Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Voting In A Gay Bishop?  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2035 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Call me crazy, but I was reading this morning's local paper and came across a story that people in Minneapolis were about to vote in a gay Bishop.

Um, educate me please. Churches with gay bishops? Sounds like an oxymoron or sorts.



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
38 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDelboy From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 725 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1999 times:

Mirrodie......and your point is??

Why not, gays are everywhere else, why not the church!


User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2011 times:

Well then, Delboy, why not vote in bishops who also live with their mistresses or various other opposite-sex partner, in what the Church holds as a sinful relationship for 13 years like this guy? It is one thing to say that gays deserve the same rights and protections in society as everyone else. However, whether you agree with Church teachings or not, they ARE the Church's teachings, and someone blatantly defying those teachings does not belong in a position of authority in that Church. Would it make sense to appoint a Grand Ayatollah who habitually eats pork, and runs websites and support groups for Muslims who like pork?

It is clear from listening to his supporters, especially a female cleric from Los Angeles I saw interviewed yesterday, that this is part of a political agenda on the part of homosexual groups who have no interest in actually participating in the Episcopal church. The question remains, why on earth would you remain part of an institution and try to attain a position of power within that same institution, which holds your lifestyle as sinful? If he had the Episcopal Church's best interests at heart, seeing that this may well lead to another schism, he wouldhave stepped aside.



Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineDelboy From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 725 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2006 times:


I'm neither gay or a believer in this God and religion stuff, however I do find it slightly amusing that this is happening, he he!!

However, I'm going back to my Sunday school days, but did God not say that everyone was equal in his eyes. I'm sure there were gays around in his day, probably well in the closet, but......

Don't really want to start a debate here as I have no strong views either way, live and let live is my motto so long as you don't touch my bum or come knocking my front door with a bible in their hands.


User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1992 times:

I agree, Delboy, I am the same way. That is also exactly why you or I would not make a good Anglican bishop! Any moreso than someone who can't live by the rules. That is not to say the rules are right, but if you are going to be a leader in an organization, you should be expected to live by those rules.



Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineTriscl From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1949 times:

It seems to me that the Episcopal Church, and the Curch England too, have a tradition of questioning authority--e.g., divorce, women in the clergy...

I am not an expert in church teachings, but if the Episcopalian views are anything like the Catholic, it is not a sin to identify as gay. (I'm not Catholic, but I did go to a Catholic high school! I happen to think the Catholic position on homosexuality is hateful) However, I haven't read anything about his bedroom life.

I suppost that living by the rules of an organization is important for its leaders, but so is recognizing when those rules have become anachronistic. I think it's up to the clergy to review things and decide what is and what is not "consistent" with what God's teachings are. There certainly has been lots of change in Christianity in the last 2000 years!




User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1940 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

And your point is....
Sounds like an oxymoron....meaning that we seem to hear all about the church and teachings on sex/church, yet this is at the heart of the matter.


Hetero and homo (and asexual) people are abound. But WHY does issue HAve to come up at all about the individuals sexuality?

too bad. gotta love sex, religion and politics!



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineGoodbye From Australia, joined Jan 2001, 913 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1934 times:

Seems like a bit of hipocrisy, the people saying it shouldnt be allowed...they let child molesters and paedophiles in the church, yet cry foul when gay people are allowed.

User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1948 times:

Seems like a bit of hipocrisy, the people saying it shouldnt be allowed...they let child molesters and paedophiles in the church, yet cry foul when gay people are allowed.

Welcome back to the controversial discussions, I'm gonna remind you now of why you avoid them.

To you I suppose all priests are child molesters? You're also confusing Churches.


User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2592 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

I don't know about agendas....his diocese nominated him, and I can't imagine a Gay Ghetto in Concord, for God's sake.

It's not my church, but I am loving the controversy though. And I DO have an agenda.


