Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NASA's Project Constellation, The New CEV  
User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1017 times:

The latest on NASA's new direction for human spaceflight...

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_aerospacedaily_story.jsp?id=news/cev02044.xml

Sounds like a promising concept and new direction for the agency but it could easily get whittled away to nothing in the usual congressional budget shenanigans. Well, I'll cross my fingers for it anyway. I still think it may be a mistake to completely retire the shuttle, which could be flown autonomously without a crew and used as a logistical support vehicle to ferry sections of a manned lunar or Mars transit vehicle into orbit for assembly, mitigating the need for many expendable ocket launches to complete the same task. Stripped of all of its' crew furnishings and life support, the shuttle could haul even more poundage to orbit than currently. If a shuttle was damaged in a Columbia style accident, it could be deorbited safely.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1005 times:

Quoting the article:

NASA plans to decide whether it will need a new Saturn V-class heavy-lift rocket to boost the CEV in 2008-2009. Such a rocket could be derived from the space shuttle's launch stack, according to NASA.

Oh God, no. I hope not.

I say roll out the Saturn V blueprints and make some appropriate changes...buld a new set of pads...and go from there.

Time to turn LC39 into a museum.



I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 997 times:

The problem with reintroducing the Saturn V is that it's old technology and it would cost too much just to restablish production, let alone updating it. The shuttle-based heavy-lifter would use components still IN production and updates could be done as running changes with the existing design. Too bad, though that Russia's massive Energia booster is no longer made; that was even more powerful than the Saturn V; buying some of those would help fill the bill, if they were still around.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The New LHMarkmobile Is Going In The Shop posted Wed Dec 6 2006 15:17:30 by LHMARK
The New 007 Wants Gay Scene In Next Sequel posted Tue Dec 5 2006 22:13:21 by Jimyvr
Introducing The New LHMarkmobile... posted Fri Nov 10 2006 02:09:24 by LHMARK
The New York Times Reader Beta posted Tue Oct 10 2006 20:28:31 by 102IAHexpress
Rollout Of The Civic With The New Paint *yayers* posted Fri Oct 6 2006 08:58:58 by UTA_flyinghigh
Cool Vid About The New Movie: Flyboys posted Fri Sep 8 2006 07:22:46 by UH60FtRucker
EWS / Lew - The New A.Net 'Ad' Man? posted Sat Aug 5 2006 12:27:12 by BMIFlyer
Lactivism: The New American Social Issue posted Fri Jul 28 2006 18:59:35 by Goldenshield
Is The New Superman Meant To Be Jesus? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 14:59:57 by KLMA330
Test Drive - Drove The New Mazda 3 MPS posted Sun Jul 16 2006 13:28:10 by GlennStewart