Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Msnbc Sez Highly Likely Saddam Killed Today  
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2049 posts, RR: 22
Posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

Yes! Way to go, George!

http://www.msnbc.com/news/870749.asp?0cv=CA01


II Cor. 4:17-18
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2049 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1157 times:

Sorry for the redundant post!


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

I won't shed a tear for Saddam when it happens, but where exactly does it say it is "HIGHLY LIKELY" he's dead?

Is this just more propaganda? How many times have they said they killed this guy? Maybe they oughta make sure first.


User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2049 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1137 times:

Here is the quote from the story: "they said it was highly likely that he and his sons were dead if they were still there when the bombs hit."


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2049 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1124 times:

More info from the Washington Times.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20030408-10813570.htm



II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1124 times:

BTW, It's not "Way to go George" but rather, "Way to go to all the hundreds of thousands of coalition troops who have put their lives on the line to accomplish a common goal." Screw George Bush.

UAL747


User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1113 times:

Here is the quote from the story: "they said it was highly likely that he and his sons were dead if they were still there when the bombs hit."


It's highly likely then that Bush would be dead IF he was in there too. That goes for me, or you or anyone else. So where does it say it is highly likely Saddam is dead?


User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2049 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1093 times:

Airplay: Chill, man. Highly likely he was there. All the news channels are going with it.


II Cor. 4:17-18
User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1068 times:

Airplay, you're whining waay to much, bro. Do you enjoy being pissed off?


"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

So where does it say it is highly likely Saddam is dead?

Hey Airplay, do you know how to read?

The sources would not rule out the possibility that Saddam could have moved before the bomber struck, but they said it was likely that he and his sons were dead.




-NWA742


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1054 times:

George Bush didn't do shit, Sleekjet. He ignored the rest of the world to show everyone he has big gonads, and went to war. The "atta boy" should go to the troops, not the idiots who sent them to war.

Having said that, Airplay, reports are that the U.S. had real-time intelligence, and knew he was there, and knew almost exactly where he was in the building, from what I've seen on CNN and Fox. If the intel is as reliable as is being told, then they got the bastard.


User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1054 times:

Yes I can read. Thank you. Where does it say that it was "highly" likely Saddam was dead? Can you read NWA742....

I really didn't intend to make a big point of this...but the topic title is sort of inaccurate. It spins the whole story a bit.

It's a subtle difference , but I'd rather be likely dying than "Highly Likely" dying.


User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1047 times:

Where does it say that it was "highly" likely Saddam was dead?

Ok, it doesn't say "highly", big freakin deal Airplay. It's not like every other news channel is saying "highly" or anything like that, right?

Open your eyes.  Insane

I really didn't intend to make a big point of this...but the topic title is sort of inaccurate. It spins the whole story a bit.

It's a subtle difference , but I'd rather be likely dying than "Highly Likely" dying


Blah blah blah yada yada yada.

You're simply denying credibility again Airplay, because it's another possible score for the US.

I swear if they were to find Saddam and hang him out in the streets of Baghdad with cameras everywhere, you'd still be denying it.

Dream on  Insane




-NWA742


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1040 times:

As I have always said, if this was Klintoon or Al Bore, the liberals would be the biggest cheer leaders for the war. Since it is a Republican President, they're opposed to it 100%.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1033 times:

Let's hope Saddam and his sons are dead, so this war can be over and our troops can come home safely.

B757300, guess what? Clinton and Gore are NOT in office, Bush is. I don't care who's the president, if he's doing a lousy job, then he deserves criticism. You need to get over your rants about liberals, man. They are just absurd.


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1033 times:

Wrong, B757300. Like a good Conservative ,you see things in simpleton terms. I would have opposed this war no matter who would have been President. It's amazing you demand respect for Bush, when you give none to anyone else, simply because they, wisely, don't agree with you.

Any way you slice it, going to war was wrong, be it Gore, Clinton or Bush calling the shots. It makes you feel like a macho man, I know, B757300, but it doesn't make it right.

