Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Strange Silence From The Anti-Bush/Anti-War Crowd  
User currently offlineTechRep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2305 times:

Has anyone noticed this other than me? All of the so called Bush illusions are becoming more solid, Iraqi's are welcoming the so called invaders, the war is not becoming bogged-down, not another Vietnam and the Bush estimates about the war seem right on tract. The silence is almost deafening.

TechRep

102 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2274 times:

Come out come out where ever you are. All quiet on the anti-Bush anti-U.S. front.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineCaptaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2273 times:

I don't have strong feelings for or against the war, there are many pros and cons in choosing the war or not. I think it's much too early to be celebrating victory, because it's not the war part that's the most significant in my mind. There was no doubt that the allied forces would win. I am surprised that there weren't chemical attacks, and glad it didn't happen.

I want to see in 6 months to a year how things develop. The war is the easy part, establishing a working democracy without threats of violence or other nasty repurcussions may not prove to be so easy. If it happens, then great! But until that does happen, nobody can really celebrate.



"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 36
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2267 times:

*cough* flamebait *cough*

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2268 times:

And the back tracking, double talking begins. Oh, I didn't mean that the war would get bogged down, I meant the process afterwards.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineTechRep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2252 times:

Things Iraqi Information Minister doesn't want you to know.



TechRep


User currently offlineTechRep From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2248 times:

Wrong thread sorry,

TechRep


User currently offlineClipperhawaii From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2033 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

What else could they say?

Debate is now over. ACTION is what was needed and has now occurred.

Let the few characters here muddle in the sanctimonious harmony that they dish.

Remember talk is cheap. Action isn't. Let their quiet continue.

LOL Roll On!

Clipperhawaii







"You Can't Beat The Experience"
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Techrep - still here, just finished dinner though. If I were you, I'd wait for a while to see if we get any suicide bombers stateside. Hooray hooray, the USA kicked the ass of a third rate military. But did we win the war? ONly time will tell.

User currently offlineCaptaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 56
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

Like I said, it's too early to parade the streets, because it's really far from over. The war itself is pretty much over, but how about the big picture? Obviously a lot of good has happened as a result, and the war itself has been fairly clean without an inordinate amount of mishaps. Like Goingboeing said, so the U.S. kicked the ass of a third rate militar, big deal? Will the plans of forming a democracy really happen as smoothly as some of you might think? I hope so, but I have my reservations. When a government is elected and the Iraqi's are standing on their own feet, with their economy working, then everybody can parade the streets and honour the Americans and British on a job well done. I will definitely salute the United States when that happens.


"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
User currently offlineThumper From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

What I would like to know is what happened to all those retired Generals who said Tommy Franks and Rumsfeld had no idea on how to plan a war,they misjudged everything. Haven't heard from them for a while.

User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2223 times:

The war was never an issue. America would roll Iraq. Yhat was inevitable. Unfortunately, Innocent people died, on all sides. The WMD still not proven but they may well be..

The major concern that I had was the after affects of the war. We'll see what transpires. I am happy that the war is almost over, i feel the fighting may continue for years. Beware the enemy you can't see

Happy to be wrong though

[Edited 2003-04-08 02:02:31]

User currently offlineKLMBlue From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 267 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

We are just catching our breath.
-Brian
Invest in education, not war!


User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2177 times:

To all those in the "peace" movement who wanted to let sanctions work. Here is what an Iraqi thinks of you. As for the civilian deaths, well he talks about that also.

http://komo1000news.com/audio/kvi_aircheck_031003.mp3



"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineNational_757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2173 times:

That is so funny CX747. I'm going to send that to everybody. "You are a joke, you cannot answer the question, you are a joke" LOL

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

It just shows you what the Iraqi people truly think of the "Peace Protesters" and how they view the "Infidels" with their military weapons. For the chirping birds of our own forum, I understand that it is just one Iraqi.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineGalaxy5 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2034 posts, RR: 25
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2160 times:

Glenn
From Australia, joined Jan 2003, 543 posts, RR: 52
Reply: 11
Posted Tue Apr 8 2003

Happy to be wrong though


you should be happy to be wrong since you ADG, ROY, sabena, Aviastia are so use to being wrong, its a routine and comforting feeling for you guys.






