Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another Victim Of The FCC: The Regular Guys  
User currently offlineJcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 38
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2230 times:

http://ajc.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Regular+Guys+out+at+99rock&expire=&urlID=9876357&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ajc.com%2Fmetro%2Fcontent%2Fmetro%2F0404%2F09regular.html&partnerID=553

Regular Guys out at 96rock

By RODNEY HO
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 04/09/04

•Join our online forum

The other shoe has dropped. The edgy Regular Guys on 96rock have been let go by owners Clear Channel Communications after a March 19 incident in which the show accidentally aired graphic sexual content.

"In line with our zero tolerance policy and after conducting a thorough investigation of a March 19th broadcast on WKLS-FM, we have decided we will no longer broadcast the 'The Regular Guys,' " said Pat McDonnell, Clear Channel regional vice president, in a statement.

McDonnell, who according to his secretary is on vacation and not available for comment, also stated that replacements were being sought.

Neither Regular Guys, Larry Wachs nor Eric Von Haessler, could be reached for immediate comment.

The move comes a day after the Federal Communications Commission proposed a nearly $500,000 fine against Clear Channel for alleged indecent content by shock jock Howard Stern. The company also announced it was permanently dropping Stern from six of its stations. (Stern is distributed by rival Infinity Broadcasting and still heard on more than 30 stations nationwide though not in Atlanta.)

The Regular Guys' popular morning show, which regularly finished in the top 2 among men 18 to 49 in the Arbitron ratings, wanted to mock the recent FCC crackdown on indecency that has intensified since the Janet Jackson Super Bowl incident. The pair planned to tape porn star Devinn Lane talking dirty, then play it on air backwards in a spot called "backward smut."

But the stunt went bad when they accidentally left a mic on so listeners could hear explicit sexual talk over a Honda vehicle commercial. The ad was distributed over the Internet and the FCC received complaints.

Clear Channel quickly suspended the Regular Guys and until today's announcement, the station has been airing highlight shows
--------------
This really sucks. I could care less if Stern got the axe, but these guys were hilarious. I'll be interested to know where they go from 96Rock and I also wonder what will ever happen to Southside Steve. Will his twenty year tenure at the station be over? I listened to the program every morning driving to school from about November of '98 until I moved from Atlanta in May '02--and I still listened over the internet on ocaission. The best spots were 'homeless kareoke,' 'the f-you line,' 'Chuck Dodie for president,' and 'shoot/beat Steve.' Their remotes were a blast, I skipped school with some friends and went to a few of them, including Breast Christmas Ever, and the one in Conyers that got busted up by the cops. Interestingly enough, I also first heard about the attacks on the WTC when I was listening to the program while laying in bed. Damn, one of the few things I liked about Atlanta is gone. Great show, very original, and always entertaining.

THE FCC SHOULD NOT PLAY THE ROLE OF PARENT!


America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 38
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2218 times:

And by the way, if you want to hear the violation, here's the link--the audio link is on the middle of the page.

http://www.rbrepaper.com/epaper/pages/march04/04-56_news1.html



America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

And yet another reason to add to my list of why I hate Clear Channel.

User currently offlineIllini_152 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1000 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2176 times:

THE FCC SHOULD NOT PLAY THE ROLE OF PARENT!

What, praytell, is their fucntion then? I'm all for personal responsablility, but just as I should be able to drive down the expressway without seeing billboards of naked women (ok, I personally would LIKE to see that...) there ARE standards for broadcasting.

Like it or not, our society does have standards. And the majority of this country thinks our public airwaves should be relativly safe for all audiences. If we extend your logic (because they shouldn't be playing parent) we should allow all 7 dirty words on the radio as well. And hard core porno on NBC at 5:00pm. After all, who's place is it to tell us what we can and cannot air? The FCC shouldn't be playing parent.

You want hard core adult entertainment, there's always pay services. Frankly, thats one of the reasons I like my satelite radio; I can hear full songs unedited.



Happy contrails - I support B747Skipper and Jetguy
User currently offlineCopaair737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

I am getting really sick over this censorship that has been being spread over lately. The parents who complain that people like Howard Stern or The Regular Guys are poisoning their kids, should instead of bitch, just turn it off. Then at least they wouldn't ruin it for all the rest of us. I am betting that the FCC won't stop until we start seeing Ward Cleaver back on TV, shooting new episodes.

-Copa


User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

the FCC won't stop until we start seeing Ward Cleaver back on TV

Yeah right. Like the FCC would allow a name like "Beaver Cleaver" on TV.


User currently offlineIHadAPheo From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 6027 posts, RR: 55
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2151 times:

I wonder what the FCC would say if they heard June Cleaver say the following to Ward after Ward set Beaver to bed with no supper...

"Ward, I think you were a little too hard on the Beaver last night"

FCC responds...$ 175,000 fine please



Pray hard but pray with care For the tears that you are crying now Are just your answered prayers
User currently offlineIflyatldl From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1936 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 2089 times:

Beaver back then aint what it is now.  Innocent Or has beaver always been beaver and we just didn't know it? Or did June Cleaver really have this beaver thing down and we just didn't know it?  Big grin Perplexing questions indeed.....  Nuts


Ah, Summer, Fenway Park, Boston Red Sox and Beer.....
User currently offlineAvObserver From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 2472 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2043 times:

"there ARE standards for broadcasting.

Like it or not, our society does have standards. And the majority of this country thinks our public airwaves should be relativly safe for all audiences. If we extend your logic (because they shouldn't be playing parent) we should allow all 7 dirty words on the radio as well. And hard core porno on NBC at 5:00pm. After all, who's place is it to tell us what we can and cannot air? "

Illini_152, exactly WHO is to determine what the standards are supposed to be? And in any case, such standards violate the Supreme Law of the Land, our Constitution:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

Bill of Rights Amendment I

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

In other words, Congress shall make NO law ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS, among other things. Yet isn't it Congress who just voted to increase the indecency fines levied by the FCC? If this isn't a challenge of our Constitution, I don't know what is. According to the letter of Amendment I, freedom of speech must be absolute. So, who has decided that the Constitution is no longer worth the paper it's written on?  Angry





User currently offlineSolarix From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2031 times:

Why is the FCC worried about this? They should focus on shutting the real criminals such as those idiots on the 435 repeater in Los Angeles. Yikes!!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Yet Another Victim Of Crime... posted Wed May 22 2002 01:00:50 by Omegous
Another Glorious Day In The World Of Rap.... posted Wed Oct 18 2006 07:09:50 by Mir
Looking For A Victim Of The Shoah posted Wed Jan 26 2005 10:32:44 by 707cmf
Baggage Handler In Paris Was The Victim Of A Plot posted Fri Jan 10 2003 16:53:00 by Ah727
Another Body Blow To The GOP (Tan D. Nguyen) posted Thu Oct 19 2006 23:53:28 by TedTAce
Another Corrupt Scumbag Bites The Dust(pleads Guil posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:37:21 by TedTAce
Thinking Of Joining The US Air Force posted Wed Aug 30 2006 02:39:09 by Coal
Out Of All The Times I Have A Good Chat Discussion posted Wed Aug 2 2006 05:52:50 by Touchdown777
What Do You Think Of Sting / The Police? posted Mon Jan 9 2006 22:41:29 by Birdwatching
Another Reason Why I Hate The NY Yankees posted Tue Oct 4 2005 00:51:26 by Dragon-wings