Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (12 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3696 times:
CNN has been airing interviews with frustrated marines who are saying that Iraqis are hiding behind and shooting from civilians, and faking surrender in order to be able to move to new positions to shoot from while protected by the white flag, or to ambush coalition soldiers who come up to accept the surrender.
This is just as low as terrorism, and seeing past behavior, not surprising. A total lack of honor in combat, not to mention a war crime. What's wrong with the Arab world in that these tactics are so readily adopted?
Ilyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (12 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3608 times:
This is ridiculous, Charles. You actually expect the Iraqi troops to line up like good little soldiers and be shot? They were known for dirty tactics during the Gulf War...to expect them to be any different 12 years later is completely naive.
Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (12 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3600 times:
Conduct of combatants in warfare is completely separate from the political and other rationale behind the war. These conventions do not say that their provisions are only valid if the war meets certain conditions. They apply to all armed conflicts between sovereign nations.
Heavymetal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (12 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3591 times:
What's wrong with the Arab world in that these tactics are so readily adopted?
Come on, Charles. Its a two way street here. I mean I agree with you wholeheartedly, but even US Generals after World War II spoke with disgust on the coming technology of warfare...push button bombs, killing an enemy you can't see, no battlefield glory.
That said, the rules of combatants and non coms and the lines blurred among the locals is what destryoed much of our fighting capabilities in VietNam. This morning Tommy Franks spoke of "10 guys with RPGs on top of a building. Do you reduce the building to rubble, knowing it will cause civillian deaths?"
Well. Yeah. The word is 'war'. It's the ugliest of ugly human concepts. Once you've begun it, you either fight one enemy or two. The Iraqis alone. Or the Iraquis and your own morality.
Staffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (12 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3582 times:
While they might benefit from it at the moment, they won't do it in the long run. They might not be so nicely met if they surrender a second time. Hiding behind civilians is also not very honorable.
To those who think this is ok, would you consider using your mother, sister or children as shields during a war? I certainly wouldn't.
Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (12 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3547 times:
CNN has never been a thrustful source!
I agree that reporter's claims are often inaccurate. But I heard these reports from the mouths of U.S. Army soldiers and Marines being interviewed on the front lines. They were clearly frustrated - their orders and own sense of honor prevents them from shouting "through" civilians or shooting people under a white flag, and keep getting the feeling that they had been had afterwards.
Erj190 From Portugal, joined Dec 2000, 397 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (12 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3531 times:
Hey, American media is very reliable.
SCUDS where fired by Iraq.
(three days later turn out to be a lie)
CHEMICAL WEAPONS factory found
(a total hoax from a US TV station nobody is talking about that anymore because everybody knows it was a lie)
AMERICAN POW's executed
(known to be untrue without one single even tiny evidence)
AMERICANS took over UMM QASR
(known to be not true at least three times - Although this one is not the TV station's fault)
The list can go on.
But these are the "news" on the american media. The latest editions of American newspapers and TV news, are based on the so-called news that are actually lies.
At the same time we have seen ridiculous images of a US helicopter shot down by Iraqi farmers. Who do the Iraqis want to convince? Maybe they want to convince the farmers.
How can an Helicopter, which is armored and protected be shot down, and show no traces of fire. At least the American propaganda tries to be convincing (although clearly failing) the Iraqis don't even try to be convincing.
Being part of the "attackers", I must praise again the BBC and even SKY news for their excellent coverage. We can't believe in the Iraqi TV, we must have doubts about Al Jazeera TV and Dubai TV, we must have doubts about CNN, NBC CBS and the likes. The only credible news comes from the BBC and from some European TV stations that can actually show us something unbiased.
Artsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 33
Reply 14, posted (12 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3527 times:
SCUDS where fired by Iraq. (three days later turn out to be a lie)
At this point it hasnt been proven untrue
CHEMICAL WEAPONS factory found (a total hoax from a US TV station nobody is talking about that anymore because everybody knows it was a lie)
This is still on more or less every worldwide western news broadcast, and is still under investigation
AMERICAN POW's executed (known to be untrue without one single even tiny evidence)
Actually they do seem to have been executed
AMERICANS took over UMM QASR (known to be not true at least three times - Although this one is not the TV station's fault)
As I am not there, this one I cant comment on, the impression I get is that they thought it was captured, but pockets of resistance emerged,
on the other hand....
