Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Indian Reservations: Soverign Or Not?  
User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 47
Posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1148 times:

Recently, I took a drive out to the Low Desert (Cochella Valley/Salton Sea area) of SoCal. Since it was hotter than $hit, I decided to go to one of the so-called "Indian" Casinos.

I saw a rather interesting sign at the entrance when driving in:

'Welcome to the Sovereign Nation of _______ Tribe' (I don't want to say which one it was).

Then, after having a nice lunch, I decided to try my luck on the [quarter] slot machines.

Well, I stuck a $20 in, and after winning a few, losing a few, with 35 credits still on it, I hit a jackpot (10,000 quarters, or $2500).

So I thought that was cool. Definitely made my day. But then, before giving me the stack of cash, I had to fill out a declaration that I indeed won that money, and it is subject to taxation. So as I walked out of there with a stack of 25 fresh new Uncle Bens in my pocket, and a lot of quarters (I always quit when I'm ahead), one thing trouble me. If this was really the "soverign" nation they claimed to be, then why am I being required to sign tax forms? If this Reservation is indeed "out of the country", then technically, whatever I win there is none of the IRS's business. Also, there was no "customs" at the "border". The currency didn't bother me. Heck, most of Mexico uses the US$D.

So can someone please 'splain to me what's going on?





10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

Putting up a sign in your driveway really doesn`t have much legal power. It`s a political statement, to be sure, but legally it means nothing.

User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13547 posts, RR: 62
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1109 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Putting up a sign in your driveway really doesn`t have much legal power.

From what I understand, Avt is technically correct. While the U.S. Government gives the various tribes the "Sure, you're a sovereign nation!" wink-wink, nudge-nudge speech, they're no more sovereign than if I planted a flag in my front yard and declared that my property was seceding from the Union.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 1110 times:

They are called Native Americans (cuz they were here first). I am Indian (from India, duh) and it really bugs when the natives themselves as well as other refer to themselves as Indians. What, now everyone is embracing ignorance?? It has been 500 freakin years since Coloubus' mistake, why is not anyone interested is fixing that BS!?

In any event, I think they are using the word to make themselves feel more independent appart from the USA. To possess sovereignity, one must simply have supreme power especially over a body politic or freedom from external control, i.e. controlling influence.

Anything else is...technical.

I think they are not, because they still need a vote from the state they are in to built a casino, otherwise they don't need anyone's approval.



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineIMissPiedmont From United States of America, joined May 2001, 6287 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1079 times:

But the fact remains that the resevations are indeed sovereign nations under non revokable treaties. True they need state permission to operate casinos (I don't understand that part at all) and, as long as you are driving on a state highway, you are protected by the US Constitution. Just don't go out into the desert and get caught breaking any laws, You may just find that they need not read you the Miranda warning (though they probably will), you can be held incommunicado for extended periods and the punishment will probably be harsher than in the city.

Also you cannot serve a civil summons on a reservation to a resident without tribal approval. In fact many criminal summons cannot be served on tribal lands.



Damn, this website is getting worse daily.
User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2578 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1059 times:

Congrats to you. I drove to Cache Creek in Northern California last night and won $2500 on a dollar slot ("The Mummy" -- oooooohhhh!).

BTW, the weather you mentioned made it up here with lightning flashes but no thunder, and minimal rain. Probably only my 3rd or 4th time to see lightning since I moved to California about 10 years ago.


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1044 times:

I had the chance to spend some time in the Navajo Nation last summer, which is located in southern Utah and northern Arizona mainly. While there I spoke with a Navajo legislator, and he told me that one of the things that was being considered in the Navajo legislature was the concept of trying to get statehood for the Navajo nation...a rather interesting idea...

Also, the Four Corners National Monument is run by the Navajo Nation as well, something which I thought was a little ironic given the whole "sovereignty" thing...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineN312RC From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 2682 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1026 times:

Statehood... why would they want statehood?? Look at all the benefits they have for NOT being a state!



Fly Delta's Big Jets!
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1016 times:

You can't be kinda pregnant, or kinda sovereign. Either you are or you're not, and anyone who thinks the reservations are is deluding themselves. BTW, I'm not for one or the other, I don't have an interest in this. But if they were truly sovereign, they wouldn't need approval from anyone for casinos, they'd have their own government, and wouldn't receive any support from the States ( or Canada, depending on where they are). By any measure, they are not sovereign anything.

User currently offlineSccutler From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 5504 posts, RR: 28
Reply 9, posted (11 years 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 987 times:

The Indian Nations are legitimate governments. They have no obligation to adopt or follow the laws of the states that they are "in" (actually, surrounded by), because they have separate existence.

Many of the basic functions of government are handled by the federal government, by practical necessity, but many tribal entities issue passports (legit), they have their own courts, customs, license plates, etc.

The casinos exist precisely because the states have no say.



...three miles from BRONS, clear for the ILS one five approach...
User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (11 years 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 979 times:

Sccutler, as for customs you mentioned, what they do in them? As I understand, no of them has embassies or issues visas and I doubt they has to fear illegal immigrants...

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is "Stupid Indian" Racist Or Not? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 06:01:30 by Don
Printer Cartridges - Branded Or Not? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 09:12:32 by Cxsjr
Fake Or Not:Up To You To Decide! posted Wed Aug 30 2006 12:21:29 by RootsAir
Great, Or Not-So-Great, Art Versus Pornography posted Thu Aug 24 2006 03:12:42 by AerospaceFan
Intelligent Or Not? posted Fri Aug 11 2006 20:44:12 by Express1
Intelligent Or Not? posted Fri Aug 11 2006 20:42:13 by Express1
Gay Or Not Gay? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 02:42:34 by Sleekjet
Sushi - Do You Like It Or Not? posted Thu Feb 23 2006 17:54:47 by Pe@rson
Underwear - To Sniff Or Not To Sniff? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 17:03:04 by 7LBAC111
Rats: Big Deal Or Not? posted Sun Jan 8 2006 04:46:11 by 767Lover