User currently offlineVirgin744 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 919 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1916 times:

Its funny that Mirodie would mention this as I was just thinking the same thing this morning... How can a gay person become a man of the faith when that faith -and corrcet me if i'm wrong, most if not all other faiths too, are against homosexuals. As peole I dont hate gay people but in faith they are doing wrong and I find it contradictory & hypocritical to have a gay person within a religious organisation. And if you think its just my own opinion, let me quote from the bible;

Jude 1:3-7 (GOD'S WORD Bible)
What happened to Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities near them is an example for us of the punishment of eternal fire. The people of these cities suffered the same fate that God's people and the angels did, because they committed sexual sins and engaged in homosexual activities.

Timothy 1:5-11 (The New American Standard Bible )
But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted.



virgin744


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

It is clear from listening to his supporters, especially a female cleric from Los Angeles I saw interviewed yesterday, that this is part of a political agenda on the part of homosexual groups who have no interest in actually participating in the Episcopal church. The question remains, why on earth would you remain part of an institution and try to attain a position of power within that same institution, which holds your lifestyle as sinful? If he had the Episcopal Church's best interests at heart, seeing that this may well lead to another schism, he would have stepped aside.

BINGO!
_________________________________________________________

Homosexuality is incompatible with Christianity. One cannot be a homosexual and a Christian. While the Bible says we should love our fellow man, it also says that a person who is actively living in sin and is not repentant cannot be a member of the Church.

Sadly I'm not really surprised by this. The Episcopal Church has been taken over by the liberal elements which have about as much regard for the Bible as the ACLU. This will split the church for sure and in the end will the church that continues to believe the truth will be better off without the hypocrites.



"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineJAL777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1911 times:

Folks,

You need to make a distinction between homosexuality and engaging in homosexual activity. I was taught, in a catholic school mind you, that one is a sin an incompatible with the church, while the other is not.

-JAL


User currently offlineMD-90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 8507 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1890 times:

Personally, I would totally accept homosexuality if the Bible didn't say it was a sin (yes, I'm not kidding, I really would). I know a guy in my church who is gay and doesn't want to be, as yes he's a member, been baptized, sings in the choir, et al, and he's struggling with himself. He's trying to change with what I know is everything that he has in him...in that case I'd say you could be "gay" and Christian.

User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1881 times:


Hetero and homo (and asexual) people are abound. But WHY does issue HAve to come up at all about the individuals sexuality?


Amen. Why does it have to keep coming up? It seems like everytime I turn on the TV they have to be talking about gay this and gay that. Look, I don't have a big problem with gay people, but I really don't want to hear about it all the time! One of my friend's roommates is gay, and it seems like that's all he ever talks about (i.e. his gayness, he's going out to a gay club, he's chatting with his gay friends). I know we live in a biased society, but it probably wouldn't be so bad if they didn't dress up in rainbow colors and march down the streets. I'm not for discrimination in any form, but let's face it, gay people largely give themselves the negative image they have by acting that way. Of course, not all of them act that way, but enough people do to turn the majority of society off.

Back to the issue at hand: this bishop is probably a great spiritual man (otherwise why would they even contemplate making him a bishop, or a reverend for that matter). Unfortunately, he will be identified not as a bishop, but as a gay bishop because people will never be able to see past this issue. That's why he probably just should have stayed in the closet and not let it become an issue. Now a church is being torn apart over one person's crusade at making a social statment.



Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 16
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1876 times:

A couple of questions - does this bishop engage in sexual activity of any sort? If not, then there "sexual preference" shouldn't play a role, but since homosexuality is in most cases defined by sex acts, what is the Episcopalian view of sex between unmarried individuals, assuming that the bishop is sexually active?

User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1872 times:

He was married for a woman for I think nearly 15 years, then he became involved with a man for the last 15 years or so.


Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineKevi747 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 1058 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 1883 times:

Why would any gay person want to be associated with a religion that follows the crazed writings in an ancient book of lies used throughout history to oppress us?  Confused I don't get it.

