LOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 579 times:
I think there should be an investigation on this, well infact there are already two investigations. Lets see we have a Pot Dealer a Corrupted individuals. I cannot see how Clinton Pardened the pot dealer from california, since the dealers family gave money to the dems before, especially to clinton fund raising and probably for the pardons. i mean a last day pardon, its not like he picked it out of the black! Then theres Mr Rich..... Thats a whole other story1
Flyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 551 times:
Everyone knows that a great deal of these were just passed out favors that were purchased or somehow previously arranged. Thats why there are investigations going on right now. He shouldn't have done it and it will be determined as to wether he had the moral right to do so.
We're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5705 posts, RR: 22 Reply 4, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 544 times:
EVERY single President (yes, even the Republicans *gasp*) have pardoned shady people for questionable reasons! You guys are just looking for more ways to get back at Clinton for the '92 victory. Geez, get a grip...
We're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5705 posts, RR: 22 Reply 7, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 531 times:
Hey, if you want to waste millions in tax-payer dollars to investigate 130 pardoned people just for revenge on something that happened 9 years ago, go right ahead. But that is as deep as it gets, revenge.
LOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 9, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 524 times:
No, we have the right as the people of this nation to investigate if our ex-president did comitt a crime while pardoning these people and we also have the right to bust the corruption in our government.
LOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 13, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 522 times:
Maybe we can do the 2000 elections, we had to count 3 times and 3 times we got the same results plus Gore didnt even want to count the absentees. Im shocked he pardened convicted criminals guilty of drug-dealing-treason-murder and such. WN i want to see the list of those Rep Presidents; if you do not hqve one then you lied in your post. Im seriouslly going now.
We're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5705 posts, RR: 22 Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 509 times:
Oh, and LOT, while we're at it, could you please name me all the Democratic Presidents who sold illegal arms to Contras? Or broke into Republican Campaign Headquarters? Or leased naval reserves at Teapot Dome, Wyo., and Elks Hill, Calif.?
Tupolev154B2 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1332 posts, RR: 2 Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 508 times:
Yes I believe the pardons were wrong and motivated only by money and contributions. But as George Bush has said/implied many times, why can't we look to the future and forget about the past? LOT767-300ER, your buddy Arlen Specter in Congress has even suggested a second impeachment of Bill Clinton, as if that is so possible since he is out of office. Yeah, and didn't George Herbert Walker Bush pardon Caspar Weinberger who was someone that could have testified against him in Iran-Contra?
OK, so Clinton was a corrupt president without any morals, but it's time to move on. Stop wasting time and money with all of these investigations that would in the end amount to nothing and let Hillary do her job as representing us people in New York. Dan Burton is a hypocrite anyway. (read the article at http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2001/02/sobel-l-02-22.html)
N766AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 502 times:
I am sick of hearing about it. Sick.
And it is the LIBERAL media that is milking the story for every second of airtime possible. Even Ed Koch went on TV today and said (paraphrasing here) "I once thought of Clinton as a great president, but no longer..." Clinton just thinks he can get away with anything he wants- and reasonably so, since the scumbag gotten away with just about everything the last eight years.
Yes, he pardoned Rich, and we all know the story behind that. Yes he pardoned the drug guy who is still under investigation by the Federal government. Yes he pardoned a few more people for money. Yes he pardoned people against the strong recommendations of the judge and prosecuters in the case. Yes he, Hilary, and Hilary's brother schemed to rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars to pardon a few people.
IS THIS NEW?
I think the media should kinda back off a bit. Let's hear about how great our new president is doing (BTW, he gave his first press conference today- very well done), not about scumbag ex-president Clinton's latest law-breaking escapades.
LOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 469 times:
N312RC where did u pick that last line up? I need one like that!!! oh and WN do not him and possibly me! Well WN 2bad for you but some democrats are jumping ship and are against clinton and his ideas and schemes.