Iraq says it shot down loads of planes
Iraq says Israel shooting missiles into Iraq
Iraq says that they are winning
Iraq says they have no chemicals , no weapons etc
For all you chemical naysayers, in 1998, the weapons inspectors knew that Saddam had these weapons, there is no documented proof at all, not one shred to suggest that they were destroyed, but, for arguments sake, let's assume that he just didnt keep records, WHY did he destroy them ? totally unprovoked, no weapons inspectors in the country and no reason at all to destroy them, why did he do it ?
Jaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3511 times:
The old days of warfare where you sang "God Save the Queen" at sunrise after eating your army ration porridge and then charged at the opponent from the other side of a grassy knoll when the bugle sounded are over, me thinks.
Gc From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2003, 356 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (12 years 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3491 times:
Someone on Sky News made the point that if the coalition had operated using WW2 tactics of flattening the towns with heavy Armour and bursting thru to Baghdad, it would all be pretty much over. The fact is that the coalition are using militarily weak methods for the sole purpose of minimising civilian lives, the trade off is to costs more time and risks more military casualties on the coalition side.
The plain fact is the Iraqi military aren't quite as concerned with this and are unrestrained. Regardless of the politics, we need to acknowledge that our troops are operating with the utmost integrity and care, even though it puts them in more danger.
Sebolino From France, joined May 2001, 3708 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (12 years 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3435 times:
Do you think the Iraqis will shoot and then stand on the road shouting: "Come on it's your turn, shoot on me".
Wake up Charles, that's called a war, that's not a video game or some duel. A WAR !!! The soldiers are trying to stay alive, that means to kill other soldiers before they get killed.
If you don't want to face that, you don't go to war.
N79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (12 years 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3424 times:
I think Charles is fully awake and alert. His outrage is justified.
If they are using civilians as shields, that is outside of the rules. And yes, even in war as chaotic as it is, you still don't use an infant or woman as a shield to save yourself. Think about it.
That they are dressing civilians is not surprising but still exposes the very people the Iraqi military is actually supposed to protect to danger. These 'soldiers' are not protecting their country or their countrymen but their own lives. You really cannot say they are defending their country, can you?
It's not like these guys are dressing like civilians and then slithering away to escape detection.
Schoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 25
Reply 24, posted (12 years 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3383 times:
I propose the US and UK refrain from using their airforces and stop aerial bombardments to make this a 'more equal' war.
Common' Charles, the US has broken numerous international treaties and conventions (including the Geneva Convention) over the past decades and now all of a sudden you want the Iraqi military, whose material is at least 12 years old and who have been attacked by the US/UK over these past 12 years continuously, you want them to defend themselves from the illegal invasion of their country in a fair way. It's ridiculous.
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
: The Australian Broadcasting Commission just broadcast the following statement: "The American Government is in Shock and Awe that the Iraqis are using
: And what tactics are those ADG??? I don't recall our guys dressing as civilians. I don't recall our guys using civilians as human shields. Is it sweep
: I'm not sure how Americans could have dressed as Vietnamese civilians. Especially back in the Vietnam era. Unless the Aussies were referring to using
: I think many are missing the very important point that Iraq hasn't declared war on anyone. Threrefore, the Americans are being treated just like any u
29 Alpha 1
: Let them fight with dishonor, as far as I'm concerned. It will only disgrace their leader, their nation, their race and their faith. And, in the end,
: I think that next week after my vacation I will bring up where the generals screwed up, after the situation has stablized.