"damn, I didnt know prince could Ball like that" - Charlie Murphy
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6291 posts, RR: 54
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

Dear Glenn, you tell us that you are happy that the war is almost over.

Talking about time frames, then please don't be too disappointed if there is still a long way to go.

After two weeks of showing off force the war is gradually entering a different phase. A phase where the Iraqii people shall have a fair chance to gain control over their own situation. And there will still be struggles at some locations.

This second phase will be a much slower thing. But also a phase where patience will be one of the qualities which the coalition commanders must master.

Those excursions into central Baghdad have a much more important task than just "showing force". They sure have carried powerfull loud speakers to tell the population how to handle their situation. It works much better than throwing millions of leaflets off Hercules planes.

They probably also left behind a trail of batteries for their radioes so they regardless of utility power or not can listen to Voice of America.

That voice will also soon be their way to be informed about how they handle their food supply.

Patience, patience, that will be the way to go during the next couple of weeks or maybe much more. That will minimize casualties among Iraqii civilians and coalition forces too.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineSchoenorama From Spain, joined Apr 2001, 2440 posts, RR: 26
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2144 times:

CX747:

"To all those in the "peace" movement who wanted to let sanctions work"

You still don't get it, don't you. NONE in the peace-movement wanted the sanctions. It was the US and the UK that maintained the bloody sanctions for 12 years. France and Russia didn't want the sanctions either.

The MP3 file is an interview between 1 (ONE) Iraqi and 1 (ONE) US anti-war protester (not a very good one, by the way). So just because 1 (ONE) Iraqi that lives in the US is against the UN, we should all believe EVERY SINGLE Iraqi citizen feels the same?

Here's an interesting article from the same KOMO site:

"A Bush administration official says the chemicals terrorists could use to kill Americans wouldn't have to be smuggled into the country -- because they're legal." http://www.komotv.com/sidebar/getCrisisFeed.asp?URL=http://localhost/apwirefeed/d7q90oo01.xml&NewsSection=BreakingNewsHeadlines

So now that the war in nearly over, a war that started over some chemical weapons Iraq could threaten the US with, and these chemical weapons might have finally been found, all of a sudden the Bush Administration tells you there are still many other reasons to be affraid of terrorist strikes. So what are they gonna do next? Ban all chlorine?

None of the anti-war posters on this board, except perhaps Indianguy, thought the US would not win an easy war from Iraq. The problem is that terrorism can simply not be dealt with by just winning from Iraq. Rather than getting rid of terrorist threats, this war has given many people a reason to hate the US. Some of them maybe probably didn't mind the US until they lost their families in 'collateral damage'. The US can win this war tomorrow or even tonight, but winning this war or ANY war will not put an end to the anti-US feeling throughout the Middle-East.



Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
User currently offlineGlenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2133 times:

you should be happy to be wrong since you ADG, ROY, sabena, Aviastia are so use to being wrong, its a routine and comforting feeling for you guys.

That the best you can do. Come on, make it hurt baby.


 Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineDc10guy From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 2685 posts, RR: 6
Reply 20, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2125 times:

I'm still very against the war and Bush, I am still hopeful that all the troops come home soon. The pro war people are in the perfect place for arguing the war ... If it goes good its Bush's great job... If it goes bad its the anti-war people and the liberal medias fault. This war was avoidable. Bush did nothing to avoid the war. Thousands of innocent people are dead because of it... Did anyone ever think the Iraqi army would win ??? The next big question is how much are we going to spend on Iraq ??? At the expense of OUR schools & cites here ??? Bush is an asshole and so is Blair.....


