Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Wesley Clark: Bush Admin. Does Not Respect Allies  
User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark, NATO's former supreme commander, who may seek the Democratic nomination for the presidency, blamed the Bush administration for not respecting our allies.


From a Reuters article (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030216/pl_nm/politics_clark_dc_2):

Clark, 58, said Bush had failed to respect the reservations of key allies like France, Germany and Russia that are calling for the United States not to rush into war with Iraq over alleged weapons of mass destruction but allow United Nations inspectors more time to do their work.

"As long as the United States stands with Europe we can move the world," he said.

He also said he would have worked much more with NATO and the United Nations against al Qaeda, the group accused of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on America, and treated the threat from North Korea's nuclear weapons program as a higher priority.



From an AP article (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030216/ap_wo_en_po/na_pol_us_clark_democrats_1):

"We're at a turning point in American history here. We are about to embark on an operation that's going to put us in a colonial position in the Middle East following Britain, following the Ottomans," Clark said. "It's a huge change for the American people and for what this country stands for."

Clark said he is concerned with how the administration has handled longtime allies, like those in Europe.

"This is an administration which really hasn't respected our allies," he said.

Clark said one thing he learned in the Kosovo campaign is "if you really want allies, you've got to listen to their opinions, you've got to take them seriously, you've got to work with their issues."



What do you think?

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineThumper From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1382 times:

Who may seek the Democratic nomination for the presidency, blamed the Bush administration for not respecting our allies.

NUFF SAID!


User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1373 times:

If I'm not mistaken, most of our Allies are with the USA on this. Everyone talks about France, Germany and Belgium, but what about the other 12 out of the 15 that are supporting the US at the moment?


"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1359 times:

JetService wrote:

"If I'm not mistaken, most of our Allies are with the USA on this. Everyone talks about France, Germany and Belgium, but what about the other 12 out of the 15 that are supporting the US at the moment?"


But there's another way of looking at that... Like it or not, France and Germany are major European powers; they have far larger populations, as well as more wealth and influence, than the majority of European countries. In political terms, they are the equivalents of Texas and California in this country -- only more so.

IMHO, Bush cannot claim that Europe supports him as long as he does not have those two countries with him on this issue. And so far he only has one of the big three European powers -- the UK -- officially supporting the war.

[Edited 2003-02-17 03:45:18]

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1348 times:

General Clark has been making more and more news lately, and you may be looking at the next Democratic nominee for President in this guy. He's got more military credentials than any other Democrat, and more than Bush will ever have. He's eloquent, he makes some sense, and his message may resonate with a lot more voters than you would imagine. What his message would be about domestic matters remains to be seen, but it the economy stays sour, and gas prices are still soaring by summer-NBC News was citing sources tonight that say prices could hit $3 a gallon by summer-he may find himself in the forefront of the nomination battle.

Remember his name-I think you're just beginning to hear from this guy.


User currently offlineDahawaiian From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 228 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

He is absolutely right, epitomized by Rumsfeld's "Old Europe" remark in reference to France and Germany. These kinds of remarks will not help the US gain friends in the world, and that is exactly what Wesley Clark is pointing out. Just because some of our allies disagree with us on this particular issue isn't grounds for this kind of silly name-calling. The term "think before you speak" comes to mind.
You don't see Colin Powell displaying this kind of unprofessionalism. Like Clark, Powell knows that Rumsfledesque rhetoric is counterproductive. For a second-term defense secretary, it doesn't seem as if he has learned much.
I'd vote for Clark over Bush any day because he actually knows something about foreign relations, unlike Bush who relies on his "expert" staff. Things would go a lot smoother if our administration could keep their mouths shut sometimes.


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1324 times:

Considering the fact he is yet another Klintoon hack and is thinking of running for President, talking trash is fully expected. He dishonors every man and woman who wears the uniform.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlinePHX-LJU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1313 times:

B757300 wrote:

"He dishonors every man and woman who wears the uniform."


How on Earth does he do that? Just by politely disagreeing with the Bush administration and yourself? In other words, a person shouldn't have opinions of one's own -- just blind obedience to Bush -- if he doesn't want to "dishonor every man and woman who wears the uniform"? This is absolutely ridiculous, B757300, and you know it.

