Dinker225 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1056 posts, RR: 19 Reply 3, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1017 times:
I really don't see a point to changing the clocks. I am just fine with the position of the sun at 5:00 o'clock in the afternoon right now. Why go and mess it all up so a few farmers could work a few extra hours??
Two rules in aviation, don't hit anything and don't run out of gas, cause if you run out of gas yer gonna hit something.
IMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6247 posts, RR: 36 Reply 4, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 991 times:
As though farmers work by a clock. I't's light, the animals wake and ask for attention, farmer has been awake since an hour before sunrise and is ready to feed, slop and milk the beasts.
The purpose of daylight savings time was that said farmer would have time in the morning to do his chores by the time his bank opened. If you think about it, it was silly when started, and useless today.
Is grammar no longer taught is schools? Saying "me and her" or some such implies illiteracy.
Yyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16126 posts, RR: 57 Reply 6, posted (10 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 964 times:
If you think about it, it was silly when started, and useless today.
Actually, it converses alot of energy throughout North America since less electric light is needed in the longer evening hours. I read a study that the North American economy would save even more energy if we went double daylight saving (2 hours).
Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.