JetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 858 times:
Damn folks. The article was obviously lathered with sarcasm, but why is it so difficult for you to discuss muslim extremism? Its a reality in our world. If anyone should be discussing it, its the peaceful muslims, but that's completely their call. Mxboy, if political-correctness compels you to have to give Christian extremism equal time, then so be it, but I can assure you that I would never paint you as a bigot if you didn't. I hope you guys can see the difference between the wacky extremists and the peaceful folks as well as I can. Your response makes me wonder. You seem to assume there is only one flavor and when discuss one, you discuss all. Not so.
Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 859 times:
The intent of the article is to show how partial, liberal, and biased the New York Times has become. 30-40 years ago, it was one of the best newspapers in the world - the equivalent to The Times in the U.S.. But now it's little more than a cross between a Democratic propaganda rag and a tabloid.