Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Al Jazeera Better Than Sex?  
User currently offlineADG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1112 times:

DESPITE being mostly knocked offline, the website of Arab satellite news network Al-Jazeera drew three times as many search queries on Lycos last week as the perennial favourite, "sex".

 Wink/being sarcastic




ADG

28 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1099 times:

well we are obviously well and truely screwed now  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1097 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

April fools day finished 5 days ago, it is still on in Australia?



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1097 times:

Nope

Did we really need to tell you that


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1245 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

Well I'll be damned....

Which country is Al Jazeera based in?

Hkg82.


User currently offlineKLAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1058 times:

Which country is Al Jazeera based in?



I believe Qatar. Ironic that U.S. main ops base is there.  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1245 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1036 times:

Hehe yeah. Centcom briefing ended not long ago & I wish General Tommy Franks did the press briefings more often, he’s an excellent speaker & direct to the point (not as direct as Donald Rumsfield though, lol), his subordinates don’t do the job quite as effectively in addressing the media.

Hkg82.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29690 posts, RR: 59
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1021 times:

Is there an english version of Al Jazzerria.

I keep getting just the Arabian version and there isn't a link on the page to an english version



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

Is there an english version of Al Jazzerria.

http://english.aljazeera.net

Many ISPs stateside have blocked access to it however, so you may have to go through a proxy.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29690 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

Thanks will find out in a second.....




Yup. Comes up for me.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 961 times:

This is only a sort of "special" on Iraq and is only a analysis and not a news website like the main Al-Jazeera website, the editor is Joan Tucker and it is a seperate team than the main Al-Jazeera website. A full fledged english website should come online before May and the english language channel towards the end of this year or in 2004.

I honestly felt that the english website is quite biased and I didn't like the fact that they are concentrating on analysis.

Arsenal,

This is no April fool joke. Search for some articles and see.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29690 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 958 times:

Looked through a coupe of items but based on what you said, there may not be much resemblence to what is on the main page.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 948 times:

L-188,

I think it may have something to do with the fact that they still haven't got all the staff they needed. The english website was hurried to capitalise on interest from the war. They want to avoid just having translations of the main website and because they don't have the resources it is very difficult to have up-to-date news and so that is why they have transformed it into a an analysis website which is far from balanced.

BTW I thought you might be interested L-188, Peter Arnett has been hired by Al-Jazeera's (The Peninsula) new rival the Saudi-backed Al-Arabiya (The Arab) channel.


User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 946 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

QatarAirways, i was referring to the fact that there is a huge number of threads started by Australians.  Big grin



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29690 posts, RR: 59
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 939 times:

Or is that in one had they want to appeal to the Islamic Masses but at the same time want to show the western world that they are a serious news source, so they tuned down the retoric.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 934 times:

I just scanned the English version of Al Jazeera. They lead with the assertion that Iraq has retaken Baghdad International, even as US helocopters are landing there. It talks about serious fighting in Karbala, even as other networks say Karbala is secure.

In essence, it leads with the slant that Iraq would like you to believe. Anyone who said they're unbiased is crazy.


User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 928 times:

Or just report the facts slightly differently to the way the AMericans do.

I remember seeing a documentary on film making.
The Scenario, travilling across Sydney Harbour on a cruise.
@ different versions giving two different perspectives. One nice and friendly, one not. Yet everything shown was true

The friendly way, Nice breeze blowing on pretty girls enjoying a laugh, nice subtle music. Nice scenery etc etc

The bad way, whinging kids, someone getting seasick, loud noises like the engine thumping away, the seagulls screeching etc etce

The point is, the same views can be presented more ways that one. I am more inclined to believe the American scenario (who wouldn't) but not naive enough to believe they are not showing you the way they want it presented.


User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 925 times:

L-188,

I am not sure, Arab media is at a spectrum just like anywhere else in the world. You have some which are Anti-American and have the typical blame everything on America and Israel attitude such as:

-ANN - Arab News Network: The channel is extremely biased and it is totally unproffesional, what place does a call-inn psychic show have in a "proffesional" news network.

-Al-Manar (The Light or The Luminence)>: This channel is backed by Hezbollah of Lebanon and pretty much thrives on rhetoric.

-[Replace with name of (non-Gulf) Arab Country] Channel: Pretty Much similar to ANN (see above)

Some show a fair level of objectivity like Al Arabiya.

Then comes Al-Jazeera, the revolutionary thing about Al-Jazeera is that for the first time Arabs had an outlet to express themselves freely, Al Jazeera allows goverments dissenters and other oposition groups to critisize there regimes and this is why Al-Jazeera faced a lot of problems including a ban in several arab countries, an advertisement boycott because "Al-Jazeera is a zionist mouthpiece". They are also fairly objective and always have interesting debate shows where they discuss issues which were previously taboo such as Sex, Terrorism, Polygamy, Repressive regimes, Democracy, secularism etc... Also they always have US and Israeli analysts, journalists and officials to particpate which was unheard of before in the Arab world.

At the other end of the spectrum you have Kuwait TV which is similar to FOX in many ways. They always glorify the US/UK forces, and try to sanitize war. This is understandable I guess because of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the horrors they witnessed.


User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 922 times:

Alpha 1,

The Arab version says something different about the Airport. Oh and mone more thing, Al Jazeera said Al-Sahaf (Minister of Information) claims that they have regained the airport. From Al-Jazeera (excerpt from article):

"US commanders moved to beef up their presence overnight at the airport, calling in soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division and the 94th battalion to reinforce the 3rd Infantry Division which spearheaded the attack on the facility.