[Edited 2003-02-17 04:33:07]

User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined exactly 13 years ago today! , 2676 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1305 times:

The Bush Administration (except for Colin Powell) are certainly not in lack of arrogance. They only respect those who agree with them and villify all others. That said, I still think they are taking the right approach in preparing for war against Iraq.

We'll see how this all plays out. If Saddam is deposed peacefully, before an invasion begins, Bush will smell like a bed of roses and the Dems may as well not even bother running in the next election. If Bush starts a war and screws up, the Republicans may as well abdicate for the next 50 years. The stakes are incredibly high.

Pete


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1282 times:

B757300 wrote:

"He dishonors every man and woman who wears the uniform."

And our great Leader honors those men and women by:

a. Being a drunken AWOL daddys boy during his National Guard stint while thousands of Americans were being killed in Vietnam; and
b. Staking the lives of tens of thousands of American men and women in uniform because he wants to get even with Saddam for "almost killing his daddy."

B757300, what the hell do you know about the uniform anyways? Ever wore one? Or even attempted to? Or even thought about it? Or is your posturing based entirely on sitting on your barcalounger as you orgasm every time Bush comes on TV wearing a phony fatigue jacket? Wesley Clark knows more about the military and NATO than you and Bush combined a million times over.


User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1282 times:

I'd like to learn more about this guy Clark, sounds like he's got his act together. We could use a pres. That's got some common sense.


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1281 times:

Considering the fact he is yet another Klintoon hack and is thinking of running for President, talking trash is fully expected. He dishonors every man and woman who wears the uniform.

B757300, you dishoner anyone who says they're an American. You're so friggin' out there that ANYONE who doesn't see the fucking world exactly as you do is a left-wing, "Klintoon" (what an assinine statement) nut. You're the one who is less of an American than any of us.

Last time I checked, Mr. Right, Clark was in the uniform long before Bill Clinton was President of The United States. So I don't see where there is any dishonor. What utter bullshit.

To call a career military man, who has served his country honorably, was the Supreme Commander of NATO someon who "dishonors ever many and woman who wears the uniform", is the sheerest form of lunacy, coming from a right-wing nut who can't see beyond his own petty hatreds. Disagreeing with Bush, or the Sent-from-God Republicans (sarcasm intended) doesn't make one dishonorable. You're are the quintisential "ugly American" come to life.


User currently offlineDc863 From Denmark, joined Jun 1999, 1558 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1277 times:

I don't trust Clark one bit. He and Madaleine Halfwit had a personal vendetta against the Serbs.

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1253 times:

Bush Sr. ran an extremely successful war in Iraq towards the end of his term, but he still managed to lose the election. A success in Iraq won't gaurantee Dubya a win in '04, especially if the economy still sucks, and the war on terror still is raging.

User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 20
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1245 times:

Bush doesn't have a prayer, why even bother to discuss him as a candidate?


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13170 posts, RR: 78
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1198 times:

So Clark should have let the Serbs carry on slaughtering those pesky Muslins (and many others too) Dc863?
Clark had a big falling out with the UK commander in Kosovo, but they handled it with the minimum of fuss and made up.
Funny how a real military man can stir up the Republican loony fringe, they seem to prefer the 'virtual warriors' in the Bush regime.
Cheney was another who managed not to get drafted for Vietnam, "I had other priorities" he reportedly said.
Funny how the right wing attack dogs forget little things like this.


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1191 times:

He dishonors every man and woman who wears the uniform.

Ah but when he did wear it, you'd get down and kiss his ass , because a good right wingbot respects the military, doesn't he? It's only when someone wearing the uniform actually opens up their capacity to form an opinion that may actually disagree with yours that they become scum.

I don't doubt, -300, you have a big American flag sticker on your car. Kindly put a big asterisk next to it that qualifies only that small part of America you feel is worthy enough to maintain their own opinion.


User currently offlineGalaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 25
Reply 17, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1175 times:

Heavymetal
From United States, joined Jul 2001, 3601 posts, RR: 67
Reply: 16
Posted Mon Feb 17 2003 15:10:34 UTC+1 and read 13 times:

Ah but when he did wear it, you'd get down and kiss his ass , because a good right wingbot respects the military, doesn't he? It's only when someone wearing the uniform actually opens up their capacity to form an opinion that may actually disagree with yours that they become scum.