I hope to hell we got Saddam, and we can get the killing over with. Again, I can see some of you really get your rocks off on this war, but that's your problem.


User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1026 times:

I'm not criticizing Bush over the war, all I'm saying is that the congrats on "killing" (if indeed he is dead) goes to those who are risking their lives, not Bush. But, I don't think Bush has done that good of a job as a president in the first place anyway. And I'm a very conservative liberal and I voted for him.

UAL747


User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1019 times:

It was "highly" likely that Bush actually lost the election. It is "highly" likely Bush pursued this war for the oil. It is highly likely Bush will not be reelected.

It is likely that many will get pissy and reply to my post with some insult...No wait. Make that "highly" likely.....


User currently offlineAlpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1014 times:

Airplay, it's highly likely that, for some reason that escapes most of us, you're having trouble dealing with the death of a tyrant. Why?

[Edited 2003-04-08 05:39:36]

User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1009 times:

Nope...I already stated I wouldn't shed a tear for this guy. I'm just trying to figure out how authoritative this report is. It's not the first time reports like this have been wrong.



User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1000 times:

I'm just trying to figure out how authoritative this report is.

Oh really?

Then why is it that, when news such as Coalition casualties--or anything bad on the US' side--comes out, you never question the reliability of the same sources you are questioning now?

Seems as though you are only hearing what you want to, and ignoring what you don't want to hear.




-NWA742


User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 981 times:

Then why is it that, when news such as Coalition casualties--or anything bad on the US' side--comes out, you never question the reliability of the same sources you are questioning now?

That's a pretty sweeping accusation. Have any proof? And remember...you said "anything bad on the US side".

I consider the source of any news I read or hear. I have stated (in other posts) that I always consider the truth somewhere in the middle between Al Jazeera and CNN etc....


User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 978 times:

That's a pretty sweeping accusation. Have any proof?

The proof is your lack of questioning the reliability of those sources right after news such as those mentioned comes out.





-NWA742


User currently offlineAirplay From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 975 times:

Ah...I guess those sources are easy to verify. Is it your habit to judge someone guilty based on LACK of evidence?

User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 970 times:

Ah...I guess those sources are easy to verify. Is it your habit to judge someone guilty based on LACK of evidence?

It's not a lack of evidence.

It's an accusation based on things I've read from you.

The lack of your questioning on those news topics is the proof, it's not a lack of "evidence". It's a lack of doing something that you do on other topics.



-NWA742


25 CPH-R : Whoa, we had to get to post #25 before someone asked the question: What if Saddam wasn't there, and all we got is a bunch of dead civilians? After all
26 Alpha 1 : CPH-R, again, for the millionth time, whehter you and I like it or not, civilians do die in war. That's not a callous statement, but a fact. If some c
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Saddam's Sons Likely Killed In Firefight posted Tue Jul 22 2003 18:43:38 by B757300
MSNBC: Bill Likely To Eliminate Border Fence posted Wed Dec 27 2006 17:48:31 by AerospaceFan
More Likely To Be Killed By Police Than Terrorist posted Fri Sep 15 2006 15:30:04 by Cairo
Civilians Likely Killed Without Provocation posted Sat May 27 2006 12:20:12 by QANTAS077
My Best Friend Killed Herself Today. posted Tue Jan 10 2006 06:32:15 by 4holer
Saddam And How Many Iraqis He Killed posted Fri May 13 2005 00:56:05 by Yanksn4
France And Germany: Saddam Shouldn't Be Killed posted Thu Jul 1 2004 21:59:27 by Jcs17
Brit Intelligence Sez Saddam Survived posted Wed Apr 9 2003 04:11:57 by Sleekjet
Today: 17 Soliders Killed, 4 Kidnapped (Israeli) posted Tue Apr 9 2002 14:50:31 by LY772
More Israeli's Shot And Killed/wounded Today. posted Sun Oct 28 2001 20:11:55 by LY772