Christians don't like us. When you have to say, "I don't have a problem with gay people BUT...I just don't like what they do." The "but" negates the first part of the sentence. (OK, start making "butt" jokes about that one. Why do I open myself up for this here?) Besides, its what we "do" that makes us who we are.

I understand and support people's desire to explore a spiritual life, but it always seems to somehow involve christianity (at least in America anyway).




"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." --Stephen Colbert
User currently offlineTriscl From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1854 times:

Okay, I also think a gay person would want to hesitate before turning to the church for anything--I for one run screaming every time I'm asked to go to my family's crazy church in Southern California--but the Episcopal Church is different than, say, the Southern Baptist Convention. Like I said before, I think Episcopalians are more amenable to the idea of change and reinterpretation, which is why it's attracted more of a "liberal" set.

And I think it's understandable that people in the United States often turn to Christianity for spirituality. It's ubiquitous. It's hard to walk down the street and not run into a Christian Bookstore in some parts of the country. I am happy, however, to live in NY where that doesn't happen.


User currently offlineTranceport From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1858 times:

JHooper wrote:

Amen. Why does it have to keep coming up? It seems like everytime I turn on the TV they have to be talking about gay this and gay that. Look, I don't have a big problem with gay people, but I really don't want to hear about it all the time! One of my friend's roommates is gay, and it seems like that's all he ever talks about (i.e. his gayness, he's going out to a gay club, he's chatting with his gay friends). I know we live in a biased society, but it probably wouldn't be so bad if they didn't dress up in rainbow colors and march down the streets. I'm not for discrimination in any form, but let's face it, gay people largely give themselves the negative image they have by acting that way. Of course, not all of them act that way, but enough people do to turn the majority of society off.

Would you be open to the suggestion that you just perhaps are not used to the idea of homosexuality becoming more mainstream? I am not here to try to change your mind or your ideas, but I would challenge you to spend one day and observe how heterosexuality "keeps coming up" in your everyday life. Almost every single aspect of mainstream American culture is geared toward heterosexuality. Your attraction to women flavours the clothing you wear, the activities you plan, the places you go, the way you behave, and the things you talk about. I would venture to say that in your life that straight things "keep coming up" because it is a large defining characteristic of who you are. When you are with your buddies, does the topic of going out with girls or discussing this hot chick or that babe not come up with any regularity?

I do understand your viewpoint. AlI used to feel much like you do now. I don't know what exposure you have had to gay guys, but if you have had much at all you probably have noticed as I have that to a certain segment of them, everything actively revolves around being gay. It's a bit hard to explain since sexuality is so omnipresent in our lives, but I'm talking about a general lifestyle. Some guys are so busy being gay and only being involved in a gay lifestyle (gay night clubs, their gayness, their gay friends, this gay event, that gay event, etc.) that they miss out on the wider world that is bypassing them. I have always found that a little sad, but then I had to realise that I went through that phase too. Although some people never seem to grow out of it, you have to have a little understanding.

For many of us, we spent between the first fifteen to forty years of our lives hiding and pretending to be something other than what we really are. For those of us who lived a part of our lives as closeted gay guys, our only interactions with other gay guys have been in gay clubs/night clubs, internet chat rooms, bathhouses or cities far from home where we didn't have the fear of being "found out". That kind of living takes a certain toll on an individual. When and IF a person reaches that point where they decided enough is enough and that they are tired of the double life, the lies, and all the secrets; then unless you have personally experienced it you cannot imagine what it is like to finally throw off that cloak that so many of us have lived under. For a period of time you absolutely revel in your new found freedom in a way that you probably will never understand. Many people who have never been able to talk about their lives and express themselves freely before suddenly are enthralled to discuss their homosexuality all the time.

