Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Apollo 13 - A Puzzle  
User currently offlineTransactoid From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 788 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1050 times:

I just watched Apollo 13 on tv tonight, and I noticed something that confused me.

When preparing for reentry, Mission Control informs the crew that their trajectory is still a bit shallow. This is because of the lighter weight of the craft due to not having any lunar cargo. They are told to ballast the craft by bringing items of the LEM into the Control Module (is that the correct term?)...thereby making it heavier.

But they're in space! There is no gravity. How can this possibly work? Could this be an oversight by the film's producers?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineVafi88 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 3116 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1025 times:

Prepairing for reentry is reentry into the atmosphere, therefore if they bring those items into the controll room when they enter the Earth's atmosphere they will have more weight.

I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7907 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1023 times:

There technically is gravity in space. The spacecraft is being affected by the Earth's gravity. So the MASS (not weight) is critical in getting the right entry angle.

Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineAC_A340 From Canada, joined Sep 1999, 2251 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1012 times:

When they're that close to the Earth, they are affected by Earth's gravity. It's the same principle as how satellites are kept in orbit. Earth's gravity.

User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3142 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1010 times:

Good morning,

On the Apollo missions it was expected that they would be carrying back a coulble hundred pounds of lunar rocks with them. By assuming that they would have rocks, they could account that in the ships trajectory, thus setting the ship up for re-entry a bit easier. On Apollo 13, they did not have this extra weight, and as a result, there trajectory was a little off. By ballasting items from the LEM, they can add that weight in to the Command Module thus making it heavier for re-entry. If they did not do that, there would be the chance that they would hit the earth at a slighty different angle, and go skipping away from earth.

Now what about on previos missions such as Apollo 8? Well, it was not calcualted in that they were suppose to carry moon rocks, because they did not land on the moon. So as a result, the numbers were all different, and they would not come up "shallow"

I hope that answers your question.

User currently offlineAerokid From Belgium, joined Jun 2000, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 983 times:

Hi there,

I'll give you the tech stuff involved in your question.

Newton's law of gravity says:

F= G x M1 x M2 / r^2

Which means the following:

The (gravitational) force between two bodies is equal to G multiplied by M1, multiplied by M2, and all this devided by r to the power of 2.


G = the gravity constant (6.672 x 10^-11)
M1 = the mass of the first body
M2 = the mass of the second body
r = the distance between the 2 objects

The gravity constant is a universal constant and is effective throughout the whole universe.

Now you can see that the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the distance between the two objects. This means that the gravitational force only approached zero when the distance becomes infinite, which off course doesn't exist, the distance can only become very great (in terms of light years) but never infinite.

So for every possible distance between the two objects, there will always be a gravitational force between them.

BTW: this principle is used when sending space probes to other planets. If they had to use a rocket motor all the way, the rocket would become too heavy (too expensive and maybe technically not achievable). So they wait until the planets align properly and then they launch the space probe (for example the 2 Voyager probes) so that they will go from one planet to another, each time picking up some speed from the gravitational attraction of the planets. Its is commonly reffered to as playing "cosmic billiards".

Also, although being 150 million kilometers away from us, the sun has definately a gravitational effect on us as she is responsible (in coöperation with the moon) for the tides of the sea.

So, I hope this answers your question.

Best regards,

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boy Becomes A Dad...At 13 posted Thu Feb 12 2009 23:42:50 by LH423
Anyone At ORD 12-13 posted Fri Dec 12 2008 06:42:44 by Falstaff
NFL Week 13 How Did Your Team Do? posted Sun Nov 30 2008 16:42:08 by Steeler83
Nearly 13.000 Children Hospitalized In China.. posted Sun Sep 21 2008 09:29:09 by Beaucaire
India Serial Blasts 13/09/08 New Delhi posted Sat Sep 13 2008 09:21:50 by HAWK21M
Amazing Race 13... Begins Sept. 28th! posted Sun Aug 31 2008 14:48:00 by BoeingFever777
ATL Meet - December 13, 2008 ** Revised ** posted Sat Aug 16 2008 22:51:03 by Flynavy
Suggestions For Framing A Puzzle posted Wed Jul 16 2008 22:46:15 by RJpieces
CEO Makes 5.13 Billion In '07. posted Wed Mar 12 2008 10:50:15 by PSA53
13 Svchost.exe's Running In Task Manager? posted Thu Feb 21 2008 13:18:06 by Bagpiper