Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Evidence - California Overdue For Big One  
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2046 posts, RR: 22
Posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/835953.asp#BODY


II Cor. 4:17-18
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClimbout From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1924 times:

They've been reminding us of that for the last 15 to 20 years. I think Californians just take it with a grain of salt, being that we know we live in earthquake territory, and when it happens, it'll happen.

User currently offlineAio86 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 928 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

I guess thanks for sharing. As a so. californian, that's really disturbing to hear, I thought that the Northridge earthquake was bad, whatever they're predicting sounds like it'd really be devistating. Yuck!

-aio86


User currently offlineClimbout From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

Well, I personally find it insensitive when the news media constantly reminds us of "the big" one, especially AFTER we've just experience a large quake, such as the Northridge quake. The first thing out their mouths comes "that wasn't the big one"! Try telling that to the people who lost loved ones, and their homes--to them it might as well have been the big one! My home looked like a bomb went off after Northridge, and I wasn't in the mood to hear "that wasn't the big one".

User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1877 times:

I don't think it will be devastating. We're a state that knows we're going to get earthquakes, so we have amazing system's to be prepared for them. Construction is earthquake safe, and disaster plans and relief plans are the best. Of course there will be damage and death, but we're not all going to move away because of the threat of earthquakes. Come on! We have the most beautiful state in the U.S.! Well, maybe Hawaii...but that's debatable  Laugh out loud


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineB737-112 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 886 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (11 years 10 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

Tbar220: You make the big one sound like a small event, like a thunderstorm or something. Fact is when the big one happens there will be total chaos and major destruction of cities, not just a few homes. It seems like half the homes in the LA area are built in the 1950's or earlier and are very much in danger. Just hope it doesn't go on as long as the one in Alaska did.

User currently offlineLindy field From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 3120 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1846 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You might recall that the Kobe quake in Japan was devastating--and Japan also has building regulations in place because of earthquakes.

The "big one" will be bad news not only for Californians and their friends and relatives but for the global economy of which California is an integral part.


User currently offlineWardialer From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 10 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1833 times:

Evidence conducted by NASA in joint with seimologist that a next Northridge sized quake that shook the LA basin (6.8) will not happen in are lifetime. Including magnitudes of 8+. As a matter of fact, the San Andreas Fault is of course the world's biggest fault but is not an active fault. But when it becomes active in energy it will cause widespread devastation to the LA area and even far away cities like San Diego or even Las Vegas. Now imagine that the San Andreas Fault had produced a magnitude of an 8.0. The ripple effect could spread 100s or even 1000's of miles away!!!

User currently offlineFSPilot747 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 3599 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1830 times:

Thanks Wardialer...I think you hit "send" everytime you wanted to click "edit."  Smile

I'm a SoCalifornian..They've been predicting the "Big One" as long as I can remember. When it comes, it'll come. California was built with earthquakes in mind, and so are most of the houses, which are capable of withstanding quakes over 7. This "Big One" can't be much bigger than what we've already seen.

FSP


User currently offlineWardialer From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1183 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 10 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1821 times:

Well, any quake with a mag. of 7.0 or greater, no building nor house will survive. And dont forget the aftershocks too. If the main shock did not make a building collapse than the aftershocks will. And remember, the bigger the magnitude the longer the shaking will last. The Big One prediction estimated that a 8.5 mag. quake will last approx. 2 minutes.

User currently offlineBWIrwy4 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 940 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 10 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1812 times:

"any quake with a mag. of 7.0 or greater, no building nor house will survive. And dont forget the aftershocks too. If the main shock did not make a building collapse than the aftershocks will."

I beg to differ. The 1989 Loma Prieta quake was a 7.2. My house survived with only a broken window. San Francisco wasn't devastated. The death toll was less than 70, and more than half of those deaths happened in one place. (The Cypress Structure collapse) Keep in mind also that many of the buildings in San Francisco and the surrounding area also survived the 1906 quake. When it happens, it happens, but I think California is uniquely capable of dealing with it.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Yet More Evidence For Unnatural Warming posted Tue Sep 19 2006 12:20:04 by 777236ER
Is California Going To Get Hit By The Big One? posted Sun Jun 19 2005 01:13:05 by Alberchico
It's A Crusade! One More Evidence. posted Sat Mar 29 2003 13:54:19 by Sebolino
Murder Conspiracy For Killing One My Space Member posted Fri Sep 15 2006 11:00:10 by Rammstein
Poll: More Americans Blame Bush For 9-11 posted Tue Sep 12 2006 20:57:24 by Rammstein
More Americans Too Fat For X-rays posted Wed Jul 26 2006 20:50:51 by Sonic99
More Federal Government Blame For Rita posted Sat Sep 24 2005 13:14:38 by TedTAce
For Sale - One Championship Ring posted Tue Sep 13 2005 08:30:01 by Garnetpalmetto
More Evidence Of Torture By U.S. Forces posted Thu Aug 4 2005 00:48:52 by Tbar220
More On The Oil For Food Scandal posted Thu Feb 3 2005 21:47:04 by Newark777