It's like the floodgates are open and you can connect with other guys with similar experiences. You become part of a community where for the first time you really feel accepted and like you are with your own kind. Maybe that sounds kind of crazy, but with many of the attitudes towards homosexuals today, it is a most amazing thing. It is natural that at this time in your life you want to surround yourself with gay friends, explore "gay" things, and talk about your "gayness" all the time. As an aside, in all fairness, I'd bet you still talk about your "straightness" all the time. You've just grown up with it as the norm so you've never really noticed it.

Some people never seem to move beyond that stage, and to me they miss out on a lot of living. However, for some it appears that is where they find their safety net, and if that is the case I say more power to them. What eventually happened to me is that I fell for someone and became involved in a long term monogamous relationship. Our lives probably more or less mirror any heterosexual couple's life, with some obvious exceptions. We don't go to gay clubs....we go where they play good music. We don't seek out gay friends.....although we have them, we look for qualities in people that make them good, fun people to be around no matter what their gender or sexual preference. We don't attend the local pride parade because it's a gay event....we like to go for the entertainment value. We don't sit around and talk about our gayness.....rather we sit around and argue about what we're going to watch on TV, discuss what we want to do this weekend, or spend an evening paying the monthly bills. Sound familiar? Hopefully so.

I believe there is also the element that people become more socially aware through intense efforts. Although I sometimes am tempted to look askance at certain groups within the gay community, I have always had to remind myself to take a step back and realise that if it weren't for the radical people who are out there making a stir, nothing would be different. If you look back through history, you will notice that all major social changes in a society generally have their roots in some sort of radical or in your face activism. It's the way things work. It is because of these sorts of people who may have had more guts than you and I might ever work up to stand up for what they believe is right and lobby for change who have made it possible for me to enjoy the life that I am able to enjoy today.

With all that said, I also think that gay issues come up too often. I should qualify that by saying that certain gay issues come up too often. When I meet a guy for the first time for friendship and/or dating and the whole conversation revolves around gay gay gay, then I usually know that we don't have a lot in common.

Airliners.net is no exception. I don't read many of the "gay" debates, much less post in them because the majority of them are inane, repetitive and unenlightening. It basically turns into a shouting match between two diametrically opposed groups of individuals. No one is going to convince anyone and all that happens is that tempers flare. I decided to post on this one because I yet have something to say about a gay bishop.

More generally speaking......

My position is plain and simple and it's going to draw heat. I don't believe that gay people should hold positions in organised religion. Before some of you start foaming at the mouth, note that I spent twenty-five years in a fundamental Mennonite religious environment. I know Scripture inside and out. I know more about a life of no television, no radio, no dancing, no movies......everything is sin sin sin than you will ever begin to dream about. I know about twenty-five years of life not allowed to wear shorts and only knowing a mother and female siblings who wear dresses, no make up and a head covering. I bet you do things in innocence that cause more conservative groups to wisely shake their heads and utter, "Those poor fools." I know more about a conservative philosophy and life than 99.9% of you can even imagine in your most conservative musings.

It's straightforward. The Bible condemns homosexuality in both the New and Old Testaments. I don't care about the arguments that the Bible is fallible because it is written by man or the assertions that it is outdated and at best a myth or a fable. I leave that where it's at. People who are Christians and spout Scripture in their condemnation of homosexuality better read the rest of the Bible carefully. If they apply the same principles to themselves found in the Scripture as the standard they apply to homosexuals, then they better hope there is a merciful God because no one stands a chance and even the most devout of you is riding a runaway train to the pits of Hell.

