GDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 12947 posts, RR: 79 Reply 3, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1258 times:
The South Korean capital is in artillery range of the North, 1000's of US troops would be killed, there is Bush's problem, casualties, for all the bluster of some on here and in the US media, the USA cannot, will not, accept heavy casualties.
Plus NK has at least one or two nukes, fancy trying living in a world economy with several Asian economies in free fall?
B747forlife From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 392 posts, RR: 3 Reply 10, posted (10 years 9 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1192 times:
Jj - Also not to mention Iraq has no nukes, yet. Would you really like for Iraq and North Korea to be running around with those things? Of course not. Every situation is different, and invading N. Korea would be the stupidest thing to do ever.