4holer From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 3097 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (12 years 8 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1765 times:
It's getting old. Very old.
But I must ask, however, mb.
What's with the clown thing? Yer killin' me with those snippets!
I must say that I last struck another human being in 1984. It was a mime.
So I can relate in a way, but not with that degree of passion.
DeltaASA16 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (12 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1731 times:
The whole Pointless thread posting has gone to a new low since the Aussies began their posting... They will never match up to the prestigious TMPTE 3 &4 (You rock TWAL1011, Kolobokoman, Ybacpa, Lapper, and the rest TMPTE supporters!)
TechRep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (12 years 8 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1706 times:
Again someone has a different opinion than you. They have a right to respond and express displeasure to your pointless threads as much as you do to making pointless threads.
You obviously have made it a point to get together with the Aussie peanut gallery and post pointless threads. I think your motive is to stir the pot and see what happens; we also have the right to point this out and report our displeasure.
Continue posting it's your right but it’s also our right to be indignant.
Alpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (12 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1682 times:
Yyz717, please don't presume to speak for me. ADG, Glenn and Mx5_boy haven't offended me at all that I can see. I find it amusing that so many posts have been started by them, and I don't think it was coincidental but I am certainly not offended.
They have every right to do so-although I wish they'd leave my basketball thread alone
ADG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (12 years 8 months 23 hours ago) and read 1665 times:
you've offended Techrep,
someone who has offended most of europe in the last 24 hours
someone who has taken offense where none was intended
Hypocritical statement, not worth a response
par for the course.
each one of us has protested your anet "etiquette" and you've just thrown it back in our faces.
I wonder who needs to change? Us?
TechRep posted something he felt was right and he put a lot of time/effort into his post, he needs to accept others do not agree with him and go with that. I suspect he does accept that because for the most part his responses address the issues that he fails to agree with. I see no problem with that. I don't recall seeing him run around calling people stupid cows because he doesn't like what has been said.
4holer needs to accept that typos happen somtimes, I issued an apology for that typo if he doesn't accept that it's his right. I can't see him requiring any change as he's not the one making a federal case out of the issue.
Alpha1, well he should never change, I like him just as he is *kiss kiss*.
Which leaves just you ....
I neither like you or think you address issues. I feel you believe that you are right 100% of the time and that makes you arrogant and dishonest. Time and time again I catch you out either misinterpreting or misrepresenting things that have been said. You need to change.
Or the elevated ADG? Dilemma....dilemma...dilemma.......
Coming from you who feels that the way to win an arguement is to lie and call people names that's funny
No dilemma there, you're the one with the problem. Build a bridge yyz.