Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Can We Accept George Bush Jr?  
User currently offlineFoxo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 995 times:

I think this guy isnt really involved in whats going on in the world. I mean this is not the cold war, we dont need anybody who thinks communism is the worst thing in the world etc. There are more important things than this SDI trash again.  Pissed

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 922 times:

With all due respect, you don't get to be PResident of the United States without knowing whats going on in the world. G Dubya doesn't have to be a genius on every world issue, because he has enough advisors around that help keep him updated. Foxo, this topic is absurd, and just another excuse to start a war in the forums.

User currently offlineN766AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 915 times:

Mega-dittos, KROC...

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 906 times:

Foxo, can you back up you story a little. Anway, as we all know, Cheney is the brain, Bush is the mouth. He won't actually have do do any thinking, that's what Cheney's for.

User currently offlineSEVEN_FIFTY7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 957 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 900 times:

I think we should give Georgie Junior a chance. Afterall, he realizes:

1) He doesn't exactly have the reputation of a rocket-scientist.

2) He realizes the circumstances surrounding his recent election "victory."

3) He realizes the popularity and concomitant successes of his predecessor (regardless of whether certain people wanna accept those successes as being valid.)

4) He realizes he needs to prove his ability to stand on his own without the direction of his father.


Yeah. I say give Curious George a chance. Let's reserve our imminent side-splitting laughter for when he f*cks up.


User currently offlineUA752 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 142 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 891 times:

I gotta bone to pick with Bush. He had his chance and blew it! The man isnt even 90 days into office and hes already stiring shit up in the middle east. Hes a power hungary bitch!

User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3369 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 890 times:

The tax cuts benifit the rich only.

User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 891 times:

clinton should have bombed Iraq years ago! Instead he left Saddam so he can build up again!

User currently offlineDeltaRNOmd-80 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 892 times:

Hey, Bush is gonna be criticized for this, right now he is playing the part of the school janitor, sweeping up the many errors of the idiot that was president for 8 years before him. Die Saddam, Go Bush!

User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 885 times:

Oh, so now Saddam is Clinton's fault as well? BULLSHIT!

Sorry pal, but Saddam, like everything else in Clinton's Presidency, is a left-over, and you know exactly who didn't finish him.


Now I suggest you take SEVEN_FIFTY7's advise and start saving your energy for the inevitable attacks on Bush. We're going to make what you did to Clinton look like friendly kidding....  Yeah sure



Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 10, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 884 times:

Hell no we cannot accept George Bush Jr. as President!


Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 879 times:

No of course i know that Saddam was not Clinton's problem! I never said he was. Superfly deal with it, he is and you can't do anything about it.

User currently offlineCba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 865 times:

Actually, it was Daddy Bush who didn't finish off Saddam. During the Gulf War, they had the option to push the ground troops to Baghdad and finish it off, but Bush pulled back.

NOTE: I am not taking a side in this particular post, just relaying the facts.


User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39478 posts, RR: 75
Reply 13, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 865 times:

Wanna bet?


Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineAn-225 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 3950 posts, RR: 41
Reply 14, posted (13 years 2 months 5 days ago) and read 848 times:

Hell, no. A redneck is not worthy of a presidency...


Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
User currently offlineMls515 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3076 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (13 years 2 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 832 times:

Well, the reason Saddam wasn't finished off is because they decided that leaving him in power was better than having lots of terrorism directed at the U.S. and crew, and also to make sure Iran wasn't the predominant power in the immeadiate region.

User currently offlineHole_courtney From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 569 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (13 years 2 months 4 days ago) and read 827 times:

A good friend of mine said something the other day that i thought was interesting.

We were talking about assassinations and someone brought up that someone was threatening George W Bush (i think this was right after that crazy guy got shot by the secret service).


He said, "I don't care if I don't like the guy or didn't vote for him, he's my president, and nobody messes with my president."

I think we can accept the president of People of the United States.



