Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Stones Or U2: Which One Would You Rather See Live?  
User currently offlineJetChaser From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 187 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1837 times:


I have seen both. Both in Toronto. U2 was outdoors at Exhibition Place and I think I was close to the top but it was a great party atmosphere. The Stones were at Maple Leaf Gardens and I think I was in awe as if I was watching History in the making. What are your experiences seeing one or both? If you have not seen either which would you prefer to see if it could only be one?

JetChaser

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3625 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

I would see the Stones.

User currently offlineAlcregular From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1821 times:

I would prefer to see U2, top quality band.

User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7443 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1820 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

U2
.
.
.

















Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2998 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1818 times:

U2, no question. Have been lucky enough to see them in concert 3 times, and would go again in a heartbeat. Never have been much of a Stones fan, although I do have plenty of respect for them.


Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1817 times:

Definately U2.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers


User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1812 times:

U2

One of the main reasons I say this is that I have seen them from the middle of the front row, and i have seen them from the back row, and both were outstanding. What great energy live every single time I saw them (6 times)

J


User currently offlineJetChaser From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1808 times:



5-1 U2 (not including me).

I'm shocked.

JetChaser


User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1804 times:

Stones,

U2 would not even be on my list. Too politcal, I'll listen to them play, but I don't give a rat's ass about their political point of view. Actually, that goes for any performer.


User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3625 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1803 times:

Oh so true JeffM!!!!!

User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1804 times:

I'm gonna have to go with U2 on this one. I say they should return to Red Rocks, because now I am not only alive (I wasn't born last time around), but I am also within driving distance.

DLKAPA


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1803 times:

U2...I don't care for the Stones at all...

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineRockyRacoon From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 974 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1793 times:

I'd see the Stones just on principal. Mick's voice can't be that great anymore though, I'm sure bono and U2 would give a much better show musically.

User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2747 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1788 times:

Seen them both. Best bet would be to have the Stones open for U2. Now that would be a show to see.
Steve


User currently offlineNormalSpeed From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1778 times:

U2, easy. I'm a fan. However, my decision is more by virtue of my dislike for the Stones. I'm not a Stones fan at all.

'Speed


User currently offlineJ.mo From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 663 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

I would have liked to see the Stones in the 60's or early 70's but now...


U2

I think they are the greatest band, currently.

Jeremy



What is the difference between Fighter pilots and God? God never thought he was a fighter pilot.
User currently offlineAerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4682 posts, RR: 47
Reply 16, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1768 times:

Being a drummer myself I am hard pressed to pick either one since I appreciate the drumming styles of Larry Mullin and Charlie Watts. Yet I do like how 'The Edge' can make all those different noises form his one guitar; not taking away anything form Richards-Woods 'weaving' of two guitars..... I'd lean towards U2.


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1762 times:

That's a difficult question because both are great bands but I would decide for the Stones.

Patrick


User currently offlinePH-KCA From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1749 times:

For me it's very easy to choose between The Sones or U2.

I'd definitely say : U2!!!

Great music and a great band.

Especially Bono's voice and the great guitarplay by The Edge.



User currently offlineShamrock_747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1743 times:

Definately U2!

My favourite band.  Smile


User currently offlineVaporlock From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1741 times:

Both bands are great as far as I'm concerned.

But my first choice would be the STONES.  Big thumbs up

I love U2 as well but the Stones will always have a special place in my heart!

Phyllis  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineEGFFbmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1742 times:

NEITHER OF THEM!

Regards,

Milo


User currently offlineJetChaser From Canada, joined Dec 2003, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1737 times:

13-5 for U2 by my count, I thought they might edge out the Stones not crush them. I guess I'm old.

JetChaser


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

The Stones. There's no telling when their next "farewell tour" will actually be it.

User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (10 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1739 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Are the Stones still alive?


Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
25 MSYtristar : I saw the Stones in the Superdome in 1994 with around 70,000 other people. Hard to imagine anything coming close to that in terms of great atmosphere!
26 ScarletHarlot : U2. Definitely! Milo, you are only 15! What do you know about either the Stones or U2? You are too young for this thread!
27 Vikkyvik : Seen both, both put on a great show. However, saw U2 on the Popmart tour, and that was just friggin amazing. Would rather see them again than the Ston
28 KBUF737 : Saw U2 Havent Seen the Stones. Want to see the stones, but both are in the top ten bands ever list 10. CCR 9. ACDC 8. Pink Floyd 7. Queen 6. Journey 5
29 Ryangooner : This thread all depends on the age of the user! bearing that in mind ive seen the stones 4 times, their last show twice and i can say they perform lik
30 Santosdumont : Hmm...that's a tough one. But I'd have to go with U2. I've seen both bands a couple of times and they've put on amazing shows. But IMHO, U2 still has
31 AirKas1 : U2!! .... Kas
32 EA CO AS : Stones Or U2: Which One Would You Rather See Live? Neither. Kill them both. sorry..couldn't resist!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which One Would You Like To Date? posted Sun Apr 24 2005 15:12:53 by Catatonic
Last One For Now... Which One Would You Shoot? posted Sat Nov 17 2001 06:05:07 by Boeing757fan
Boxing Or MMA - Which Would You Rather Watch? posted Thu May 18 2006 15:55:50 by PROSA
LA Vs NYC.. Which Would You Rather Go To? posted Thu Mar 9 2006 04:11:32 by UAalltheway
Which Smilies Would You Like To See On A.net? posted Sat Sep 17 2005 15:10:36 by Gkirk
The "Would You Rather..." Game #2 posted Mon Sep 18 2006 05:05:29 by Iamcanadian
The "Would You Rather..." Game posted Fri Sep 15 2006 19:03:01 by Iamcanadian
Which A.nutters Would You Like To Meet? posted Thu Aug 17 2006 09:03:54 by Carmenlu15
Where In The World Would You Rather Be? posted Sun May 14 2006 18:01:22 by Cosec59
Where Would You Prefer To Live In General? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 13:56:27 by Oly720man