Next time try the old "dirty Sanchez" She'll love it !!!
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2123 times:

Did any of you for the slightest second believe that the US wouldn't win agains the Iraqi military? Even if we had scooters and water pistols, we could have won against Iraq. The Iraqi military was a joke post 1991, and Saddam was a tinpot dictator with a lot of ugly, tacky palaces. In effect, an Emperor with no clothes.

Now do you people believe that 1200 dead civilians (The Washiington Post reporting on April 7, 2003) is mere collateral damage? Now don't bring up "all the slaughtered civilians under Saddam." They were mostly killed when we sat around selling him more weapons to do his dirty deeds. Civilian deaths caused by the direct paramilitary fascism that Saddam became infamous have largely not occurred since the 1991 Shiite massacres (when we sat around twiddling our thumbs). Much of the opposition to war came from those who did not believe that civilian deaths in the thousands was a price worth paying if other avenues were available. Those avenues were in effect shut out. It turns out that those avenues with a military presence helped reduce the Iraqi military to a non-entity over 12 years.

As far as that Iraqi goes, he could well have been some comic at an Improv for all you know, or one of the goons who made up Saddam's overseas opposition - a rather unsavory bunch. Iraqi politicians of all stripes were never known for their finesse and respect of human rights. But interestingly enough, I was just watching the BBC where interviews with the local population of a Baghdadi suburb showed a level of social schizophrenia in Iraq. Those who were interviewed said they liked the US soldiers, but didn't like the US, didn't like Britain (Britannia, they called it), didn't want the US in Iraq. A few said they wanted the US soldiers to be "king," while others said "kill Saddam and all his family." Surprisingly, most said they hated the Iraqi military, but loved Saddam. Others said they hated Saddam, and hated Israel. All said they were sick of the bombing and were tired of watching a parade of funerals. It was quite mindboggling, and showed the enormous complexity we have to deal with in Iraq.

I suspect that a few months from now, when we are caught in a quagmire in Iraq far more complex for most of you to understand (and one can only hope that Paul Wolfowitz doesn't think that massive pogroms of Iraqi against Iraqi isn't also mere collateral damage), and when FoxNews has moved on to topics like "Fat running woman causes forest fire with chafing thighs," the cheerleaders will move on to topics less taxing for their minds.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13255 posts, RR: 62
Reply 22, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2120 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Invest in education, not war!

- admissions slogan, Université de Paris and Université de Marseille  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineIndianguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

You armchair soldiers have no balls to go out there and fight. You love wars, becuase its free entertainment: Something different from the everyday fare you see on FOX. And you dont even have the balls (or the knowledge) to enter into a sensible debate with the anti-war camp. So you guys prefer to shout us down!

So I am now doing what I can do on the ground to ensure that this war machine cannot rise again to smash another country's independence; rape another 5000 year culture the way Iraq was. Or Afghanistan before that.

We are organising an economic boycott of British and American products. From clothes to cosmetics, from airlines to TV channels. And the response we have got in city like Pune is phenomenal! Thousands of students have written in saying they want to join in! Some have even come up with suggestions like making huge bonfires of US/UK made products, and complete boycott of stores keeping products made in these countries. Suggestions which will be taken up.

Already, cable operators in the city have pulled out FOX, even without us asking! We are now asking for a ban on the BBC and the CNN.

I believe this is the beginning of a revolution. We will not help these new age invaders by enriching them so they can go out and enslave other people. After all, it is Iraq today, it could well be India the day after!


All of the so called Bush illusions are becoming more solid, Iraqi's are welcoming the so called invaders,

More childish drivel. Whioch of the "illusisions" have become solid? Where are the WMD's over which the war was fought?

Iraqi's are welcoming the invaders? Really?


