Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sadaam Has To Get Out Of His Own Country?  
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 17
Posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 2041 times:

Hi, I'm definitely all against Sadaam and his rule. yet, how can Bush tell him to get out of his own country?

Yes, he's a dictator, his Government sucks, but still....it's his country....how can Bush tell ANY leader to get out of his own country???

I see it as just a bully attempt.

Now, for people with a mind barrier here, take this example:

A boss for Company *A* has the right to fire anyone that's on the workforce with company *A*. Company *A* cannot fire anyone from company *B*, and vise versa.


I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 2027 times:

I am sure Idi Amin feels the same way.

I don't think Ugandan people will though.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineMxCtrlr From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 2485 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 2005 times:

Got to go with L-188 on this one...he needs to go and someone needs to tell him. If the schoolyard bully isn't stopped, then he keeps beating up other kids, until someone bigger and/or stronger makes him stop. Same thing here but it just a whole lot bigger schoolyard!

MxCtrlr  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Freight Dogs Anonymous - O.O.T.S.K.  Smokin cool



DAMN! This SUCKS! I just had to go to the next higher age bracket in my profile! :-(
User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1987 times:

Now that I've safely made my case on what a mistake this is, I can chime in on why it needs to go fast and efficiently to keep from becoming a BIGGER mistake....and part of what will make that happen is the abrupt and hopefully painful dispatch of Mr. Hussein and his two scumbag offspring.

Iraq is NOT his country. Hell is his country. Time to stamp his visa home.


User currently offlineUSAirways737 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1026 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1963 times:

but still....it's his country....

It's not HIS country until the people of Iraq can vote for who they want to lead their country without fearing death if they vote for the other person.

We don't call the US Bush's country, it is the OUR country. WE chose him without fear of being murdered or tortured if we voted for Al Gore. That's how every country should be.

Erik in MSP


User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 1956 times:

We don't call the US Bush's country,

...yet.


User currently offlineUSAirways737 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1026 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week ago) and read 1945 times:

...yet

You go ahead and call it his country if you want to, but the hell if I ever will. Do you honestly think he doesn't know that WE have to re-elect him? He doesn't just get to decide that he's going to be president for another twenty years. WE will always have the power in this country to at least decide who leads our country.

Erik in MSP


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 1 week ago) and read 1942 times:

To keep this in perspective, Saddam could have stayed in his own country had he disarmed like he was supposed to. Getting him out of Iraq is the only sure way that can know that he is not in control. In the minds of non-tyrants, exile is better than an invasion of his country.
Hussein and presidency of GWB is ludicrous.


User currently offlineDragon-wings From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3995 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1926 times:

Bush telling Saddam to leave the country was dumb cause Bush and the rest of the world knows he will not leave Iraq. Where is he supposed to go? I doubt any country would want him.


Don't give up don't ever give up - Jim Valvano
User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1915 times:

Actually several countries would have offered him asylum including Russia.

User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

Leave it to Bush to make a totally unrealistic, demeaning statement like this. I honestly think that if it weren't for the tremendous pressure from the US to comply with resolutions, Saddam might actually be willing to work with the rest of the world. However, I think, like Bush, Saddam's ego is huge, and being TOLD what to do with his weapons, and now being TOLD to leave Iraq, there is no way in hell he will ever comply. It's human nature to resist when TOLD to do something.

I don't want Saddam in power any more than anyone else, but I think the way Bush is going about removing him is extreme, and his lack of diplomacy is a disgrace.


User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1899 times:

Ilyushin,

Right.....if Bush had a lack of diplomacy, I think we would have attacked back in November when 1441 was passed.

Or rather your version of lack or diplomacy is what France is doing instead? Gimem a break.



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16365 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

I don't want Saddam in power any more than anyone else, but I think the way Bush is going about removing him is extreme, and his lack of diplomacy is a disgrace.

Diplomacy has not worked. Iraq has been in breach of UN resolutions for 12 years.

It's time for force.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1888 times:

En, you're a smart man.....answer these questions:

First the Administration said he must 'disarm'. Do you think for the Administration that point would...have...ever....been reached?

Second...if Saddam had through some miracle in the past four months expedited monitoring and WMD destruction, and Hans Blix reported to the UN last week that most if not all were accounted for and in the process of being negated, that we would have brought our forces home?

And finally....suppose Saddam had actually sometime today gone on tv and said me & the boys are outta here, Iraq is now under UN control. Do you think Bush's mission would be accomplished? Do you think at that point not one Abrahms or Bradley would have crossed that border? Everyone would just pack it in and go home?

I answer no, no and no.

There are reports surfacing tonight that several Republican Guard commanders have made inroads to stand their forces down. I can only hope that's NOT wishful thinking. If it is, Baghdad has just awoken to its' last quiet sunrise for awhile.


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

HM,

Sure.

1. Yes, it certainly could have been reached in my opinion. Saddam's game playing and our refusal to play ball made Bush look an insatiable madman to anyone that is capable of feeling boredom or impatience. Even I got sick of hearing about Saddam from GWB. But Bush was not insatiable rather he was fiercely persistent. For that, he has my respect and admiration. In the past, when Saddam played this game, the world sort of said "f' it" after a while, "I have other shit to worry about." Only Tony Blair really kept an eye on Saddam from I what I hear.

