Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IRS Stats: How Much Do You Pay?  
User currently onlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

The top 1% of wage earners, who earn 20.81% of national income, pay 37.42% of the income tax.

The top 5%, who earn 35.2% of national income, pay 56.47% of the income tax.

The top 10%, who earn 46.01% of national income, pay 67.33% of the income tax.

The top 25%, who earn 67.15% of national income, pay 84.01% of the income tax.

The top 50%, who earn 87.01% of national income, pay 96.09% of the income tax.

The bottom 50%, pay 3.91% of the income tax.

The top 50% were those individuals or couples filing jointly who earned $26,000 and up in 1999. The top 1% earned $293,000 or more.

These are the stats from the IRS itself, by the way.


11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1522 times:

What is your point -- that upper income people are unfairly taxed?

If so, read an Economics 101 textbook on the subject of "principles of tax equity" paying particular attention to the "ability to pay" and "equal sacrifice" principles. Consideration should also be given to indirect and other taxation that is paid by consumers irregardless of personal income -- such as sales taxes and taxes included in the cost of goods and services, all of which are disproportionately borne by lower income people.

The IRS stats only include direct income taxes.

Pete


User currently onlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

It's called socialistic redistribution of wealth.

I don't know how it was when you took Economics 101, but now it's divided into Macroeconomics and Microeconomics, and I've only taken macroecon so far, and as an aerospace engineering it is extremely doubtful I'll ever take micro.


User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1493 times:

MD-90 wrote:

"It's called socialistic redistribution of wealth."


Absolutely.  Yeah sure And Bill Clinton was a closet socialist, the Democrats are all Marxist revolutionaries at heart, the EU will transform Europe into a far-left dictatorship, a UN-backed One World Government will take away our sovereignty, the rich will be taken out and shot, and unpatriotic liberals and will take over the world, right? Give me a break.

Seriously, the US, with its long history of free market policies, has far fewer "wealth redistribution" programs than most other countries. Depending on your point of view, this may be good or bad (I see it both ways), but the US is definitely not socialist... not even close. You may disagree with the current tax system, but calling it something that it is clearly not doesn't help your cause.


User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1483 times:

MD-90 -- it's Macroeconomics, and you would probably have learned this concept had you been reading the book and/or paying attention.

It has nothing to do with redistributing wealth! It has only to do with fairness and ability to pay. How much can you tax someone making $20K a year? 200K? $2M?

I am an aerospace engineer, and I took the trouble to get an MBA just so I would be aware of what makes our world go around. You should read up on economics before you make statements like "It's called socialistic redistribution of wealth." This goes for PHX also.

I know it's popular in Mississippi (before you get all wound up, I live here, too) to call everything you don't like "socialism" but that does not necessarily make it so!

Pete


User currently offlineKLAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1479 times:

You'd rather tax a guy making 20K a year half his salary then someone making 500Mill a year?
The guy with 500 Mil can easily live off 250 buddy  Big grin The guy on 20K would probably starve off 10K.

-Clovis


User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1476 times:

KLAX ... Great post -- That's exactly my point -- if the $500K guy pays $250K, his sacrifice may be the same as the $20K guy paying $1K.

Pete


User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1475 times:

KLAX ... Great post -- That's exactly my point -- if the $500K guy pays $250K, his sacrifice may be the same as the $20K guy paying $1K. That is, in essence, the principle of tax equity.

Pete


User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1469 times:

Delta-flyer wrote:

"This goes for PHX also."


Actually, I agree with you 100%, Delta-flyer. Maybe I didn't make my sarcasm obvious enough in my post...


User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1469 times:

Just to make it crystal clear, this is what I said to MD-90 (the non-sarcastic part):

"You may disagree with the current tax system, but calling it something that it is clearly not [socialistic redistribution of wealth] doesn't help your cause."


User currently onlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1461 times:

Bah, we may not be choking on socialistic economic policies like Sweden or Germany is, but if it ain't socialism, then what is it? Fair, I suppose? Or maybe, fairer, back when the income tax on the highest wage earners was 90%?

User currently onlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8494 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (11 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1439 times:

KLAX, of course not.

And Delta-Flyer, I don't know about you, but if I made $500,000/year, and the government wanted to tax me at a rate of 50%, while the $20,000/year worker is only taxed at $1,000 (which is a 5% tax rate), I'd be upset if I was the guy making half a million. Unless you're born with a trust fund, it's dang hard to make half a million a year. What if you're a doctor, who has shelled out great amounts of money for medical school, and now has to pay for malpractice insurance? How much do you think he'll have left after that 50% tax?


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Much Do You Pay Taxes? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 03:11:35 by Andaman
Another - How Much Do You Pay For Gas - Thread posted Thu Oct 6 2005 05:55:59 by Searpqx
How Much Do You Pay In Incometax? posted Wed Jun 16 2004 22:52:47 by Bofredrik
How Much Do You Pay For Your Household Food? posted Wed Nov 19 2003 09:32:10 by 707cmf
How Much Do You Pay? posted Sun Nov 11 2001 03:57:30 by Lindy
How Much Do You Guys Pay For A Haircut? posted Thu Mar 7 2002 16:09:48 by Lax
How Much Do You Care About National Unity? posted Tue Oct 17 2006 23:18:32 by AerospaceFan
Mormonism: How Much Do You Know About It? posted Wed Apr 12 2006 00:53:37 by Iamcanadian
How Much Do You Post? posted Mon Apr 10 2006 11:38:08 by Lordanmol
How Much Do You Drink When Beer Is Cheap? posted Sat Mar 25 2006 15:16:03 by Runway23