User currently offlineCaptaingomes From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 6413 posts, RR: 56
Reply 24, posted (11 years 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2111 times:

Seems like Dixie Chicks CD's will sell well in India.  Big grin


"it's kind of like an Airbus, it's an engineering marvel, but there's no sense of passion" -- J. Clarkson re: Coxster
25 Post contains images EA CO AS : We are organising an economic boycott of British and American products. From clothes to cosmetics, from airlines to TV channels. Oh man, you mean we w
26 Post contains images KAUSpilot :
27 TechRep : Everyone please take note. The Bush/War haters were ready to engage in sanctimonious battle with the Right Wing Republican Rich Christian fundamentali
28 Glenn : Cute kid, Show us one in the hospital waving the US Flag. That would make me a bit happier
29 Post contains images Glenn : Tech rep, you sound like David Koresh, My advice, don't go playing with matches
30 Jaysit : "Don’t be a hater…." Don't be an idiot.
31 KLMBlue : Are we going to rebuild Iraq like we did with Afghanistan? If so, i pity the Iraqis, for we have done little to help them. the standard of living has
32 Alpha 1 : I haven't been silent, and I was NOT for this war commencing, and I'm certianly not for Bush. I am 100% behind our troops, even though I opposed the o
33 Post contains images Glenn : Spot the true Armchair Rambos War aint like tele. People die painfully
34 TechRep : Glenn, You have been relegated to the proverbial clown-in-a-circus that comes out to entertain the crowd till the real show begins. You have lost so m
35 Glenn : Just so I am aware, was that an insult ??? And just so you are aware, knowing that facts are all important to you I would think an A.Net Mod I am not
36 TechRep : Even grown-ups make mistakes, maybe you can honk your nose or hit Roy with your powdered sock. TechRep
37 Airplay : The Iraqi’s will call Bush their Liberator but the haters will not relent, “look how long the infidels stay, will they not ever leave?” The Unit
38 CX747 : Ahh and the peanut gallery finally chimed in the 10 cents worth of nonesense while I was gone this afternoon. Thanks for the comments as always. KLMBl
39 Heavymetal : TThe silence is almost deafening. It's always quiet in your own little world.
40 Zeus01 : Everyone applaud: Clap Clap Clap This post has demonstrated liberal ignorance at its finest. Ha ha. Just watch. When this is all over and Iraq is a pr
41 Thumper : Airplay: And, the question of why the US took on this "fight" with a third world country that has been crippled by sanctions for 12 years. Can you ima
42 Airplay : Thumper, Good point. I wouldn't put it past Bush. That's why we're all worried. The only problem is that I think Bush thinks that Canada is somewhere
43 N79969 : Roy, Aren't you for having India take care of Pakistan once and for all? On the basis that India has a 'better' nuclear arsenal? And that India would
44 Glenn : Actually, I dunno if you would call it Strange Silence. This thread amongst all teh others seems to be pretty healthy.
45 CX747 : While some of the Anti anything movement has shown up, your posts have been few and far between. Basically you have little to argue against as the war
46 Avt007 : It could be that many people have burned out on this subject. This is the first war related thread I have opened in quite a few days. We get enough fr
47 ILOVEA340 : You guys always want to keep arguing, some of us refrain from the rediculous comments for a few days and you bash us for that, I can still come up wit
48 MD-90 : You know, if Roy is boycotting all American and British products... I'd be very surprised if there weren't Intel or AMD processors used to run this si
49 Post contains links Sabena 690 : The reason I almost stopped replying in those thread, is because I cannot withtstand the blindness and dumbness by some forum members. Live in your ow
50 Sebolino : TechRep, Since the beginning of this war, nothing can be said anymore except that we hope it will finish very soon. If you think it's a change of opin
51 9V-SVE : Prevent another 9/11? Nah. As the Egyptain President said, there will be 100 Bin Ladens because of this war, if the original Bin Laden is killed or ca
52 Glenn : And they'll breed them too just for it.