I don't doubt, -300, you have a big American flag sticker on your car. Kindly put a big asterisk next to it that qualifies only that small part of America you feel is worthy enough to maintain their own opinion.


What a hypocrite you are Heavy, you only agree with clark because he slams bush and is trying to run for a president as a Democrat, had his views been conservative you would have called him a Bush robot. People are only open-minded and think for themselves if they agree with YOUR views and only your views.

Just like most of you libs think, there should only be one train of thought and if you’re not on it, the conductor will run you over. You guys always talk about being open-minded but you’re so unreceptive to other points of view that don’t reflect yours.





"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13170 posts, RR: 78
Reply 18, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1167 times:

At least they can articulate a different view, rather than doing Eric Cartman impressions.

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

What a hypocrite you are Heavy, you only agree with clark because he slams bush and is trying to run for a president as a Democrat.

Galaxy5, Clark has not even declared which party he would seek the nomination from, if he runs. He has said he can't imagine running as a Republican because of the policies of the current administration. And Heavymetal didn't slam Bush at all-he was slamming B757300 for his assinine comments that, simply because Clark served under Clinton, he somehow dishonored the uniform he wears, which is a crock of crap.

Bush robot. People are only open-minded and think for themselves if they agree with YOUR views and only your views.

I think you need to speak to B757300, not Heavymetal about that one, Galaxy5. Conservatives, by definition, are closed-minded people, since conservatives don't like change. So you have it backwards, I believe.

Just like most of you libs think, there should only be one train of thought and if you’re not on it.

You confuse "liberal" with "reactionary", Galaxy5. Despite the hard work of the GOP and mouthpieces like Limbaugh and the Republican News Network to make the two synonymous, the are not. Reactionaries, whether they be on the left or right, are closed-minded, as we see from the ultra-left, and the ultra-right. But most main-stream liberals and most main-stream conservatives-those not given to ideological hysterics-are open to ideas from other sides. It's the lunatic fringes that are not, and B757300 definitely is in that lunatic fringe.


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1153 times:

Galaxy...

My issue wasn't with Wesley Clark's opinion. My issue was with a poster flaming off about how someone "dishonors the uniform" by actually having the nerve to possess a non-"On Board And Behind George Bush" opinion.

I certainly don't have to tell you that by wearing the uniform, you are tasked to do with what the Commander In Chief's orders are, regardless of what you think of them. That is at the noble heart of serving your country. But at the heart of a country worth serving is the freedom to form and voice an opinion very much to the counter of that Commander in Chief's orders. Wesley Clark..now out of uniform and no longer obligated to do the job he spent a career doing well...taking and carrying out orders...has earned the right to take advantage of that freedom. 757300 used his right to voice an opinion about how Clark's excercise of that freedom 'dishonored' those who protect it.

And I used my right to call B.S. on that opinion. It has nothing to do with liberal or conservative.


User currently offlineCapt.Picard From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

To a certain extent, I agree. On the other hand, I believe France & Germany have been unreasonable in their delaying and blocking tactics. I can partially excuse Germany, in that their belief that war will be damaging and unnecessarily costly, is more or less genuine.

However, the same cannot be said for France, in my opinion. Although I respect the French people's decision against a war in Iraq, I believe the French government actually realises weapons inspections have been, and are, useless; that Saddam is a brutal dictator who will continue to kill his own people indiscriminately; and that Iraq will almost certainly pose a serious threat in the near future. And whatever anyone says, the fact that there are very large quantities of oil lying beneath the ground in Iraq is partly, although not the principle, reason for the US to safeguard the region.

The French government believes war is now necessary, and has done for a quite a while now. But the war will only start at a time of their choosing, as far as they are concerned. They do not like the fact that America wields so much power and influence (that goes for a long list of other countries too) - it bothers them. What bothers them too, is that they still can't get over the fact that they lost the monopoly on power 100 years ago...that hurts, and to make themselves feel better, they kick up a huge fuss at NATO, EU and UN levels.

Normally I wouldn't mind, but I believe the French government has stepped a bit too far on some occasions, and its present stance is not a reasonable one, given it knows aggression is now the only solution (whatever it may say publicly)....