If Saddam actually (key word) handed over and Blix verified tons of the real bad stuff (not missles that exceed UN limits by 12 miles or whatever) like VX, sarin, botulinum, and anthrax, I would bet money that the escalation would have stopped. If we had actual unconditional disarmament, the sanctions would have been lifted and Iraq (sans Saddam probably) would have been open for business. They could sell oil and natural gas and buy Starbucks and Blockbuster memberships.

But I think that the Bush Administration reasonably concluded that Saddam would never disarm...thus the goal became regime change. Given the importance of not showing any weakness in the tribal society that Saddam hails from, there was no way he could do it and not be overthrown.

2. I think that I might have answered two. I would bet we would have rolled it back signficantly but kept forces in Kuwait around...just in case. I do not think that we would or should ever trust Saddam completely even if he did surrender his WMD. That is being prudent in my opinion.

3. Assuming that Saddam grabbed the kids and left, (this is a huge and almost absurd assumption) how would the UN secure Iraq? Walking away in this situation could be really bad because of the uncertainty post Saddam. There is no one esle around but us to go in and make sure that the guy passed over for two promotions doesn't just step in and take over. Saddam's police state apparatus would not just disappear. The WMD would still be a threat. I see nothing ominous by the fact that the US would not just disappear from the scene.

Look, I consider myself a realist. I realize that guys like Perle and probably Cheney are dirty. But I do not see a war for oil or vindication for dad here. I understand that you hold very cynical views and that's just the way you view events. But I enjoy post and replies regardless. Good discussing with you.

-N


User currently offlineADG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1849 times:

If the schoolyard bully isn't stopped, then he keeps beating up other kids, until someone bigger and/or stronger makes him stop.

but we teach our kids not to bow down to bullies ...



User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

En...

No less a conservative hawk than Lawrence Eagleberger was on Crossfire last night. Did you happen to catch the question Carville asked him?


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1796 times:

I completely missed it. No cable. What happened?

User currently offlineHeavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1780 times:

James Carville had a screen put up with the names of the President, the Vice President, The Secretaries of State and Defense, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Condi Rice. He then asked Eagleberger, without giving names, just a number, how many of those people he thought were happy today that diplomacy failed.

Eagleberger squirmed uncomfortably and said "Can I take the Fifth?"

Carville reminded him he need not name names, just give a number.

"3." was the reply, "and probably more. But at least 3. "

The meandering justification for taking out Saddam was so hopeless from this despicable bunch, a reasoned soul cannot help but ask if they were mere cover. And yet for ten hours yesterday along the Thames, Tony Blair nobly pointed out reason after reason that likely would have justified all of this in the world's eyes, and the shred of reasoning that gives me some comfort as 200,000 Americans, and 1 I have close ties to, get ready to go in.....the destruction of the tyranny of Saddam. No WMDs. No ties to al Qaeda. No regional threat, no threat to Israel, no exile to wherever. The argument was so simple from the beginning for honest men.

When has George W. Bush spent ten consecutive hours arguing for anything?
He's still too arrogant to bother to learn how to say "nuclear" right.



User currently offlineSabena 690 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 9 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1775 times:

Bush telling Saddam to leave the country was dumb cause Bush and the rest of the world knows he will not leave Iraq.

It sounds nice for the public opinion... "Bush gives Saddam the last chance to avoid war" <--- sounds nice, not? And this while Bush knew very good before this statement that Saddam will never leave...

BTW: has America gone crazy completely? Nice move from Bush: put police on all corners of the street, on several tv posts is a clock with the time ticking away before the attack, documentaries are shown of how to run away from your house if it is on fire due to terroristic attacks etc etc.... It's unbelieveble how the people are influenced with the 'bad people that will attack the US', and how people are given the scary impression that they are in real danger, and that it is for their own sake that the great Bush will attack Iraq.

Same on CNN: every time that they speak of 9/11, they also show Middle Eastern people. And if you want it or not, people really link those people to the attacks.

Result --> the bad Middle East.

Go on Bush, in the name of God! GOD BLESS AMERICA!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Man Desperate To Get Out Of A DWI! posted Fri Apr 1 2005 04:49:48 by AsstChiefMark
Songs To Get Out Of Depression With posted Wed Jan 30 2002 00:58:04 by N400QX
Has Stephen Harper Dug A Hole He Can't Get Out Of? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 22:27:15 by Iamcanadian
Get Out Of My Country! posted Fri Mar 28 2003 02:09:41 by I LOVE EWR
Help Me Get Out Of Going To A Party posted Fri Feb 15 2002 09:22:11 by LGW
Ways To Get Rid Of X-boy Friend And His Friend posted Fri Jan 18 2002 14:07:31 by KLM672
Canada, Get Out Of Afghanistan: NDP posted Mon Sep 11 2006 01:50:25 by SKYSERVICE_330
Fosters To Pull Out Of Formula 1 posted Thu Apr 13 2006 11:20:14 by Bill142
Help - How To Get Rid Of A Pesky Sticker? posted Thu Feb 16 2006 14:22:33 by UTA_flyinghigh
"Special" Days/months We Need To Get Rid Of posted Fri Jan 20 2006 22:28:42 by Airlinelover