Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Two Questions About Former Colonies  
User currently offline9V-SVE From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 2066 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1080 times:

1. Why did Brits immigrate to some English colonies (South Africa, Australia etc) and not to others? Why did they prefer the above two?

2. Why are former European colonies in Asia/South America much more successful than ones in Africa?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1070 times:

9V-SVE, Brits actually immigrated to all the colonies. In Hong Kong, Zimbabwe, etc. there are expatriate communities. Also, because colonies in America were colonised before (Canada), there were more immigration. As for Australia, UK exiled their criminals there, thus white population quickly surpassed local one, since locals lived very scarcely. In African colonies there are less expatriates, since they were colonised later. South AFrica is different, because it was before colonisation controlled by Dutch (Cape colony), and there were already some expatriates. Later these Dutch expatriates created new states, Transvaal and Orange Free State. All later incorporated in South African Union. Of course, English also then immigrated and thus there are more whites than in other colonies. Also, apartheid didn't allowed to mix them with local blacks. But currently there are 12% whites in South Africa, thus, not so much.

As for African colonies, not only English ones, but also French, Belgian, Spanish, Portugal, German (before WW1) ones in sub-saharran Africa are unsuccesful. South Africa was more succesful, whites ruled there all the time until 90s, but now economy heads down also crime skyrocketed. Every black ruled state (including those in Carribean) is more or less poor. White (Australia, Canada) or Asian (Malaysia, Hong Kong) colonies lives better (there are poor white and asian states too mostly because unsuccsesful communist experiments, etc., but most still progresses or will progress when bad government is removed (North Korea)). Not sure why is it so. Some (racists) says this is because blacks are worse then whites, however I think that probably there are more reasons, like artificial boundaries set by Europeans in Africa, and this when united with African tribalism may force civil wars. But even small countries with dominating groups aren't rich though...


User currently offline9V-SVE From Singapore, joined Nov 2001, 2066 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1064 times:

Yes I know that Brits immigrated to most of their colonies, but the question was why the percentage of whites in S. Africa & Australia were much larger than in other colonies.

Thanks for the answer  Smile


User currently offlineMx5_boy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1056 times:

Errrrrr,

Too many rumours went around about what a great place the :

GREAT SOUTHERN LAND

was....

So Australia got heaps of non convict movers - and still does.

Singapore is an Island state of Australia. We created it.

*laughs*


mb

toybox toybox [boytox boytox]


User currently offlinePerthGloryFan From Australia, joined Oct 2000, 751 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1029 times:

In African colonies there are less expatriates, since they were colonised later.
? Later than when Sonic? - I think it's probably more to do with a combination of factors such as accessibility to the local natural resources, climate, level of resistance from the indigenous inhabitants, the effectiveness and quality of the local colonial management, competition from other colonial powers, the current state of affairs in Europe, and such like.

Singapore is an Island state of Australia. We created it.

That's why Perth is known as South Singapore, Mx5

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy

PGF


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1027 times:

The vast overwhelming majority of British emigrants migrated to North America. Over 100M North Americans have British background vs only 2-3M South Africans and perhaps 15M Australians.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineSonic From Lithuania, joined Jan 2000, 1670 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

PerthGloryFan, I meant later than North America. While in Canada and USA Great Britain had huge territories, in Africa (with the exception of Cape colony) they at start had only coastal cities under control, while Africa itself was not colonised. It was fully colonised only in late XIX century (excluding Ethiopia and Liberia). Boers were only defeated in early XX century.

User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 992 times:

"2. Why are former European colonies in Asia/South America much more successful than ones in Africa?"

Colonization in South America was also synonymous with immigration to the continent, as opposed to Africa (other than Rhodesia and South Africa) where colonization was a means for temporary expatriates to extract wealth.

The continent of Africa and its inhabitants were treated the worst by all colonizers. Africa was primarily a source for natural resources (Gold, minerals, oil), and its people the primary currency in the global slave trade.


User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16285 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 982 times:

The continent of Africa and its inhabitants were treated the worst by all colonizers. Africa was primarily a source for natural resources (Gold, minerals, oil), and its people the primary currency in the global slave trade.

The majority of Africans were not affected by colonization. Africa was a hunter/gather/subsistence farming environment before colonization and remains so after.

As for the slave trade: as reprehensible as it was, African tribal leaders were as complicit & cooperative as were the white slave traders themselves.

I would argue that the biggest colonial faux pas was the division of country/national borders after they left which ignored tribal divisions.

Anyway, most of Africa has been free of colonization for 30+ years......it's time for Africans to solve African problems.





Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 958 times:

"As for the slave trade: as reprehensible as it was, African tribal leaders were as complicit & cooperative as were the white slave traders themselves."

True. And lets not forget the Arab slave traders too. But the point here isn't who's to blame but that the treatment of Africa by its colonizers was very different than, say, Australia or Brazil. And far more exploitative.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A Few Questions About Traveling To Seattle... posted Wed Nov 22 2006 16:35:09 by Jaws707
A Few Open Questions About Iraq posted Sat Nov 11 2006 02:30:38 by Bushpilot
Questions About "WG's" In Germany posted Tue Oct 31 2006 15:30:16 by Nosedive
Questions About Obtaining Student Loans posted Mon Oct 23 2006 02:17:58 by VonRichtofen
Questions About Cost Of Living In The UK posted Sat Jul 8 2006 05:38:22 by WindowSeat
Questions About Moving To The Northeast posted Mon May 22 2006 17:42:40 by Texan
Questions About Blogger.com posted Tue Mar 28 2006 18:22:39 by 'Longreach'
Questions About Life/cost Of Living In London posted Sat Mar 4 2006 19:21:29 by B727
Questions About Traveling To Las Vegas? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 21:05:07 by Jaws707
Questions About Visiting Kuwait posted Sat Feb 11 2006 07:32:13 by VonRichtofen