I just hope, for the Iraqi people's sake, that the US and Europe put a little more effort into rebuilding Iraq than they have in Afghanistan - which remains as anarchic as ever (may that soon change...)


User currently offlineRyanb741 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2002, 3221 posts, RR: 16
Reply 22, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

I am with Capt Picard on this one. I am pro war on Iraq because I believe Saddam is a menace who needs to be removed, but I can see that Germany has given compelling reasons for no military action to take place (I disagree with their 'no war under any circumstances' stance however). The French on the other hand are just being a pain in the ass for the sake of it, just like they constantly are within the EU. The thing is, France will eventually stick it up Germany's ass and join the war against Saddam, leaving the Germans very isolated and France having no friends either in the 'old' or the 'new' Europes! Unfortunately whilst everyone else has worked out that the US are for the time being the top dogs, the French find this hard to come to terms with (just look at their stance on their colonies for example). It's a shame really, because France is an amazing country and, hell, I even did a University degree in the French language, but they suck when it comes to politics.


I used to think the brain is the most fascinating part of my body. But, hey, who is telling me that?
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1093 times:

lol @ GDB

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1080 times:

So it's ok for Germany to disagree with the US, but France is labelled as an enemy and a traitor when they disagree?! And people say that they are not anti-French. The double standard here is just obsurd.

And before you go shooting off your mouths about France not helping at all militarily, check the news and you'd see that France recently sent their nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf. I wonder why...


25 Capt.Picard : "see that France recently sent their nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf. I wonder why"... Good point, should have added that to my p
26 Ryanb741 : Cba and Capt.Picard - that is exactly the point I am trying to make. The French WILL participate in the war, sticking it up to the Germans in the proc
27 Arsenal@LHR : You have to remember German constitution does not allow a pre-emptive strike.
28 Dc863 : GDB as a Serbian American I'd never give Wesley Chump Clark the time of day let alone my vote. And no I'm not a Rep, or Dem., I'm Libertarian.
29 FDXmech : I feel Wesley Clark is just playing politics. Well, that makes sense as he might run for office and so this is par for the course. But when Bush ran f
30 Klaus : FDXmech: But when Bush ran for office, he abhorred nation building and was seen as an international lightweight. As opposed to... what? Nation buildin
31 Post contains images FDXmech : >>>Nation building both in the Balkans and in Afghanistan is mainly done by Europe; And that he is in fact an international lightweight couldn´t have
32 Post contains images Klaus : FDXmech: Well Bush the lightweight resumed the disarmament of Iraq which in 1998 seemed an impossibility. The term "international lightweight" identif
33 Post contains images FDXmech : Klaus, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
34 Cwapilot : Ummmmm.....I've seen Wesley Clark speak three times, most recently at my sister's graduation. It was clear that his graduation speech was the beginnin
35 Heavymetal : The far left is taking over the party, As a direct response to the equal and opposite action of the far right being in COMPLETE control of the GOP, an
36 Post contains images Keesje : At least this guy knows how to build bridges to solve things, instead of escalating them.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Wesley Clark : Does He Have A Chance? posted Sat Jan 17 2004 14:44:14 by Flying Belgian
The Isle Of Man Does Not Exist posted Thu Oct 26 2006 21:40:04 by PlymSpotter
Pres. Fox Does Not Sign Bill Into Law posted Thu May 4 2006 06:21:23 by ANCFlyer
Quoting Monty Python Does Not Impress Girls posted Thu Apr 27 2006 21:58:00 by LHMARK
Gravity Does Not Exist: God, Is Pushing Them Down posted Sat Oct 8 2005 21:20:36 by Airbuzz
Who Does Not Drink Beer In Here? posted Wed Jun 15 2005 09:33:27 by UTA_flyinghigh
My Word Does Not Work posted Fri Apr 1 2005 23:48:09 by BRAVO7E7
Bush Figures. (Statistics, Not Action Figure...) posted Thu Jan 20 2005 16:40:28 by Thom@s
Michael Moore Does Not Speak For All.. posted Sat Nov 13 2004 17:48:59 by EMBQA
What Will You Do If Your Candidate Does Not Win? posted Mon Oct 18 2004 21:01:45 by Corpsnerd09