Shamrock_747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1147 times:
Definately get Rattle and Hum, the new songs on it like Angel of Harlem and Desire are great, and there are some good live versions of classics like Pride and I Still Haven't found what I'm looking for.
Pop is very different to the usual U2 sound, lots of electronics and techno. I hated it at first but it's grown on me.
I don't have Zooropa or Under A Blood Red Sky Either!
Artsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 36 Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1144 times:
Blood red sky is a yes, great album, Zoooropa while originally panned, is actually quite good, it just was a different path from where they seemed to be at the time. I am not a fan of pop, Rattle and Hum I could take or leave, it has some nice moments, but doesn't feel themed like an album, it is more of a compilation.
FoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2902 posts, RR: 5 Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1145 times:
I think if you've got both Greatest Hits CDs, plus the accompanying B-sides, you'll be pretty well covered. As others have said, Zooropa is ok, but Pop never really "blew my skirt up," so to speak. To me--and I know every U2 fan has a different opinion on this--the three "peaks" of U2's achievement to date are Joshua Tree, Achtung Baby, and ATYCLB.