53 ADG : Galaxy5, I can't think of a single time you've ever proven me wrong. Funny how your ego works. Some idiots in here seem to equate terms such as "there
54 Mx5_boy : Gosh, What bothers me is the warmongers who are claiming victory when victory was never in doubt. Personally I would be worried big time if I was in I
55 Lewis : The war is almost over but I still cannot see how Iraqis are liberated. What will be the next move for Americans? From most statements by the American
56 Racko : We have been helping the Afghans for less than a year and YES there have been improvements to their way of life.I think being able to listen to the ra
57 Scorpio : Some of the members of the Bush cheering squad on here just don't seem to get it, do they? No-one on here (well, hardly anyone) believed the US would
58 Schoenorama : CX747: "I think being able to listen to the radio,..." In a country as poor as Afghanistan and after all the years of problems they have had, being ab
59 Boeing757/767 : The reason it's quiet is because those who oppose this effort for long-term reasons, like me, are waiting for the first of many terrorism strikes expe
60 TechRep : Boeing757/767, Wake up we were being attacked all over the world by terrorism before the war started. We will not be held hostage by terrorism. Don't
61 Goingboeing : Then we can say "we told you so." I agree with your post, but I really wish I wouldn't have to say "I told you so". The really sad part is that terror
62 Alpha 1 : According to the 'embedded media' it has, according to independent media, it hasn't. Schoenerama, the war has gone extremely well from a military stan
63 Heavymetal : We will not be held hostage by terrorism. Is the potential of terrorism in or against the United States greater or less now than it was 6 months ago?
64 Jaysit : "NONE in the peace-movement wanted the sanctions. " What a pile of BS. You armchair warriors have no hold on reality or facts. At a time of massive op
65 ADG : Wake up we were being attacked all over the world by terrorism before the war started. We will not be held hostage by terrorism. Don't Tread On Me, me
66 Yyz717 : Have you ever been out here TechRep? you've never been attacked by terrorism here. What about the terrorist attacks in Bali, aimed primarily at Aussie
67 9V-SVE : What about the terrorist attacks in Bali, aimed primarily at Aussies? This was also a terrorist attack....out "there" in your part of the world. If I'
68 Heavymetal : You can post em easy enough, but you can't answer them.....o n c e again: Is the potential of terrorism in or against the United States greater or les
69 Glenn : How do you successfully avoid Killing Civilians Answer, drop not 1x2000lb bomb an a residential area, Drop 4. If any of you have been anywhere near a
70 N79969 : "Is the potential of terrorism in or against the United States greater or less now than it was 6 months ago?" That is a fair question. But I don't kno
71 Goingboeing : I suspect that they will still be indignant about the invasion in public but will privately admire our work. Maybe if they are lucky, they can convinc
72 Post contains links Schoenorama : Alpha1: "Civilian losses, even when the Iraqi's mentioned them, are lighter than anyone expected." The country is currently in a great chaos. If the I
73 Glenn : "Is the potential of terrorism in or against the United States greater or less now than it was 6 months ago?" well our Gov't in Australia thinks it is
74 UALPHLCS : YES THE IRAQIS ARE TO BLAME. Does anyone blame the Allies of WWII for the civilian deaths in Dresden. And the indiscriminate carpet bombing in WWII. T
75 Glenn : Gosh UALyaddayadda You sound like your almost over there doing the fghting. If that was the case, you have my respect, If not, you don't. It isn't jus
76 Yyz717 : how many of those billions could have been used to help the homeless and sick in the American back yard. With a higher per capita income in the US tha
77 Matt D : how many of those billions could have been used to help the homeless and sick in the American back yard. If it was up to me, not one thin dime. That's
78 Post contains images Glenn : With a higher per capita income in the US than Australia, there are hence relatively more homeless and sick in OZ. If any military spending is perhaps
79 UALPHLCS : No Glenn I missed my time in the military. But whats your point. Only people who are int he Military can have an opinion in favor of soldiers defendin
