Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS23 Arrested - Is This For Real?  
User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3688 times:

just ppruneing and come accross this from 'Danny' (Capt PPRune)
is this for real ? anyone else heard this? Quite shocking actually and very dangerous if its not true. Mods sorry i didnt know what forum this should go in.
___________________
Neil Robertson aka The Guvnor Arrested
The following information has been received and is confirmed:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Robertson is alleged to have sexually abused a primary schoolgirl on several occasions between September 1 and December 27 last year at his home in Troon, Ayrshire.

The 37-year-old is charged with attempting to rape the girl on September 1. He is charged with using lewd, libidinous and indecent practices towards the girl on December 27 and other dates not known to the prosecution.

A third charge alleges that he made an indecent photograph on the girl on December 27.

It is also alleged that between December 27 and January 1 he wilfully ill-treated the same child in a manner likely to cause her unnecessary suffering or injury.

At Ayr Sheriff Court on Friday afternoon (7/2/03), Robertson made no plea or declaration and was fully committed for trial.

He was remanded in custody.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Thanks to all the members of PPRuNe who were instrumental in gathering evidence of Robertsons past history. It is my understanding that the information, which was passed to the police led to their investigation and his subsequent arrest and detention until trial.

Robertson was known on PPRuNe by the following Usernames; The Guvnor, Ceilidh, Scarebus321, Sid's Stars and at least 10 others. He was also known on other aviation forums as SAS23 and Lawyergirl amongst others.

As the matter is sub judice there will be no further public discussion on this case or previous history pertaining to Robertson. As and when the trial date is set and subject to any reporting restrictions information regarding the case will be posted here.
____________________


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3560 times:

That is not good for him and if its not true its not good for you.

User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3554 times:

He probably pissed off US law inforcements so bad because of his anti-US sentiment.

UAL747


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

I would like to see the actual newspaper story this was in. Do they have police blotters in the newspapers in Scotland? Just a posting on Pprune is not what I would call a good source.

Can somebody please set us up with a link.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

"law inforcements " ?...

Law Enforcement ?...



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3410 times:

Yes, it looks very confirmed !!

User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3397 times:

He probably pissed off US law [enforcements] so bad because of his anti-US sentiment.


The US has nothing to do with it. This is Scottish law. We have sheriffs there too, you know.  Insane


User currently offlineGKirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

Its true. No doubt there will be stories in tomorrow's papers about it.


When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3253 times:

May I suggest that a moderator locks this thread ASAP, there are all sorts of issues regarding prejudicing any future trial.


Matt



you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineHepkat From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 2341 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

How can an internet discussion prejudice a trial? As far as I know, the only danger of prejudice lies with the jury, in which case the trial judge will order them sequestered.

User currently offlineAA61hvy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 13977 posts, RR: 57
Reply 10, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

Good point Hepkat. Thats amazing though, I can't believe someone would do that, but I guess out of 10,000 people you will get some bad eggs.


Go big or go home
User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3200 times:

Wasn't this matter discussed and subsequently locked less than 24 hours ago?

'Former A.net member arrested' was the title IIRC.

The idea of trial by jury is that the jury makes a decision on the evidence presented to them in a courtroom, not idle gossip on a public internet forum or (in the Bowyer/Woodgate trial) what they read in newspapers.

I'm not saying that it isn't a valid topic for discussion but that may not be a legal one.


Matt



you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3180 times:

This has been discussed already. I agree with Hepkat 100%. I don't see where this can interfere with any trial that might ensue, but why don't we all wait a while before ascending like a lynching mob on Neil. And remember, guilty until proven innocent. If Neil did do this, he deserves time. If he's proven innocent, than that should be the end of it.

User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

guilty until proven innocent.

Don't you mean Innocent until proven guilty?


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3182 times:

Don't you mean Innocent until proven guilty?

Not in Scotland.


User currently offlineDavid B. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3175 times:

Is there a link to the story or something? Is there some way we can confirm that this is not BS?


Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3154 times:

guilty until proven innocent.

Don't you mean Innocent until proven guilty?


ROTFLMAO! Uh, yeah, that's what I meant. Although I'm sure, with my past tussles with Neil on here, some might not believe that!  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 17, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3148 times:

Yea, is there any official link to this? I don't know if I take this real seriously.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3145 times:

Lol, one of the best slipups ever made here. Don't judge the guy unless he's found guilty. Is this even true? So far we've seen nothing official and I don't really want to believe a (perhaps madeup) news report from a person that hates him. As for legality, there probably ARE legal issues. I thought the mods were going to have a discussion and decide...

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 19, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 3132 times:

Once criminal proceedings are brought, the matter becomes sub judice meaning that under both English and Scottish law, the case cannot be discussed in the public arena for fear of prejudicing the trial, although events at court can be reported. This may be different to what happens in the US. For example, disclosing the identity of a suspect prior to an arrest is also forbidden in the UK.

As for prejudicing a trial, the Daily Mirror in the UK published an interview with the father of the alleged victim of an attack by footballers Lee Bowyer and Jonathan Woodgate. Despite the case going ahead on the basis of it being an "ordinary" assault, the Mirror repeated allegations that the attack was racist in nature. The trial subsequently collapsed, and the newspaper was prosecuted for contempt of court, being fined hundreds of thousands of pounds as a result.

That's the danger. Tread carefully.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 19
Reply 20, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3107 times:

Just goes to show ya, you never really know anybody.


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5310 posts, RR: 61
Reply 21, posted (11 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3116 times:

I have chosen to close this topic for obvious reasons. Again (and as I said yesterday), it could be reopened depening on further discussion among the moderators.

Best Regards,
Jeremiah - Forum Moderator



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This For Real? (Bill Gates Mug) posted Wed Apr 5 2006 03:44:14 by Derico
Is This For Real? *Pol. Correctness Warning* posted Mon Mar 13 2006 02:30:36 by Derico
Is This For Real? Very Funny posted Mon Mar 28 2005 16:31:55 by Horus
Is This For Real? (I Mean The Picture) posted Mon Nov 18 2002 20:49:39 by Airways1
Tanya Grotter, Is This For Real? posted Tue Nov 12 2002 09:15:26 by Tbar220
Is This Video Real? (No, It's Not That Model A320) posted Sun Oct 29 2006 02:56:18 by Kaneporta1
How Is This For A Close Call? posted Mon Aug 7 2006 07:09:42 by Thom@s
How Is This For A Ruined Christmas Present? posted Mon Jun 12 2006 10:24:30 by AAFLT1871
How Is This For Freaky? posted Thu Mar 31 2005 06:41:13 by Atrude777
How Is This For A Short Lived Celebration? posted Mon Dec 6 2004 13:20:52 by Thom@s