The point of all this is that Christianity is founded on the Bible. No matter what you believe or do not believe, that fact is true. And it is irrefutable that no matter who wrote it, those principles include condemnations of homosexual behavior in both the Old and New Testaments. I joined my church voluntarily when I was young and I left it voluntarily when I decided it was not for me. I'm having a hard time saying what I mean here. Since the church has its foundations in the Bible, it essentially cannot or should not change its rules to accomodate people. It doesn't matter if the issue is homosexuality, premarital sex, divorce & remarriage, bestiality, fornication, drunkeness, etc. If a religious body decides to "change the rules" then they depart from their Biblical foundations. That's why I left religion. It's all fucked up. People have "changed the rules" to accomodate their wishes and desires and overlook the judgements and guidelines that would affect them and zero in with religious fervour on issues that don't affect them or cramp their style. That's why it's so easy for straight Christians to bear down on homosexuality as a nearly unpardonable sin dooming gays to hell while continuing on with their own hedonistic lifestyles. I can say that with some confidence because if most of you who claim to be Christians were measured by the yardstick that I grew up with, then you're all phony anyway. It's all relative.

I had enough of it. When I left religion, I left a way of thinking that cannot by its very nature ever accept who or what I am. I don't expect it to. It's the nature of Christianity. It's just the hypocrisy that was a bitter pill for me.

Just some thoughts. I don't expect anyone to agree and neither do I care. Quite frankly, while we sit here at our keyboards and debate these issues from the comforts of our first world homes, millions of people at this moment are starving, being tortured, torn apart by land mines and bombs, and dying of preventable diseases.

That should make all our little pseudo-intellectual efforts look like a shameful pursuit and cause us to put our differences aside long enough to make a difference if only in just one person's life.

Bring on the wine, sex and song and let the sin begin!!!!


User currently offlineQANTASFOREVER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1847 times:

I'm sorry, but did you say they were voting in a gay bishop?

In the gay bishop?

Let me have a moment to comprehend the logistics of such an undertaking.  Big grin


User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1849 times:

Tranceport ,

That was a very interesting analysis. In fact, that was so damn good I'm adding you to my respected users list. You're right, heterosexuality is omnipresent all over the place in our daily conversations, etc. and we've gotten so used to it that we really don't even think about it. Even still, though, the topic doesn't usually dominate the conversation, since when I'm having a conversation with someone I usually have many more important things to discuss other than sex.

A little more about my friend's room mate. We all lived in the same college dorm last summer. I really don't understand why, but as cool as I tried to be to him, he never seemed to really want to have very much to do with the rest of us until such time that he decided he wanted to "come out" to us. I mean, we kind of already suspected him of being gay, but we didn't really care. But he just never wanted to grab lunch with us or anything. It was like he was being very exclusive about who he wanted to associate with. So anyway, whenever I try to strike up a conversation with him, I'd like to discuss any activites he might be involved in or interests he may have, but it always seems to come back to his gayness and he really doesn't have anything to talk about other than that, and that gets kind of irritating. I don't talk about girls all the time around him, so I wish he wouldn't talk about guys all the time around me. But your post possibly explains why he does act that way.



Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineTranceport From Canada, joined Jul 2003, 282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

Nice reply. I know the type you're referring to exactly. Whatever his deal is, I don't know but it sure sounds as if it's not because you're not trying.

Is Houston a place worth visiting as a destination? I'm down here in Mississippi working for a few months, and a few connects in HOU with CO is as much as I know about that part of Texas. I've heard it's a great city.

Any good spotting at the airport? It looks like you guys are pretty much dominated by CO there. I don't know where downtown is from the airport, but it must be a heck of a long way or else I've never known where to look when we're landing.


User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 23, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1817 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Jhooperand Trancesport, you are both on my silent respected users list as well. I appreciate your viewpoints.

I know threads of this nature can go awry, but I am lad we can discuss it meaningfully. Thanks.

mirrodie



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 24, posted (11 years 1 month 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

"To you I suppose all priests are child molesters? You're also confusing Churches."

So, to you, only Catholic priests are child molesters? I wish I could find the report again, but, as a percentage, the number of Catholic priests who are child molesters is no higher than in society at large, and no higher than among clergy of any other denomination. The Catholic Church happens to be the target of liberal media outlets, specifically the Boston Globe, which has had an anti-Catholic agenda for decades. The Church dealt with these isues no differently than any other institution at the time that most of these victims were violated, but we see only one institution having to fork over cash and make apologies.

