ignored 
From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