"[He] knew everything about literature, except how to enjoy it." - Yossarian, Catch 22
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 821 times:

For all of you, who think Bush Sr. failed to finish off Saddam, you all need to check your facts. There was great pressure not to "finish off" Saddam from not only middle eastern nations fearing complete upheaval, but even members of Nato (like the freakin' French, who oppose damn near every U.S. military action, oh, except those times in WWI and WWII), who for some reason, thought it best that we only show Saddam who is boss. Because of this, the war ended the way it did. With Kuwait liberated, and Suadia Arabia feeling "safe" again. Bush Sr. nor justthe U.S. called all the shots in the Gulf War.

Also, Billy Clinton on occasion had fighters attack Iraqi radar sites and such, when they were threatening Coalition aircraft patroling the no-fly zone. Why is it that when G. Dubya does it, he gets critized? Why?, because the world and this forum is filled with a bunch of hypocrites. Not to mention, Bush Jr. didn't wake up, and say "Let's bomb Saddam today." You see, Bush has military advisors. Its those advisors job to watch military issues, such as Saddam. Those people recommend to Bush what course of action needs to be taken. 90% of you who are critisizing Bush Jr. for this, are just looknig for another platform to attack him on, and thats pathetic.


User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 18, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 816 times:

The father is: George Herbert Walker Bush

The son is: George Walker Bush

They are not, therefore, Sr. and Jr.

If you didn't already know.

redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineC72 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 806 times:

Whether you accept him as President of the United States of America or not, he's the President, so live with it!!!!

I accept him 100%


User currently offlineTWA From Iran, joined Sep 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 805 times:

Okay I'm a Democrat but I strongly support any Air-Strikes on any enemy country.

Regards,
TWA


User currently offlineDoomfox From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 125 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 800 times:

I had my doubts about him, but he's doing alright. You can't criticize him bombing Iraq if you didn't criticize Clinton for doing the same thing.
I think that Bush was letting Saddam know who's in charge (USA), even after Clinton.
Don't forget that it was the United States that gave Iraq a lot of the technology they have today, including anthrax.
I voted for Gore, but I think that I'm going to have to live with Bush for a while and accept it.


User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 20
Reply 22, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 801 times:

>I think that Bush was letting Saddam know who's in charge (USA), even after Clinton.

What the hell do you think Iraq is, the 51st state!?



Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (13 years 2 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 799 times:

>I think that Bush was letting Saddam know who's in charge (USA), even after Clinton.

That is the most absurd thing I have heard since I last read a post on the Affirmative Action tread. Bush was not letting Saddam know "who is in charge." Bush, was acting on what his top military advisors suggested to him, and that was a course of military action, due to the fact, Saddam had his Army keep threatening coalition aircraft patroling the No-Fly zone. There was a logical, and real explenation behind the attacks. If G. Dubya was just flexing the U.S.'s proverbial muscle, then why did the British attack as well?

(I'm all for people having htere own opinions, but the more I read of them, the more I question myself on that)


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 788 times:

Thank you, Redngold! That was bugging the hell out of me!

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineN766AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 25, posted (13 years 2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 782 times:

You tell 'em, Redngold...  Big grin

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
For Those Who Can't Stand President George W. Bush posted Wed Jun 8 2005 04:47:34 by Falcon84
So How Can We Blame Rita On Bush? posted Wed Sep 21 2005 06:14:36 by CaptOveur
George Bush Joke, Enjoy! posted Fri Oct 6 2006 21:46:55 by Luv2fly
What If George Bush Was A Black President? posted Fri Oct 6 2006 16:57:37 by VHVXB
George Bush - Sunday Bloody Sunday posted Sat Aug 12 2006 11:40:25 by Gkirk
How Can We Stomach These Politicians? posted Tue Jun 6 2006 08:19:23 by TedTAce
Can We Use Floods For Our Own Good? posted Thu Jun 1 2006 03:46:00 by Aleksandar
An Open Letter To George Bush posted Thu Apr 27 2006 18:11:22 by Columba
Can We Open Anwr Yet? posted Wed Apr 26 2006 01:32:16 by Bushpilot
The Official Impeach George W Bush Thread! posted Sun Apr 23 2006 00:52:30 by Dc10s4ever