Andreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 30
Reply 1, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1708 times:
Now that's an easy one: We translate all Iraq-related threads into Arabian, especially the posts of those www-heroes like galaxy, apathoid, thumper etc. and broadcast it all over Iraq, 24-7...either he'll step down voluntarily and moves to America or he'll die laughing...mission accomplished...now send that money over!
Boeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2285 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1702 times:
Either that or make him watch reality TV shows all day. Arrgh!
Seriously, it would take time -- a combination of stepped-up inspections, continued sanctions/oil embargo and stepped-up no-fly zone patrols. It's not perfect, but I believe Iraq is being watched enough for him to think twice.
MD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8516 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1683 times:
That's easy, put international diplomatic pressure on him to disarm, step up UN inspector roles, and continue the oil for food program.
a combination of stepped-up inspections, continued sanctions/oil embargo and stepped-up no-fly zone patrols.
That will never work. What international diplomatic pressure? The UN inspectors are seeing exactly what Saddam wants them to see and no more. The oil for food program is a joke. Saddam has 60 palaces and yet people don't want war even though there ARE starving children in Baghdad, unlike the US?
And who's hurt by the oil embargo and the sanctions? With 60 palaces, doesn't seem like Saddam is. And what good is it going to do to increase the no-fly zones? Make the Iraqis dependent on Land Cruisers and camals and forgo aircraft altogether.
Both of y'all need to come up with much better suggestions because what you've suggested won't work at all. It certainly hasn't for the last 12 years.
Ilyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1669 times:
Put Saddam and Bush on Jerry Springer and have them duke it out on live TV. Now THAT would be hillarious. Question is, would that get rid of Saddam??? I bet Springer's ratings would go up so high, he'd have to sign a contract.
Sebolino From France, joined May 2001, 3717 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1559 times:
You send UN soldiers in Iraq to prevent any killing and to contain Iraqi forces + inspectors to disarm + heavy diplomatic work to isolate Hussein from other Arabian countries + direct help to the population through international help association.
DaV From Italy, joined Jun 2001, 669 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (12 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1515 times:
DaV, if Saddam was either desposed, killed, or exiled, the embargos against Iraq would drop, and a war (or the threat of war) would indirectly give them food.
I don't think the same happened in Afghanistan, despite being now a "free" nation. I think we all agree that Saddam is a threat, but not for Americans or whoever, but for his people, and I highly doubt president Bush wants a war to save thousand of Irakis he doesn't care of. Your key argument is "if Saddam was either desposed, killed, or exiled", my question is, very simply, is necessary a war to achieve this result?