: Saddam's Iraq will lose, and some of those repsonsible for things like the execution of those soldiers, will face punishment. Ask the families of thos
32 Alpha 1
: Airplay, this isn't about how the war started; it's about the brutal execution of American soldiers. Obviously that doesn't bother you one iota. It bo
: Alpha1, I see that you're starting to have trouble controlling your rage. I understand why. This whole thing must be confusing and frustrating for you
: Schoenorama: Common' Charles, the US has broken numerous international treaties and conventions (including the Geneva Convention) over the past decade
35 Alpha 1
: Airplay, no rage here, really. Despite the fact I did not want this war to start, I'm behind our troops, and am confident they'll be victorious. I jus
: Aren't you guys confusing the issues here? Its one thing to engage in guerilla warfare in the defense of your country (however reprehensible its regim
: I don't recall our guys dressing as civilians. I notice your age bracket puts you younger than me and as I was born when my father was in Vietnam I th
: By the way, is there really *honour* in killing others? ADG
: I have been thinking for the last day or so, that if the Iraqi forces continue to mix with the general civilian population in the major cities, then i
: Its guerilla warfare charles. Plain and Simple. The Iraqi's are fighting a force that has overwhelming technical superiority. The only way for them to
: Cedarjet, So will someone please explain Camp X-ray and the treatment of it's guests? As people have been saying for over a year, they are not POWs. T
: For once Roy says something I agree with. It is guerilla warfare. Plain and Simple. Now I need to go outside and check on the alignment of the planets
: Wake up Charles, that's called a war, that's not a video game or some duel. A WAR !!! The soldiers are trying to stay alive, that means to kill other
: Indianguy, Why do you call the coalition soldiers "mercenaries"? Please explain. mer·ce·nar·ies 1. One who serves or works merely for monetary gain
: Would you be so understanding and accepting if the US troops decide the same thing and start carpet bombing Basra and Bagdad. If the only way to win
: I doubt if carpet bombing is going to work though. It didnt work in Vietnam, and it wont work here! Correction: The carpet bombing in Vietnam was main
47 Alpha 1
: I notice your age bracket puts you younger than me and as I was born when my father was in Vietnam I think I can suggest quite categorically that you
: Hey, American media is very reliable. SCUDS where fired by Iraq. (three days later turn out to be a lie) CHEMICAL WEAPONS factory found (a total hoax
: SCUDS where fired by Iraq. (three days later turn out to be a lie) *************************** At this point it hasnt been proven untrue Great. Guilt
: Thumper: "Charles you are absolutely right if you look at the ones disagreeing with you they are all American haters whither they are from Spain,Canad
51 Alpha 1
: American friends, if I were you I would be very worried about the quality of your democracy, a free press which reports accurately what's going on is
: Hi, sorry but i have to say this: to all who are debating in details about the Iraqis and the Geneva conventions and the way they resist the US & UK f
: That is a very cheap excuse! If the US is so convinced these are all Al Qaida terrorists and the Geneva Convention is not applicable on them, why did
: Alpha1: "Well for someone with a supposed knowledge of the U.S., and someone with family here, you don't know that the U.S. people are not "ruled", we
: SCUDS where fired by Iraq. (three days later turn out to be a lie) *************************** At this point it hasnt been proven untrue Great. Guilty
: Well, ADG, I AM old enough to remember, and I do not recall EVER seeing our forces fighting in civilian duds, or pretending to surrender, or holding h
: No explaination needed from him, Charles. It's very calculated, just like everything he types on here. He'd be a very good PR guy for a Dictator like
: What is honour anyway. WW2 the V2s were a cowardly weapon. Today the cruise Missiles are considered OK. in Vietnam, Defoliants such as Agent Orange we
: WW2 the V2s were a cowardly weapon. Today the cruise Missiles are considered OK. Cruise missiles are very precise. Accuracy is measured in feet. V-2s
: That's why they hit Iran 3 times with Cruise Missiles Doesn't matter how much they new about the effects, it was still a chemical weapon of mass Tree
61 Alpha 1
: Indianguy, I am no longer going to answer anything you say. I cannot do it quite the way I wanted, because of decisions not in my control, but I will
: That's why they hit Iran 3 times with Cruise Missiles ********************************* Irans official statement on this is that it was actually Iraqi
: Regardless of that fact (which I hadn't heard) Cruis missiles do miss their intended targets. The Americans even admit that. Iran don't wanna upset Am
64 Go Canada!
: "The Iraqi people are fighting for their independence and pride." and they have pride under saddams regime do they? how can u have pride when u see yo
: and they have pride under saddams regime do they? Well you have pride under Bush's regime ... but seriously, you can't say whether they do or not .. s
: Well you have pride under Bush's regime ... but seriously, you can't say whether they do or not .. seems to me that some feel that they do and others
: Neil:The Iraqi's can elect ANYONE right? Anyone except Saddam or Tariq or...! The Iraqi's can elect anyone from a list of people handed over by the Am
: ADG As a Vietnam vet who did 2 tours there with the Australian Army, I can assure you at no time did I see or HEAR of American troops operating in civ
: Thanks for your contribution, Wirraway. It's good to hear from someone who was actually there. I personally can't imagine any actual US soldier dressi
: @Wirraway: You would only hear of it if you had been told. Looking at The way the American Propaganda machine has been working now in this conflict it
: Roy, So you are saying that US troops are wearing civilian garb in Iraq and using human shields? I guess you would know from your extensive time on-sc
: ADG, My Lai was not covered up contrary to your ridiculous innuendo. Your second hand knowledge is no better than Alpha 1 or anyone elses. Although it