Usairwys757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 867 times:
Maybe the guy who stole the car didnt know how to drive? I wouldnt go so far as redesigning it, I think its a great car with great features. So i dont think they should redesign the car because of a stupid guy who stole the car and got caught by the police.
Cptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2904 posts, RR: 13 Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 819 times:
Good observations (partially) Captaingomes! The two iterations of the BMW Z cars (are they Bangles' seeped dreams?) look as though they ought to have Donald Duck masks supplied as standard equipment for the drivers.
I'm not a flag-waving fan of J Mays, but at least he accomplished a more commendable effort with the "new" beetle....jack
Cfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 806 times:
First of all, Volkswagen is no longer just the maker of the old Beetle. Some of them go like stink.
Secondly, some drivers are better than others. If the guy stole a manual-trans. car and was used to autos, it would be easy to catch up.
Thirdly, The Z4 was not meant to be a supercar. It is a modestly priced (for a BMW) sports car more in the tradition of the MGB than Ferrari. With the biggest engine, it is 225 hp in a 1400 kg frame - a fun ratio, but no necksnapping. I've driven a Z4 3.0, and it is a blast to drive, but it's not an extreme car. Maybe that will change in a year or two when the M-version or a V-8 version comes out (or has nobody else noticed that there is quite a bit of empty space under that long hood).
As far as the styling is concerned, I like it. It is a much more masculine looking car than the Z3, which I found very feminine. It certainly was a big hit with women.
Greg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 735 times:
One of my buddy's is BMW lease manager..he drives a fairly sedate 540 (auto..not manual). He returned it to the dealer in anticipation of getting his new 2004 model...so he's beem assigned a variety of cars off the lot to drive in the interim. I've been a mooch and have test driven quite a few. One of the pleasant surprises was the 3.0 Z4. While the styling is a little squirrely for me..it's decent performer--pretty much a roller skate with a rocket attached. It's a huge improvement over the Z3. The M version will be wild with 321 horses (a Porsche beater...).
I got the drive the 760il. Needless to say it's probably the best ride I've had in a while. It's easy to see why the 7-series is stomping the S Class here in Houston...
Ual747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 734 times:
My sister got the Z4 3.0 for graduation in May. She got it with a stick, and it beats the hell out of my 330Ci convertible. Same engine, but her's is a much lighter car, and a lot more fun to drive. Though, I still prefer my car to her's for its ride. Her's is too damn rough for me.
Cptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2904 posts, RR: 13 Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 729 times:
Ual747 wrote: "My sister got the Z4 3.0 for graduation in May." Fine; I hope she got the Daisey Duck mask instead of the Donald Duck mask. Great chickey-poo car.
BlatantEcho wrote wrote: "...(Z4 styling) works relatively well." My point exactly...RELATIVELY well. But relative to what? It's hard to design a good looking suit for a dwarf. Best forgo the angles, gimmicks and convoluted surface development to the Pontiac or JGW stylists...Jack
Cptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2904 posts, RR: 13 Reply 14, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 720 times:
I disagree, George. The Z4 is too small an envelope to throw all that crap onto surface-wise. Now, I'm not saying that you could up-scale Xerox the Z4 styling, per se, onto the size of a Jaguar Saloon and have a perfect styling statement, but all that convoluted mish-mash of gimmicky ideas squashed into the Z4 would, in fact, be visually less forced and offensive on a more generous proportion...Jack
Cptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2904 posts, RR: 13 Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 months 1 day ago) and read 718 times:
Ual747 wrote: "Donald and Daisy Duck? WTF?" Sorry, Phil, I seem to fall into my (retired) auto designer "terminology" when bantering about cars. In the old Donald Duck comic strips and cartoons, he and Daisy were always driving a, well, Donald Duck "cartoon" car. So, whenever we (the auto guys) see a cartoon car, like the BMW Z3 or Z4, we simply infer that the car should have a Donald Duck mask for the driver as standard equipment. Kinda like if you were driving a Trabant or a Skoda.
It's sort of like calling a shitty little gnome car being designed for Mickey Rooney and his pet gerble as opossed to a tall, ungainly crap-box being designed for Abe Lincoln and his pet giraffe. You get the idea.
NOW! That's not to say that WE (the infallable captains of industry know-it-all gurus) haven't produced our share of Donald Duck and Daisy Duck cars. We have. However, NONE of them were done on MY shift! ...Jack
Stretch 8 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2561 posts, RR: 17 Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 months 12 hours ago) and read 700 times:
I agree with the comment above about the Z4 being the best of the new "Banglish" language being spoken in Munich. I have a (now) classic E39/5 series, and will keep it for many years.
I think BMW's problems these days are not sheet metal design, but overly complicated driver-input systems (such as the horrific Idrive on the 7, apparently dumbed-down for the new 5). Quality control on new models also has never been a strong suit for BMW. One should wait until mid-life of any particular model to lay out the princely sums that BMW demands these days.
Maggs swings, it's a drive deep to left! The Tigers are going to the World Series!!!