Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Comparing 2 Similar Disaster Films.  
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Posted (11 years 2 months 2 hours ago) and read 875 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Deep Impact VS Armagedeon (sp?)

I happened to see Deep Impact months before I saw Armageddeon. In fact , DI came out quite some time before Arm. made it to theaters.

I was extremely moved by DI. It was of excellent quality and seemed to capture the essence of the characters much more deeply than Arm.
I think the Story was MUCH better than Arm.'s

Arm. seemed to be a replica of DI but only seemed to excel due to the extraordinary amount of top actors and money pumped into the effects.
So IMO, the only aspect that Arm conquered was the effects and top name billing.


Does anyone share the same opinion? I have founf drives of people who saw Arm but never even heard of DI. I know droves more who saw both but preferred Arm.

I think DI's story and characters were much more connecting to the audience. What do you think?


Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 2 hours ago) and read 847 times:

I actually feel the exact opposite. I thought Deep Impact was poor, I thought the acting was poor, I felt that Tea Leoni (while easy on the eyes) was not strong enough to hold the lead. I thought the opposite for Armageddon. Willis was clearly strong enough, and Steve Buscemi was a total riot.

Both were a little over the top, but I felt Armageddon was better in just about every dept

Jeremy


User currently offlineIloveBOI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months ago) and read 836 times:

Mirrodie,

I will say I agree with you 100%! I loved Deep Impact, but thought that Armaggedon sucked and was unrealistic, especially the Paris Explosion.

I thought the explosion of Baltimore in The Sum of All Fears was the most realistic I've seen. Usually people wanna slow it down so it can be longer and the audience can see everything explode.

The Tidal Wave in Deep Impact was real as well, especially for the fact that it actually moved fast like it's supposed to. However, the tidal wave didn't do what it would've in real life.

Usually, the asteroid would hit the water in a big splash, but wouldn't exactly create a tidal wave instantly. Instead, you would see the Tidal wave about 3-500 feet from the shore of the land it'll hit, and it would slowly grow bigger and bigger. This is due to the Continental Shelf and the astroid creates a sort of underwater wave instead of a surface wave and when the bottom goes up to meet the land, so does the wave and the water would rise up creating death and destruction.

Btw, has anyone seen the show on the Discovery Channel "Three Minutes to Impact"? It had an awesome scene where Tokyo is hit by a massive Tidal Wave, complete with a choir song in the background to create a mood for destruction.

I  Love BOI


User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 828 times:

These two movies were only separated by about a month in the theaters.

While DI was alright, I found it to be slow paced and somewhat forced at times. I prefer Arm by a long shot. There was a great blend of comedy, action, and drama for me that made the movie work.


User currently offlineHomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2245 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 817 times:

Both movie were ok, but different. If DI was Tony Bennett, then Arm. would be Metallica.

DI - Tea Leoni was lame, but I liked Morgan Freeman as the President. The movie had more of a human element, and it did show an asteroid hitting earth (where Arm. had frequent meteor showers).

Arm - Bruce Willis was cool, but the movie DOES have Ben Affleck - yikes. The editing was so choppy, the movie was like one, long movie trailer (I heard a movie critic make the same analogy). It has it moments, but I'm sure any scientist and/or astronaut would be ROFL at all of it's technical goofs. It is a Jerry Bruckheimer production, so I pretty much expected this kind of a movie.



"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 812 times:

The one scene that I got the most kick out of was when Bruce Willis was chipping Golf Balls into the Greenpeace boat.


Too bad we can't do that in real life.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineHomer71 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2245 posts, RR: 14
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 807 times:

I forgot about that...a little of Willis' conservative side making its way onto the screen?  Big grin


"On spaceship earth there are no passengers...only crew."
User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 44
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 771 times:

I thought Deep Impact had a better, more realistic story.

But, I saw Armageddon ten times and bought it on video. I also have the Armageddon soundtrack and the book "Visions of Armageddon" about the artwork in the movie.

You're right, they're very similar in pretext.


redngold



Up, up and away!
User currently offlineUPSfueler From United States of America, joined May 2003, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 769 times:

I liked both of them. I thought that Deep Impact was a little bit better and realistic because of the Tidal Wave at the end and where the "heroes" somewhat fail at what they are sent to do. I also was watching Arm. a while back and when New York is being hit by the meteor shower it shows the WTC being hit by an meteor. It explodes the exact same way and looks identical to how it did when flight 175 smashed into it. Very erie.

User currently offlineCanadi>nBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 745 times:

As an avid and ardent "disaster movie" fan, I must say that I really liked and enjoyed "Deep Impact". Very well done, and I agree, realistic to a large degree. I liked the fact that, in the end, the protagonists failed to "save the earth", alas, a non-Hollywood ending. Very good effects. I would say it was much better than Armageddon. I didn't like the inclusion of "comedy" in the script, which eroded my interest.


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13702 posts, RR: 61
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 728 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"Deep Impact" vs. "Armageddon" is equal to "Star Trek" vs. "Star Wars."


Deep Impact/Star Trek: both preceded their counterparts (the original "Star Trek" series preceded Star Wars: A New Hope) and both are more "realistic" from a technical side.

Armageddon/Star Wars: both came later than their counterparts, both involve a much higher degree of the suspension of disbelief by the audience.


In short, both sets are enjoyable...but Deep Impact/Star Trek is more for the logic-oriented, realism-seeking audience while Armageddon/Star Wars is more for the "whiz-bang" special effects hungry fantasy crowd.

[Edited 2003-09-29 21:05:48]


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 714 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

EA CO AS, YES! That is so true.

I have always maintained that Star Wars, while a great epic trilogy, is eye lots of eye candy, ...

whereas, in terms of credibility, STAR TREK is really a potential extension of our real life NASA.



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineUal747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 710 times:

I preferred "Deep Impact" over "Armageddon." But I have to say, "Sum of All Fears" was by all, the most realistic and most probable of them all.

UAL747



User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8341 posts, RR: 23
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 710 times:

"Deep Impact" vs. "Armageddon"

Yeah no kidding they were disasters....

I want my 4 hours back!



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineC172Akula From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 1009 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 701 times:

Ahh yes, Deep Impact...I've made deeper impacts in my toilet!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Housing Crisis - Could Become A Disaster posted Fri Aug 8 2008 07:41:13 by BristolFlyer
Blazing Saddles/2008 Election Similar? posted Sat Aug 2 2008 19:47:43 by TheGov
Is There A Similar Site Like Cardatabase.net posted Sun Mar 9 2008 08:41:00 by Emair
50 Years Ago Tomorrow Since The Munich Disaster posted Tue Feb 5 2008 04:33:13 by Gkirk
Name That Movie: Classic Films posted Tue Jan 29 2008 12:28:17 by Confuscius
Do Honda Use A Brake Similar To Jake Brakes? posted Tue Sep 25 2007 03:12:29 by 747400sp
Dozens Of Videos Of Argentine Football Disaster posted Tue Jun 26 2007 17:47:44 by Derico
What Book Are You Reading--me: Inviting Disaster posted Tue May 22 2007 02:13:57 by ScrubbsYWG
RAM Disaster! posted Tue May 8 2007 22:23:35 by Jamesbaldwyn
21st Anniversary Of Chernobyl Disaster posted Thu Apr 26 2007 03:30:43 by Levg79