That having been said, what has happened is, of course, inexcuseable, and heads should be rolling. You'll also notice that, now that the media have moved on to bigger and better things, they could care less about these victims, and we never hear about it any more. Meanwhile, several attorneys are much wealthier, and a lot of people are still hurting.

Child molestation also has nothing to do with the topic. While I am not in support of the homosexual political agenda, I don't think it is fair that, every time these issues come up, it leads to suggestions of child molestation. Again, I am sure there are no more homosexual child molesters than heterosexual child molesters.

Finally, living in a 15 year homosexual relationship after leaving your family is not exactly the profile of the typical, ideal bishop of any church.



Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
25 Boeing4ever : Ummm, cwapilot, I happen to be a Catholic. And I was speaking AGAINST Goodbye's generalizaition. B4e-Forever New Frontiers
26 Cwapilot : The first sentence of that quote would indicate that. The second sentence alludes to another ugly generalization that needs to go away.
27 Boeing4ever : Well true. But it is important to distinguish the Anglecan Chruch's problems from those of the Catholics Church. Of course this demonstrates how Goodb
28 Cwapilot : They need to hand them over to the local prosecutors and take their collars away immediately upon conviction, and let the state correctional instituti
29 Boeing4ever : Agreed Cwapilot, definately agreed. My own priest Father Ron Gollatz would agree as well! He wrote an open letter to Cardinal Francis George of Chicag
30 Dc10guy : Much like abortion, a persons sex life is a private matter and none of the churches business. or anyone else's for that matter.
31 Cwapilot : ...unless the church's business is your job. Nobody forced him into his career. Aside from that, he has made it his mission to make it everyone's busi
32 Dc10guy : It doesn't matter ....Its not the churches business. Even if he's open about it. I would at least give him credit for being honest.
33 Kevi747 : Tranceport, Thank you so much for putting everything so clearly. I agree with everything you said. I sometimes have a hard time finding the patience t
34 Tekelberry : Delboy, The church is supposed to be a place for MORAL support. As much as I side with most gay rights issues, allowing their LEADERSHIP in churches i
35 Alpha 1 : I'll stay away from this one. It has become a forum, over and over again, on this subject, for so-called "Christians" to bash gays, and use religion a
36 Tranceport : It took me a long time in life to learn that it is possible to debate issues without beating other people up and making a fool of yourself. It is hard
37 DoorsToManual : I think some people are confusing the bible with the non-fiction genre....big mistake, and the cause of all the church's problems!
38 Indianguy : There is a positive side to this. As it is Priests and Mullahs have quite a justified reputation for buggering young boys behind churches/mosques. Wit
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gay Bishop Fiasco In The US posted Mon Aug 4 2003 23:58:52 by DoorsToManual
Ford To Pull Ads In Gay Publications posted Mon Dec 5 2005 16:57:02 by PROSA
Mexican Expatriates Voting In America... posted Wed Feb 23 2005 06:49:33 by SFOMEX
This Just In! Gay Simpsons Character Revealed! posted Mon Feb 21 2005 02:21:27 by EmiratesA345
Voting In Florida posted Mon Oct 4 2004 18:56:09 by Flyingbronco05
The New 007 Wants Gay Scene In Next Sequel posted Tue Dec 5 2006 22:13:21 by Jimyvr
Nominee In Limbo Over Gay Marriage Issue posted Mon Nov 27 2006 15:15:48 by Dtwclipper
Columnist Coulter In Hot Water Over Voting posted Thu Nov 2 2006 04:11:29 by Luv2fly
Highest Court In New York Tanks Gay Marriage posted Thu Jul 6 2006 15:59:09 by Dougloid
Gay Tourism In The Middle East posted Wed Mar 15 2006 07:08:11 by NWA757boy