Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Guardian: Blair Must Check Bush's March To War  
User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 3 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2023 times:

Here's an interesting editorial from Britain's left-of-center The Guardian:



"Right now, this war is wrong because it weakens the very democracy for which we are summoned to fight. If democracy's good health were the arbiter, Mr Blair would not be currently blocking out the roaring surge of opposition in Britain and around the globe. There would be a free, prior parliamentary vote on any proposal to send troops into combat. Right now, the country is deeply divided on this question, the armed forces under-prepared and equipped, the aims blurred and unconvincing, the likely consequences as incalculable as they are potentially dire, and the exit strategy remains unrevealed."

"War cannot and should not always be avoided. Here is no argument for a blanket pacifism; this newspaper supported the Kosovo intervention and the 1991 Gulf conflict. But war must be a means of last resort, when all else fails. That moment has not yet come. It may never do so. War, as in Mr Bush's careless hands, must not be an option of choice, dubiously decreed, pre-emptively and partially prosecuted, and electorally exploited. Have we learned nothing from the past? Did history somehow stop on September 11? Are we, the British people, so vicariously panicked by the Bush administration's global fright that we forget the lessons of reconciliation, humility, tolerance and common sense belatedly grasped at the close of our own imperial era? This is not to be "anti-American". It is to be pro-American in that country's best, egalitarian tradition."

What does everyone -- and particularly a.net's British members -- think about this? Is the Guardian right?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8653 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (13 years 3 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1962 times:

The Guardian is 100% right. But this is not a blinding flash of insight, this is a universal view, albeit very articulately expressed. It is not anti-American to want them to stop this fatally stupid march to an imperial war, I think it's pro-American. I like the American people on the whole and I don't want them to go through more September 11s, which they will if their leaders continue on their present path.

fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13604 posts, RR: 76
Reply 2, posted (13 years 3 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1956 times:

The paper is just expressing the views of most of the population, and seriously for Blair, most Labour MPs and probably a good portion of the cabinet.
Another pro-Labour paper, the tabloid Daily Mirror, is much more aggressive in it's attacks on Blair and Bush, but using the likes of John Pilger to write articles does not help their credibility, I prefer the Guardian's style of criticism.
Anyway, Piers Morgan, the editor of the Daily Mirror, has fallen out with Blair, so their slant on this has as much to do with wanting the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, to succeed Blair, as Iraq.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4887 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (13 years 3 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

Well, I'm not british, but this editorial perfectly represents my opinion.

User currently offlineScotty From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 1999, 1875 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (13 years 3 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

I heard British MP George Galloway, a well known maverick, call Britain an "American Tumour in Europe" on a radio interview at lunchtime.

Whilst I find this analogy repulsive and inaccurate, I do believe that the Guardian's editorial reflects the view of the people and nations of the UK.

I also think that Blair is finished if he goes ahead with the will of the US and goes to war without a further UN resolution


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bush Trying To Pardon Self For War Crimes..sick posted Fri Sep 29 2006 23:56:05 by Mdsh00
Who Will Be The Next Bush Staffer To Leave? posted Fri Apr 21 2006 00:44:41 by Bushpilot
Bush Address To The People, I Mean Naval Academy posted Wed Nov 30 2005 18:02:36 by VSLover
Bush Lied About Going To War And WMD.....Proof? posted Wed Dec 17 2003 07:19:19 by Dragon-wings
How The Road To War Was Paved With Lies posted Tue Apr 29 2003 01:12:20 by Schoenorama
The Son Of God Goes Forth To War posted Sat Mar 22 2003 04:17:43 by MD-90
Voices From The Gulf: Yes To War posted Mon Mar 17 2003 21:56:49 by Heavymetal
Bush Just Got One Step Closer To War posted Mon Mar 17 2003 16:45:20 by Blink182
The March To Save Saddam posted Mon Feb 17 2003 15:57:37 by Galaxy5
Bush Compares Raising Twins To War posted Mon Jan 28 2002 11:38:28 by Superfly