80 Schoenorama : UALPHLCS: "YES THE IRAQIS ARE TO BLAME" Why? They live in their country, in their City. The US forces have surrounded THEIR city. What do you want the
81 Airplay : With a higher per capita income in the US than Australia, there are hence relatively more homeless and sick in OZ. If any military spending is perhaps
82 Jaysit : So where are the WMDs? You know, the reason we went to war - the nuclear weaponry Iraq was making with those Aluminium tubes, the biological weapons,
83 Post contains images Airplay : Oh they'll find WMDs alright. Even if they have to plant them themselves!
84 Alpha 1 : From a military perspective? What about all the other perspectives, like the human perspective. I asked you a direct question: can you NOT answer it?
85 Artsyman : And you dont even have the balls (or the knowledge) to enter into a sensible debate with the anti-war camp. ******************************* So 12 year
86 Sabena 690 : So 12 years of trying to get rid of him, the last few years of intense debate in the UN, debate with the French, Germans, Chinese, Russians, and then
87 Glenn : If Saddam is trapped in teh City. Ie, I believe he can't get out. I assume he is alive as no matter how many bombs the Mercans drop on him, they still
88 Post contains links Racko : "Does anyone blame the Allies of WWII for the civilian deaths in Dresden." I do. Bombing Dresden was simply an act of revenge and a war crime. Even Ch
89 Post contains images Alpha 1 : Glenn, you need to learn how to spell "the" ADG went over it with everyone just the other day.
90 Post contains images Glenn : Um it's not me, it's teh keyboard
91 Schoenorama : Alpha 1 : "I asked you a direct question: can you NOT answer it?" If I haven't answered you question, it is because I do not believe one should judge
92 Post contains images Alpha 1 : Um it's not me, it's teh keyboard ROTFLMAO. I don't often really laugh out loud when reading stuff on here, Glenn, but was very funny. If I haven't an
93 Post contains images Glenn : It's not me it's teh keyboard
94 Alpha 1 : That's what I told teh guy, Glenn, it's not you. Teh keyboard won't cooperate, so what teh hell are you supposed to do about it?
95 ADG : You all will be pleased to know that his inability to spell the word the is a pet hate of mine and I happily tell him so every time he does it ADG
96 Post contains images Alpha 1 : I think you should make him suffer for it, ADG, and "make it up" to you, for torturing you so. I know my wife would do that. ....OK, time for a cold s
97 Post contains images Glenn : The other words I have trouble with is User that becomes Suer and account I once typed the words the users accunt, when i was actually referring to hi
98 Post contains images ADG : Alpha1, I don't generally go into the noctural habits of the VH's .. and will only go so far as to say that you dont' need to worry on that part ....
99 Post contains images Alpha 1 : there is a big gap between the kids bedtime and ours ...lots of time for fun. For you maybe. My wife goes to work at 3am, and I don't get home till 93
100 ADG : There is a 3am? ADG
101 Post contains images 747-451 : "According to independent media, there are many indications civilians have been killed ruthlessly by Coalition Forces" Aside from Al-Jazeera, can you
102 Glenn : I don't think 2000lb bombs dropped on a residential area is friendly killing. Do you. All after a target that can't escape anyway. Assuming of course
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Voices From The Gulf: Yes To War posted Mon Mar 17 2003 21:56:49 by Heavymetal
A Question For The Anti-Bush Crowd: Re: Privacy posted Mon Nov 6 2006 00:25:44 by Matt D
Kerry - The Anti War Vote? posted Mon Oct 25 2004 02:52:21 by Techrep
TotalFinaElf And The Anti-war Left posted Tue Apr 22 2003 23:02:33 by Apathoid
My Theory On The People At The Anti-war Protests posted Wed Mar 26 2003 22:52:31 by Jcs17
Dixie Chicks Join The Anti-War Wagon posted Mon Mar 17 2003 19:40:31 by Ilyushin96M
The Losers At The Anti-war Protests posted Tue Feb 18 2003 04:26:17 by Jcs17
Berzerkeley U And The Anti-war Movement posted Sat Oct 27 2001 19:15:07 by Whistler
Does Bush Get His Intels From The Google Earth? posted Tue Oct 24 2006 07:00:20 by FlyingTexan
The Anti-bacterial Ban: A Good Idea! posted Fri Oct 22 2004 02:21:37 by Derico