Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bush Moves Ahead On Missile Defense  
User currently offlineTWA From Iran, joined Sep 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 945 times:

Hello to all, This is kind of a repeat post of my "Missile Defense System II" Thread. This time I have conformation on the Missile Defense System

http://www.msnbc.com/snap/517502.asp

I'm totally in favor of it!!!!!

Thats 10 Points for President Bush

TWA

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePeter From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 925 times:

That's great. I too think that the US should have one. I didn't see it in the article, but does any one know what type of system Bush wants or when it might be ready?

User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 922 times:

Great!

User currently offlineTWA From Iran, joined Sep 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 915 times:

Heya, Glad you guys support it to!!!!!

TWA


User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 914 times:

This is going to piss off every other country in the world. Bush hasn't even been president for a week and he's already pissing off foreign nations.

User currently offlineTWA From Iran, joined Sep 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 911 times:

Its going to make a lot of people mad, But oh well. If they have a problem we'll fix that problem.

TWA


User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 908 times:

Pissing off foreign nations like who?
This is going to work partly for NATO u know! What nations China????? Damn it they should kill all those communists over there.


User currently offlineBoeing in pdx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 904 times:

I hope it is the lazer program but knowing how bush is a dumbass he will probably chose the missles. even thought the lazers work better

User currently offlineIndianGuy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 900 times:

This is a sad day for the cause of disarmament.

This is only going to push the rest of the world into an arms race that nobody, except the arms mafia in the Pentagon wants.

Its sad that Pres.Bush Jr has given in to this arms mafia.

The Russians will most certainly be moving for their own such system, probably built around their S300 system, as well as beef up their ICBMs.

Its the Chinese reaction which has me worried sick. They are most definitely going to up the ante with more ICBMs and defence spending, which means India will have no option but to follow suit.

Pres. Bush deserves to have those missiles stuck up his rear for pushing the world into another arms race.


User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 894 times:

LOT767-300ER

Sorry to say this, but you would have to be one of the most idiotic people I have come across. I refer to your "Damn it they should kill all those communists over there.".

I know, while we are at it, why don't we kill all people with a different value system to you.

OK....let's make a list.

Jews
Muslims
Socialists
Australians
Indians
Germans
Russian

and while we are at, how about we kill all Irish and Polish people. Hell knows, they are the butt of a hell of a lot of jokes, so they mustn't be worth having around. Right?

Wake up!.

----

As to the rest of this missile defence system. The Cold War is now over, and there really is no nuclear threat which is going to require such and expensive, and threatening system such as this.

What needs to be done is to try and stamp out the new forms of terrorism, i.e. chemical weapons, suitcase bombs, etc, because this is where the real threat to America is going to come from, and it will more than likely come from within, a la Oklahoma City.

You will know have Russia, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, and all these other country's which I have noticed some Americans calling the 'enemy' (even though you aren't at war with any of them), spending more on defence, which will herald a new arms race, and with it, maybe, another Cold War. The planet does not need this.


User currently offlineDerek H From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 888 times:

I am totally against the Missle Defence System. Aren't we try to get all nations to live in peace, and get along? Clinton has tried to unite nations, and get them to work together. I have a feeling if we build this its going to give other countries a bad opinion such as, "Hey, we dont trust you, so were going to protect ourselves, you've never shot anything at us, but we still want this toy for no reason what so ever except to be on top off technology, and to have a nice toy to mess with"

Have we had a problem yet with other countries attacking us? No we havn't so I dont think we should be worried now. We have the army to protect us, thats what it is here for.
If we had a missle defence system, would could just sit on our butts and be like, lets not fight, lets not help other counties, lets just sit here. Hey, if they are going t shoot missles at us, the Missle Defence System will protect us.

ITS A BIG MISTAKE TO MAKE IT. AND A HUGE WASTE OF OUR MONEY!! Talk about the USA being free with money to build this, we'll waste billions of dollars on this, yet sit trillions of dollars in debt. But then again, debt is becoming an american thing. There is so many better things that the feds could do with our nations money.

I still think we are all going to die since Bush was elected, i think he is a moron, who knows nothing, I feel at my age, 15, with a nineth grade education, I am smater than he is. But that has nothing to do with this. But all in all, i think this will cause more problems.

We have no problems with foregin countries attacking us, so why, mess? Other countries know the US is a strong millitary force, and dont usuall mess with us. We are the ones usually sticking out noses in to other counties problems trying to solve them.
We are fine now, leave it be!!! Any one agree??


User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4531 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 882 times:

Thank you Brissie! You hit it right on. Knowing Bush, he'll probably try to restart Reagan's Star Wars project.

User currently offlineN766AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 879 times:

>I feel at my age, 15, with a nineth grade education, I am smater than he is.

Hmm... so you wouldn't have ANY problem, as a 15 year-old obtaining a bachelors from Yale and an MBA from Harvard, not to mention flying an F-102, and you have just as much political experience as a 6-year Texan governor, the first ever to be re-elected. No problem... oh- and maybe learn how to spell? You may be "smater" than the POTUS, but not smarter.

How immature.

Now, as most of you know, I am not a big fan of President Bush and probably will not vote for him in 2004. But on this issue, he has my respect.

>This is a sad day for the cause of disarmament

Oh please.... It is THE primary obligation of the federal government to provide for the common defense, and to be vigilant regarding potential threats, prospective capabilities, and perceived intentions of potential enemies.
I strictly oppose unilateral disarmament and dismemberment of our defense infrastructure.


That which is hastily torn down will not be easily rebuilt.



User currently offlineBoeing in pdx From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 880 times:

This is Regan's star wars project

And why are people aganst anti missle projects? The new lazer projet TRW is making to combat the Lebanese terrorists will save thousands of Isrelies. or the ABL which will protect our troops from schds?

i am only aganst NMD but these other projects will save hundes of american soldiers so why are you aganst them?


Pardon my spelling, thanks.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Russian General: U.S. Missile Defense A Threat posted Thu Oct 19 2006 03:11:40 by AerospaceFan
U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Now Operational posted Tue Jun 20 2006 09:26:07 by AerospaceFan
Bush Warns Iran On Israel Again posted Mon Mar 20 2006 22:01:14 by RJpieces
US Missile Defense posted Fri Feb 24 2006 19:22:01 by Lutenist
Bush Waives Sanctions On Saudi Arabia posted Fri Sep 23 2005 22:11:21 by Tbar220
Bush Tightens Screws On Damascus, Backed By France posted Wed Mar 2 2005 10:53:18 by Keesje
MSNBC.com - Bush Pulling Ahead posted Mon Oct 18 2004 21:04:10 by EA CO AS
Bush/Kerry - Similar On Important Issues? posted Thu May 20 2004 15:27:49 by Homer71
Missile Defense Sheilds? posted Wed Jan 14 2004 22:00:26 by Lehpron
"That's My Bush" Back On The Air! posted Tue Jan 6 2004 20:27:53 by ConcordeBoy