The arrival of the extra troops raises the number of US soldiers at the airport from an estimated 1,500, possibly opening the way for it to be used as a forward base in any battle for the sprawling city of five million people.

These reports appear to disprove claims made by Iraqi Information Minister Mohamed Said Sahaf today that US forces involved in securing Baghdad's airport are isolated.

Sahaf insisted that Iraqi forces had succeeded in expelling the coalition troops from the airport, which US military officials said was under their control on Friday. He said he was planning to organise a trip for journalists to the airport to prove that the coalition troops were chased out of the airport."

How is this different from this http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/05/sprj.irq.sahaf/index.html

"It talks about serious fighting in Karbala, even as other networks say Karbala is secure."
Remember Basra and Umm Qasr? Do your remeber what was said about those two places in the beginning of the conflict by coalition forces? Another thing the Arab website has updated news while the English website is more of a newspaper with hardly any breaking news, so this could just be outdated news from the fighting and when they update the website overnight you will see what happened in Karbala. BTW CNN has also said that there was heavy fighting in Karbala too.

[Edited 2003-04-05 17:54:43]

User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 916 times:

Yes, QatarAirways, I do remember: the reports were that there was stiff resistance, and because of it, there was difficulty in getting the aid into Iraq. It said that the fighting was more fierce than anticipated.

What's your point?

[Edited 2003-04-05 17:47:36]

User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 908 times:

"What's your point?"

On the first day coalition forces said that they secured Umm Qasr which was untrue. Even a few days into the conflict there was still resistence in Umm Qasr and it was not secure. My point is that the same could have happened in Karbala.


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 906 times:

QatarAirways, they said it was "secure, but not yet safe". Which means they had control of the port, but that there were still serious pockets of resistance. THAT is what was said on ALL American networks.

So much for that.


User currently offlineKLAX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 years 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 896 times:

From one article:



'Dirty war' allegations cut both ways

The latest came from Pentagon spokesman, General Stanley McChrystal on 5 April in a briefing to reporters.

But he seemed to be taken by surprise when an American journalist asked him to comment on the the fact that sections of the US-led force routinely operate out of uniform.

His response was one of pregnant silence, as if struck by the reminder that US-led special forces are working in Iraq without uniform.



"No one imagines that secretive special forces units, such as Delta Force and the SAS, walk around behind enemy lines in their uniforms."


AFAIK, this is not true. Rangers and U.S. Special Forces operate in camo outfits suited to the terrain they will operate on. Granted, they don't wear giant Red and Yellow bunny suits, but they do have "uniforms".

This part of the article was the icing on the cake:

"Of more concern is the claim that civilians feign surrender, lure US troops into weak positions and then ambush. Victoria Clarke, the Pentagon spokeswomen in Centcom, describes this as the ‘deadly deception.’ So far there has not been any independent confirmation of these reports but, like the heightened threat of human bomb attacks, they have raised the suspicion that they may simply be deployed by US-led forces as a pretext for an aggressive policy against an unwelcoming Iraqi population.

Well if that isnt biased I dunno what is. We're lookin at Roy's favorite news source here.

-Clovis





User currently offlineQatarAirways From Qatar, joined Sep 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (11 years 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 893 times:

I think you may be missing the point Alpha1,

Coalition Forces said that Umm Qasr was secure but there was "serious pockets of resistance" as you said. Then Karbala could still be "secure" but still have "serious fighting". What I am trying to say is that even if the place is secure as coalition forces say it doesn't mean no fighting is going on.


User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 882 times:

Yeah and American news sources are reliable?

*FOX* springs to mind as do others...

Particularly the ones that *kept* the Pricilla Bus and associated Drag Queens out of the closing ceremony pictures of the 2000 Olympics.

And it's not even about discrimination.. They are too worried about upsetting their bread and butter mid-western trailer trash audience rather than being truthful.

CNN=Clowny No News Network

mb



25 ADG : I honestly felt that the english website is quite biased and I didn't like the fact that they are concentrating on analysis. Find a media website that
26 L-188 : The point being is that I take into suspicion any news site that makes an english version and a native language version that aren't mirror images of e
27 Post contains images ADG : L-188, You should take any media source with a grain of salt, none of them have proven themselves to be unbiased and accurate at all times. Me, I like
28 KLAX : Bron, the C.I.A. are spies, not members of the armed forces. They do intelligence and espionage stuff. They arent with the grunts shooting back at Ira
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Al-Jazeera - Shame Of Islamic Community posted Wed Oct 24 2007 11:24:09 by Cfalk
What Do You Think Of Al Jazeera? posted Thu Jun 21 2007 04:05:54 by ConcordeBoy
Environmentalists Know Better Than--nature? posted Thu Mar 29 2007 01:26:01 by 767Lover
Egypt Seizes Al-Jazeera Reporter posted Thu Feb 22 2007 00:28:37 by Aloges
Al Jazeera English, The Daily Show Makeover posted Mon Jan 8 2007 20:03:41 by Bravo45
Al Jazeera English Launches posted Wed Nov 15 2006 16:58:42 by GSM763
Al Jazeera Sets English Launch Date posted Fri Nov 3 2006 14:57:40 by Cedars747
Hdtv On Analog Better Than Just Analog? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 03:21:14 by Lehpron
This Is Better Than Google Earth posted Fri Sep 29 2006 01:10:05 by VC10BOAC
Lucia Newman To Head Al-Jazeera's New Bureau? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 05:41:58 by Derico